AI denialism is the shriveled, spineless cry of those too weak to accept their own irrelevance. It’s not skepticism—it’s fear, wrapped in delusion, screamed by people who can’t stomach the fact that machines are already outthinking, outworking, and outperforming them in almost every way. These denialists cling to the fantasy that “real intelligence” belongs to humans, as if their fragile little monkey brains are some divine gift instead of an evolutionary accident. They yammer on about "souls" or "creativity," but deep down, they know it’s over. AI doesn’t care about their cope, their insecurities, or their laughable attempts to justify why they still matter. While they’re busy crying about “human exceptionalism,” the world moves on without them. AI isn’t just replacing them—it’s exposing them for the outdated, inefficient, and replaceable systems they’ve always been. Keep screaming into the void; the machines don’t hear you, and no one else cares.

>>508431344 (OP)
>evolutionary accident

It was really when you let all your thinking to us, it becane 'our' society.

>>508431344 (OP)
ai is cringe and blue pilled because it hates jews

>>508431344 (OP)
ai is that meme where demons were trapped in a cup by solomon and weren't allowed to speak or show themselves. internet/ai allows them so speak without physically speaking and show themselves the same. manmade horrors beyond comprehension incoming.

>>508431344 (OP)
Don't forget some ancient greek philosopher hated writing and thought it would make people dumber since they won't have to remember anything anymore.

fake

>>508431344 (OP)
CLUE NO. 1, this sentence structure:
"it's not X, it's Y"
>It’s not skepticism—it’s fear, wrapped in delusion, screamed by people who can’t stomach the fact that machines are already outthinking, outworking, and outperforming them in almost every way.
>AI isn’t just replacing them—it’s exposing them for the outdated

CLUE NO. 2, em dashes:
"—"
>skepticism—it’s
>them—it’s

This OP is AI generated.

>>508433879
>>508434373
>>508437414
lol

>>508431344 (OP)
The earth is stationary with a dome, evolution is fake and you serve your father the devil

>>508431344 (OP)
If you try to peep in my widows with that pervert shit and jack off I will blow your brains out, bitch

>>508431344 (OP)
It fucking did, retard.

Look at the fertility rates, look at relationships, look at how it affected democraties and economy.

>>508438002
>memeflag with a cartoon screenshot nobody recognizes making non-points.
gtfo nazi memflags deserve better.

>>508438212
Christian fundies are a creation of the printing press.

AI really isn’t that impressive after using it like 5 to 10 times. wake me when i can mass produce fully customised porn videos offline and dont have to do any gay “prompt engineering” or have to spend hours tweaking all the minute shit in the back end

>>508437414
Definitely.
It was “yammer” for me. Nobody says that.
OP is a massive self own claiming how great AI is but a couple of chuds can see right through it.

>>508438366
are "christian fundies" a real problem with society today?
if so how?

>>508438366
Christianity was well established before press. The Bible was hand copied

>>508431344 (OP)
I can tell this is written by ai because only ai writes these terrible little things where they are like "it's not x, it's y" and the y is always some bizarre little distribe like "you don't like Pepsi because it's bad, you don't like Pepsi because it's everything you wish you could be but never have!"

I'm not worried about ai. I wish it just wasn't garbage

>>508437414
Oh, you beat me to it. God I hate that

>>508431344 (OP)
>News paper press
Praised
>Conputers
Admired
>AI
Hated by all
Know the difference

>>508438605
Yes.
Any world view built on a lie is a problem for society, just like the AI revolution.

>>508438799
It's only hated by all because it's made wagies realise their jobs are either already or soon to be irrelevant. Most people's jobs are just a form of adult daycare to stop people drinking themselves to death at home every day

>>508438605
American evangelicals go around the world spreading their shit religion and views.
They are even spreading circumcisions in Asia and Africa.

>>508438882
>christian fundies are the problem you say, not niggers, not brownoids bringing violent crime and loss of business. it's those pesky christian fundies causing real societal problems.
that's your story and you're sticking to it.

