>>508098872>after you burned out on x, you switched toIn your mind?
Holy shite, you are so far away from having even the slightest clue about what you're talking about. This is basically 90s MSM views. What are you even doing here?
If you had taken molly even once in your life you'd know you can't get addicted to it, just like acid.
Re-read the studies, both with primates and with rats. The sleight of hand is in the doses given, the age at which they were administered, and the age at which the brains were actually dissected. Long story short, to replicate this in a human you'd have to take a literal child, inject them intravenously (!) with something like 10x the maximum single-time dose, and disregard all safety measures like heat management, something an animal can't consciously do anyway. At the doses used in the studies, I'd be surprised if all the subjects didn't immediately go into seizure, at which point you're studying the effects of seizures and not the drug.
Cooking a study like this requires careful knowledge of the substance's safety profile, it's widely known that keeping the first doses small is recommended to build up a resistance to the negative effects. The studies do the exact opposite, because they're designed to cause damage.
With a methodology like this, you could prove the harm in virtually anything. Crucially, no studies outside of that time period have come up with effects like these. Finally, look into who conducted the studies.
I went down this rabbit hole because I got real scared the first couple times just like
>>508094901, but this is literally an effect of the hangover, it makes you a coward until you replenish your tryptophan supply. Said replenishment can take anywhere from a day if you adjust your diet for it, to a whole month if you're chronically malnourished. Since then I've done supposedly brain-melting amounts and I'm fine. Don't believe everything you're told, by anyone. Do your own research.
