Why did WTC-7 collapse?

A controlled demolition. Here is the footage and here is the science that confirms it.

https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7

>>508589267 (OP)
You know when someone yawns and it makes you yawn? That's how it happened.

>>508589267 (OP)

>>508589267 (OP)
jewish insurance fraud
JIF

>>508589447

>But why?

The zionist Jews did 9/11 to justify the wars in the Middle East.

They want to conquer the nations that surround them.

>>508589267 (OP)
it fell due to embarrassment and cringe -- that those big ass towers could fall from planes hitting it, it was too much for poor wtc7 to bear.

>>508589267 (OP)
Insurance

>>508589267 (OP)
Had to pull it.

>>508589267 (OP)
Controlled demotion obviously. Any other explanation is completely implausible, if not utterly ridiculous.

>>508589267 (OP)
fire and no water pressure in the sprinklers to put it out

>>508589267 (OP)
WTC going down damaged its structural integrity, the whole "distraction planes to fire off sapper charges" thing is retarded

>>508590002
demolition*

>>508589447

>>508589267 (OP)
It was sad.

>>508589267 (OP)
>Why did WTC-7 collapse?
dunno, pull it

also why did a missle hit the pentagon? Right in the section where they were investigating the missing 2 trillion dollars. Weird

>>508590029
I could buy "not leaving anything to chance" that they had a bombing planned in parallel but never needed to pull it
the whole distraction plane argument and that the planes didn't bring the tower down is retarded

>2 planes
>3 buildings
Pro-narrative shills will defend this

FOMO
everyone else was doing it

>>508590225

>>508590167
pentagon was another plane not a missile, US air defense is laughable
they too play the pentagon down and the WTC up to pretend it was an attack only on civilian targets

>>508589267 (OP)
Fires started by burning debris presumably.

>>508589267 (OP)
It was already rigged to blow, but flight 93 went down during a fight with the passengers.

>Why did WTC-7 collapse
Controlled demolition with pre-planted explosive charges.

>>508589267 (OP)
yawwwwwwŵwwwn
shlomo was here

PULL IT

>>508589267 (OP).

As a reminder that the only true, and genuine Higher Being, and Excellency is FRAP.

>>508589447
It was clearly demolition, but I heard this video is fake and I believe it

In the future when AI simulations are perfected, the truth will become obvious.
USA probably won't be around by then.
The future generations would wonder how people were so stupid to believe that two planes could take out two skyscrapers.

>>508590167
who told you that? The internet?

dummt

>>508590294
this talking point is pushed as misdirection. Any structural engineer will tell you that steel fails under high temperatures

>>508590294
thats retarded, the idea that the planes crashing into it is not enough to bring down the steel beams
there is zero benefit or reason to assume there were charges placed

what you can proof is israeli foreknowledge, it was a saudi attack funding from the royal family too probably ($500k-1m)

>>508589447
Remember Larry SilverSTEIN, the owner of this building, was being recorded one way on a phone call when this was happening.
He was listening, said "pull it" then the building collapsed.
IT WAS JUST A COINCIDENCE THEY SAY.

>>508590307
>pentagon was another plane not a missile,
lol, this guy

>>508590307

>>508590684
they hit the three symbols of US power
military power (pentagon), economic power (world trade center), political power (congress, this one failed because the passengers attacked the saudi attackers)

9/11 was a saudi attack, planned in hamburg germany, trained for in the US in flight schools, paid for with money from the saudi royal familiy likely and ultimately with israeli foreknowledge as they stood down

>>508590009
This.

It got hit by a skyscraper sized wall of flaming debris. What did you expect to happen?

>>508590746
yes that is a gif and they got retarded old cameras with retarded frame rates

>>508590576
>>508590601
Bros... you're like 25 years too late... everyone knows 911 was a false flag inside job and that the buildings were taken down with demolitions... only a complete mouth breather moron pledditor would think otherwise. It's not even worth arguing over.

>>508590994
>>508590888
ok CCC CEO

>>508591049
ok jew boy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOZToel_368

>>508589671
Here a better version

>>508589267 (OP)
Actually, if you dig a little deeper, you'll discover that the world trade center at the time was made up of seven buildings. Not only did the towers and building 7 fall, but so did the other four buildings that made up the WTC at the time. As far as I know no other buildings had any major structural damage. It's been a while since I researched this, so it's possible new information has come out since then.

>>508589267 (OP)
To destroy all evidence relating to the numerous financial crimes of the 90s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOZToel_368


Remember folks, always accept [CURRENT NARRATIVE] about [ANOMALOUS ACTIVITY] during [TERRORIST ATTACK]. Not doing so would be insulting to the victims!

>>508590938
it's fishy as hell and reeks of Mossad and one of their epic cinematic operations they love to brag about. That scummy gangster Netanyahu was in charge back then too.

>>508590294
Jet fuel CAN melt steel beams you stupid pastry. See picrel

>>508591102
Jews did 911. Lucky larry, the dancing Israelis. Everyone knows it was a joint Mossad/CIA operation.

>>508591261
based flesh simulator enjoyer

>>508589267 (OP)
Two much larger buildings collapsed right next to it you stupid fucking faggot.

>>508591293
>>508591278
you have no idea about the forces, weight or speeds involved in this

the idea of distraction charges and to then pinpoint precision ram planes into them is retarded, you are a retard

>>508591293
>Jet fuel CAN melt steel beams you stupid pastry. See picrel
holy shit son, that thermite reation looks like jet fuel melting steel

>>508591155
Good video but this guy's mouth is too wet when he speaks and it's annoying to listen to.

>>508591337
dancing israelis is evidence of extensive israeli foreknowledge to a degree of shared culpabillity

alan derschowitz the epstein massage lawyer got them out of jail

>>508589267 (OP)
The 5th plane bound for building 7 never took off in time. They were experiencing major electrical issues. The captain and crew later described it as "something they've never seen before, like the entire plane was hacked".

>>508591293
That Indian airliner crash from a couple weeks ago hit a small building and didn't melt shit even though it was a massive inferno of jet fuel

>>508591511
Kek, of course Mossad had extensive foreknowledge, it was their operation to blow up the buildings, with their lapdog zogbots in tow.

>>508589267 (OP)
Jewish and Fed terrorists destroyed the building to erase cold war era documents and likely the 9/11 plans as well

>>508591293
Nice thermite reaction

>>508591604
you can not prove the israelis were embedded in or aided the saudi cell, I have not seen information of this sort

>>508591416
Im on your side you stupid kraut. The forces (hot) weight (heavy) and speed (fast) all conspired to melt the steel.