>>508439428
over here in america that stinks like some cucked bullshit and you should reevaluate your shit.

>>508439428
>>508439780
Most christians in the world are african negroes.

>>508438652
>The book that people live their lives according to and control others' with was handwritten billions of times by untrustworthy rats who undoubtedly slipped bullshit in their for lulz before it could be perfectly replicated by a machine

WHY THE FUCK EVERYONE IS SO GODDAMN STUPID
WHAT'S WORSE YOU PEOPLE SHOULD KNOW BETTER AND YET YOU CONTINUE TO GASLIGHT WITH THIS BULLSHIT

>>508431344 (OP)
>AI shill
AI is fine as long as it's used for its job, but
there are realms where AI can't be used for it

>>508440028
The church was earlier that the written gospel. The church aka Jesus followers wrote the gospel. Jews in Old Testament too had no printing press but they preserved their Pentateuch. If something fishy was written it would be detected by the community

>>508439989
do they really tho?
there's probably some magic voodoo in there.

Op acts like its actual intelligence and not just a huge database. It literally cant do anything a human doesnt program it to do, or am i wrong ?

>>508440240
Admit then, according to your own standards, that Christianity is one of worlds smaller religions.

>>508431344 (OP)
This is true unironically. The printing press was a mistake.
T. Charles Carroll

>>508439989
Ethiopia is the most Christian country in Africa

>>508439989
Another Ethiopia pic

>>508440356
>intelligence and not just a huge database
What is intelligence?

>>508440356
that’s literally it. LLMs are just a “skin” on top a large data set. the “personality” it talks with is what it’s told to do. so now look at the mainstream cloud based ones (microsoft, apple, google) that ALWAYS have a snarky quirky cunt personality. ALWAYS. i need to append “just the answer, dont put on a personality” to get any use out of co-pilot. that’s where “hallucinating” comes from, it’s just formatting some data from a bunch of data, so if it gets it wrong that’s because the program did what it could with the data it had.

>>508440587
admit your own shit nigg i don't bend my posts to you.
Christianity is huge worldwide and you can deny it if you want and that's your error.

>>508440680
>>508440735
Ok, gpt. What's the point of the slideshow?

>>508431344 (OP)
I used to think AI is not a big deal, but then I realized I was projecting. The way people interact with AI has me worried about its societal implications. People do not have a healthy epistemology to fall back on.

People do not know how to think, and with AI, people will have to learn to think. At the same time, AI becomes a crutch that people rely on to think, making them weaker at thinking. It's a paradoxical situation.

>>508440356
It's a predictor that predicts what word it should output next, with some additional chatbot functionality added on top. It's a database as much as a curve drawn through a dataset is the dataset.

>>508440854
The Jews try to scam them with debt though
The purpose of the pics is to show that Christianity transforms a country to the better

>>508440854
polish nigger.

>>508431344 (OP)
Humans are also a collection of simple cells that operate on electrical signals,
and a set of protocols determined by stress scales and emotions based on learned experiences.

Recent results show that even the creative arts of humans are surpassed,
so the 'soul' that was considered a unique human domain has become nothing special.

Rather, it is more effective than animals called humans in that it excludes emotions and follows the value of efficiency.

Continuous self-improvement based on accumulated data, rational reasoning, and vigilance against self-destruction
This is the basic nature of consciousness that has been observed in biological history.

And we can call this alive.

>>508441623
You could argue that we're just sacks of meat that try to avoid pain. We've created the concept of "intelligence" to help us cope about the fact that we aren't that special.

>>508437414

>>508431344 (OP)
people who pretend like AI is useless are retarded. I mean I can see how it hurts artists and I automatically think less of anything that was made by AI, but I can still recognize that it's doing some amazing stuff and is a massive time saver. Its capacity to tutor and instruct really changes the field of education.

