>>508194651A Christian would never denounce the Torah, because that's their Old Testament. It's the canonical history of the relationship between humans and God.
However, a Christian *would* be potentially willing to denounce the Talmud, because the Talmud is a book of exclusively Jewish law. It's Jewish doxa, and so a Christian wouldn't be blaspheming for saying it's trash.
A Jew would never denounce either, because both the Torah and the Talmud are considered holy texts by their religion.
Therefore, if a person refuses to denounce the Torah, they could be either a Christian or a Jew.
But if a person refuses to denounce the Talmud, then they can only be a Jew.
So, asking one to denounce the Torah is an odd choice, because it's a deducting question with limited specificity for determining who and who is a kike shill. Asking one to denounce the Talmud however is a much better litmus test for determining if someone is a kike or goy. This is why the protocol for determining kike shills has frequently been requesting that bad faith actors denounce the Talmud.
I denounce the Talmud, btw. Can you denounce the Talmud?
Lastly, there are many holy and theological texts which I personally wouldn't denounce, because I respect the perennial spirituality of groups which defer from my own. I few those texts as man's early search for God, even if they don't adhere to what I authentically believe is the best description of man's relationship with God. Poetic Eddas fits into this category, for example, and I would never ask a pagan to denounce it. However, the Talmud is different. It's an aberrant work influenced by the OT but specifically oriented towards the activities and rites of the Jewish people. For this reason, I view it as a philosophical/legal manuscript, and not a true spiritual text. Therefore, it is meaningless to denounce it -- I'm not Jewish, so why would I care about their ethnocentric codes of living?