>>508591652
yes the air defense was useless, americans can't accept it and create psychological cope

Pro-narrative shills be like
>believe in Jewish Commission Reports
>Believe dancing israelis was just a happenstance
>believe that it’s just a cohencidence that Israeli art students were carrying out 'projects' inside the World Trade Center buildings prior to the attacks
>believe Lucky Larry and his fellow jews just happened to miss work that day for reasons
>3 buildings, 2 planes
>believe that planes can pulverize entire buildings, yet the passports inside those planes remain perfectly intact.
>Believe that fires can cause buildings to collapse in a perfect free-fall footprint
>believe in mossad double agents like Michael Chertoff that was heavily involved sabotaging the investigation by cutting up the scrap metal from the buildings and shipping the evidence to China

The difference between a pro-narrative cuck and a false-flagger is that the former is bluepilled, while the latter is jewpilled.

>>508591416

>>508591250
So I did a bit of a refresher. I was correct. There were seven buildings, and all of them fell. I was incorrect about buildings nearby that didn't suffer major structural damage. There were several buildings that did suffer major structural damage, but they did not fall that day. They were later demolished. But, on that day, seven buildings were destroyed by two commercial airliners, allegedly. Of course we know jet fuel can't melt steel beams, but they obviously can bring down seven buildings.

>>508589267 (OP)
WTC7 is too distract retards from the fact that jetfuel doesn't melt steelbeams. It's well known and admitted it they brought it down on purpose.

>>508591957
cope, saudis attacked you, jews let it happen and danced in celebration

>>508591708
Pfff, I don't need to prove it, it's common knowledge.

>PROVE WATER IS WET PLS
Fuck off back to pleddit, 70IQ nigger, kek.

>>508589267 (OP)
When conspiracy theories were fun instead of schizo

>>508591415
That wouldn't cause it to collapse exactly as if it got demolished. It is hard to make a building collapse that way

>>508590394
that this guy is still able to walk anywhere in the USA is proof that amerimutts with their funkopop gun collections won't do shit. in any sensible country this guy would be "congratulated"

the horse woman that was PM during covid here and fucked up so many people's lives with lockdowns, prevented people from seeing their dying relatives is afraid to come back here. guess where she went?
>oh say can you see
teaching at harvard.

the safest country in the world, they can do anything and you won't do shit. what an absolute joke. same late roman empire aura.

>>508592035
nice try jew

>>508589267 (OP)
>Why did WTC-7 collapse?

controlled demolition

>>508592009
>So I did a bit of a refresher.
Nigger, I watched that shit live

>>508592040
the weight made it come down, once it had momentum it folded the entire structure down

>>508589267 (OP)
Becuz your mom had an interview on that day.

Who wanna bet the ITT had an office on a hit floor?

>>508592119
me too, saudi attack, no sapper charges, no missile on the pentagon, planes, paid by saudi royal cash as jews danced on rooftops instead of warning america

>>508592119
So you knew all seven were destroyed?

>>508589447
You can see the same thing here, from a different angle.

>>508589267 (OP)
hit by debris from WTC 1 and 2
that's the difference between controlled and uncontrolled demolition, controlled demolition does little to no damage to the surrounding area
>but muh conspiracy theory
objective reality doesn't care

>>508592298
nice leap there chud
xD

>>508592022
Checked. Now clean up your act

>>508589267 (OP)

Jews planted bombs in it

Silverstein and his family that perpetrated this crime against humanity should be crucified.

>>508592461
It was very helpful of the debris to only home in on WTC 7 then

>>508589267 (OP)
Foundation was connected and cracked, hit by debre, and jewish telekinesis.

>>508592375
There's no flashes when the windows blow up on that video, contrary to the first one.

>>508593607
They are filmed from opposite sides

>>508592761
just because it didn't knock any other buildings over doesn't mean they weren't damaged, Sven
it's probably beyond your grasp of reality, but not everything has to be either 100% fine or 100% destroyed

>>508589267 (OP)
Controlled demolition.

>>508593762
Ah I get it, so the windows are getting blown up by the blast from the other side of the building, is that right?

>>508592461
I can't think of any mechanism for how large chunks of debris falling from above could make a building like WTC 7 collapse like it did. It was like a perfect controlled demolition

>>508591049
>everyone knows 911 was a false flag inside job and that the buildings were taken down with demolitions
Go on and read my comment again and realize that you're retarded. Steel beams don't melt during a demolition.

Aliums

>>508589267 (OP)
Anyone ITT have the aerial footage from the chopper of WTC-7 collapsing that got shown on national news a few times before being memory-holed?

>>508594598
an anon posted it as an OP last week

also, why the spate of 9/11 topic threads here lately?

>>508594543
Kek.

>>508589267 (OP)
Yes a fucking fire took the entire thing down, there's no conspiracy beyond Israel being behind it. Mutts forget or pretend to forget the architecture of the entire WTC complex was fucking shit on purpose since the whole thing was supposed to be demolished and replaced in 20-30 years tops, since in the 70s the optimism in the US was so massive they unironically believed they would never ran out of money and they would be rebuilding cities every few years, their delusions caught up to them very quickly though and a lot of shit infrastructure stayed for longer than intended.

>>508589267 (OP)
Shockwaves

>>508589499
>You know when someone yawns and it makes you yawn? That's how it happened.
Nice.

>>508590009

>>508594833
The wtc was not built with the intent to be torn down in twenty years, where did you even get that retarded idea?

>>508594706
Thanks
I'll check the archives.
Clearly remember seeing that on 9/11 and thinking "wtf?"

Not sure why this keeps coming up every couple days. Probably glowniggers testing out new well-poisoning methods that are more convincing than "no planes, ufos, space lazors, etc."

Remember that the conspiracy theories are just theories, but we know the official government narrative is retarded bull shit.

>>508594833

>fire causes a building to instantly collapse

nigger please

>>508589267 (OP)
It knew too much.

>>508596753
>instantly collapse
the fires burned for 8hrs in wtc 7 you stupid cunt

it only took this building a couple of hrs before collapsing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwoBRHDLxdo

retard please

>>508589267 (OP)
the smartest thing to do at the time was pull it.

>>508594263
it didn't just fall from above, it also blew out to the sides
but of course you knew that, and are just being an asshole about it

>>508598065
it makes no difference. Debris impact would not cause a perfectly clean, level demolition like that

>>508596753
That's a concrete building not steel so not directly comparable. Not that it matters, no other steel building ever free-fall collapsed in the manner that the WTC buildings did.

