Can someone explain me how nukes aren't real? Weren't they used on Japan and testimonies confirmed it?

Also if nukes aren't real and can't be used means that americans need to put boots on the ground right?

>>508073093 (OP)
It's a psy-op to make conspiracy theories in general seem retarded, same with flat earth. Flood the world with idiocy like that and suddenly questioning 9/11 gets you grouped up with hollow earth people.

>>508073093 (OP)
If nukes aren’t real, why haven’t I seen one in real life? Sounds like some shitty cartoonish scifi weapon some lazy scifi writer make up imo

>>508073230
ask me how i know you are a kike. if you believe earth is round you are either a jew or a npc cattle

It was proven that a military contractor called EG&G that basically invented modern special effects, created all the videos in a Nevada studio. Tokyo was firebombed, so was Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Why isn't there footage of the actual bombing, but there is footage of dozens of test detonations?

Protip: all those videos of nuclear mushrooms exploding in the desert? All done underwater. Practical special effects are a muhfucka. EG&G morphed into a large global construction conglomerate called AECOM

>>508073231
I like it is a script in order to lure people into wars and fearmongering.
BTW I also watched the video from the bunker buster myth that was posted yesterday here and makes me think that all these "weapons" are nothing else but an excuse to be used only to justify boots on the ground which means white men dead.


>>508073368
>>508073521
Yeah I was wondering if someone has some infographics or images on how nukes are fake that I can spam on xiter.

>>508073093 (OP)
retarded niggers like you are in infinite supply, no one has time to explain this shit over and over again

just watch a video that summarizes the whole thing to get familiar with the basic fucking arguments and then go from there wherever it takes you

here, have a few random ones
https://rumble.com/v5y4mx2-nuclear-weapons-hoax-galen-windsor-.html
https://rumble.com/v6q5s2w-nuclear-weapons-do-not-exist.html
https://rumble.com/v4lt98k-dr.-tom-cowan-and-the-hoax-of-nuclear-weapons-one-less-thing-to-fear.html
https://rumble.com/v6tpvxf-atom-bomb-nuclear-weapons-hoax-fear-control.html

>>508073230
>It's a psy-op to make conspiracy theories in general seem retarded, same with flat earth.
Yes.

>Flood the world with idiocy like that and suddenly questioning 9/11
If you're one of the retards who think there weren't any planes you're not helping.

>>508073093 (OP)
Japan was firebombed. Not "nuked."

>>508073326
>round
words have meaning, nigger, be precise

"round" doesn't mean "ball"

earth could very much be round, but it definitely isn't a ball

>>508074755
>Japan was firebombed. Not "nuked."
Tokyo was firebombed.

>>508074793
or even better, a "sphere"

>>508074840
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were firebombed nukes aren't real.

>>508073093 (OP)
If nukes were real we had seen them go off in 80 years of constant conflict since 1945. When the SU collapsed, all kind of shit was rusting in some Central asian shithole that any odd (((terrorist group))) could have get hold of. FFS, even the USA allegedly managed to 'lose' several nukes that haven't been found to the present day.
The invention of these alleged 'super weapons', all in the hands of kikes or kike golem states, or "rogue states" that are in reality run by Mossad, CIA and other glowniggers as boogeyman to scare the boomer into constant fear. the entire 'Cold war', lasting for almost half a century, was 45 years of 'nothing ever happens' and 'two more weeks'.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were firebombed, they looked exactly like Tokyo, Dresden and Hamburg in the aftermath,. there was no effects of radiation, and no long-term effects that should have been expected have ever been recorded. Jap kids went to school there under the open 2 days after the 'nuke' was dropped.
It is a bunch of kike bullshit to cement their post-war "NWO", which isn't something that will happen in the future, but something that we have all been living under since 1945.
Not sure about the shape of the Earth, but moon landings were definitely fake. 9/11 was done my Mossad, mutt glowniggers and saudi.

>>508074550
Thanks for spoonfeeding me also rude for calling me a retard

>>508075231
Thanks, very beautiful explained.

>>508073093 (OP)
they aren't real so that jews can use them openly and claim it's just bunker busters, zog can't win conventional wars anymore, that's why it needs nukes. they used them in Bagdad's airport, that's why they removed a layer of soil after winning the iraq war

normal bombs are very small, and you need to throw tens of thousands to do any significant damage

>>508075494
You are welcome. I recommend https://archive.org/details/8d-0de-2/page/n37/mode/2up for further reading. It is by a Japanese phycisists, who has investigated that stuff in great detail.
That was the book that convinced me.

Also it seems you have more than 2 IQ, as you are genuinely interested and not just a shill.

>>508075576
Could have used a lot of shit there, must not have been anything nuclear.

hello

>>508075612
>https://archive.org/details/8d-0de-2/page/n37/mode/2up

Thanks a lot germabro

>>508073093 (OP)
the zionist shills who run /pol/ want you to parrot that nukes aren't real so you go along with their agenda in ukraine and against iran more pliantly and without objection. that literally the reason, but odds are you're too stupid to see it even now that you know why.

>>508075900
Don't even wear eye protection. kek.

Dude, if nuke goes off right in front of you, just turn around for five seconds, I swear, nothing will happen to you.

>>508075957
Oh fuck off already, Shlomo. No one buys your bullshit here, except maybe for some newfags and sub 80 IQ niggers. Oldfags have known all this and more for many years.

>>508073093 (OP)
I will use logic to prove nukes aren't real.

Brown people (pakis/indians) have nukes, but never used them, despite being ultra retarded spastics.

Therefore, we can conclude that nukes probably aren't real after all.

>>508076045
the sad state of zionist propaganda is to call you a kike shill and claim to hate both muslims and jews

>>508076075
Exactly. One of a thousands instances in which the would and should have been used, but never were.

>>508075970
all the real men died long ago

captcha: 4GOY0

>>508076216
This looks like two videos put together

>>508074690
>If you're one of the retards who think there weren't any planes you're not helping.
That is the psyop nigger.
What of the Jewish Austrian Art Students working on the B-Thing involved in gelatin? You aren't helping when you hide the truth of the dancing israelis, when you hide the truth about the BILLIONs of dollars in insurance fraud paid out to Jewish elites. when you hide the truth that NO PLANE HIT BUILDING 7. That there was a very convenient financial issue that got burned up in the pentagon. You lie about the Truth and spread false testimony to your own detriment you satanist scum

>>508076141
No, I called you both a kike and a nigger, Shlomo. Your reading comprehension seems to be underdeveloped. And no, I don't hate muslims, only the scum that has been crawling into my country, particularly since 2015. I couldn't care less what those towelheads are doing in their own countries, because it is none of my business.
But I hate you and your ilk, and, btw, I also hate ratrded fat muttgolems, should you, unexpectedly, happen to be one. If you are not a Shlomo, than you are a retarded boomer faggot who believes absolute shit that you have been fed for your entire life without using whatever you got for a brain up there in your goblin mug a single fucking time.
You should probably just fuck off from here, because /pol/ is about truth, and not about promoting and perpetuating boomer MK-Ultra style brainwashing.

>>508073093 (OP)
Water is wet
Earth isn't flat
Nukes are real
Sugar is sweet
American politicians are wholly owned & operated by Israel

>>508076376
no it doesn't

>>508073093 (OP)
They just are. It's a jewish lie, like the shape of the earth
Jews get real mad about these "crazy conspiracies" when you start questioning their narrative, see this thread.

>>508076620
That can be easily be done with dynamite, a shit ton

>>508076376
>>508076376
Whatever it is, that's definitely just a conventional explosion of a big heap of shit. Many such cases. Bommers sucked it up nonetheless. Just like the hilarious (((moon-landings))). Sure, the German rocket did work, but it never went into 'space', let alone on the fucking moon, with 1960s stone age tech. How dumb has anyone be to believe that crap? And looking at the footage today is like looking at a bad sci-fi show from the 1970s. It is abosulte and complete bullshit, and whoever gobbles it up, is a retard. Period, point, blank.
Gigantic money laundering in the trillions over decades for shit that never worked. Probably every single shekel going into jew pockets, or directly to isdrael, or into some REAL black-ops projects, of which there are plenty.

>>508076759
uh huh

I won't bother explaining to simpletons like you.
If you haven't put 2+2 together by now, you won't for the rest of your NPC lives.

>>508076784
I am watching some of the docu from above and what I hear and see in the docu a lot of jewish names and second I keep wondering why haven't done another modern explosion? I mean in order to dete, to show off, to test and to innovate you need new explosion, but all the footage are from the 70s. Seems a little strange.

With all the new tech we have today you would expect some new test explosions right?

>>508076901
Why is it from the 50s and not from 2014? Why did they stop testing?

>>508076901

The fuck is that

>>508077107

Same reason why "they" don't go to Da Moon anymore. They just don't feel like it, ya know.

>>508077200
kek

>>508077107
Its a mystery
>>508077168
ayys
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_sFO1yip0Y

>>508076513
Kike, please

>>508077024
Exactly the same with 'space travel', last man on the moon, look up when that was. And you saw what just happened to Elon Musk's latest super-rocket. It just went 'boom'.

