>>508518789>No they are not. Initially they do but as time goes on they become a reflection of who is in power who may not even remotely be related to the culture.We are not a monarchy but a representative democracy. The people elected are tacitly endorsed by the American public. They are a reflection the culture, vice versa. Zionism is deeply embedded in American culture, do you think these people are grown from pods? No, they are raised with zionist ideals
>Given the fact the West is absolutely fucked right now with multiple domestic crises that need to be addressed before anther GWOT disaster is taken on, no. It is in the interest of Israel. Not in the interest in the west. Zionists Once again, for what I believe is the THIRD time, "western interests" does not refer to something that is GOOD for western countries. It means that they are involved in the region for their agenda, which in this case (and in most cases) serves a Zionist agenda.
>Yeah, and when I brought up the factors which made that successful you spergedno, I very clearly pointed out that what you were debating against was not at all what I believed or said, and that it was simply comically inaccurate to claim that Iran is impossible to invade. I made it extremely clear, you have since responded a dozen times refusing to accept what I said because you are intent on having the last post. Iran is not special. Its mountains don't make its people uniquely impossible to kill.
>It’s not the positions per seSo to be clear, at no point have I even remotely suggested that it is beneficial to invade Iran, which I would not say because I don't believe that to be true.
>4chan is not super serious.4chan is SRS BSNS