>>508598276
>Debris impact would not cause a perfectly clean, level demolition like that
and it didn't, faggot

>>508590005
the steel was burning!

>>508590307
you must listen to Ryan "the shill" Dawson or something

>>508594706
Think I found it.
This isn't what I was looking for though.
The view from the news chopper made the idea of an "organic collapse" even more ridiculous.

>>508589447

This video is fake made by old youtuber from 2008 called Edward Current. It was made to make fun at truthers. Dont use it.

The video is vertically reversed, and all the explosives and sounds were added by video editor. There is even hidden ufo in that video. Dont use it, as it is poisoning the well so to speak.

>>508598454
looks pretty clean to me. The thing falls straight down all together like a demolition job. It is not that easy to make a building fall like that

>>508595431
Fucking amateurs. Not even close to straight down.

>yes goyim the low oxygen, constantly crawling, unevenly spread fire burning out in the open managed to weaken all steel beams and frames at once
>how lucky then that the floors pancaked each other and that both buildings fell on their footprints and not sideways, erasing entire city blocks in Lower Manhattan
Who believes this shit?

All three towers were controlled demolition.

AE911Truth.org

I'm a professional engineering in Texas, and licensed in New York.

>>508597319
>collapsing
Not at free fall velocity into its own footprint in less than 8 seconds
That's what he meant by 'instantly'

if there aever /intheeater was a time like this where this shitty (((((false flag)))) is still questioned it could only be now.
i´ts another shoa - well it´s not

>>508592461
>kike flaggot

>>508595431
This also shows why you need the charges all through the floors of the building. If you don't it collapses straight down for a couple floors then topples over.

>>508589267 (OP)
"pull it"

>>508594833
>Mexico flag 1 pbtid
>fire took the entire thing down
What were the airliners for?

>>508589267 (OP)
Because the dirty fucking subhuman kike rats arranged it, idiot. Any other retarded question that has been trvthfully answered a million times?

i know alot of you are like 3 years old when 9/11 happened, but basically WTC7 got hit by debris from north tower, it made a huge hole in the south side of the building, they decided to just bring it down since it wasn't structurally sound
turns out a tall building with a giant fucking hole at the bottom is not going to stand very long

>>508598872
He pretended to have faked the video because he wasn't able to debunk it. He specifically added a UFO just for Youtube. It's not in the original.

>>508599467
>they decided to just bring it down since it wasn't structurally sound
why not just let the city do that after the incident?

>>508599125
>Not at free fall velocity into its own footprint in less than 8 seconds
but WTC 7 didnt do that either. The penthouse started to collapse several seconds before the facade even moved indicating a structural failure internally.

Why was it silent when it fell? Why were there no corresponding, consecutive loud bangs as the CD charges went off just priot to collapse....like every other CD??


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnYBX6QT0R4

>>508599467
>they decided to just bring it down since it wasn't structurally sound
>pull it
Kek, that's not the official narrative.

>>508599467
So they rigged it with explosives in real time? I would think something that complex would take a few months of planning and a few months of actually planting the explosives and wiring.

>>508599673

unfortunately anon it was a emergency situation and they needed to move ambulances, fire trucks, etc into the area, you cant move that kind of force if you have a tall ass building threatening to fall onto you

Probably because it was made of cardboard.

>>508589447
> A controlled demolition.
Anybody with a minimum of knowledge of physics only required unimpaired good judgment to come to this conclusion. Many however, even of those who have detailed knowledge of physics, even highly intelligent, preferred to believe official narratives because they are weak cowards who fear the consequences of questioning the lies of criminal governments.

>>508599467
>They decided to bring it down
They sure did, but please explain how they did that? Are you suggesting they rigged the building after the twin towers fell?

>>508599719

if theres national guard there they can do it whenever they want anon
your making the mistake of thinking it was just cops and fire dept in city

I woke up in another timeline again, when did "pull it" become a thing?

>>508599920
The idea that it was "brought down" was what all the "conspiracy theory" people were saying back then... it was highly debooooooooooooonked by independent fact jews.

The official narrative is that building 7 fell completely on it's own.

>>508590307
>pentagon was another plane not a missile

>>508599985
since the beginning. welcome to our timeline brother. It's pretty wild here

>>508589267 (OP)

That's where the real JFK files were stored.

>>508590294
The kinetic energy applies to the plane crash but not the wrc7 impacts.

Nist says the penthouse fell into the building. But the problem is that wtc7 neither has kinetic energy nor flammable materials on hand to cause that level of structural integrity issues.

thermite charges placed in the buildings

>>508600113
WTF, of all the shitposting and 9-11 threads I have been involved in, I have never seen "pull it" posts. I'm really starting to believe I am in a different timeline.. Fuck

>>508600514
ofc

>>508589267 (OP)
How come troofers never show the full collapse? Watch this video. You can clearly see the penthouse fall several seconds before the rest of the building. That would never happen in a controlled demo.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WNk674LZrI

>>508589267 (OP)
OUR GOVERNMENT NEVER LIES TO US!
THEY ONLY TELL THE TRUTH!
TRUST THE EXPERTS!
TRUST THE SCIENCE!

>>508589267 (OP)
>collapse
>>508589447
>demolition

>>508600601
Hello Berensteiner, in our reality pull it posts have been a core sample of every single 911 discussion for a quarter century.

>>508589267 (OP)
not sure how but jews were involved 100%

>>508590888
wtf is this

>>508590601
When they built those towers they also took into account the scenario of airliners ramming into them. Most of the kinetic energy of an impact would just go through the empty floors and exit on the other side, just as seen in the footage of 9/11 with the fuel exploding outside of the building. And fires could never bring down steel frame buildings, never before and never after 9/11 but, as they want to make us believe, supposedly even three times on the same day in the same spot. You must be rather naive to believe this.

>>508600665
Just look at that fucking video, obviously a controlled demolition.

How did a passenger plane get lower than 30m to hit the pentagon without hitting any other adjacent buildings beforehand?
Was Maverick from Top Gun the pilot?

>>508597319
>poorly maintained concrete core shithouse
Lmao, you are beyond retarded. No high-rise steel-framed building has ever completely collapsed in solely due to fire. The Windsor Tower in Spain held strong after a 20 hour inferno while being only partially steel framed. Kys btw.

