What tribe/ethnicity make the best warriors?

>>508609239 (OP)
angles

Irish travellers

>>508609239 (OP)
Motivated Italians can do anything
It's just hard to motivate the lazy bastards

>>508609239 (OP)
Well let's see, which ones have conquered large parts of the globe?

Gotta go with anglos, slavs, Iberians and what the original romans were (celts). I'll throw Mongols and turks in there too though horse archers or any group were dominant before gun powder.

>>508609239 (OP)
maybe the last leftover Eurasian races that haven't been totally buck broken, Chechens, Mongolians, etc...

>>508609239 (OP)
The Chechens seem like pretty formidable fighters to me. I would not want to tangle with them unless God told me to, or if they invaded my country.

>>508609239 (OP)
Christ Jesus

>>508609677
Mongolians are so buck broken they use Cyrillic anon

>>508609629
the conquest of the world has very little to do with warlike abilities considering they were mostly facing vastly outgunned stone age tribes, it was a feat of logistics and organization for the most

>>508609970
meaningless babble, it's like saying phoenicians buck broke Greeks into using the alphabet, it's useful, thus they adopted it

>>508610077
They had their own writing system

Those who are willing will submit those who aren't
Those who are willing and able will do better
Those who are willing, able and celebrate/enjoy it will do best

Nowadays everybody is a pussy crying about warcrimes and human rights, so i guess we'll never know

>>508609239 (OP)
Finns. Duh.
>once the mightiest empire teh planet has ever seen by far
>defeated the entire USSR war machine with a handful of drunk farmers and a box of scraps

>>508610167
the Norse too, then they switched to Latin, but they weren't forced at swordpoint to do it

Celtics and Germanics. all whites in general, but a well trained Celtic/Germanic warrior is the ultimate killing machine.

>>508609239 (OP)
proto-indo euros combined indo euros of the balkans were top tier fighters, best roman soldiers and emperors came from there
also iberians, celtiberians kicked ass, were savage as fuck

gauls, germanics and of course slavs who are by far the best fighters

>>508609239 (OP)
Gothic/Scythian clans and tribes, and by extension most people descended or related to them.

>>508609997
And yet no one else except the Spanish ever even approached it.

>>508610077
Mongolians had a short lived run, but no one regularly defeated horse archers except the normans on the first crusade and the normans basically never lost.

>>508609358
Didnt the Angles lose to rome the vikings and king arthur??

>>508609239 (OP)
People are coddled today so the historical ones are either not interested or fat. Pound for pound (both in numbers and money) probably Afghans desu.

>>508609507
This. Even the WWII savoy cavalry defeated a Russian batalion 3x larger than them. You just have to get them motivated to get off their ass and stop drinking wine

>>508610644
>France on top
Interesting. Then how come they have the reputation of being pushovers waving white flags at the mildest inconvenience? Is it all because of WW2?

>>508610943
1871 also.

>>508609239 (OP)
Warriors are made not born.

You have to ask what society and environment produces man that are true to there word, what values true to warriors needs are rewarded.

Intelligence, honesty, truffullness, loyalty. Key points of a warrior.

Any society that rewards lies, body values, straight in line thinking makes for weak soilders.

Bodys can be shaped by effort but characters are build throu life and the envoirment. That is something you cant teach, cant copy and paste.

>>508610943
Non stop anglo governement black propaganda

>>508611042
1871 is even worse, we didn’t surrender, at least not Paris, but rural subhumans were so jealous of Parisians (aka their buddies who could compete in the big cities and who came from all over France) that they were manipulated by Bismarck to side with the invaders against themselves and shoot at the French army

VERY similar situation to how Hannibal Barca managed to recruit rural Italians in his army while he was attempting to fight Rome. The big difference was that by then cannons existed and made sieges impossible

>>508611400
Bismark was one of a kind in history. The world may never see another like him.

Two blemishes on an otherwise mighty record by the French people.

