>>507894801For Jews:
- "Judaism" in ancient times is basically just Egyptian mythology. Maybe a recording of some history there. The kings lists may match Mesopotamian kings lists as well. It's not even clear what the most ancient kings lists refer to, as some people believe strongly in this international college of priesthood idea. Kings in those days may not be like kings in our day.
- "Judaism" today is basically masonry that they tried to make into a regular orthodox religion. People here say that Masonry is Jewish. No, Judaism is Masonry. It didn't really take off until the 1600s.
- "Judaism" throughout the middle ages was a convenient title for escaping the wrath of the Vatican. It would be understandable is western esotericists simply called themselves Jews in this era, and then by the 1600s they just called it a Jewish tradition. The ancient connection to the Egyptian Jews is completely fabricated, even though some of the knowledge is similar.
For "elite":
- Black Nobility. They come from Romans. Before the Romans, it was the Greeks who were different people. Before the Greeks, it was Persians. These are not all "Jews". The Jews had zero impact until Rome, and then you could say the Piso and Flavian conspiracies had some people that we today call "Jews", but these same people literally became Christians just a couple centuries later. So, that makes no sense. Also, the Black Nobility could have married into some aspect of Jesus' bloodline, which would also be their claim to being the true heirs to Jewry.
- War is a more important cause of elitism than banking. See my thread on this:
>>507840313