Thread 508487250

>>508487250 (OP)
Shut up nigga

>>508487250 (OP)
I'll deal with the dictator after we get rid of the stockholders.

>>508487250 (OP)
Nothing in the top right panel is true though.

I wish Trump was 1/10th the dictator leftist think he is

>>508487250 (OP)
AHAHAHAHAHA
WHAT
WHAAAAAAAT?
WE WERE ALL CHEERING ON DICTATOR DON IN 2016 YOU FUCKING NICOMPOOP.
LOL
remember when we were bummed out he didnt use the marines to seize co trol of the capital building?
did you forget the meme
>mfw people say trump is a facist and im mad because he isnt
who are these fools?

>>508487515
Lol fucking cucked

>>508487515
It was under Biden.

>>508487250 (OP)
dictator usually genocide its citizens and they can't say no

>>508487515
>>508487547
>>508487584
That's completely true, Biden was the real dictator

>>508487808
So he turned off the rape?

>>508487250 (OP)
isn't this the cartoonist who cheated on her husband, had a kid with the guy and made a comic about it?

>>508488128
It's a three way switch, the other one is his dick

>>508487250 (OP)
Well they just always go with whatever way the wind blows at the time. People who have no principles of their own at all tend to do that just like all these white girls who get macho man tattoos to make up for their lack of depth and personality.

>>508487250 (OP)
the left can't meme and this artist will never be a woman lol

>due process
You do realize that when you say this that it only makes normies hate you, right?
What "DUE PROCESS" did illegals use when they illegally crossed the border?

>>508487250 (OP)
Im here for two things: bubble gum and this bitches beef flaps and I’m all out of bubblegum

>>508488543
Oh she’s a woman alright. She has an onlyfans.

>>508488334
So he can only rape when his dick's turned off?
Poor guy.

>>508488334
Is his dick a ceiling fan?

Gonna have to agree with the faggots on this one. He’s going scorched earth because our last prime minister banged his wife so he’s been having another little melty

>>508488128
kek

>>508488660
>What "DUE PROCESS" did illegals use when they illegally crossed the border
This sentence could only have been created by someone with sub 90 IQ.
How did you think this even made sense?

>>508487250 (OP)
>its far right thuggery unless we do it

>>508489182
>Due process only applies when you have to send them back!
Thanks for confirming you are a retard, this is why normies hate you.

>>508487250 (OP)
The left can't meme

Due process does not apply for when they illegally entered the country and it does NOT apply when removing illegals from the country.

Only a drooling retard would think otherwise.

>>508489433
>>Due process only applies when you have to send them back!
Yes, exactly.
Due process is not something a civilian applies, it's the government.
Seriously, never take an IQ test.
You're not going to like the result

>>508487515
this too. federal agents got blinded in portland due to their standing orders to not retaliate.
theyre asserting the foreign invaders on the southern border trying to use numbers to rush across were "protestors"

>>508487250 (OP)
illegals are not people

>>508487250 (OP)
Illegals arent citizens and dont deserve freedoms.
Get fucked.

>>508489822
the process due to alien invaders is to be sent back.

>>508489822
ILLEGALS ARE NOT GRANTED THE SAME RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AS LEGAL MIGRANTS AND US CITIZENS.

THE SAME WAY A INVADING FORCE OF A FOREIGN ARMY ARE NOT GRANTED THE SAME RIGHTS UNDER THE US CONSTITUTION AND ARE INSTEAD GRANTED RIGHTS AND STANDARDS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW (GENEVA CONVENTION)

You are sub 20 IQ. Never post again.

>>508490006
i had a guy yapping off about this shit at work last week and i actually proposed the "what if a uniformed army of a foreign adversary crossed the border" and he actually went so far as to say the current federal law means they jave to be let in and we have to let ourselves be invaded.

>>508487250 (OP)
>the people who constantly and continously argue in bad faith and apply double standards demand ideological consistency from others only when it would benefit them

>>508489182
Nobody really cares what you say because we all know your gameplan for really caring about "due process" suddenly is to be obstructionist.

>>508489998
It's actually not.
Supreme court ruled 9-0 that you have to give them actual due process.
I understand you have strong feelings about this, but consider the facts instead.

>>508490006
>ILLEGALS ARE NOT GRANTED THE SAME RIGHTS
Wow, you got really emotional about this.
And as you'd think, you're literally just feels posting.

>Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886)
>Held that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses apply to “any person” within a state’s jurisdiction, regardless of race, nationality, or citizenship status.

May I also suggest you put aside your feels and consider the facts

>>508487547
Normies think 50% of the US is "literal nazis". If only 1% truly was, the country would already be liberated.

>>508487250 (OP)
>silences the press

Fucking lol

>>508490528
I'm sorry that the constitution triggers you and that the supreme court agrees.
It can't be easy when you want your feels to reals

>>508490631
>Jurisdiction
Thank you for dunking on yourself without me needing to.
I accept your concession
Illegals are NOT under the sole jurisdiction thereof the United States of America because they are ILLEGAL INVADERS who are still under the jurisdiction of whatever country they ILLEGALLY fled from.

>>508490792
Ah you don't know what jurisdiction means.
>“jurisdiction” means being within the territorial and legal authority of that government.
Can you show me a ruling stating that people within the US territory are not afforded rights?
I already know you can't, I'm just making a point.

>>508491397
Cope and seethe
I accept your concession.

Pic related is Senator Howard the AUTHOR of the 14th Amendment and Clause 1 that you are invoking.

I accept your concession.

>>508491772
Yes we are taking about the 14th amendment.
Good boy, you're catching up.
The Supreme Court has ruled multiple times that the rights are granted to anyone within the jurisdiction.
Maybe start by reading the ruling before you try to deboooonk it
I'm sorry but this is just facts, you're trying to make your feels fit reality

>>508492205
I accept your concession.
Cope and seethe.
You really argued yourself into a corner there, next time before you open your mouth you should first understand what you are saying and copy pasting because it might just turn out that you are dunking on yourself without you even realizing why or how.

>>508492452
I assume you're playing dumb.
But if not.
The Supreme courts interpretation of the constitution is what the law is, not the actual constitution itself.
I assume you understand this and are just running away.
There's no way I know more about your country and constitution, r-right?

>>508493396
Please try to keep up.
There is NO RULING by SCOTUS that states that the children of illegal aliens are citizens, that is NOT what the 14th amendment says either and it is NOT what the author of Clause 1 of the 14th amendment says in constitutional record, and it is NOT what SCOTUS precedent says.

Here is how it stands today:

1: Constitution says that children of illegals do NOT have citizenship.

2: Precedent set by SCOTUS in Wong Kim Ark states that children of LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS have citizenship.

3: The author of 14th Amendment Clause 1 Senator Jacob Howard, specifically excludes the children of illegal aliens from birthright citizenship when he offers his definition of the words "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof"

THEREFORE a ruling is required by SCOTUS NOW to clarify if the children of illegal aliens are covered under the 14th amendment and given all of the historical context and precedent set by previous SCOTUS majority opinions... the answer is CRYSTAL CLEAR.

Also SCOTUS rulings on constitutional questions and interpretations are RETROACTIVE because to argue otherwise would be to claim that SCOTUS has the power to alter the US Constitution or to "make laws" which they do not. Only through the utilization of Article V in the US constitution can the US Constitution be amended and only Congress has the power to write, vote on federal laws which are ultimately signed into law by the President of the United States.

You didn't realize you were arguing with someone who was infinitely more knowledgeable about this subject than you are, did you?

>>508493807
Okay now you're talking about something completely different.
I don't know if you're trying to move the goal post or if you just forgot what were talking about.
This is if people within US jurisdiction are afforded rights under the constitution.
I've already named a supreme court ruling interpreting the 14th amendment as such.
But I like the blog post

>>508487250 (OP)
None of this is true btw, it’s just a narrative force fed by leftist media.

>>508494318
>too low IQ to understand that this is a discussion about "jurisdiction" and what it means
pottery

>>508494812
>Zadvydas v. Davis (533 U.S. 678, 2001)
>Once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, and he is entitled to due process in deportation proceedings

Can't be easy to be schooled by a Swede.
Your seething is understandable

>>508487250 (OP)
>protestors
who are fighting to violate the law
>due process
for people here out of the law
>the press
who lie that these people are honest

>>508495258
>who are fighting to violate the law
This just surprise you but you are allowed to protest anything in a free country
>for people here out of the law
This just also surprise you but you have to give them due process, supreme court ruled 9-0
>Who lie that these people are honest
you should probably read your constitution in freedom of the press.

you can just admit he's a dictator.
The truth will set you free