>>508610943
Only among the historically illiterate. Overall they did ok in WWII anyway taking the whole war (we also lost in May-June 1940 but no one seems to care and German leaders viewed them highly). It's mostly a US psyop against the one western country that was showing a modicum of independence (not anymore, they're total cucks like the rest of us).

the ones who are willing to fight.

>>508609239 (OP)
The organized ones

>>508609239 (OP)
Completely irrelevant until 30,000 years from now when the primarchs are born

>>508610077
>>508609873
>>508609677
Do you guys have any idea how hard the Russians genocided Chechens and other Caucasians? They completely terrorized them, genocided them and displaced them from their homes and sent them to Kazakhstan. I think Stalin invited them back to Chechnya otherwise they were completely fucked.

Don't fall for the "le ebin strong warrior" meme, they only live because Russians decided to let them live.

>>508610510
not underplaying the Spanish at all, it's just not really a feat of warriors as much as a feat of highly organized and adventurous people, even the way they conquered the native empires has more to do with wit and political acumen in playing them against each other rather than swords and horses

also I didn't say Mongolians due to Genghis, I'm talking about modern Eurasians who having maintained some political autonomy haven't gone through the processes of self-taming as much and have maintained some kind of violence-prone honor-based culture without being retarded niggers, hence why I mentioned Chechens as well, even if the latter much more than Mongolians have been brought to obedience of Russia not without many losses on the Russian side due to their stubborness

there really is a difference between a soldier and a warrior anyway, soldiers can be ok warriors but not necessarily, warriors can be horrible soldiers, soldiering has much more to do with tolerating toil and orders, it's kinda the old Roman vs Germanic, the Roman soldier individually 1to1 might not have been much but in legions they kicked ass, while Germanics were fierce and warlike but didn't really tolerate that kind of life
one could say the best spot to be in is when you are in the process of having made good soldiers out of a living warlike people and you are able to get the best of both, fearless and violent groups of men who also follow orders and maintain discipline

>>508610173
>Nowadays everybody is a pussy crying about warcrimes and human rights, so i guess we'll never know
Nigger you fucking heebs jest spent EIGHTY FUCKING YEARS bitching about a bad summer camp experience you had in Germany. I don't want to hear it.

>>508612174
Lel

>>508611545
It’s really crazy how similar 1870 was to the Punic wars

In both cases there is a mighty empire of superior western Latin cultured people, who are attacked by lowlife scum barbarian peoples, in both cases the empire is ruled by an elite of based geniuses who live in a city state that controls the empire, in both cases armies are made up of mostly low quality rural trash and are destroyed by the invader, in both cases despite the total annihilation and encirclement of the armies, the city state capital refuses to surrender or even so much as negotiate, in both cases the capital citizen instantly form new armies of volunteers to continue the war while the invading leader recruits the jealous and angsty rural retards ruled over by the mighty and superior city state

It all came down to Rome having walls that Hannibal couldn’t breach while Paris had walls that the weapons of the time could breach

The other lesson is to have the high quality people/triarii as reservists even before the Zerg troops/Hastatii get annihilated

>>508609239 (OP)
Probably the Thracians. They were the kings of the Roman Arenas which had people from anywhere in Europe

>>508610629
>lose to rome
anglos weren't permanently settled on the isles before the romans retard
>the vikings
assimilated one warrior culture into another, how is uniting england under anglos post-danelaw a "loss" ?
>king arthur
not a real historical figure retard
the only time we truly lost was when harold godwinson lost in 1066 to the norman conquerors
>>508609239 (OP)
objectively angles, britain has invaded 95% of countries on earth and has a very high success % in battles

>>508612260
Irony is the finest comedy.

>>508612436
Bvlgarians

>>508609239 (OP)
>MARCH OF THE TITANS
kek

>>508613262
part 2

>>508612565
The English are not a martial society, a real martial society looks like the Roman republic, not a people who are deeply distrustful of even having an army, as the English historically were. Maybe things could have been different, but that's the direct English culture took after 1066. Americans are more like the Romans than the English are, but even we look like a relatively feminine compared to them.