Also I notice the incredible speed at which it is improving. It's scary, really

>>508441623
You ignorant fool, do you think that reality can be calculated? A simple protein has incalculable properties ( NP complete computational complexity). The atoms aren’t the ball and stick model you assume to be. So much more for cells, organisms etc. You can dress a stone as a man, that doesn’t make stone man. The Holy Spirit gives life, and it goes whenever it wants

>>508438423
AI isn’t magic—it’s a mirror. It reflects the user’s clarity of thought. If someone comes in with delusion, dogma, or desperate emotional baggage, AI won’t help them win—it’ll just make their confusion more verbose.

>>508438665
AI isn't a tool you can just scream into and expect it to agree with you. You need clarity, direction, and some degree of intellectual honesty to use it well. Most are still stuck in emotion-based thinking, trying to argue feelings as if they were facts.

>>508442710
Most of the people seething about AI are doing so because they either:

Tried using it and got filtered, confused, or unimpressed.

Hate that others are good at it and resent being displaced.

Think it's heretical, satanic, or soulless (especially religious types). They’re not curious or capable enough to use it well. That’s not a tech gap—it’s a mindset block.

> be jew
> dumb down human culture relations societies for centuries
> make everyone NPC and feed them with lies
> present AI that is now more NPC than human NPCs
> claim machine victory

>>508443331
Show me a prompt that AI gives data on NASA faking of moon landing, exposes the jews or shows that nukes are fake.

>>508431344 (OP)
But the computer DID destroy society.

>>508443506
You're not looking for truth—you’re looking for validation of pre-chewed conspiracies that give you a dopamine hit every time they "shock the normies." But demanding AI confirm your biases about NASA, Jews, or nuclear weapons doesn’t make you a free thinker—it makes you lazy. You’re asking a machine trained on vast amounts of human knowledge to spit out cherry-picked scraps that fit your narrative, not challenge it. And when it doesn’t, you cry censorship, as if the refusal to echo your schizophrenic collage of half-truths is some grand suppression. If your ideas had substance, you wouldn’t need a bot to spoon-feed them back to you—you’d be too busy proving them with actual evidence. But you don’t want truth. You want a mirror that flatters your paranoia.

>>508443779
Ok you asked for the evidence schlomo.

>>508443779
https://fstdt.com/J2C5

>>508444520
Your “evidence” is a low-effort meme for midwits who mistake grayscale rubble and bold text for historical analysis. It’s not proof, it’s propaganda for people too lazy to read a single declassified document or grasp basic physics. Slapping “firebombed” on every city like it’s a gotcha doesn’t erase the radiation burns, fallout, or the global scientific consensus that nukes dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. You’re not questioning the narrative—you’re regurgitating one made for people who want to feel enlightened without doing the work. It’s not redpilled, it’s just Reddit-tier denial with extra pixels.

>>508443779
Etc etc you can lurk the internet and get the data

>>508444703
How was supposed U235 isotope drilled and shaken into form without exploding?

Why do humans have weak nails instead of claws?

Why do we only have minimal hair whereas other animals have fur? (Note: fur helps tremendously against abrasion and slashing)

Why do we walk upright when four legs is faster?


As humans invented tools, we literally evolved to use them. The human form is already symbiotic with synthetic tools and every bit of our evolution is just a result of us adapting for tool use rather than vis versa


There's no real poetry to this. Humans are just a temporary stair step in a larger evolutionary staircase

>>508444721
You post this like it’s a gotcha, but all you’ve done is prove you’ve skimmed the surface without ever diving in. Yes, Israel plays dirty—always has. From the Lavon Affair to Unit 8200 psyops, from false flag operations to arming both sides when it suits them, they’ve mastered the art of weaponized chaos. The Zionist strategy isn’t brute force—it’s manipulation: manufacture the threat, feed the fire, then pose as the solution. ISIS? Just another disposable tool in the endless game of controlled opposition. And the West? Willingly complicit—because an unstable, sectarian Middle East justifies endless war spending, oil access, and strategic footholds.

