Okay, let's name some people. Scott Ritter, Col. Douglas MacGreggor, Peter Zeihan, et al... Why do they suck so badly at predicting things. Peter Zeihan has been saying China will end for the last 20 years. Scott Ritter has made some crazy predictions than never materialize. His latest prediction is that Israel will cease to exist soon. All of these guys can't predict shit. For some reason, I see a bunch of sandniggers praising Scott Ritter and Col. MacGreggor for their "courage" in the predictions they make. How can you be this wrong all of the time and still be taken seriously? At least people make fun of Jim Cramer for making lousy stock market predictions. For some reason these old boomer fucks get a pass????

>>508235088 (OP)
Ritter is a Russian asset, wether he's aware of it or not, it doesn't matter how wrong he is, his media is getting artificially propped up by the FSB.
Social media algorithms can be easily manipulated and bad actors have long realised this.

>>508235088 (OP)
Retard

I think I've heard/read Ritter disclaim he considers even a 5% chance of nuclear armageddon something worth screaming about and trying to prevent it. All his rants should include this disclaimer if the scenario he's fearmongering about really is that unlikely.

>>508235666
Nukes are fake and gay bro
They got big bombs and missles and shit
Nukes are a psychological weapon on the masses not a real weapon
Israel wants to completely destroy iran and its ability to strike them whenever
Picrel nagasaki now
0dy8sh

>>508235384
>bad actors

yeah just like Lex Fridman, faggot ass kike

>>508235088 (OP)
lmao the day of the surprise attack scott ritter said that iran had nothing to counter attack with and was done. good to see he has changed his mind already. what a clown.

>>508236377
Seriously, I don't get how he can be wrong on so many predictions and still be taken seriously. If you say anything against Scott there are like 50 dudes with broken English attacking you in the comments.

>>508235384
>his media is getting artificially propped up by the FSB.
Not his own Podcast. It's fairly obscure. He gets a ton of views when he goes on Judge Napolitano's channel or other people's channels. Hearing passionate people is entertaining, it was Hitler's best trick.

>>508235088 (OP)
Wasn't McGregor saying dumb shit that was Q Adjacent

>>508235088 (OP)
Dude let's predict how hundreds of millions of people are going to behave in the information liberation age using our Boomer brained understanding of the world.

>>508235088 (OP)
The problem is that there's really no such thing as geopolitics so when you view something from that perspective you're bound to get things wrong. World affairs are still led by emotions more than anything.

>>508235088 (OP)
Because Geopolitics doesn't exist. Everyone can sit around, look at current events, make predictions. Everyone is going to get most predictions wrong because reality is impossible to predict and anyone who claims otherwise is full of it. That's how you get so many 'experts' that constantly make false predictions.

>>508235088 (OP)
These guys still believe in the dream of the American empire, that's why they are all wrong. Look further East of you want the reality.

>>508235088 (OP)
They start with their position and then look for evidence to justify it. They don't start with uncertainty about the answer and then derive a conclusion from their analysis

>>508235384
>>508235088 (OP)
I can see you are pretty mad about things not going your way kikes, but don't worry, they'll get a lot worse.

>>508238763
>I can see you are pretty mad about things not going your way kikes, but don't worry, they'll get a lot worse.
Look, if you make a prediction and it does not turn out to be true then what should everyone's reaction be? If I say Mexico will not exist and 1 month and it's now a year later and Mexico is still there, then what does that say about my predictive ability? I'm talking about people who are praised for their "insights", but none of their predictions come true.

>>508235088 (OP)
They're all clowns, grifting and entertaining their low iq audiences.

Idk about the others but on numerous YouTube interviews with MacGregor, there is a disclaimer below the video description pointing out that the content is "synthetically produced." I am not sure what that means in terms of the video or audio but it makes me not trust what I hear or see of him.

>>508235088 (OP)
Ritter and Macgregor were right in their prediction because they assumed monke would have acted for crushing ukraine for real and not just force a deal with the west. That did not happen but it has nothing to do with their military analysis.