>>508084371 (OP)
Looks like I was right and everyone in the entire world was wrong, I said that it was an electrical/electronic failure, that there were no electrons flowing.
In future just ask me what's going on in the next air disaster.
>>508084371 (OP)
To me it looks like fuel contamination. Bad performance when taking off followed by complete loss of power on both engines, RAT deployed. The accidental flap lever theories are just dumb, it wouldn't lead to such a fast sink rate.
>>508086938 >>508086401
I am not ruling it out, because there is so much about that plane's systems that I don't fully understand, but I don't see how it would lead to a loss of engine power. It has mechanical redundancies and you can still control the plane fully manual without any displays. Would be a serious emergency, but I don't see how it would just drop down like that with no thrust. It is most likely fuel contamination.
>>508084541
what if HE caused the disaster by opening the door?
because it seems impossible to react and open the door that quickly
also why nobody else followed him?
there are no witnesses unfortunately
>>508089987
If I recall correctly, the rift opened in the floor; he didn't open the door at any point. It just happened to open right in front of him, and he took the chance to escape. Very lucky, it seems