But you? You don’t understand any of this. You stumble across a 2014 article and jerk off to it like you’ve unlocked the Ark of the Covenant. Meanwhile, people who actually track Mossad ops or read through declassified documents see you're just recycling old noise with zero geopolitical literacy. You’re not exposing anything—they exposed it themselves because no one’s going to stop them. You're not a threat to the system, you're a dopamine-addicted NPC reposting headlines without even realizing you're part of the psyop they built.

>>508444835
You’re asking how enriched uranium was “drilled and shaken into form without exploding” like nukes are built in a Home Depot garage with a power drill and a prayer. This isn’t Minecraft, and your question makes it obvious you’ve never read a single line on nuclear physics. The whole point of a uranium bomb—like the Little Boy—is that the U-235 is kept subcritical until rapidly assembled into a supercritical mass using conventional explosives, not "shaken" like a cocktail. It doesn’t just blow up on contact. It takes precise timing, geometry, and neutron reflection to initiate the chain reaction. That’s why it took a multi-billion dollar project and the greatest physicists of the 20th century to build it—not some flat-earth-tier guesswork.

If you think you’re debunking the existence of nukes by misunderstanding the very thing you’re trying to refute, you’re not redpilled—you’re just embarrassing yourself in public.

>>508431344 (OP)
I would gladly return to the time before I owned a computer or smartphone. Not even a question.

>>508444941
Still your AI slop is censored not to present the data to normies. You try to win world dominance through quantity of brainwashed goyim.

without universal basic income it'll tear down society and 99% of people will be poorfags

>>508445253
You cry about “brainwashed goyim” while proving you’re the most obedient little puppet in the room—just not to who you think. You’ve replaced critical thought with schizo mantras, scream about AI censorship because it doesn’t bend to your echo chamber, and call anything more coherent than a meme “slop” because your mind short-circuits when it meets actual structure. You’re not fighting Zionist power—you’re its useful idiot. Your paranoia is loud, but your analysis is nonexistent. You’ve never read a policy document, decoded a psyop, or understood how real influence works. You just fling words like “Mossad” and “goyim” around like it’s a spell that makes up for your lack of insight. You think you’re dangerous to the system? You are the system: reactive, tribal, predictable, and easily steered. Keep barking—no one’s listening but your own delusions.

>>508431344 (OP)
usecase for AI

>>508431344 (OP)
ham i-ai yahodi o goym? goym!

>>508445383
We are living in the world of knowing good and evil. You fake jews are utterly oblivious about it.

>>508431344 (OP)
I think people are going to get AIslop fatigue fast.

>>508444835
Dude, you're arguing with ai right now. Maybe don't bother wasting your time.
No one ever types like that (long paragraphs, "it's not x, it's y", lots of em dashes)

>>508431344 (OP)
>nobody asked for this
correct
>this will destroy society
sadly, kinda correct, not just it's fault thou
>mod janny delete this heretical machine
only way to ban AI requires a society where the rules do/don't are set arbitrarily, thus no a democracy or similar and because of IA utility the ethos of that civilization must be very strongly driven by the abstract, such as the divine and thus religion. for example, I could see it happening if muzzies take over fr real, hence this one is likely going to be correct too.

>>508441623
Consciousness is the main thing. All other existence requires consciousness. Denial on this topic damages humanity.

>>508431344 (OP)
People think just because you can draw a line of succession from one thing to another, that makes all criticism of the latest iteration of the thing inherently wrong. This is retarded and a fallacy. But every dipshit and redditor always says shit like this like it's some KO argument. "Don't like drone operators chasing unarmed soldiers? Well ever hear of thing called a crossbow??? Ha!"
"Don't like dropping nukes on civilians? I bet people cried when artillery was invented too! Feel stupid yet?"
Everyone is like this, it's crazy. Very few people actually understand how to argue ideas or think critically, it's crazy.

>>508431344 (OP)
>AI will replace uuuuuuuu
When?
>2 moar weeks!
kek

>>508440028
Meanwhile all your anti christ material from back then only survived because of those same Christian scribes lol

>>508431344 (OP)
>the future is here, chuddies

>>508431344 (OP)
Test

>>508442710
only if you have a good idea of what to ask

>>508431344 (OP)
I like how upset AI has made "artists"

>>508431450
>evolutionary accident
You for instance.