>>508613313
part 3

>>508609239 (OP)
I think times and technology really change things. Being a Giant is more of a burden for military organizations, than it was 500 years ago, when skirmishes were a things.

Best "warriors" now, might be guys in their mom's basement that can fly a drone better than any pilot ever could.

>>508609239 (OP)
They're starting project bluebeam, whatever you do, do not board the ships, frens.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/uY_xgaPRYxA

>>508609239 (OP)
Mexicans, Polynesians, Arabs, whites and Vietnamese

>>508609873
Chechen mortarmen of 2000's were....yea bretty gud
Like 1990-2010 chechen mortarmen

>>508609873
Yeah but they don't count as human
>>508609239 (OP)
All, it depends on the individual

>>508612126
I don't really agree with the differentiation between soldier and warrior. Back in the days of medieval hosts men at arms still were disciplined for not following orders. Also the germanics were organized enough to bring down rome. And if we are going to go that route a lot ameri-indians would make the cut. I know Europeans don't think a ton of them, but that's because you didn't have to fight them. They were very brave and fierce. There just weren't a lot of them after the plague.

>>508613352
The USA is going the way of the movie Idiocracy if you aren't careful, your education system is way beyond fuckd, you have an overwhelming percentage of low IQ mongs.
You fuckers need to fuckin shape up yesterday or earlier.

>>508609677
Chechen and Mongols are/were sadistic subhumans (just look what churkas and turco-mongols did to white people in Ukraine).
Being bestial at war acting like a total sauvage doesn't mean being a good warrior.

>>508612325
The real similarity in my opinion is that in both cases the "latins" were led by incompetents. Well some of the early romans defeated by Hannibal were modestly competent in the type of grinding warfare without flanking. In the case of the Prussians they were just better at everything militarily than the French were at the time. Plus they had competent leaders.

>>508614004
look at the very origins of medieval warfare and how utterly different it was from Roman mass soldiery, what you have in the middle ages is kinda my point, it has its origins in small-ish bands of warlike people, not soldiery culture, you have a slow transformation into the latter as the aristocracy also begins to become less and less directly involved in battle
by the time Germanics were marauding Rome they were still getting routinely kicked in the teeth by standing Roman armies, it's just that the empire was a clownshow that at some point couldn't manage to maintain said armies anymore after defeats that to Republican Romans would be a tiny inconvenience
I did think about Amerindians in WW2 actually and I would've included them but nowadays I think they are kinda broken in their own ways

Any faggot country from the Balkan, those niggas crazy

>>508609239 (OP)
>Warrior
Sparta
>Soldier
Any good organised white people

>>508609239 (OP)
Based upon the history of combat sport, I hate to say it, it’s probably niggers if it’s just one man vs another with a club/sword/other melee weapon.
They’re closer to animals than human beings and possess every conceivable physical advantage other than static pushing/lifting strength.
Once gunpowder comes into play and essentially even the Orks could be beaten by humans then it’s probably Germans.

>>508609239 (OP)
>What tribe/ethnicity make the best warriors?

What does "warrior" even mean anymore? Most willing to die for rich people?

>>508614601
Medieval hosts were composed mostly of knights and men at arms who basically spent their entire lives training. Is that more soldiery or more warriory? Idk but I don't see a huge difference other than knights had a knack for charging at the wrong time. The aristocracy was still heavily involved in warfare throughout the middle ages. It was more reformation period that they began to get away from that at least up north where my anscestors were from. Yeah the romans could defeat the germanics until they couldn't. And yeah they were a clownshow by the end. But is that because they were clowns or because the germanics were no longer clowns? Probably both.

>>508614134
yes we know all that
>sads

>>508614992
Combat sport are utterly irrelevant to real fighting.

>>508609239 (OP)
1. Caucasian mountain muslims/Chechens
2. Pinoys
3. Rural Appalachia natives
4. Japanese
5. Pacific Islanders

>>508612565
>could only conquer spearchuckers
Sad

Historically, Spartans and Romans. Then the Sacred Germanic-Roman Empire. Superior to anyone else in History. These guys created Western culture. We would not exist withouth them.

