Thread 508156742

Couldn't we solve the problem of women thinking that men shorter than 6' tall are below average (fyi 14% of the US is 6' tall or taller) by requiring all dating apps to only list heights in metric centimeters? Centimeters are meaningless to 90% of Americans and American women have no idea what the "average" height in centimeters is.

>>508156742 (OP)
When manlets want to change from imperial to metric to lie about their height, you know its over for them. Being 5'5 and saying you're 5'8 no longer cuts it. You can't say 6'2 6'3 because you'll be laughed out of the bar when you pull up at 5'8. Dating apps are already letting women filter by height. Its over

>women thinking
It's not thinking, it's a hardwired evolutionary response. It's like someone telling you to stop thinking big tits are attractive.

>>508156742 (OP)
I am old so I have to ask are white girls really bringing tape measures with them on their dates nowadays?

>>508156742 (OP)
It would just be 180 which is like 5'11" so there's no difference

someone said that 6'0 is a nice round number and the equivalent for europoors is like 170cm which is like 5'10. Kind of makes sense but honestly just lie on the dating app if you are 5'10 say you are 6 foot. God knows women do nothing but lie in terms of make up, fashion, their past, etc. Lying is part of the game.

>>508156742 (OP)
Imagining being so fucking stupid and deranged that you'd reply earnestly to an obvious troll bot designed to slide threads

You fucking newfags should be shot in a ditch.

sexual selectors are attracted to vanity metrics?? Oh my heckin science!!!!!!! Its a incelocaust!!!!!

You're in stage 3, bargaining.
Keep coping, manlet.

>>508157332
Europeans are taught imperial and metric, they can spot a lying manlet a mile off

>>508157332
>lie on dating apps
I'm not going to lie just to appease women.

>>508156742 (OP)
she looks like she would be a nightmare

>>508156742 (OP)

Woman don't really care about that. Its just social media bs. Also, if you happen to match with one and she asks that just say you're sorry, but you noticed something from her pics and you happen to don't like fat chicks.

>>508156742 (OP)
dont care, what's her husbands name? (she's not married)

suggestions like these are retarded and entirely pointless. there's genuinely nothing to prevent someone from just lying. like those retards who suggest women should be required to list their weights. they would never give a true answer, just like a manlet would never give one either.

>>508157042
This line of thinking is what led to polygamy and eventually the overthrow of the sultans. If 14% of men are getting 80% of the women then that means the other 86% of me are disgruntled and have nothing to lose by killing the sultans, and everything to gain. And it means women are going to lose a lot of their autonomy when choosing a husband because the next generation of fathers will not allow their daughters to be hypergamous / polygamous.

>>508157204
if a woman has been with someone who is 6'2", she's going to be able to tell right away that you are not. if you lie, then the first thing she learns about you in real life is that you're a liar. you really feel comfortable tricking someone into a date?

>>508159176
why would you want to date a vapid social media whore anyway? she's not going to stop publicly sharing images of her anus for jeets to goon over, who knows what else she just assumes she's allowed to get away with.

>>508159532
date?
my question was pointing out that regardless of how attractive she may be, she was not worthy enough to be married

>>508156742 (OP)
Women are fine the way they are.

Worthless and disposable.

>>508156742 (OP)
all you have to do is be a 6ft+ chad and says your 5' 6" bro you mantles are done.

>>508156742 (OP)
would go to bite her ass check and get annoyed that its actually silicon injections so have to bite and suck her titties instead