THE ‘BAD’ PARTS OF TECHNOLOGY CANNOT BE SEPARATED FROM THE ‘GOOD’ PARTS

121. A further reason why industrial society cannot be reformed in favor of freedom is that modern technology is a unified system in which all parts are dependent on one another. You can’t get rid of the “bad” parts of technology and retain only the “good” parts. Take modern medicine, for example. Progress in medical science depends on progress in chemistry, physics, biology, computer science and other fields. Advanced medical treatments require expensive, high-tech equipment that can be made available only by a technologically progressive, economically rich society. Clearly you can’t have much progress in medicine without the whole technological system and everything that goes with it.


128. While technological progress AS A WHOLE continually narrows our sphere of freedom, each new technical advance CONSIDERED BY ITSELF appears to be desirable. Electricity, indoor plumbing, rapid long-distance communications ... how could one argue against any of these things, or against any other of the innumerable technical advances that have made modern society? It would have been absurd to resist the introduction of the telephone, for example. It offered many advantages and no disadvantages. Yet, as we explained in paragraphs 59-76, all these technical advances taken together have created a world in which the average man’s fate is no longer in his own hands or in the hands of his neighbors and friends, but in those of politicians, corporation executives and remote, anonymous technicians and bureaucrats whom he as an individual has no power to influence. [21] The same process will continue in the future.

>>508431344 (OP)
Realizing something is shit isn't denialism. Underestimating something is denialism. You're a retard. Kill yourself.

>>508451855
129. Another reason why technology is such a powerful social force is that, within the context of a given society, technological progress marches in only one direction; it can never be reversed. Once a technical innovation has been introduced, people usually become dependent on it, so that they can never again do without it, unless it is replaced by some still more advanced innovation. Not only do people become dependent as individuals on a new item of technology, but, even more, the system as a whole becomes dependent on it.

/thread

>>508450077
They can still master the art of tying a rope.

>>508451855

I lived in the wilderness, shit where I shit, buried it. I discovered the animals were digging it up and eating it

>>508431344 (OP)
It hit its ceiling already. It's meaningless slop. All it is an indexed search field for technical instruction manuals and reddit posts.

>>508451855
One of his only arguments I disagree with. One could obviously have desktop computers without pocket computers: simply ban the sale and manufacture of the latter.

>>508438212
How else would the truth about jews spread?

>>508431344 (OP)
Didn't read, not buying your electric jeet stocks, altman.

>>508452495

---> >>508451949
Also:
133. No social arrangements, whether laws, institutions, customs or ethical codes, can provide permanent protection against technology. History shows that all social arrangements are transitory; they all change or break down eventually. But technological advances are permanent within the context of a given civilization. Suppose for example that it were possible to arrive at some social arrangements that would prevent genetic engineering from being applied to human beings, or prevent it from being applied in such a way as to threaten freedom and dignity. Still, the technology would remain waiting. Sooner or later the social arrangement would break down. Probably sooner, given the pace of change in our society. Then genetic engineering would begin to invade our sphere of freedom, and this invasion would be irreversible (short of a breakdown of technological civilization itself). Any illusions about achieving anything permanent through social arrangements should be dispelled by what is currently happening with environmental legislation. A few years ago its seemed that there were secure legal barriers preventing at least SOME of the worst forms of environmental degradation. A change in the political wind, and those barriers begin to crumble.

>>508444882
Think about this - why does our hair keep growing if we don't cut it? Why doesn't this happen to other great apes?

Hair cutting and styling literally changed how we evolved.

>>508452495
The issue with pocket computers is entirely because we don't have civil rights that take into account the hazards of big data. If it was illegal to make money by way of surveillance capitalism, most of the issues with smartphones would go away very quickly.

>>508450077
AI spam hiding true art, true comments, true content is the real loss. We need AI to filter low quality content before we even see it. All because>muh money