>>508609239 (OP)
Celts

>>508619770
Yay pretty much.

>>508619770
Do you mean that ethnicity that was brutally fucked by everyone in history? All the former Celtic lands now speak Italic and Germanic languages.

>>508609453
Examples?

>>508609239 (OP)

Whites, because we know how to team up and watch each others backs, Its in our DNA from being bred in harsh conditions surrounded by cunts on all sides, Hey maybe we really are the lost tribes

>>508609239 (OP)
Honestly it likely depends on the meta/rules of engagement.

Depends on the terrain.

>>508609239 (OP)
Today or Historically. Because if it's Historically. Probably Spartans.

>>508609239 (OP)
The Dutch, of course
Caesar, Napoleon and Hitler would all tell you the same thing

>>508609239 (OP)
Meds.
The romans, greeks, the spanish and the portuguese proved it.

>>508618850
Have you researched this? It's a real particular list.
>2. Pinoys
I don't know about this Hans. Their historical record isn't all that great. Some pacific islanders like maori def deserve some recognition for standing up to the british and they've maintained their pride/honour quite well

>>508609239 (OP)
Dolichocephalic light-eyed English and Scottish. Preferably those who come from broken homes.

>>508609939
>https://www.youtube.com/shorts/9D7FjSFzNvo
Facts

>>508617408
The physical realities of life inform the state of combat sport and its those realities that would influence combat. As I said, if it’s just one big brute vs another with a club I’d expect the one that can bludgeon the other faster and harder to win, and as sport also proves, there’s almost no level of talent that can overcome such excessive physical advantages, like fighting a gorilla, racing against a cheetah, or swimming against a dolphin.

the vikings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTPDmZx3gKk

>>508614992
>Based upon the history of combat sport
retard
>>508613346
>The English are not a martial society,
retard >>508610644

>>508618850
The only reason Chechens and other hairy mudslime mountain niggers like them are so prevalent in UFC is because their mudslime rage and the fact that they’re often raised in counties in Europe, and therefore have an invaders psychology, raises their testosterone to levels that most white men can’t legally reach.

So they’re effectively winning because of juice, its just that for them it’s a natural consequence of being a mindless savage who’s been raised his whole life to view everyone in the society he’s been dragged to as an enemy.

Jews they are ruling everyone

>>508611833
This.

>>508610454
this, those people are the strongest and most capable warriors in history

卐THIS TIME THE WORLD // WHITE POWER卐

WE WILL RISE UP AGAIN,

There's a reason Jews would rather you obsess over Rome than the Barbarians.

Asha Logos on the barbarians:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLN29_DFNgg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kLYLwWIx30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HX8ljqgNH10


Watch/Rewatch Asha Logos to enjoy white history without jewish bullshit (keep in mind that he later fell into the psyop of Christian identity, his early videos are fine tho)

https://www.youtube.com/@ashalogos9221/videos

>>508609239 (OP)
Iberians, Afghans, Yemenis

>>508610644
Does it count HRE victories under Germany?

>>508610644
>rome only won 260 battles
wat

>>508619401
"Then the Sacred Germanic-Roman Empire. Superior to anyone else in History. These guys created Western culture."
LOL

>>508609629
what kind of historical revisionism is that?
the roman kingdom and roman republic spent much of their history defeating celts left and right
the empire was founded only after julius caesar destroyed the celts powers in gaul
they were indoeuropeans like the latins in rome, but not closely related to them in any way whatsoever
i imagine the celts were more closely related to proto germans, slavs and other northern indoeuropean branches than the italics

>>508627988
Actually Celts and Italics were very closely related, they were genetically the same people before the invasion of Italy and their language were very similar even long time after.
But Italics developed their own identity since before entering in Italy and they were a kind of half-way between Celts and Germanics.
This said, Italics were a different group when they defeated Gauls and muttoids invent absurde copes to not admit that ancient Romans were genetically like modern Italians because they are envious of us.