>>508077258

idk those explosions seem weaksauce bruh

- Hiroshima and Nagasaki firebombed not 'nuked'
- mushroom clouds standard in chemical explosions
- old 'nuke blast' videos clearly doctored

crisp summary
https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/07/nuclear-bombs-do-not-exist.html

free books online
'Death Object: Exploding the Nuclear Weapons Hoax', by Akio Nakatani
https://archive.org/details/8d-0de-2
'Hiroshima Revisited: Evidence that Napalm & Mustard Gas Helped Fake Atomic Bombings', by Michael Palmer
https://mpalmer.heresy.is/webnotes/HR/download/hiroshima-revisited.pdf

'. From 'Jewish Scientists and the Atomic Bomb':
>[Per] Ben-Ami Shillony ... Jewish scientists played a central role in construction and testing of the atomic bomb ... an inordinately large number of Jews at various research centres and Los Alamos ... a large number of Jews occupying the highest positions

Robert F Kennedy Sr, 1960s, watching a 'small nuclear bomb explosion' within walking distance lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLEAuapfwHc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO11fP6TsXo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8vUfLrWkvo

>>508077729
agreed

The Soviet Union used to paint logs to look like nukes and parade them. No nation with an actual military needs to parade shit around. There's a real possibility that the Soviet Union got nukes. But you cant just leave your nukes sitting around forever. you have to decommission your nukes and build new ones. The US nuclear program was so compartmentalized, when we figured out you can just leave a nuke lying around and have to decommission and replace it, we had to start from scratch, since everyone that knew how to build a nuke was dead. This was a program codenamed something like operation green brick or green foam or something.

TWO: The Russians have already faked having nukes by parading around logs. Theres a concerted effort to try to convince your enemies you have more nukes than you have. So theres a possibility of hoaxing a nuke test. IE droppings something thermobaric, then seeding the wind so hopefully somebody watching will say oh that guys got a nuke.

THREE: The way we determine the Soviets working Nuclear stockpile is 100% guess work and its to the interests of the guessers, Big GOVERNMENT and Military Industrial complex to INFLATE the numbers, since it makes big bad Russia look like a big bad threat we have to prepare to defend against. Reasoning also suggests its better to prepare for MORE nukes than LESS, in case you guess wrong.

In Conclusion: theres a strong argument Russia is a post Nuclear power. Theres also evidence that suggests we have no idea of our own REAL nuclear threat and the possible number may be 0 as much as the inflated published number.

Theyre all fucking spooks and lied about having 2 until we dropped them and even that might be a lie since <fucking spooks.

>>508077024
Concerning the Jewish names, you are also absolutely right. It was basically a bunch of sub-par kikes in the desert allegedly cooking up the 'nuke', while real German geniusses like Heisenberg and Hahn were too incompetent to do the same, all the while German scientists and engineers deveoloped practically every kind of modern weapon system still in use today, at least in statu nascendi. It was intentionally done like that to cement the 'Jew clever' mindset in the boomers, the most prominent fraudster was Einstein, who was nothing but a plagiator.

>>508073093 (OP)
They're real. Pol just throws every conspiracy theory shit at the wall and when one sticks exclaim "see! Pol is always righf" while ignoring the two tons of shit they are standing in that didn't stick.

>>508077731

Whenever I hear the "old Jewmerica broadcast voice" I feel such anger, I think the levels of it are equivalent to nostalgia that the dumb retarded boomers feel when they see and hear shit like that and start reminiscing about their "youth" and shit.

Behind that retarded "old american" english tv anchor is a fucking kike propaganda in full motion, the 60s were absolutely crucial in that aspect, and they seduced retard boomers with cheap credit and pacified them with jewmerican jingo war hero shit, to the point where every single boomer became an inoperable zog-zombie which paved the way for jewmerica that exists today, with Benjamin Netanyahu as president.

It's fucking infuriating. Death to Jewmerica (and every person in it, no exceptions)

>>508077831

Wow dats a real video yo, and NOW I'm scarred.

>>508077864
Yeah, you are on the right way with that reasoning. Keep open minded, always consider new evidence. And don't believe waht anyone tells you. Also do a bit of research on Yuri gagarin as you are on it. that was also a complete fake from A to Z. Mutts and Vatniks were all in on it from the beginning, as the entirer 'Cold war' was just a shitshow for the plebs.Soviet Union would have collapsed more than 30 years earlier if the mutts hadn't supplied it with grain much below market price. they always made sure that the Soviets were thriving, as they were needed as the boogeyman to keep the plebs in check, and vice versa.

>>508077905
Prove it. Prove it to me that they are 'real'.

>>508078082
>thread full of videos
>P-PROVE IT!!
heh

>>508077972
And that's how it looks there today.

>>508078150
I shit on your videos. have a nother picture of Bikini. King Kong is also on video, so I have to assume that he is real?

>>508073093 (OP)
Nukes are real but it's over imagined to an extent. It does destroy everything within 11 km radius so the damage is much significant than those regular missiles you see. It's just 11 kms not the end of the world. The health complications are pretty serious.

>>508077972

Yeah sure.

1 small dumb civilian reactor cooks boils and blows up in You-kraine and the entire hemisphere gets fallout traces and the entire place is inhabitable till this day, and they have to build a fucking dome over it because it oozes shit out 40 years later.

Jewmericans test 1035478732652 nuclear bombs, some of which on video seem to BLOW DA LID of the world itself (get scared) but business is continued as usual, maybe some local small patch of those remote places are discomforted, aye kid you can't live here we dropped a (insert a number) KT bomb here yesterday bro. Oh ok I'm packin up.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were uninhabitable for DEC...for YE...for days after the big bomb drop. Get scurred yo, it's over, nukular is big scary and you don't want that smoke kid. Still doubting? Watch this 35mm scan from jewmerican kikeslave boomers in the 60s, that makes it real (that generation went to Da Moon and back, faggot, back to back World War champs deal with it!!!)

>>508078208
>random bunch of trees nowhere near the test site
lol

>>508078265
I love how tiny the brains are in this place.

>>508078265
>a fissioning reactor is nuclear and so are the bombs therefore!
lol

>>508073093 (OP)
Pedokikes from Mossad are saying nukes aren't real
Stop believing them

>>508073368
Explain how they got radiation poisoning then
>>508073093 (OP)
It was fabricated by the USSR like the moon landing hoax and AIDS denialism

TheSlav cannot handle the might of the Anglo Germanic bull

>>508078482
dumping the videos shuts them down quickly. sad how low energy they are

>>508077107
Nuclear test ban treat. It banned testing of nukes above ground. Most modern nuke tests are done deep underground by digging a shitting pit and then covering it up with tons of dirt. Even nukes get cucked by jews.

>>508078716
*Nuclear test ban treaty

>>508078668
>dumping the videos shuts them down quickly.
lmao, you're winning son

>>508078851
too much winning!

>>508073093 (OP)

GONNA NOOOOK HRRNNNGGGG

>>508073093 (OP)
>Can someone explain me how nukes aren't real?
well, you know how my big huge cock and my ability to do shit are not real, but are instead just a little honeybear baby dick and an inability to pay attention....its kind of like that but even gayer.

>>508073093 (OP)
It is because schizos or trolls just love to be on the opposite of facts. What they of course never say is how nukes are not real or that there are nuclear power plants which work on the same principle or that the sun works in the same way or that radiation exists whether from the sun, from the earth or through say an old CRT or that X=Rays exist or an MRI scanner or an electron microscope. So it is down to them being trolls are mentally ill. There is nothing wrong with discussion as the "science is settled" is also BS, but you do have to have genuine reasons and not either be a fool or a troll.

damn where'd all the schizo bros go

>>508073093 (OP)
>Boots on the ground
Probably not, as that'd be pointless due to there being no Iranian almost-nukes to destroy and also because that means their highest class conventional weapons are good enough to pass for "nukes".

>>508079075
Busy getting bombed by Iran.

>>508073093 (OP)
Stop believing stupid stuff you see on pol
Nukes are very much real and provably so.

Cesium-137 is the proof.

Look at Low-background steel.
Look at Cesium-wine testing for vintage classification.

It is just another jewish psy-op to poison the well. Just like flat Earth nonsense.

>>508079297
poor lads
anyways im off, cheers cunts

>>508079023
>dude the heliocentric theory confirms nukes
this is the level of delusion we're dealing with here

nukes dont exist anymore because i 100%ed MGS V. no need to thank me, just doin my duty

>>508073093 (OP)
It's a Russian psyop campaign to try to make gullible Americans as retarded as possible. It works really well too. Americans and other westerners vehemently believe that space is fake, vaccines are unsafe, so on and so forth.

>>508079547
theory exists, has been proved, been put into practice for numerous things from nukes to everyday use cases. And the schizo only comeback is "i don't believe in nukes". You don't have a shred of evidence disproving them, do you also not believe nuclear power plants exists and are wooden decoys? kek

>>508078943
me in the back

>>508078716
>It banned testing of nukes above ground. Most modern nuke tests are done deep underground by digging a shitting pit and then covering it up with tons of dirt

How convenient lol check out my captcha

>>508079790
>It's a Russian psyop campaign to try to make gullible
No it is some anons having some fun.
t. Starter of the nukes are not real meme

>>508073230
This 100%.

