Anonymous
ID: KLuk4Feo
6/23/2025, 11:17:12 PM No.508504334
Election:
>Trump ran against a senile, dying old man and weak brown woman
>both highly improbable winners from a historical perspective, nevertheless, the Democrat party chose them
>given a party's entire raison d'etre is to win elections, it is highly plausible that the Democrat party intentionally lost the election
Foreign policy:
>following inauguration Trump completely changed the foreign policy of the United States by halting support for Ukraine and imposing blanket tariffs on enemies and allies alike
>he even muses annexing Greenland, Canada, or leaving NATO
>reasonably, this series of erratic acts could be called a threat to national security
>yet no generals, current or former, appeared on CNN or elsewhere to condemn his actions
>two months later Trump bombs Iran
>the media is completely unaware until informed by the President
>the press remarks repeatedly with astonishment about the lack of leaks from the Pentagon
>this unusual silence, in the face of several incredibly divisive policy decisions, implying that the Pentagon is completely onboard with Donald Trump's behaviour
Theory:
>Top Democrats rigged the election, with intention to lose, using ineptitude and poor leadership as a cover. The reason being Donald Trump was the chosen candidate of the Pentagon, and defense intelligence threatened to expose and punish senior Democrats otherwise.
>At a time when Russia and China are arming and being led by their own 'strong men' the Pentagon chose Donald Trump to be the United State's strong man. Rather than being unpredictable, all foreign policy action has been wargamed by the Pentagon, and is their intended strategy to rein in China. Trump is merely playing his part, the way he did in WWE and on The Apprentice. There is no democracy. Thank god.
Only responses with the word 'nigger' in them will be read.
>Trump ran against a senile, dying old man and weak brown woman
>both highly improbable winners from a historical perspective, nevertheless, the Democrat party chose them
>given a party's entire raison d'etre is to win elections, it is highly plausible that the Democrat party intentionally lost the election
Foreign policy:
>following inauguration Trump completely changed the foreign policy of the United States by halting support for Ukraine and imposing blanket tariffs on enemies and allies alike
>he even muses annexing Greenland, Canada, or leaving NATO
>reasonably, this series of erratic acts could be called a threat to national security
>yet no generals, current or former, appeared on CNN or elsewhere to condemn his actions
>two months later Trump bombs Iran
>the media is completely unaware until informed by the President
>the press remarks repeatedly with astonishment about the lack of leaks from the Pentagon
>this unusual silence, in the face of several incredibly divisive policy decisions, implying that the Pentagon is completely onboard with Donald Trump's behaviour
Theory:
>Top Democrats rigged the election, with intention to lose, using ineptitude and poor leadership as a cover. The reason being Donald Trump was the chosen candidate of the Pentagon, and defense intelligence threatened to expose and punish senior Democrats otherwise.
>At a time when Russia and China are arming and being led by their own 'strong men' the Pentagon chose Donald Trump to be the United State's strong man. Rather than being unpredictable, all foreign policy action has been wargamed by the Pentagon, and is their intended strategy to rein in China. Trump is merely playing his part, the way he did in WWE and on The Apprentice. There is no democracy. Thank god.
Only responses with the word 'nigger' in them will be read.
