Thread 508126307

Would you support a ban on social media for under-15s?

>>508126307 (OP)
They'll inevitably find a way around it but, having been online for as long as I have, if I do have kids I will do everything in my power to make sure they don't spend time browsing around on the internet.

>>508126307 (OP)
I think for anglo forums and social media its much more important that we have a Great Wall like the chinamen have to keep out the oncoming wave of jeets learning how to open a new tab out of Quora and shitposting. Musk already encouraged them by brownnosing Modi and advocating H1Bs for everyone, look at X now and the weird ass pro-India shit

>>508126307 (OP)
What was the skin colour of the attacker

>>508126307 (OP)
I would support a good reset of the internet with social media destroyed and personal responsibility

>>508126307 (OP)
>they all just flood here

>>508126307 (OP)
I'd prefer to ban it for women

No one under 18 should be allowed to even access the internet or own a phone.

still dancing around the issue.........

They're only mad because under 16s are getting racially radicalised and they want to enforce lobotomy tier globohomo propaganda in old school media so they can end the white race.

>>508126307 (OP)
At least France's ban springs from an actual event, not goyslop fiction, kek
Should be 18 like everything else. Porn too

>>508126307 (OP)
How about just a social media ban?

>>508126307 (OP)
Nope, because it's just a opening a door to further internet censorship. "Under 15 can't use social media because bad thing happened" is just step one in "all adults must register their identity to use websites because bad thing happened".

Once against the useful idiots fall for the THINK OF THE CHILDREN strategy to sign off on more and more government power

>>508127314
i think they should so it because dealing with retarded underages makes me see red + its absolutely decayed the brain of many of them
i take back my statement of >>508126820 because i realized a flood of underage migrants will make the jannys life even more miserable with zero downside to myself because i already found a few good altchans
if porn sites should require a photo id then twitter, tiktok, instagram, facebook, snapchat, and whatever else can do it too

>>508126307 (OP)
This could lead to some problems.

I have libertarian sympathies.

But if there's proven links between youthful social media use and mental disorders, then we should do what we must.

~ May IHVH and his Son, Jesus Christ, bless all of you here on 4chan. Amen. ~

~ Let's all love Lain! ~

>>508128135
>i think they should so it because dealing with retarded underages makes me see red + its absolutely decayed the brain of many of them
Good little sheep, ooga booga 4chan shitposters so scary, let the government ID you, put a camera up your ass and tell you what you're allowed to do to be free from them

God I miss old /pol/ before you retards showed up