>>508073093 (OP)
Tbf though there is some truth to the claim that the power of nuclear weapons is over-exagerated. The US, Russia and China do not have the power to nuke the entire world several times over.

a) Nukes aren't as powerful as the propaganda makes it appear. The classic video of a house being blown away by a nuke? It's made of wood. Most of the buildings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were made of wood too. Many buildings actually survived in Hiroshima despite being only hundreds of meters away from ground zero: because they were made of brick (e.g. Genbaku Dome). There's even a case of a centurion tank surviving an atomic bomb from only 450m away from a nuclear bomb detonation. Most modern buildings are far more durable than the wooden houses like pic related or in Hiroshima.

b) There aren't enough warheads for how many targets there are. In the entire world, there are a less than ten thousand nuclear warheads. In a nuclear war, many of these would be intercepted or malfunction before they hit their target. So in total if there were a nuclear war, there would probably be a thousand or so nuclear bombs go off across the world. This may sound like a lot, but the world is really big. There are 346 cities in the USA with a population over 100,000 alone. And that's before even considering how many military/infrastructure targets there are. And as mentioned previously, nukes aren't actually that powerful. Unless each city is bombed multiple times, you would probably survive in a city that got nuked.

Now obviously a nuclear war would be extremely bad. But it wouldn't instantly cause a global apocalypse, Fallout-style. The overwhelming majority of people would survive it. For most countries, life would probably be relatively unchaged.

>>508081672
tldr nothing ever happens

>>508078082
>>508077731
>>508074998
>>508074755
>>508073521
The Shadow people wanna have a talk with you

>>508082458

>>508081672
>Tbf though there is some truth to the claim that the power of nuclear weapons is over-exagerated
Yes that's it
The carpet bombings in second world war did way more damage than these hyped up piece of shit, what they are really good for is eliminating concentrated high value targets like large military bases, and also i believe producing the EMP phenomenon .
Radioactive poisoning is a total hoax on the other hand, radioactivity is just a name for emission of energy in various wavelength bands like radio transmissions, heat, visible light, X ray and gamma etc ... energy starts to dissipate as soon as the source it is emitted from is cut off just like a lamp, and higher the frequency the faster it loses its energy and dissipates
That being said "le big bad radioacitivity" is just the pulse of energy the atom bombs emit during the few milliseconds of their explosion, nothing more, there are no lingering effects afterwards like biochemical weapons have .

>>508073093 (OP)
Let them explain Tsar Bomba and its effects if they are not real.
That is way more irrefutable than Hiroshima.

>>508082842

>>508073093 (OP)
A 10-KT nuke is the same as 10-thousand tons of TNT. So if you put, or throw, such a pile of TNT somewhere, it seems like a 10KT nuke detonating.

>>508073230
Fpbp

>>508073230
>hollow earth people
To be fair there are some cavities and such in the ground.
Do they lead to some kind of hollow interior? Not exactly, and that wouldn't work either, also it conflicts with the earth being flat (FACT), because it looks flat to me at a glance, like it did to some dude 500000 years ago. No way he could have been wrong. Maybe there are multiple flat earths stacked on top of another like parallel dimensions? They could give it the appearance of being hollow.

>>508085878
Not exactly, but the explosive effects are the same, yes.
The truth is a nuclear explosion really doesn't do that much; it's not even fair to call it an explosion.
The weapon simply releasesa lot of raw energy, which is mostly converted into heat, the spread of which causes a shockwave and "fireball". Nothing is actually burning there in any sense just air being displaced by extremely sudden and dramatic heating.
This is functionally rather different from a chemical explosive, which relies more on the production of gas pressure.
There are a few definite tell-tale difference to the immediate effect, like the heat flash, which is much greater in nuclear weapons, and possibly its two-pulsed detonationg, if it is a "hydrogen bomb" (which in the case of a 10kt warhead it is not, that's mainly fission in any case).

>>508082842
>>508084705
God I fucking love the X-Files seasons 1-5.

>>508073230
Except the nukes still don't exist no matter how much you wish they did you foul dane cuck.

>>508073231
Your eyeballs will fry instantly looking at it

>>508087258
It's not exactly like a laser or whatever tho. Your eyes aren't special to nuclear weapons. If they burn so does the rest of your body.
It's an elevated issue only because eyes have poor circulation and hence cooling, so they burn more easily than you skin; one reason you have eyelids.
Now of course your eyelids might catch fire, much like whatever else is expose to the thermal flash at shortish range, in which case your eyes will not be sufficiently protected, but overall they are especially vulnerable only under certain circumstances.

>>508073093 (OP)
>Fogbank
There hasn't been a new weapon design since the year 2000. The stockpiles are reaching their end of service life. This is a case where you can literally track bad boomer policies. They compartmentalized every chemical and component so much that we just simply dont know how to make all the active components anymore. At best we can revamp or service current ones. The psyop is simply FEAR, fake evidence to appear real. We basically do the same thing Iran, russia, and north korea do. We claim to have 10's of thousands of nukes, leaving out the parts where we have no way to deliver nor know if they even work anymore. For an interesting rabbit hole, look into the apollo affair beyond wiki. Israel was so desperate for a nuke that they setup fake weapon manufacturing companies in the united states just to get access and steal weapon triggers. Ever wonder why isreal never threatens with nukes? because they dont legally own a single one, they are all stolen. They were caught once in 1979 testing one and have locked the program down ever since.

>>508073093 (OP)
nuke never happened

>>508074690
No plane hit the Pentagon.
No plane hit WTC7.

Doesn't really matter if there were or were not planes that hit the others. That isn't what brought them down.

>>508073093 (OP)
forged coerced faked unverifiable and unfalsifiable "testimonies" are all it takes to make something real in your eyes, huh? dumb nigger

>>508087857
>Ever wonder why isreal never threatens with nukes?

>>508073093 (OP)
Nukes are not real
It would require kikes to have self control
Do you think kikes could sit in front of a big red button that says "fuck everything up permanently" for 80 years without pressing it?
It's just not possible
>>508074840
Hiroshima was completely rebuild just some 5 years after the "nuke". I have been to Hiroshima, according to nuketards it should have been a toxic wasteland for centuries. It makes zero sense. Oh muh nuclear fallout but not in Hiroshima because that's special goy, but if we ever use it again nothing will grow for millennias. Yeah right.

>>508077258
Is this a merchant?

>>508088148
You overestimate 1960s CGI.
In fact they didn't even have ICs yet.
Same issue with the moon landing, which however is one of the first cases ICs were used.
Yet the main fallacity with this crap is the idea that either millions of people could all keep a secret or that enemies would cooperate in doing so. If nukes weren't real the first thing the Soviets would have done is buttfuck NATO to daeth, because nukes were pretty much the sole thing keeping them at bay. What's the deal with those nuclear spies anyway? Some kind of ultra-reverse-psychology propaganda?

>>508078265
>1 small dumb civilian reactor cooks boils and blows up in You-kraine and the entire hemisphere gets fallout traces and the entire place is inhabitable till this day, and they have to build a fucking dome over it because it oozes shit out 40 years later.

Also - people are still living around Pripyat just fine. Wildlife is blooming around there. Radiation is mostly ok-level except very close to the elephant's foot, and even there it's just the direct radiation that fucks you up.

Goes the same with the liquidators - the ones who died were directly irradiated by the nucleus debris. Everyone else was just fine, INCLUDING the people operating the plant WHILE THE NUCLEUS MELT DOWN.

They sent people in to release a valve near the nucleus, supposedly a suicide mission. The three people were completely fine, 2 are still alive, one died of natural causes at 82.

The alpha radiation fallout fairy tale is just that - a fairy tale. A convenient sandman used to keep a lid on all potential warlike activity after WWII, so kikes had all the time in the world to fuck everything up in the west without any serious fear of whites actually organizing and starting the fourth reich and making all the holocaust fantasies true this time around, eagles eating livers and all.

Again, imagine kikes sitting on nuclear weapons for 80 years and not using them. It's just not possible, murdering genocidal kikes sitting on the doomsday device and not using it - give me a break.

Nuclear power is real? Yes. Is it potentially dangerous? Yes. Is it what they've sold as? Fuck no. Are nuclear weapons real? Nope they are not.

If I'm wrong, we're gonna find out soon. But I'm not. Kikes would have used nukes long long time ago if they were real.

>>508078164
Nukes created Farcry?

It's really easy. Get highly enriched uranium 235. Either explode an uranium 235 projectile so it propells towards a uranium 235 lunp target or have uranium 235 encased with explosives going inwards. How is that a conspiracy?

>>508073093 (OP)
Culture is our business by Marshall mcluhan pg. 66 states that nukes are a form of international play adjusting foreign policy as in they're never used but the idea of "having" them shapes the international stage.

>>508079075
And the water remains perfectly still, almost like this is a composite of a miniature studio explosion and an exterior shot.