>>508592073
Damn I can’t believe you literally can’t reach the United States yourself to do something mr big talk

>>508589447
This

>>508590076
did they put some sensors in the windows or rooms to guide the missile-planes? or was it just to remove furniture and replace it with explosives?

>>508591293
Thermite can melt steel beams, kerosene can't. I have had steel bars in kerosene fires for hours and it did not weaken them.

>>508599711
>3 pbtid damage control *paid shill*
checked,
all three of the World Trade Center steel frame skyscrapers imploded into their own footprints at free fall velocity in the same manner on 11 September 2001.

>"muh penthouse" / "seconds" before
Doesn't matter. It was a controlled demolition.
Any controlled demolition video of thousands of buildings for decades, shows minor parts of a skyscraper/high rise beginning to implode prior to the main structure near-simultaneous sequential demolition of floors below.

>'a structural failure internally'
Not how any of this works: It's a controlled demolition. That's the failure; that's the job


Fuck off *paid shill*.

>>508601064
How the fuck should I know? All I know is that Mossad did it, and the buildings were obviously taken down with internal explosives.

>>508600601
what does it (do to) madder/matter ? where all in this together so strip in for the ride
>>508600800
(AI-dumpfuck)There have been claims that the Pentagon had lost $2.3 trillion the day before the attacks, but these claims have been debunked. The reference to $2.3 trillion was part of a speech by then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld on September 10, 2001, where he discussed the Pentagon's outdated financial systems and the difficulty in tracking transactions.
However, the Pentagon did not report that $2.3 trillion was missing on that day.
The claim that the attacks were a distraction from this issue is false and has been widely debunked.3 trillions of dollars vanished
why Saddam Hussain believed that
(AI SLOP) Saddam Hussein believed he was the reincarnation of King Nebuchadnezzar, a powerful ancient ruler of Babylon.
This belief was noted in various sources, with some mentioning that he even named one of his Republican Guards divisions after Nebuchadnezzar.
Additionally, there are references to Saddam considering himself the reincarnation of other historical figures, such as Amel-Marduk and Saladin.

It's been 24 years and people still somehow don't notice the lack of any debris or crash evidence from the aircraft or how fast they were going, or the lack of appreciable rubble, seismic impact, or basically anything from the buildings surviving in any capacity.

>>508601191
>the buildings were obviously taken down with internal explosives
This.

>>508601217
>lack of any debris or crash evidence from the aircraft
Some minor parts of the airliners were recovered outside of the buildings. Also the black boxes
Correct, most of the internal furniture/material inside of the towers themselves were burned to a crisp from the fires

>>508601217
The fuck are you talking about, I haven't met anyone real who buy the official 911 narrative in over a fucking decade. No one believes the jewish version of events, these two pledditors in this thread defending it probably aren't even real people. People in general might be stupid, but they're not complete morons either.

>>508590636
Same Larry who missed work that Monday morning (which he never did before) due to a 'doctor's appointment'? And one of his sons too on the same day by pure cohencidence? And bought the asbestos towers a few months before, insuring them specifically against plane attacks? And tried to jew the insurance company twice for the same buildings because he claimed they were separate attacks?
What a lucky guy!

>>508589267 (OP)
You didn't get btfo enough in the thread yesterday?

>>508601179
>5 pbtid retard sperg *confirmed tard*
>Doesn't matter
lmao. so quick to the desperate cope
>Not how any of this works:
lol. your opinion is not an aswer

fuck off *fucking retard*

>>508601435
>What a lucky guy!

>>508593607
I can see one flash only in the right upper side about 0:10 secs in.

>>508600861
A 767 was bigger and had a larger fuel load than anything flying when the towers were designed in the late 60s when a 707 was the largest airliner.

>>508600987
>No high-rise steel-framed building has ever completely collapsed in solely due to fire
shut the fuck up you stupid cunt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwoBRHDLxdo

>>508600987
>you are beyond retarded
your proejection is not helping lmao

>>508600864
lol.

>>508600745
No it hasn't
>>508601203
It matters because I'm either losing my mind or I'm in another timeline. So far all all other points that have been brought up I know about, except the "pull it"

>>508601633
I think I know why the buildings fell. The charges they placed in the building.

>>508601633
>doubles down on retardation
Wilton Paes, the building in your video, was not a steel framed building you profound moron and had known severe structural vulnerabilities. Rope and chair, pronto.

>>508589267 (OP)
He couldn't stand the smell

>>508601633
>6 pbtid damage control *paid shill*
the Brazil building didn't completely collapse into its own footprint at free fall velocity, as the three steel frame skyscrapers in New York City on 11 September 2001 did: and no other steel frame skyscraper in human history has before or since

>'proejection'
(You) = BTFO

>>508601769
we are switching(changing/channeling) timelimes all the times.
i´ts a mixture of belive and information - thoose can coolide at any moment.
who is what? and who are you in that constalation

>>508600861
>the scenario of airliners ramming into them.
the scenario was a 707 "lost in the fog" and expected to be traveling at 200mph....not a plane 1/3 larger and traveling 500mph.


but the buildings did survive the impacts of the planes...just not the resulting fires.

>>508601417
There were no major pieces of the planes left aside from the engine cores and not even any bodies recovered because the extreme heat and pressure destroyed almost everything.

>>508591573
>muh Indian airliner crash
No. A lightweight piece of the tail fell off onto a building, no fuel in tail section no fire

american buildings are all made of cardboard and plywood.
It's literally a paper tiger empire.

>>508601633
that is a blazing inferno though. WTC 7 was nothing like that

>>508601975
As I said, the airplanes in use in the 60s were not as big as the ones flying by 2001 or as fast. The nearest comparable accident they could have used for a study back then was the B-17 that impacted the Empire State Building in 1945.

>>508601417
>minor parts of the airliners were recovered outside of the buildings
Ah yes a few pieces of scrap and some freshly grey looking pieces of fuselage that appeared on top of the WTC pile later and absolutely nothing else that should have been left behind.
>Also the black boxes
Yeah sure, so they claim.
>Correct, most of the internal furniture/material inside of the towers themselves were burned to a crisp from the fires
There wasn't actually much combustible material inside of the towers that could burn though.

>>508601491
>7 pbtid *paid shill*
(You) have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to present itt and have repeated the same IRRELEVANT spew seen for two decades


Fuck off shill. (You) FAILED

>>508601179
>their own footprints
>47 other buildings damaged from the collapses
what a fucking retarded meme

>>508590307
you really think three towelheads with zero flight experience inside an actual 757 were able to overpower 60 people using nothing but boxcutters and shoeblades, then turn their plane around and fly 100s of miles until they nosed down at treetop level and flew straight into the Pentagon?

