← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 508437775

26 posts 16 images 19 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: bKO9Jy3P) Australia No.508437775 >>508437914 >>508438154 >>508438198 >>508438414 >>508438484 >>508438796 >>508438952 >>508440159
LMAO
>A US official tells the New York Times that they don't know where Iran's 400kg of 60% enriched uranium is.

https://x.com/Megatron_ron/status/1937039391693717678

So those B2 strikes were for nothing.
Oil prices is going to go nuts, for no reason
And Iran will now enrich to weapons grade


At least ONE positive comes from all this.
Israel gets wiped off the map.
Anonymous (ID: 3UNS1tKL) Germany No.508437914 >>508438961 >>508439020
>>508437775 (OP)
The strikes were not directed at the Uranium but at the ability to refine it. They're not trying to blow a bunch of Uranium sky high.
Anonymous (ID: 7kdyQImJ) United States No.508438154 >>508438923
>>508437775 (OP)
iranian girls will all be sucking nigger dicks in hell soon
Anonymous (ID: F66CFSKA) United States No.508438198 >>508438603 >>508438678
>>508437775 (OP)
>And Iran will now enrich to weapons grade
Picrel is another post on the log rn that says Iran doesnt even have a nuclear program.

Which take is correct?
Anonymous (ID: jnUxDyNE) Italy No.508438414 >>508438492
>>508437775 (OP)
they don't know because it doesn't exist
Anonymous (ID: h0oY9HJM) United States No.508438484 >>508438579 >>508439083
>>508437775 (OP)
>And Iran will now enrich to weapons grade
Anon quick question where do you think they will enrich the uranium?
Here's a hint: there are 3 places in Iran that had the equipment necessary for enriching uranium
Anonymous (ID: /sKqlnRh) Russian Federation No.508438492
>>508438414
Anonymous (ID: 2RMTn2kU) Netherlands No.508438579
>>508438484
enriching 60% to weapons grade is the easiest part
Anonymous (ID: bKO9Jy3P) Australia No.508438603
>>508438198
>Iran doesnt even have a nuclear program.
Well it has a civilian program
and it has a stockpile of 60% enriched uranium (not weapons grade)
It was compliant with the IAEA

BUT, this was a deterrence, that indicated IF you fuck with us, we CANT enrich to weapons grade. And then build a warhead, and put it on one of their existing rockets.

You have no one to blame but youselves (Jews and Trump)
And i for one will be buying the MOST EXPENSIVE bottle of Champaign i can find the day the mushroom cloud appears over Tel Aviv
Anonymous (ID: bKO9Jy3P) Australia No.508438678
>>508438198
>Iran doesnt even have a nuclear program.
Well it has a civilian program
and it has a stockpile of 60% enriched uranium (not weapons grade)
It was compliant with the IAEA

BUT, this was a deterrence, that indicated IF you fuck with us, we CAN enrich to weapons grade. And then build a warhead, and put it on one of their existing rockets.

You have no one to blame but youselves (Jews and Trump)
And i for one will be buying the MOST EXPENSIVE bottle of Champaign i can find the day the mushroom cloud appears over Tel Aviv
Anonymous (ID: PCwy+hl0) United Kingdom No.508438796 >>508439126 >>508439417
>>508437775 (OP)
Is 60% enrichment enough to make a viable nuke and if so what sort of yield etc... will that generate?
Anonymous (ID: /kQzNglw) Mexico No.508438923
>>508438154
A sad Mutt's Law instance
Anonymous (ID: /wKUJFwq) United States No.508438952
>>508437775 (OP)
it's in the tunnels under the chabad lubavitch hq in ny
Anonymous (ID: DEUrr+as) United States No.508438961
>>508437914
/thread
Anonymous (ID: gq2AA+ep) Hungary No.508438996
looks like it's time to die for israel
Anonymous (ID: 1ArBhw3R) Portugal No.508439020 >>508439791 >>508440125
>>508437914
Have you ever seen Breaking Bad? You can refine uranium in your own kitchen nowadays
Anonymous (ID: 8eqt+ql9) No.508439083
>>508438484
Technically you can build a nuclear device with 60% enriched Uranium, but it is unwieldy.
80% is enough.Both Pakistan and NK used it.
Anonymous (ID: mLUASEe7) United Kingdom No.508439096 >>508439296 >>508439791
How do they know exactly how much they have and how enriched it is if Iran wasn't cooperative with inspectors? Is their program secret or not?
Anonymous (ID: 8eqt+ql9) No.508439126
>>508438796
Yes, but it will be very cumbersome device.
Anonymous (ID: bKO9Jy3P) Australia No.508439296 >>508439470
>>508439096
Well they had IAEA monitoring, which the allowed in and were compliant with
Anonymous (ID: HwMlPvZp) United States No.508439417
>>508438796
90% is needed for TKD
Anonymous (ID: mLUASEe7) United Kingdom No.508439470 >>508439677
>>508439296
So what's the problem?
Anonymous (ID: bKO9Jy3P) Australia No.508439677
>>508439470
>*whispers* ... the Jews
Anonymous (ID: /kQzNglw) Mexico No.508439791
>>508439020
>Breaking Bad
>Not Cody's Lab
NGMI

>>508439096
>if Iran wasn't cooperative with inspectors
They were until they realized months ago that the IAEA snitched the scientists' names and locations to Mossad
Anonymous (ID: 3m3qlk8A) United States No.508440125
>>508439020
Refining isn't enriching. Enriching cannot be done through chemical means.
Anonymous (ID: sLMjPwSg) Poland No.508440159
>>508437775 (OP)
*spoiler alert*
It's hidden in the same place where Iraq's weapons of mass destruction are.