>>508089315
> If nukes weren't real the first thing the Soviets would have done is buttfuck NATO to daeth
And that is PRECISELY why you have to believe they are real
They're a dampening device
At this stage, hell even in the 80s, the only real possible way kikes are dethroned is by war. Hot, real, house by house searching kikes and throwing them in pits war.
And they don't want that of course. They want the west to die a slow, painful, but mostly uneventful death. War messes things up and creates opportunities for rouge groups.
You know, we could make war and solve international disputes between nations the good old way but NO NO MUH SCARY NUKES WE CAN'T DO THAT, so we need to have a nice and quiet and predictable world goverment and a nice and interconnected world economy and kumbayah and all that shit while kikes sit at the top of it and keep printing your money.
Nukes are the end of history. And they're not real. And we're gonna find out very soon. Israel has nukes right? So if they're on the brink of destruction, they're gonna go full samson and nuke some european city right?
They're gonna do some sort of false flag, that's for sure. Maybe they're gonna sell it as a nuke (bonus: you can now explain the sudden huge rise in cancers!). But it will be no nukes. As usual, there will be people pointing the obvious evidence out, and they will be called crazy and shit by the media.

>>508089612
Eh, you are better off using Plutonium.
Having a lot of HEU helps, it's great (unless you put too much of it too close together, in which case you die of radiation poisoning) but you can do with sorta medium enriched Uranium.
I'm not sure anybody has any warhead in operation that uses a pure Uranium primary or secondary. Plutonium is just so much better, and it is easy to produce from lightly enriched Uranium. Uranium enrichment and seperation is a bit of a pita.

No one will acknowledge much less refute anything in this image.

>>508089612
> How is that a conspiracy?
The amount of precision and timing needed for that to happen makes the whole thing suspicious af. Plus, if you consider that if you do the math there's no way that's a self sustaining reaction because of the (very common and very observable - we have nuclear power plants) speed and frequency at which neutrons are shed by an ongoing reaction which is just not fast enough. Concentration doesn't matter, you just get more energy out of it, you could enrich it to 99.9% and it would make zero difference. You can't make a self-sustaining reaction that happens in fractions of a second like that, the uranium would get spread out by the explosion itself far too quickly for anything to actually undergo fission.

If you add the retarded explanation about how an H-bomb is supposed to work on top of that... lol. Please.

>>508089944
But you are not providing a single shred of evidence they don't exist whilst the evidence on the other side of them being real is there for everyone to see, via peer reviews by any scientist on Earth to discuss. What notable people, scientists have said that nuclear weapons are not real or cannot exist? If it down to just a few schizos and trolls saying "nukes are not real" then it pretty much ais a joke

>>508090477
>Scientists
They are as fake as the nukes. Academia forces actual scientists out and only promotes those who agree with the cult.

>>508089944
I think there's quite a few people who do not like wars very much and appreciate them not happening, in whatever capacity.
It is worth noting that not everybody agrees to using nukes in this manner.
>everybody has nukes
>nobody dares to attack anybody ever again because they will get nuked
>war ends
>???
>anti-nuclear guys don't like this because nukes LE BAD
If people could simply agree to avoid wars they would have done so a long time ago. This modern version of war is inherent to the "nation states" who wage them and who are the only ones who want them (cattle can't want things, they are robots).
How do your discourage a genuine psychopath with a god complex from attacking you? Nukes, that's right. Tell him that no matter how many billion cattle zombies he sends your way he is one button-press away from being vaporized no matter where he hides. In other words nukes are largely a political threat which says, or is meant to imply: we can take down your entire system, your leadership and originators of the war.
Now you should also understand how critical these implications are. Underlying the entire system of nation states is the idea that the political master class itself will not be attacked or desposed; and in fact that is often what these wars are about: deposing a foreign government because they don't suck your (governments) dick hard enough.
A million dead cattle is just a statistic. Material damage.

>>508087962
This. Just wanted to drop by and look if the (((Australian))) is still posting his shitty special effects and fertulizer explosions. Top kek.

OOOOOHHHH MUHHHHH MuSHROOOOM CLUD!
BE AFRAID! BE VERY AFRAID!
JEW WILL NOOOK YOU!
What bullshit. And ITT hordes of retards falling for it. That is /nu/pol. Shills, bots, glowniggers, Juden, sure, we laways had them, but since 2016 we were FLOODED with absolute retards, as well as brown shitskin scum with 60 IQ.
Hilarious.

>>508090668
>they are fake
ok, then everything is fake, all tech is fake. The very computer i am using, the keyboard i am using is fake - in fact I am fake and existence doesn't exist literally and it's all a mirage. Any "reality" can be made up, anyone can "believe" what they want. meanwhile the world spins and history decides what was real. Science is actually there for anyone to discuss, to try to challenge anything. Saying "nukes are not real" and not providing a shred of evidence or info to back up that claim is pure trolling. In any case /x/ is there for people to discuss such things.

>>508090477
> But you are not providing a single shred of evidence they don't exist whilst the evidence on the other side of them being real is there for everyone to see

Oh really? Where's the evidence? It's "there for everyone to see", so where is it?
Have you seen a nuke go off with your own very eyes?
The (((media))) creates narratives constantly, that have zero and I say zero footing on reality. Read Baudrillard. You don't know what's real.
Let me state it again: you don't know what's real. You can't know what's real. The only way you can judge reality is by the aftermath of what happens after the niggers that run the media tell you stuff. You don't judge the fact, you judge what consequences it brings.
Narratives are primary sources. Primary sources, as every historian worth his salt will tell you, are completely useless and unreliable. Secondary sources is where the meat is. And secondary sources tell you that nukes do not exist - if they did, they would have been used already.
Why do you think you know what's real? You don't. Reality is out of reach, hidden behind uncountable layers of smoke and mirrors.
So where's the evidence? Do you have a nuke at home you can show me? That'd be interesting. Until then, I have to assume they're not real and just used as a deterrent in case the goyim decide to get a bit too uppity - you can't make war goy, think of the nukes.

> If it down to just a few schizos and trolls saying "nukes are not real" then it pretty much ais a joke

It was down to just a few schizos and trolls saying "covid is not real" and how did that turn out?

>>508090873
Funny how all these states in possession of nukes were engaged in permanent conflict since 1945 - or allegedly so - ever since 1945. They have been in Ukraine for 3 and a half years now, if you haven't noticed.
What happened? Exactly, nothing. Instead you see literal Worl War 1 warfare, with a few drones.

>>508074956
>>508074793
>>508073326
>t. well poisoning Jews
Why should I care if the earth is a sphere, or flat and round, square, or even deez nuts shaped?

>>508073231
If polio is real why haven’t you seen any polio patients in real life?

>>508091020
There is enough evidence posted ITT, you are just too dumb or lazy to look at it. Read the fucking book and watch the documenatries posted her first, and then come back and share your 'opinion' which is exclusively based on what Juden told you to believe.

>>508091060
Chernobyl exists, radiation exists. Oh but there will be people who said that didn't happen or that Fukushima didn't or 5 mile island or Windscale or the other numerous reactor disasters. Praise tell why nukes cannot be real and why specifically is them being a real a problem in the scale that a world today can only exist without them? It is like picking any random thing and saying it doesn't exist and putting your hands over your ears when people show the evidence. At least flat earthers try to engage and show their evidence, ironically that is how things are proved.

>>508090873
>How do your discourage a genuine psychopath with a god complex from attacking you? Nukes, that's right
How is that working out for the kikes in Israel right now? They're bombing 7 countries concurrently. Nobody's stopping them.
I repeat it again: if nukes were real, kikes would have already 100% used them. They're deranged psychopaths with a god complex. They would have used nukes, lied about that, and then kept using them until nothing's left but irradiated ashes. Because that's what they've done socially to our countries - they've effectively nuked the world already, just economically and genetically.
What we're moving towards is a 1984-like world where there's constant war brought upon the countries by the very governments that claim they're preventing it. War generates fear like nothing else, and fear is the best thing that a government can use against their own citizens. Governments love fear. Kikes LOVE fear. Fear shuts the goyim little brains out.
If they had nukes, they would have used them. There's nothing that kikes love more than absolute and needless destruction. Do you think they'd have the self control to stop themselves? The child fucking satanists? Really?

>>508091210
I don't know, maybe having above nigger IQ and having a healthy amount of human curiosity about the world you live in, instaed of belonging to some half-human ape race that could not invent a wheel in 300.000 years would be a start?

>>508091374
A nuclear reactor is not a nuclear bomb. Do you have any idea about the difference? No, you don't, I guessed so.

>>508073093 (OP)
They’re real. They’re not that crazy science wise.
It’s possible there aren’t as many nukes as advertised or maybe they’re unreliable but they’re real this is flat earth spam

>>508091429
Exactly. Nucler program in Iran has been going on sice the 1950s. Do they have nukes? No. Do they claim to have nukes? No. Why not? because they are not (fully) controlled by the jews. That makes jews seethe hard.

>>508091311
>posted here
Yeh that will be on /x/ tho. this is a political board not people trying to disprove something that exists. Trying to shoehorn politics into "nukes don't exist" and "well they use nukes to suppress the common man" BS. Embarrassing. And not a single scientist even ones that will go out on a limb in other cases will say "nukes are not real". And then it's "well all scientists are fake" kek

>some how the retards returned
sigh

>>508091374
> Chernobyl exists, radiation exists.
I suggest you read up my previous posts, and something about Pripyat while you're at it. In short - nukes are one thing, nuclear power is something else completely.
> Oh but there will be people who said that didn't happen or that Fukushima didn't
ONE person died because of Fukushima. And the link is dubious at best. That didn't prevent them to use that to scaremonger the shit out of the japanese though.
> It is like picking any random thing and saying it doesn't exist and putting your hands over your ears when people show the evidence.
Where's the evidence? Honest question. Where's the evidence? Have you seen nukes with your own eyes? Have you seen a nuclear explosion with your own eyes? Have you critically evaluated the "evidence" presented by the same governments that lied about literally everything else? By which criterias? How do you think oppenheimer was able to WALK to ground zero the day after a nuke went off in SLIPPERS and not lose his legs at the very best? How does that fit with the rest of the "evidence"?