>>508602092
>WTC 7 was nothing like that
Correct.
NIST in their seven-years-delayed report, tried to pin that building's collapse on 'office fires' (as they'd done with WTC 1 & 2) but their report's collapse modeling is ludicrous and nonsensical

>>508590636
>Larry SilverSTEIN
How did Larry missed work that day?
Do we have to assume he ate non kosher meat and had longest diarrhea that morning

>>508602164
>There wasn't actually much combustible material inside of the towers that could burn though.
Beg pardon? There were vast quantities of paper, wood, chemicals, electrical wiring, and a million other flammable objects in there.

>>508601975
>not a plane 1/3 larger
Hollow aluminum tube is hollow aluminum tube, the only part that's going to be doing much damage is the engine cores.
>and traveling 500mph
This is not physically possible, airliners do not have the power to go that 580 MPH at sea level even if they could do so without ripping their wings.

>>508602189
>Anonymous (ID: 8/i8/W7U) 8 pbtid *paid shill* totally failed their mission about to get Fired.

>>508601938
>as the three steel frame skyscrapers in New York City on 11 September 2001 did
imagine believing this
>exposes sheer retardation=stupid fucking retard
lmao

>>508599909
They rigged it before, like the twin towers, but they probably expected more damage to it from the collapse of the twin towers. They may have waited with the demolition to give the fires in the building time to provide a narrative for how it collapsed. We know the laughable report of the NIST and the few seconds of their rudimentary animation that supposedly "prove" the fires made the building collapse, while the raw data used for the simulation was declared classified. Not plausible in the slightest but enough to fool the cattle.

rely like (aislop)
A number of official military and government drills were conducted on September 11, 2001, the same day as the 9/11 attacks. These drills included simulations of scenarios such as plane hijackings and crashes into buildings, which some researchers and conspiracy theorists argue may have contributed to confusion during the actual events.
For example, the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) had an exercise scheduled for 9 a.m. on September 11, 2001, involving a corporate jet crashing into one of the four towers of the NRO Headquarters in Chantilly, Virginia.

>>508602218
You only need overpower the three guys in the cockpit.

>>508599467
>i know alot of you are like 3 years old when 9/11 happened, but basically WTC7 got hit by debris from north tower, it made a huge hole in the south side of the building, they decided to just bring it down since it wasn't structurally sound

That's not what they say, though.

>>508602478
and then my nigger ?

>>508602323
Official reports determined that the combustible content of the buildings was lower than comparable skyscrapers due to the nature of the buildings designs. Besides, that's not going to do any good in a heavily oxygen starved environment as was shown by the rather cool temperatures of the fires by infrared camera footage.

>>508599095

>>508599095

>>508599095

This. Bump

>>508602478
no actually you need to overpower everyone on the plane

>>508589267 (OP)
>why
Jewish real estate agents wanted to collect on their insurance policy plus they wanted to kick off the Greater Israel project we see advancing to this day

>>508602384
>Anonymous (ID: 8/i8/W7U) 9 pbtid *paid shill* totally failed their mission about to get Fired.

>>508602478
The three guys in question being military combat trained pilots.

They declassified the docs yesterday all the fat cops that responded made the towers top heavy. They say there were over 20,000lb of pig in the north tower alone

>>508600861
>Most of the kinetic energy of an impact would just go through the empty floors and exit on the other side
Or it would just blow up the outside of the building and shatter, assuming it could even approach that fast.

>>508601633
That Brazilian high-rise wasn't made from proper steel. Please post evidence from Chinese quality high-rise collapsing in fires.

>>508602653
Also the taliban had just taken over and banned opium production, which cut off 30% of the world supply. The CIA and Mossad need that opium to manufacture heroin to sell to American citizens.

That's a big reason why Pat Tilman was killed. He realized we were there to defend opium fields and boy rapists.

>>508589267 (OP)
Progressive internal collapse. Just goes to show how the WTC complex put cost and space efficiency over all other design considerations.

Does anyone stop to think that they managed to sell to the American public "iconic buildings" that looked like mega tall jail blocks with their narrow windows. All so a bunch of finance kikes didn't have to look at building columns in their offices.

>>508602576
Do you think IRL is like playing Street Fighter? Most of the passengers would have been too afraid to do anything and not all of them were 28 year old ex-Marines with huge biceps.

>>508602092
>WTC 7 was nothing like that
>just little baby fires
fires burned unfought for 8hrs. what exactly were the conditions like inside the building?

https://youtu.be/t5tEy6mXSE8?si=-2q7JF9BRYIV-EBO&t=316

>>508602668
tjey believe this_
The Hamburg cell is a group of radical Islamists based in Hamburg, Germany, that included students from different Arab countries who eventually became key operatives in the September 11 attacks.
Important members included Mohamed Atta, who led the four hijacking teams in 2001 and piloted American Airlines Flight 11; Ramzi bin al-Shibh, who conspired with the other three members but was unable to enter the United States; Marwan al-Shehhi, who piloted United Airlines Flight 175; and Ziad Jarrah, who piloted United Airlines Flight 93 and failed to hit a target in Washington, D.C..

The Hamburg cell was formed in 1998 when future-hijackers Mohamed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, and Ramzi bin al-Shibh moved into a spacious apartment together on Marienstraße. Here they formed the secretive Hamburg cell, which also included other minor participants in the 9/11 plot. They met together three or four times a week to discuss their anti-American and anti-Israeli views and to decide how best to fight for their cause.
As late as 1999, the four core members of the group had intended to wage jihad in Chechnya, where Islamic jihadists were rebelling against Russia. The 9/11 Commission Report notes in Chapter 5 that "according to bin al-Shibh [who is now in U.S. custody], a chance meeting on a train in Germany caused the group to travel to Afghanistan instead. An individual named Khalid al Masri (or Khalid al-Masri ) approached bin al-Shibh and Shehhi (because they were Arabs with beards, bin al-Shibh thinks) and struck up a conversation about jihad in Chechnya. When they later called Masri and expressed interest in going to Chechnya, he told them to contact Abu Musab in Duisburg, Germany. Abu Musab turned out to be Mohamedou Ould Slahi, who was well known to U.S. and German intelligence.
((((to be continued))))) [Hamburg Cell TheorieAI]

>>508602178
>SPERGING COPE
the post.