>>508091020
>jewish kvetching-the post
Didn't acknowledge anything, just generically ranted. They're is your proof and you won't when address anything in it.

They're real but the war machine has a deadlier weapon they haven't unveiled yet and so they keep touting about nukes because everyone since birth was taught to fear the mushroom.

>>508091601
Yes they are. That shit is simply physically impossible. You can build a dirty bomb, sure, and I am certain they have them, and may ven have used them (like on the Baghdad airport), but you can't make your wonderful hollykike mushroom cloud world-ending bid badabooms. It's just simply as impossible as to jump right on top of the fucking Empire State Building.

>>508073093 (OP)
iirc it has something to do with the oxygen or hydrogen molecules in water.

>>508091197
That's a very important point indeed. These were all proxy wars instead of direct conflicts, and wars for influence over third countries (peons).
Why do they have to fight wars in such a pathetic roundabout manner instead of actually annihilating the enemy?
The answer is quite simple: because while politicians love sending people to die for their interests they do not like to die themselves or see their personal interests destroyed, and that's the threat nukes (and today also some other weapons systems) present to the people deciding how and where wars are fought.
>they'll only pick wars they'll definitely survive
Does anybody dispute the Soviets had dramatic numerical and material advantage over the West in Europe in the immediate decades after WW2? Nukes are a huge factor in why, contrary to expectations, all other avenues of fighting besides nukes were explored in detail, because nukes get you (the leader) killed, and that is not an acceptable mode of operation. There were some who unironically thought nukes would end war, but in the end they only prevented themselves.

>>508091653
There are a number of scientists who do so. Including a very well-respected japanese pgysicist with numerous perr-reviewed publications. Conveniently ignoring these facts, my fren, just shows me that you are a kike, because kikes are the only ones profiting from this bullshit, and you defending it tooth and nail is exact proof that you are nothing but a kike or kike cocksucker, which is even worse. And yes, most scientists nowadays are fake, absolutely.Just like everything else.

>>508091894
Does this honestly count as "evidence" to you?
Let me guess, you're vaccinated

>>508091518
It is of the same principle and a nuclear reactor it is controlled to produce massive amounts of heat to turn turbines. The Sun is the same, nuclear fission taking place. But hold on, it is scientifically not possible to create a nuclear bomb - even tho it has been proved over and over and peer reviewed. Not a single scientist in the world who would care to try to disprove it could or even would. But hey it's there, science is all about challenging what has been proved. If you think nukes are fake, have not been produced then you can simply disprove the science to win the argument.

>>508073093 (OP)

It's weird. I am a trained nuclear reactor operator. So are nuclear reactors fake too? I stood on top of one. I worked at the labs that made plutonium for the bombs. What else...I've seen the rad counts of the plutonium vaults, I've seen what nuclear sources do to glass.

I have never seen a nuclear bomb though, I know radiation is real, but nuclear bombs are one of those things I guess I need to see to believe.

I do have friends that were on ballistic missile submarines, if nukes are fake then there's a lot of expensive theater.

>>508091967

>>508091780
>because everyone since birth was taught to fear the mushroom.
>because everyone since birth was taught to fear the mushroom.
>because everyone since birth was taught to fear the mushroom.
>because everyone since birth was taught to fear the mushroom. because everyone since birth was taught to fear the mushroom.
>because everyone since birth was taught to fear the mushroom. because everyone since birth was taught to fear the mushroom. because everyone since birth was taught to fear the mushroom.
And you never wondered why? Everyone since birth was alo told that Hitler is a monster and 6 garillion jews were baked in the oven in the holohoax.And that brave masonic mutts landed on the fucking moon in the 1960s, lel.

>>508091773
>muh jews
pathetic, hilarious monkey IQ

>>508076075
the (((urss))) gaven them the technology

>>508091923
More like phony wars.

>>508091979
> The Sun is the same, nuclear ****fission**** taking place.
Holy shit if you know nothing about this stuff why do you post?
> even tho it has been proved over and over and peer reviewed.
Same as covid vaccines
> Not a single scientist in the world who would care to try to disprove it could or even would.
Ditto. Some do, but they're "crazy", right?
> If you think nukes are fake, have not been produced then you can simply disprove the science to win the argument.
The burden of proof lies on the ones that make the exceptional argument. Again, where's proof aside from the religious like "arguments" I keep hearing? Grainy videos from the 60s?

>>508092132
And that's exactly what jews do when you call out their bullshit. They get mad and hostile.
Still waiting for you to acknowledge the proof I posted, but you still won't. That's what jews do.

>>508092032
Let me repeat it again - soviet action movie from the 80s counts as scientific proof to you?

>>508091429
There's only one problem:
While Bibi is absolutely itching to use nukes the USA is telling them to fuck off.
Kikes have demonstrated aplenty that they do not care what the world thinks of them, so I do not put using nukes beyond them either; and which is why Iran needs nukes to stop them from contemplating that, but there is a level of escalation beyond which they fear the price will be too high; mainly their fear of genuinely souring relations with the USA and other kike proxy larps.
They do not even have nukes in an official capacity, so a lot of the burden of blame will fall on the USA, and they already are the most reviled state in the UN.
If they use nukes offensively the fucking General Assembly may well decide to abolish their ass.

>>508092028
These submarines are armed with fully functionla ballistic missiles which can deliver all kinds of extremely deadly payloads. there is nothing 'fake' about them. the only fakery is that people, soldiers included, are told that these are 'the world ending doomsday weapons innvented by super-clever jew".

Anyone saying nukes are fake just can't cope with the fact they have forced the human race into stagnation.
America should have nuked Tokyo, Berlin and Moscow and stablish itself as a defacto empire in the 40's, but (((they))) didn't want that. (((They))) wanted this perpetual stagnation

>>508092283

>>508092028
radiation is not real
your a shill
your a liar
your a fucking faggot
also you dont have any friends on submarines shut the fuck up!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd8c_IIJyls

>>508092347
What speaks against using a nuke somewhere in totally uninhabited territory, right in the desert, in Iran, with warning any goatfucker 1000 miles around to evacuate 2 weeks beforehand?

No one is hurt.

demonstration of power.

Instant capitulation.

Your argument is bullshit.

>>508092462
They should have nuked you instead. A country that produces such retards deserves to be nuked. If only...

>>508092212
Some, sure, all sorts of mostly unnecessary or unjust conflicts.
Hell, MAD may have been a curse on third party countries, say SEA or Africa or whatever backwoods place.
Instead of NATO and Soviets simply utterly obliterating each other they saw the need to fight over who is whose slave instead, wrecking the poor nignogs countries instead of their own countries.

>>508073093 (OP)
nukes aren't real as in nukes aren't the real threat, they're all for posturing. the real threat is the one we originally feared in the early 1900s, biological warfare

Why use a nuke in an era of covert war when you can unleash disease without a clear trail ever leading back to you avoiding war, backlash and economic repercussion all together?

china undoubtedly has agents here and canada doing this on a small scale. we've already caught 3 chinks smuggling bio hazards this month alone.

>>508092234
>Same as covid vaccines
except that has been challenged with actual science, so when they said "10% effective, if you get vaccinated you won't be infected" was BS. And that was known before they even started because no vaccine is 100% even something like the measles vaccine. But the "nukes are not real" and "have you ever seen one with your own eyes" is akin to people saying god exists are god doesn't exist or that a magic unicorn floats in the sky or in space. Yes we have people who will make up something and then say "well try to disprove that" knowing full well if something is made up and can never been seen then it can't be "disproved" Could a magic unicorn be floating in space? Well seeing as space cannot be full explored then well - it could be just like anything could be possible in the universe. But you have to deal in facts, what is known or can at least be a theory that stands up to people challenging it.

>>508092347
kikes have literally nuked the world already
that's how kikes are. destruction is paramount, everything else comes second. tikkum olam.
They took a society that was functional and that they controlled and ran it into the ground in 80 years. Where do you think they'll be going next? Do you think they thought about that when they were importing infinite niggers into what is ultimately the home they need to live in as well?
If they had nukes, if nukes were real, they would have 100% used them. No contest. If they had the ultimate destruction weapon, they would not be able to restrain themselves. They would drop it and then kike their way out of it at most, but they would drop it.
> While Bibi is absolutely itching to use nukes the USA is telling them to fuck off.
If anything, it's Bibi giving orders to the USA, not the other way around. Isn't that clear by now? The US of A is a colony of israel

>>508092592
cope anon.
American won ww2 and should ruled the world

>>508092260
You don't have proof. You cannot disprove the very theory of nuclear bombs or that nuclear reactions have taken place. It is literal trolling or schizo shit

>>508092472
Cool movie, special effects are so so
Now where's proof of U235 being able to undergo fission in microseconds and without said fission generating enough kinetic energy to displace the U235 itself (which would stop the fission right away)?