LMAO

>>508601517
>t. problem goyim?
add a speech bubble and it's perfect

>>508602861
The towers were half a Ponzi scheme during the shitty years of NYC being a crime-filled ghetto.

>>508602817
The footage is irrefutable. The plane flew straight into the building.

So let me get this straight.
-- These buildings were a massive problem for the Port Authoriy, and it was likely they would need to be demolished.
-- Coincidentally, these problem-buildings were targeted for a terror attack in 1993. The FBI literally gave them the bombs and pointed them at these buildings. The attack failed by sheer coincidence.
-- 2001 was the first time the buildings had gone up for public auction in 40 years. It was bought 1 month before the attacks by a zionist billionaire.
-- He wasn't even the high bidder, the high bidder mysteriously dropped out of the auction.
-- He contracted with various groups to do work on the towers, some of these groups are thought to be Israeli intelligence fronts.
-- Building 7 was not hit by a plane, and collapsed in the same perfect pattern as the other two. The news seemed to know the collapse was coming too.
-- "pull it"

>>508602944
>Anonymous (ID: 8/i8/W7U) 11 pbtid *paid shill* totally failed their mission about to get Fired.

>>508603021
Good summary.

>>508599467
>they decided to just bring it down
feeling cute, might rig a 60-storey building for demolition later today, idk lol

>>508602915
Yes these guys were hardened terrorist operatives who were trained for this mission they were not 5'7 130 pound dudes who work in an office. Not somebody the average airline passenger was going to win a brawl with.

>>508599719
>So they rigged it with explosives in real time?
Zoomers don't even know about Larry's Lancers. the crack team of firefighters trained to set demolition charges during live fires.

>>508602997
Yes, and that's the problem all these years. It shouldn't be able to do that.

>>508589447
was it really the jews

Remember there was a plane where the passengers overpowered the hijackers and made it crash in Pennsylvania or something instead?

That one was supposed to hit the third tower but it didn't and they just brought it down anyway

>>508603158
>hardened terrorist operatives
>trained for this mission
give me moooore nigger

>>508602662
>intellect of a child.
You remind me of a little child who when they hear things they dont want to they put their fingers in their ears and call people names

>>508603313
>That one was supposed to hit the third tower but it didn't and they just brought it down anyway

My understanding is that Flight 93 was supposed to hit the White House and the one that went into the Pentagon was supposed to hit the Capitol Building but the passengers in both cases managed to prevent them from reaching their targets.

>>508602817
>it would just blow up the outside of the building and shatte
what? you expected the planes to bounce off?? have you even the slighest understanding of physics? Those planes pentrated the building like a pencil poking into a soda can....with ease.

>>508603482
yes because you ((((believe))))
how fucking dense can a scull be?

>>508589267 (OP)
I find it funny how in the past all the media treated anyone who questioned this incident as schizo. But now it seems like a truth that even the normalfags have accepted.

>>508603161
kek>>508603333
Holy quads. His power level...

>>508602822
>wasn't made from proper steel
this is the cope you're going to go with?? lmao.

>>508603507
I have consistenly found over the years that 9/11 hoaxfags generally flunked out of high school science class.

>>508602374
>gets BTFO
>Only option is to call people names
holy cope lmao

>>508602997
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRi0NTwbcOs

the plane should have done roughly what this bullet did: crumpled in the center before mushrooming outwards in all directions. The reason it looks so fake is because the jewish animators who produced it would not have been able to make it look realistic enough if they tried something like >>508602817.

The truth is that there was no flying object. It was just a bomb inside a building. They tried to do the same thing in 1993.

>>508603293
Those planes fly at a very high speed. Like 2/3 the speed of a 9mm bullet

>>508603574
The news did say that flight 93 was likely meant to strike the White House.

What's funny about flight 93 is that one of the passengers was able to make a cell phone call during a time no one else could get through because the circuits were busy. Just another miracle of 9-11

>>508603661
i´ve worked hard on it, and everyone else that questions authority and blind acceptance. // You have to choose goooddamnit.
I(me/we) can´t do it. rembember that-
You are what you belive and do. don´t blame it on the other´s when it´s your fault.

>>508603778
high school doesnt have "science" class
you mean biology? physics? chemistry?

>>508603778
That’s literally never once happened to you

>>508603894
>Anonymous (ID: 8/i8/W7U) 15 pbtid *paid shill* totally failed their mission about to get Fired.

>>508600987
This

>>508603921
>there was no flying object
explain this then.
https://youtu.be/miA8Td4oNcY?si=O6WVB1TjLsiXuhYg&t=36

>>508603894
Is there some reason you’re only replying to the name-caller (with name calling I might add) instead of the Greek or German who actually engaged your claim?

>>508604002
They also flew at higher speeds than the planes in service when the WTC was designed.

>>508604074
Thanks DVD bro

>>508603778
People are unclear on the physics one way or another. It seems like you can tell a story for one or the other.
But if you follow the people and the money, it is indeed obvious they were pulled down by thermite charges.

>>508603293
>It shouldn't be able to do that.
why not? You can shoot a ping pong ball thru a paddle if its going fast enough
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Wc-zmb3jAgo

>>508600987
>No high-rise steel-framed building has ever completely collapsed in solely due to fire
Except according to NIST, the three skyscrapers in New York City on 11 September 2001.

>The Windsor Tower in Spain held strong after a 20 hour inferno while being only partially steel framed
This.

>>508590636
There was an interview with him where he openly talked about making the decision to "pull" the building. It's probably gone now.

>>508604201
lol aluminum slicing through steel, we wont see that for another 100 years

>>508603021
Isn't it weird how terrorist attacks always blow up the most money pit buildings and ships? Like how the Titanic wasn't sunk, the older Olympic was. The titanic was sold to Europe.

>>508602549
>Besides, that's not going to do any good in a heavily oxygen starved environment as was
The buildings were ripped open and air was entering from the outside which meant the fires had access to adequate oxygen.

>>508589703
Yeah but taking down the two main towers would have done that. Joe-Q normie has never even heard of WT7, unless it's in a 'conspiracy' video as evidence that the whole thing was staged. So why bother taking it down when it wasn't hit?

>>508604469
Steel buildings don't collapse from fire.

>>508601947
This confirms it. Thanks Hans

>>508602822
I'm reading the report about the collapse and they state the steel reinforcement bars are fine. The concrete is mega cracked which they state could be due to bad construction work.
Again the two aren't really comparable as we see a much, much bigger blaze in the Brazil building and also it's almost all reinforced concrete and not steel frame construction.