>>508092347
And that, btw, is how EVERY SINGLE CONFLICT since 1945 could have been ended within 24 hours if nukes were real.

Instead we have seen the slaughter of uncounted millions of innocent civilians and millions of soldiers, and the use of all kind of fucked-up and sadistic weaponry.

If only ONE nuke, which does not even have to hurt ONE SINGLE PERSON

would have been enough to make anyone who has no nukes kneel and kiss your feet.

>>508073093 (OP)
>testemonies confirmed them
Kek!

>>508092690
>But the "nukes are not real" and "have you ever seen one with your own eyes" is akin to people saying god exists are god doesn't exist or that a magic unicorn floats in the sky or in space
How so?
If anything, it's you saying that. It's you saying that god exists and we can't see it and there's no tangible proof of it but it totally exists because everyone says so. I'm just asking for proof. Where is it?

>>508092816
Jews have won, you retarded faggot. What are you even doing here? looking at gay ass BBC threads? get some eductaion while you are here, maybe then you are salvagable.

>>508092092
it's all a joke and this world is fake

>>508085878

No, it's 10 metric tons
They goose the numbers as part of the psy-op

>>508073093 (OP)
tinfoils say that the same way they speak of pussies and the female orgasm.

they have never seen one thus its fake.

>>508092875

>>508092527
It's not my argument tho but the politicians (who really, really hate dying). I have an entirely realistic appreciation of nukes. They just cause a big explosion of sorts. That's it. Giant ass high explosive bomb (except smol).
Sure, there's also some fallout but you can keep it to a reasonable minimum if you want, by building efficient warheads.
But this again only confirms it. To whom are nukes a real threat, compared to other weapons, whether they dropped a hundred bunker busters on your military abse or one nuclear warhead? Where does it make a difference? The outcome may be about the same. In fact the bunker buster bombardement could be worse.
But having a salvo of 12 450kt warheads fired at your ruling class faces is extremely undesirable (to them).
Even if they escape their organization, system or property will probably be fucked quite badly.

>>508092863
Explain the theory of nuclear bombs, than I tell you whiy it cannot work. Master challenge: no Google AI, Grok or ChatGPT, bubba. I have tools to recognize such shit instantly.

>>508093026
Basically this. I'd rather put it the other way areound, it's all fake and this world is a joke.

>>508092987
so every tourist that visited Nevada to see nukes go off subsequently lied about the experience? stop fucking posting retard.

>>508073093 (OP)
>Can someone explain me how nukes aren't real? Weren't they used on Japan and testimonies confirmed it?
Photo flash bombs, mustard gas, and napalm.
Testimonies?
You mean approved sources.
You didn't take that vaxxine did you?

>Also if nukes aren't real and can't be used means that americans need to put boots on the ground right?
Right.
Failed amphibious assault incoming!

>>508092092
Mushrooms super healthy for brain, must convince populace they're gross!

>>508073093 (OP)
>testimonies confirmed it?
>testimonies
Anecdotal fallacy.
https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1745605148004265.png
Bottom middle.

>>508092987
But there is proof so this isn't akin to a magic unicorn. We know in theory that aliens will exist in the universe as it is practically impossible for Earth to be the only planet among the trillions of planets to only have intelligent live. But does it mean there are little green men flying around Earth? Well without actual evidence then no, but it actually cannot be disproved because it is possible. But this is basically saying "no, no, no matter what evidence is there are NO NUKES!!"

personal favourite

>>508093143
I therefore specifically referredto thos cases where wars were carried out against NON-NUCLEAR nations by allegedly NUCLEAR nations. You know that they dropped more bombs on tiny Vietnam than were dropped in entire WW2 in all theaters, and they fucked up half of the country with chemical shit, from which people are still dying? And sacrificing their precious mutt bois for it?
And could have ended that with dropping a single nuke in BUT-FUC-HO somewhere in the fucking jungle?
No way dude, no fucking way.

>>508092899
But you see, nukes are so incredibly evil and terrible that they can't be used ever for whatever reason.
You could have just dropped a Hiroshima-sized nuke in Korea in 53 and demostrated that nukes are real for the whole world to see, with the whole world to watch, international agencies and all, to certify that nukes are totally real and totally horrible so to act as a deterrent forevermore and thus avoiding millions and millions of deaths caused by all the wars that happened the last 70 years, but NO.
Nope.
Nukes are just too terrible to even do that. Even if you just did that, twice, just some years earlier, for no fucking reason whatsoever if not to save yourself the invasion of Japan. Can't do it again. They leave too terrible of a mark. Except Hiroshima was "nuked" in 45 and was back to absolute normality in less than 5 years.
Oh and by the way, do you know that it was illegal in Japan to even QUESTION that a nuke was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? And did you know that there's multiple witnesses, some even western (some monks - Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the number 1 and 2 cities by Christian presence, hmmm wonder if that's a cohencidence) that say that there were a lot of planes and a lot of bombs dropped that day, not just one? And did you know that plenty of brick and mortar buildings in Hiroshima, some just 200mt from the "detonation", were mysteriously still standing after the "nuke"? How? It's a mystery.

>>508090310
yep

>>508093390
Yeah, a boom. Saw that a couple of years ago in beirut in better quality.

>>508093198
> so every tourist that visited Nevada to see nukes go off subsequently lied about the experience?
Yes?
Have you talked to any of those "tourists" yourself?
Or have you just read about it in the (((media)))
Stop thinking you have a grasp on reality. You don't. You live in the simulacrum.

>>508093492
Exactly, you get it, OP got it as well - which was the purpose of this thread anyway - so I'm out of here. Got better stuff to do right now.

>>508093145
>what's the population of Iran
thanks Tucker, very good. The think is scientists have already proved nuclear bomb and the tech so it is all a moot subject. Now what you have to do is prove why all those scientists are wrong and I am guessing you are not a physicist never mind have any real knowledge of nuclear science.

>>508093492
because MAD you absolute retard.

Hey! You guys wanna see something really cool?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUWxNS_XDWQ

>>508073230
fpbp
nukes are real
earth is a globe
kys if you think different

>>508093504
uhhhh lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezMy-WnwgmU

>>508092028
>I do have friends that were on ballistic missile submarines, if nukes are fake then there's a lot of expensive theater.

Large thermobarics with some radioactive material would still be a useful weapon. Look at Ukraine. We might see it in Iran or Israel if the censorship ever cracks.

As to a nuclear reactor, using hot rocks to boil water is a bit less dramatic than a nuclear bomb.
Useful, but dangerous.

>>508093580
You could see the detonations from downtown Las Vegas. The entire town was in on it eh? You tried so hard here but now sound like a dumb nigger. Amazing. Surely you have a few people around to back up your claim that atomic tourism in Las Vegas was faked? No? Eat the shitty shit now faggot, its over for you trolls.

>>508087154
It's a complete red herring and irrelevant either way. Tokyo was destroyed just as bad as the other places and there were no """"nukes"""" dropped on it. Iran could continue lobbing conventional missiles at Tel Aviv until it looks like Gaza.

>>508093662
Yeah call me names jew, that surely makes a point

>>508093145
The theory behind the fission primary is simply assembling a critical mass and keeping it contained for as long as possible, as the chain reaction escalates - really quite similar to a nuclear reactor, where the chain reaction is initiated but very carefully maintained and moderated at a minimum level, while the weapon instead serves to maximize it.
And in the context of the secondary fusion stage the goal is simply to heat the fusion fuel to the poiint of igniting, which is in the millions of Kelvins, and then again containing this accelerating reaction (the so-called "radiation implosion") for as long as possible to maximize burnup as it heats up even further.

>>508093893
> You
YOU could see the detonations? Did YOU see them?
You have no access to reality.
> Surely you have a few people around to back up your claim that atomic tourism in Las Vegas was faked?
You do? Where are them? You know them personally?

>>508093905
>Iran could continue lobbing conventional missiles at Tel Aviv until it looks like Gaza.
this is true, bibi admitted that iran's basic ballistic missiles are too much for israel to deal with now, let alone nukes

>>508073368
>>508073521
There are literally pictures taken in Vegas with Mushroom Clouds in the background.
I wish nukes weren't real, but his is just schizoshit.

>>508093999
>where are them?
esl

>>508093999
kys

>most evil country on earth
>bomb hospitals and kill innocents
>did the most horrible crimes you can't even imagine
>never used nukes


The rabbit hole starts here

>>508093258
>Mushrooms super healthy for brain, must convince populace they're gross!
Don't forget, they stopped being plants in 1969.
>Muh fungus among us!

>>508094103
thanks for confirming my point jew

>>508091979
Poor bong i think you really should stop arguing with these people. They do not give any evidence and just offer alternative explanations for all the physics around nuclear technology. I mean there us nothing wrong with being critical and questioning things but you must at some point bring up evidence.