>>508604402
Can I investigate your red-herring later? rn Im having fun shitting on the official narrative and all the goobers who still try to uphold it.

>>508604521
You don't actually have to get the structure of the building to melting point just hot enough that the support beams begin softening and can't support the weight of the floors above them.

>The melting point of structural steel typically ranges from 1370°C to 1530°C (2500°F to 2800°F), but its strength starts to decrease at much lower temperatures. While steel doesn't melt in typical building fires (which reach 600°C-800°C), it can lose significant strength around 600°C (1100°F).

tl;dr the fires in the towers were plenty sufficient to soften the structure enough that it failed under load

>>508604356
>while being only partially steel framed
Steel is the weak component in a fire. Concrete is much more fire resistant. I think you niggers intentionally sound stupid to make people questioning the official narrative look like retards.

>>508604575
happy to be of service
(AI Slop)
Selfless service refers to actions taken to help others without expecting anything in return, emphasizing altruism and the welfare of others without personal gain or recognition.
It is a concept found in various spiritual and philosophical traditions, including Buddhism, Hinduism, and Jainism, where it is seen as an act of devotion and sacrifice for the benefit of others and the Divine

>>508603293
>>508603921
Retards like these make it hard for the common npc to take any shit you say seriously.

A +/- 200 ton plane travellig at cca 700 kph is supposed to crumple, fold and mushrooum upon hitting a glass and steel pillar building.

>>508603021
>collapsed in the same perfect pattern as the other two
this is a memetake. not factual. the collapses of WTC1&2 were very different from WTC7. Both 1&2 collapses started right at the spots of impacts and fell down but the facades sheered off and fell far outside the footprints of the buildings ,damaging 47 others buildings in the process. WTC looked much for like a controlled demo and fell in on top of itself.

>>508604618
How is it a red herring? Both the twin towers and Olympic were destroyed, instead of more expensive items.
>>508604749
See >>508599095

>>508604809
>I think you niggers intentionally sound stupid to
You're giving them too much credit. Most hoaxtards literally don't understand elementary physics or materials science.

>>508604749
>tl;dr the fires in the towers were plenty sufficient to soften the structure enough that it failed under load
Or could it be, the thermite charges they planted in the buildings? You admit that is a possibility too right?

>>508589267 (OP)
>Why did WTC-7 collapse?
Jews.

>>508604749
If that were the case the columns would buckle at a specific point where these temperatures are reached, and the building would topple over. Not collapse in on itself. See >>508599095

>>508604879
They both fell directly down, since this was a controlled demolition. Whether the facades fell off or not, is immaterial. They have little control over that.

>>508589267 (OP)
I don't think it jet fuel can melt steel beams but I think an airplane explosion can heat up steel enough to warp it and cause it to bend under the weight

>>508605075
True. But what actually caused the building to fall was the thermite charges they placed inside.

>>508599095
That also fails remedial science class. The structure of the towers softened and then the upper floors failed and fell down onto the floors under them in a domino effect, you'd have to be very very dumb to think it would tip over like in a cartoon.

>>508589267 (OP)
>why was 6 afraid of 7
>because 7 fell at free fall speed into its footprint without being hit by anything

>>508594263
>Multifloor uncontrolled fire
>Sprinkler system had no water pressure when wtc 1 & 2 collapsed severing every water main
>Densely packed wooden desks and plastic cubicle and carpet made a hot fire
>Steel loses 80% of strength when heated to that temperature
>Steel beam construction held up until enough steel beams gave out and then house of cards collapse
>Imma post a fake webm of demo blasts as my evidence.bat

>>508605200
They had the towers rigged to go, and they pulled them down.

>>508605279
I agree that is possible anon. But what actually caused the building to collapse was the thermite charges placed on the support columns.

>>508605279
How would you get enough explosives into buildings that size to demolish them unnoticed? That would be a very extensive undertaking and require many dozens of people working for weeks.

>>508605075
>508591293

>>508605279
>Densely packed wooden desks and plastic cubicle and carpet made a hot fire
As I think was mentioned before the average office building has a huge amount of flammable material in it that would all go up like a tinderbox.

>>508605065
>They both fell directly down,
>what is gravity
Should they have fallen over? lol. Once one floor fell down on the floor below it the rest was inevitable.

>Whether the facades fell off or not, is immaterial. They have little control over that.
Not if it was a controlled demo. They have complete control of what the buildings will do when brought down. Have you heard the term implosion? WTC1&2 were not implosions and nothing like a typical controlled demolition. educate youself instead of believing memes.

>>508604937
I think 9/11 was bullshit, but not for the reasons these tards are pushing

>Unprotected steel columns and beams exposed to heavy fire. Unprotected steel columns and beams exposed to heavy fire and high heat conditions can precipitate an early collapse. Steel beams attacked by the heat of the fire causes them to expand. Steel expands approximately 9 1/2 inches per 100 feet. A fireground rule of thumb for steel expansion is one inch for every 10 feet of steel. As steel is subjected to high temperatures, it will absorb the heat until its failure temperature is reached, commonly set between 1,100 and 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit. It will then fail, often pulling or pushing down other structural members with it.

As a horizontal steel beam expands, it can push against an exterior wall, knocking the wall out of plumb and causing it to lean outward. When the steel reaches its failure temperature, it will sag and can slide down the inside of the leaning wall, exerting a tremendous pressure and violently pushing the wall outward. This can cause a 100 percent collapse of the wall, often projecting parts of the wall even farther.

The function of the failing steel structural member will determine the severity of the collapse. Failure of a beam can affect a localized area. A column failure can trigger a substantial building collapse.

>>508605279
It was a weak fire. You couldn't even see flames. Any skyscraper would turn into a blazing inferno before the fire would cause collapse

>>508605200
Go look at this video and see why you're wrong. >>508595431
When you scroll back down give me the goddamn (You) I'm owed you fat fuck

>>508605428
who placed the explosives ?
why do you wear a purple dress?

>>508589267 (OP)
A shit ton of debris & fire as hot as a forge was piling up inside of it over hours & hours
>>508589447
Those are obviously photoshopped effects, they make no effect on the building, half of them look identical & they have no relation any realistic controlled demolition spots used to bring down a building.
>>508589562
>>508589671
This shit makes no fucking sense either, the economy & political impact was too awful to make any profit in any sane way.
Larry Silverstein made what 4.8 billion but between the cost of rebuilding, inflation, chaos of both the real estate & insurance landscape in New York, nobody made any profit on 9/11.