>>508094127
if they could get away with nukes, they would use nukes
this is how jews operate in everything. if they aren't doing something, it's because for some reason they think they can't get away with it

>>508093999
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FghT80tVFKo

>>508091707
neat now show some footage made after 2010 bro :)

>>508073093 (OP)
they're real. in the 50s you could go to watch them be tested, it was like a whole tourist thing where people could watch.

but the people who made them are all dead from old age

>>508094196
>You have no access to reality
Oh you wanted to be taken seriously after saying something so asinine? You really are a dumb fuck nigger lol.

>214 replies
>no post of Galen Winsor eating Uranium
ngmi

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYEHkQFubr0

>>508073230
I'm old enough to remember when people would mock the short-lived "Spacebeams did 9/11" meme on sites like AboveTopSecret as obvious disinfo.
Then a few years later, the flat earth shit started, and somhow took off, along with nukes aren't real, dinosaurs aren't real, etc.
I don't it's just disinfo, I think it's also algorithmic engagement (you get more views making outlandish videos).
Also AI/bots tech has gotten much better, so it's easier to flood the internet with nonsense.
Notice how much more common
>you're not white
thread-derailing is here than it was just a few years ago

>>508093920
The point is that nobody wants to be the guys that started.
If America used even a hiroshima level bukes, the urss would have been forced to respose which in turn would have forced America to respose until every major city was burning.

>>508094240
They've literally killed a hundred thousand defenseless sandniggers and they're still acting like they're the victim
they're throwing them food and then wait for them to get out to get the food, and they shoot them. Like you do with boars.
They've got a tourist service for kikes that get to a viewpoint to watch Gaza get bombed to shit

And by the looks of it, they're getting away with it all

Here on the talmudvision it's a plethora of "israel has a right to defend itself"
Imagine if North Korea decided to "preemptively" strike South Korea and then acted as the victim when they got bombed back
Ridiculous, right?
Well that's where we are with the kikes

If they had nukes, they would have used them. 100%. Nothing can convince me otherwise. They're literal satan incarnate.

>>508073230
fpbp

>>508073326
glowniggers gtfo

>>508074690
I'm not entirely convinced plane hit pentagon tho.

>>508094240
Yes that is correct, this conflict is slowly proving nuke arent real

>>508094387
LOL sounds like the holocaust

>it happened long time ago and you need to just believe it

Russians, Jews and their minions push the "nukes are a hoax" PSYOP to cover up their crimes on September 11th, 2001.

>>508094544
You're telling me they could not have dropped a teeny tiny nuke on Teheran and get away with it?
Just a tiny nuke
They've killed 100k gazans at least, women and children, and instead of having the whole world putting them against a wall and shooting them we're still discussing on TV if "the reaction was proportionate enough" for fucks sake
They can do whatever the fuck they want, they control public opinion 100%. If they tell people on tv "yep we nuked iran now eat our shit" they would quite literally do that. They would eat the kikes shit and say "hmmm so tasty".

>>508094240
It goes beyond this. Let's say it like this:
>if the risk of using nukes was calculable and within the limits a schizophrenic jew would be willing to risk or accept, then they would use them
And niggers in this thread really need to adjust their self-contradictory attitude.
>nukes are the ultimate weapon!
>also they don't exist because nobody used them despite being so ultimate!
Have you consiidered that they may NOT be the ultimate weapon? A big explosion isn't always better than a smaller one. The end.
Hell, even economic concerns come first, because if you have a real nuclear weapons industry then nukes are quite cheap; less than a fighter jet.
>why would they rather risk losing the jet?!?!?!!

There's also the chance it's simply more trouble than it's worth. Should probably also consider what you actually need such a big explosion for?
>blow up Teheran/Tel Aviv with a single bomb
That is within the realm of possibility, sure, but it won't make you any friends.
>dropped tiny bunker buster nuke into some desert bunker
Cares will be much less, but odds are you could have easily done this with a bunch of conventional bombs or ballistic missiles without stirring up this undesirable controversy.
Nukes are not the solution to every military problem.

>>508094333
neat

>>508074690
>If you're one of the retards who think there weren't any planes you're not helping.

It's physically impossible for aluminum planes flying at the purported speeds to pierce the WTC buildings like we "saw" on television. So there were 100% no planes. The question for serious researchers becomes, did anything at all hit those buildings, and if so, what? And the theory that two missiles hit the WTC buildings ends up being by far the most likely.

>>508094609
meds, schizo

>>508094915
>photographs

lmao

>>508094827
nope.
at this point is basically a taboo.

>>508095033

do you retards deny that nuclear energy, nuclear power plants, are a thing?
if you don't deny that, then nuclear weapons obviously exist. they are just an extension of that same technology
the end

its hilarious that one time we actually have a real giganigga explosion we have 300 angles of it, meanwhile this retards is posting still images

Huh, I wonder why protons stay so close together in a nucleus even though they have the same charge?

>>508094827
nukes don't perform any different than high explosive apart from the radiation they give off. So sure if you simply want an area filled with radiation then you could use a low yields nuke as per the neutron bomb where buildings are not damaged so much but people, animals are killed due to the radiation. Problem of course is then radiation then is there in Gaza and then it will be in Israel. So if the purpose is to simply destroy things then why exactly would you use a nuke when you have the radiation problem over regular high explosives?

>>508095064
yeah kikes are so careful of not breaking any taboos, they're so so considerate when it comes to that

>>508095206

>>508095246
like i said, they don't think they can get away with using nukes.

>>508095126
look guys, here's proof that U235 can magically fission at the speed of light
pack it up guys, the physics make no sense but bruce here has a picture, we're done for

>>508095018
I'll give you my entire portfolio if a nuke bomb is dropped during this decade.

I'm ready to bet.

>>508095356
like I said, they can and do get away with much much worse

>>508095380

>>508095380
>t. schizo incel in mom's basement acting like he understands nuclear physics

>>508094827
>>508095064
To further elaborate, the human race is used to that level of atrocities but nuking people is fast, impersonal and effective that as species we have nope out of it.
Elites enages in cannibalism and incest, yet they are never public about it even though we could do nothimg about.
Using nukes is on that of taboo

>>508073093 (OP)
non-schizo argument is that nukes exist but they haven't been in operational condition in long time, so more of there are no working nukes

>>508073230
FPBP

>>508095236
>So if the purpose is to simply destroy things then why exactly would you use a nuke when you have the radiation problem over regular high explosives?
Aren't they fretting over big bunker buster bomb that might or might not work right now?
Use a nuke, gg
But yeah no we're not gonna do that, we're too considerate and we might not get away with it
Now let's starve another 1k gazan and watch their kids die for fun

>no bro you don't get it, we totally have nukes you just literally never see them used because, uh, reasons

anons, it is alright to admit that you were duped into believing fairy tales

>>508073093 (OP)
If i can't see it with my own eyes or understand it then it is fake and gay.

>>508082458
Why weren’t the structures behind them destroyed?

>>508095526
i can believe that a lot of the nuclear weapons collecting dust these days are duds, yes

>>508073230
>knows that flat earth is a psy-op to make conspiracies look stupid
>doesn't know that 9/11 conpsiracies were also a psy-op to make conspiracies look stupid
9/11 conspiracies were designed to distract from the patriot act.

>>508095568

>>508095437
oh hi professor, you clearly know more than I do. Please explain to us, how would that work instead?
Because you clearly understand the physics right? You wouldn't just say shit and then defer to the "experts" that lied to you over and over again like a retarded sheep. It's that YOU yourself know how things work, that's why you talk shit on the internet

>>508095605
I don't know, why did the earth itself not get destroyed in the blast?
nuclear explosions don't destroy literally everything

>>508095639
This faggot is still posting modern art and calling it proof

>>508094827
How tiny? Tiny nukes don't rerally exist. They are bullshit. In fact they should be outlawed because they are so incredibly ineffiiicient. Nuclear artillery shell? Execute the guy who thought that was a good idea, ideally with one of his own shells.
The minimum that is feasible is something like 10-12kt, and even that is shit, not much more efficient than the WW2 nukes.
But explosions of this order of magnitude, say 10-22kt, the lowest amount that make even the slightest sense, are quite big.
And "proper" nuclear warheads start somewhere around 50-150kt. That will level half the city.
Good question what sort of warheads the kikes even have. They probably have some low yield weapons but I don't expect the real warheads to be below 150-300kt.

>>508095437
are these the same physics that have to pretend that universe is 99% made out of magic matter you can't observe or interact with, but you HAVE to believe it to be real otherwise they make zero sense? Those physics?

>>508094967
>It's physically impossible for aluminum planes flying at the purported speeds to pierce the WTC buildings like we "saw" on television.
I could throw a pineapple through a window, or a screen door.

>>508095628
9/11 conspiracies were designed to distract from figuring out israel did it lol

>>508095422
nukes are off limits to use and are just a deterrent. Ironically you could say kill 50k with a nuke and that be wrong and yet kill 1m with normal explosives and that would be OK, just like many things where people die is allowed and yet. The whole world could not be destroyed with high explosives, it could be with all nukes used and by "destroyed" I mean people would not survive the radiation even if they survived the destruction in cities and towns

>>508095422
The human race is used to that "much much worse"
Attacking civilians, starting people to death, genocides, etc all been done before across history.

>>508095745
So use a 150kt nuke to blow iran's centrifuge facilities then
No?
I wonder why
It's surely because kikes are scared about what public opinion will think of them, it's surely that.