>>508589267 (OP)
all those heavy archives stacked at the top, rookie mistake

>>508605732
E-Team from Urban Moving systems, a front for Mossad, is who planted the explosives.

>>508605793
tjey wear purple dresses ?

>>508605632
Lot of smoke for a weak fire

>>508604879
>>508605567
>Anonymous (ID: 8/i8/W7U) 19 pbtid *paid shill* totally failed their mission about to get Fired


>'controlled demolition is not an implosion'

>>508605793
Doesn't answer the question of how one could plant all those explosives and nobody saw anything.

>>508589866
fuggin check't amd KeK't and correct

That's it. That's the thread

>>508605927
exactly don´t answer that

>>508605769
>nobody made any profit on 9/11.
silly

>>508589267 (OP)
Your bestie dementia don did it. His buddy Rudy, too. He's on video several times and even on Howard Stern talking about how he wished the towers were gone.. They obstructed his view.

Go research who benefited the most monetarily from 9/11.

>don
>rudy
>blackrock

Wake up.. jesus fucking shit people..

>>508589267 (OP)
Unironically Jewish magic

>>508605927
Large buildings have engineer teams constantly working on something. Nobody notices them.

>>508605567
>Once one floor fell down on the floor below it the rest was inevitable.
If the support columns were cut, sure.
>Not if it was a controlled demo. They have complete control of what the buildings will do when brought down.
Larry Silverstein contracted with various Israeli front-groups to do work on the towers. They did work on the elevator shafts and the fire-prevention systems. They placed thermite charges on the support columns, which were detonated at their leisure. He himself said he "pulled it".

Larry Silverstein had purchased the towers the month before the attack, the first time the buildings had gone up for auction in 40 years. The leader of the Port Authority was later indicted for corruption, since his wife had taken millions in loans during their trip to Israel.

Actually the initial attack was supposed to be coordinated with truck bombs at the base. That would have trapped everyone inside, and resulted in a much higher casualty count. It was reported that a truck filled with explosives was stopped on the George Washington Bridge, although mayor Giuliani and the leader of the Port Authority stringently denied it.
Because of the dancing Isralis, the police was alerted to suspicious vans, and started stopping them on the street. That's why the truck bomb part of the plot fell through.

There were auxiliary bombs placed in the basement to help close the exits. They went off on their own, without the truck bombs being in place. Many people report being in the basement and the entire basement exploding, and there seems to be no other explanation.

They were unsure what to do , their plan was incomplete. So they made the decision to pull them down. Making sure that the damage was contained to Larry Silverstein's own property rather than damaging other surrounding properties.
Building 7 looked ridiculous collapsing without a plane hitting it, but it had to be pulled down too

>>508606019
>>508606046
The only fuckers who made any money off this are the ones who wanted more war in the middle east & defense spending budgets justified.

>>508606334
>truck bombs at the base
They tried this in 1993 and it did minimal damage

>>508606468
That's because their bombs fucked up. That was a botched FBI plot.
Remember the FBI literally sold them the bombs and gave them the idea in the first place. It ended up being totally botched though.

Those buildings were a massive problem. They were unsafe with asbestos, and it would have costed billions to tear them down. That's why they became the sitting duck for FBI terror plots.

>>508589267 (OP)

jewish space lasers

>>508589447
This video butthurted many kike shills, hope their mother dies at her sleep tonight for "dispoving" this video without actually following up with the actual info.
>Hey anons, lets believe the kike vermin again!

>>508589267 (OP)
it didn't take the vaccine

>>508605908
>gets BTFO
>seethes
>still coping with retardation
lmao

maybe leave a sincere comment in this death/thread so you can leave in vain)(

>>508606607
>FBI literally sold them the bombs
I never heard this. Are you confusing it with ok city?

>>508604809
Nobody disputed that retardbro, when we call for steel framed high rise buildings, we are not implying that steel can take the heat better, but that structurally it's much more sound than a pure concrete core that is heavy as fuck and collapses the moment something goes wrong. And all steel used in those building is required to be fireproofed for that exact reason.

>>508606334
TL;DR
>somehow collapse of WTC1&2 both started exactly at the points of impacts
lol

An anon posted this HQ pic that looks like its straight from the SD card of the original camera, few days ago.

>>508605927
Anon they have a service elevator and nobody is going to question pallets of shit being moved up if all the paperwork is good.

>>508607168
>concrete buildings collapse the moment something goes wrong
you're fucking retarded

>>508607175
DELET THIS

>>508607127
That information comes from Ryan Dawson's documentary on this, called the Empire Unmasked, You can probably find it on Odysee. Found this article on it:
https://nypost.com/2023/02/26/1993-world-trade-center-attack-was-fbis-biggest-bomb/

Anyway
9/11 occurred, coincidentally right after Bush was elected and put insane ravenous neocons all throughout the defense department. Literally 8 months after Bush was sworn in.
Those very same neocons had, 3 years prior, written about the need for a new pearl harbor to get middle eastern wars.

The attack was carried out by Saudis, but it was allowed to go through. The defense department looked the other way.
This attack also occurred in the midst of a massive Israeli spying operation, hundreds of spies were crawling all over the American east coast, and were setting up various phony business fronts. One of which was Urban Moving Systems, which employed the famous dancing israelis

>>508605075
If the plane crash was the only thing that led to the fall of the tower, why did it fall symmetrically?
Why wouldn't the side that got hit buckle first from the impact/heat of the fire, resulting it in toppling to that side instead of falling straight down?

>>508607360
Correct, concrete only high rise buildings are a failure in the making, which is why nobody is making them. We are not talking about 10 stories here.

>>508607399
Asked him very nicely to post more and tell where he found the pic and posted some random shit.
I hope /our/ inside guy spills the beans.

>>508607458
Amazing how often these people have relationships with the FBI. Terrorists, school shooters, etc...

>>508607459
>symmetrically?
lol

>>508607675
Why didn’t you answer the Greek and German? hello?

You argue very jewishly

>>508607605
Nobody makes all steel hi rises, either. You don't know shit about building construction. Concrete has compression strength and fire resistance, steel has tensile strength.

>>508605428
There are secret UFO programs that require silent cooperation from thousands if not more people, I have no problem with believing that they could use a hundred of later disposed people to pull this off

>>508606941
11 pbtid *paid shill* totally failed their mission about to get Fired.

>>508607834
He's JIDF. paid shill