>>508095725
theres no need to be upset

>>508073093 (OP)
Can you not go to japan?

>>508095902
they can barely get into iran's airspace enough to throw some teeny tiny guided missiles
they aren't dropping mega nukes on tehran, retard

>>50809587
So what's a teeny tiny nuke then? Even just to show the world they're totally real and the kikes totally have them? So Iranian towelheads calm the fuck down? Wouldn't that be useful?
It makes zero sense. It makes the same amount of sense as the 9/11 explanations. Which by the way you're absolutely crazy if you don't believe in.

>>508075900
nice cgi

>>508095953
Oh I thought kikes were fully in control of iranian airspace, the tv told me that
Maybe they're just telling some other lies aside from that?

>>508096030

>>508095562
But that is a particular place that cannot apparently be destroyed with the MOP bomb and a nuke would be more powerful. Israel has destroyed Gaza by doing it over months. Sure they could have dropped a few nukes to get the same effect. But then they have the radiation problem and also the fact they used nukes. Even US won't be stupid and support complete nut jobs who risk a nuclear war. Nukes are a deterrent

>>508096081
yes, jews and media are lying to you
but they also mix in some truths into what they're saying... like nuclear weapons existing
being smart is the ability to separate truth from lies
hope this helps

>>508096113
kek at all those clipping artifacts
did AI make this

>>508073230
Fpbp

>>508096228

>>508096181
>being smart is believing into magic fairy tale super weapon that can never be used, but we MUST do as jews want because it could be used!

You'd think that years of Ukraine conflict would show retards that wunderwaffle are meme and militaries are incompetent retards, but I guess you can't break your talmondvision programming.

>>508083034
The sustained risk of radiation from a nuclear bomb is mainly from fallout, i.e. dirt, ash, soot, etc that's irradiated and blasted up into the sky by a surface level burst. Airbursts are much less likely to result in fallout, so yeah the only radiation you'd likely get from those would be in the initial high energy gamma burst. That's not nothing though—many people at Hiroshima didn't die in the initial blast but then suffered for weeks or months after before dying in agony.

>>508095725
Hey I am going to say the Romans didn't exist and neither did Jesus and Italy made it all up to get tourists. All those statues, buildings, viaducts? Built within the last hundred or so years.

>>508095902
Well, there's a difference where your nuke detonates. Underground it will cause mainly a rather limited ground shock and massive local contamination. If it explodes at ideal airburst altitude the main effect will be the shockwave. Yes, everybody within a bunch of kilometers will burn to death or whatever but the shockwave will fuck up things out to 10km.
That also illustrates how accuracy is such an important factor. If your bomb penetrates an underground bunker directly, like a Kinzhal, you don't need that large of a warhead to do catastrophic damage. If you miss you definitely want to use a small nuke. If you can't be sure it even impacts in the direct vicinity or have to use laydown mode you'll need a much larger nuclear warhead.

>>508096228
it's just a shitty black and white video camera, zoomer

>>508096414
zoomers are so cooked en mass they will have to bring back the asylums

To people who unironically believe nukes aren't real, what do you think happens in nuclear power plants? How do they get the electricity? Or, say, x-rays, how can doctors see your bones?

>>508073230
>the conspiracies I don't believe are psyops!
>these other retarded conspiracies I believe are heckin based and true!!!
you're still a retard

>>508073093 (OP)
Technically, atomic bombs were used on Japan. Thermonuclear bombs have never been used in combat.

Atomic bombs are a fission reaction, while thermonuclear bombs are a fission reaction that subsequently triggers a larger fusion reaction.

>>508073230
This is the one and only answer.

>>508096617
>what do you think happens in nuclear power plants?
nuclear power generating heat to heat up water
>Or, say, x-rays, how can doctors see your bones?
xrays penetrating softer tissues

what does this have to do with magic meme weapons we can't see but totally exist bro, trust me

>>508096850

>>508073230
>it's a psy-op to make conspiracy theories in general seem retarded, same with flat earth.
nah, there are general concerns about all the nuclear test footage we've been shown looking fake/produced as fuck. there is no reason to equate it at all to flat earth, and that's what the flat earth psyoppers want you to be doing with every single other conspiracy theory. an open-mided investigation of nuclear footage fakery should leave one questioning.

as for the japan events specifically, there is indeed a decent amount of evidence that those incidents could have been conventional bombing runs. anyone actually interested in these theories can do the research and make up their own minds. i haven't looked at the evidence in quite some time but typical concerns include things like telephone poles and structures at ground 0 remaining standing, whereas future nuclear test footage shows utility poles coming down like toothpicks. so which is it? also, a really ridiculous photo on the ground (picrel) that is a clear and obvious fake. followed by heavy duty censorship by the US of anyone even communicating about the attacks afterwards. like they maintained a literal wartime censorship office in japan for years that would read people's mail and listen in on phone calls. so there is plenty of reason to question the japan stuff

my personal conclusion is that nukes are probably real but real footage of them, if it exists, has never been shown to the public.

>>508091461
>typical low effort five eyes divide and conquer shilling
not dying for israel

>>508073368
basado el muchiachio

all my schizo frens went away again :(
they don't like the videos

>>508073093 (OP)
Beirut was real and it was not even a nuke, just a firework capable chemical's port

>>508097391
Beirut was real so we have 200 different angles of that event
Nukes are not real, so all you get is doctored underwater bullshit. It is quite literally a hoax.

>>508095833
Didn't understand your mindless drivel, let me put it into my Jewspeak translator "OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN" Ahhh I see where you're coming from now!

>>508097530
thats crazy

>>508076713
"Nukes are a hoax" PSYOP took off after 9/11 and was pushed by Jews. That's because buildings 1, 2 and 7 were all brought down by underground nukes.

anyway, the issue is that in current day we understand that government is beyond retarded, jews are making shit up and in general there is a much higher level of scrutiny. Nuke meme took hold in era where scrutiny was much lesser, so people just took shit for granted, and then they embedded themselves into our mythos as ultimate super weapon. However if you apply any amount of scrutiny to "evidence" of nuclear bombs it should be obvious that it doesn't hold up at all.
Sadly you have anons who can't admit that TV lied to them so nukes have to be real even if there is absolutely no evidence of them existing.

>>508098074
whoa

>>508097376
Nice models

>>508097653
I see the story of editing you do when making a practical effect.

>>508096368
The only ones pushing the "nukes are a PSYOP" bullshit are kikes

>>508098220
Grainy crap again. I've seen better flying saucer footage.

>>508098285
>>508098352
>>508098471
hey thanks

>>508097199
Jesus, when you fake a photo they not to use pedestrians in the foreground having a conversation like nothing is happening.

>>508096850
You do understand that normal uranium rocks you get out of the ground don't usually heat up by themselves to let us boil water to spin a turbine? That you have to enrich it first, to 3% of fissile atoms for fuel and to 80-90 for nukes nukes. And that the physical process going on in the fuel is the same as in a nuclear explosion, except we add some material to capture some of the neutrons to not let the reaction. Like, if you understand that some atoms can give off energy in the form of heat slowly, to let us heat water, what makes it so unbelievable that it can also, under different conditions, generate energy in the form of heat quickly to make a big boom?

Anyone who wants to seriously understand why the "nukes are fake" PSYOP started being pushed so hard should watch this video. It's the most censored video on the internet for a reason. Keep in mind in any thread like this, Ziotard shills will be mucking things up to a whole new level. Just look at this thread as proof. https://www.bitchute.com/video/MPSJvePiIQhf

>>508098796
So fake.

>>508098660
cool, post video of nukes :)

>>508099068
you got it

>>508098953
Notice how the shill replies within seconds with mindless drivel in a mocking tone. Jew tactics 101

>>508099115
Now post the adamantium camera mount that didn't shake at all. Oh wait, it's a practical effect model.
These are always short cuts with no footage of people in them before the blast.

>>508095605
Why would light rays destroy a building?

>>508099283
>No, you're the jew!
Explain the image then.

>>508099297

>>508099374
Explain the four hour documentary I posted that is the most valuable piece of information on the subject.

>>508099333
So fake. Got her mid jump! Sci Fi nonsense.

>>508099504
Explain why you can't clip anything convincing with 4 hours of material?

>>508099629

>>508097915
>911 was nukes
Now you're just trolling

>>508099760
Again short clip composite of a model and landscape. No humans in shot.

>>508099760
Also, no blast wave, the cactus doesn't move

>>508073326
>el invacunable novaxxx djokovic

>>508099629
I gave you the most mind blowing, interesting documentary out there that you would never, ever hear about from 99.9% of normie conspiratards, and you want me to condense it to some Reddit tier meme so that your small brain can understand it ...

Or, you're just mucking things up like the slave low level Juden that you are.

Not even sure what would be worse...

>>508099850
uhhh did you miss these>>508075900
>>508076216

>>508099762
>17 posts by this user

OY VEY MUCK UP THE NUKES THREAD A FEW GENTILES ARE CATCHING ON~!!

>>508099555
How do you fake a scorched building? You can still go see these to this day

show me one example of similar shadow formed from a conventional bomb?

>>508100132
Top is front screen projection, bottom is video composite. There are no people at the site that is destroyed. Those houses are models.