>>508609239 (OP)
Far east europeans. Look who dominate sports. Germany would’ve murdered the entirety of europe if not for Russia.

>>508630975
Hooked Jewish claws typed this.
PS: What's "far east europeans"? No such thing.

>>508621912
A lot of the current world we live in is because of the accomplishments of spain/france(which created england as we know it)/italy. They may have lost their original celt language/culture but the people themselves remain formidable warriors

>>508609239 (OP)

I'm going to say Pashtuns

>>508627048
That's still a lot. Ancient warfare was very concentrated on giant battles. Alexander only really fought a dozen battles including the large sieges and it got him from Greece to the conquest of the present land of Pakistan.

>>508613346
England was historically rather martial. The reason we didn't have conscription until the mid 20th century is not even really because muh freedums (although it plays a role), it's because military higher ups never saw the point because they never were short of voluntaries for the army and navy whenever they called for it.
The reason half the European pirates were Englishmen is just that there were so many people from here going into naval armed forces, which didn't get a command structure developed enough to enforce discipline over that mass of militarised sailors until the close of the 18th century.
Of course it's less martial than complete madmen like Republican Rome or warring city states of pre-Macedonian Greece where a third of the men were soldiers.

>>508633609
Celts didn't create Italy at all and abour England, they inhabitated the land but then they were first military and culturally conquered by the Romans and then replaced by the Anglo-Saxon. England as we know it today is mostly Germanic influenced by Latin culture while the Celtic component is now just about half of the people's blood. The British Empire was made by Germanic Anglo-Saxond and Vikings and Latin-Germanic Normans.
They were strong warriors yes but still they never defeated another ethnicity and they were culturally (and in some case ethnically) erased bu the Italics from the south and the Germanics from the east.

>>508609873
ahahaha, picrel is russian meme about going fight 1 vs 1 against chechen. they are like typical middle east "fighters" i won't even go into details as everyone know this type very well

>>508628812
kys lombard. hail dea Britannia!
>>508627988

>>508638077

the english were conquered by rome, the angles, saxons, vikings, normans, the dutch had a go at them, then the jews conquered them and now the pakis will take them - they conquered the greatest empire the world has ever seen by swindling the locals and shooting with guns, peoples armed with bows, arrows and spears - they are a nation of shitebags who love gay sex - all anglos are poofs

>>508609239 (OP)
I’m German Rhine/Old Frankish and Hungarian Slav. I’m telling you that is the best warrior. My head is in the 97th percentile, extremely wide and dense skeletal frame, I look like I weigh 250 but I am 328 and at 36 at my physical factory job I move I move 3x faster than everyone around me. The downside is arthritis and join and spine getting ruined by fast and heavy impacts which in turn make you disabled after war age.

>>508609239 (OP)
Judah

>>508638716
shut up shitskin you are nothing

>>508609239 (OP)
Dinaric mountains in the Balkans

>So why didn't they conquer the world?

They're good warriors but low IQ af and inbred

>>508609239 (OP)
>best warriors?
Border Reavers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQxzKoAcaIA

>>508623187
that one movie from that lock stock guy, richie something, sold out to disney and was married to bogdonna
i can't remember any of these hollyjewers, it's like my brain just started autodeleting irrelevant names and things when i found out they were fake and gay

>>508609239 (OP)
Blacks exceed in non-state environments.

>>508641933
wtf does this even mean? as in a state of non-existence? because yea that would make sense, only place they can win is in the void, because in reality they never left straw huts in their own 'non-state'

>>508609239 (OP)
The mongols unironically only had respect for the russians. For hundreds of years, the swiss were hired by every ruler in europe who needed good warriors.

>>508638077
Probably you wanted to say "Thanks for civilizing us"... you're welcome.
You wuzn't Romans, you are basically Germanic, also things related to post-war Troy are just legend, like Aeneas as an ancestors of the Romans too.
And I'm not Lombard thanks to the Gods, I'm Italic.

>>508609239 (OP)
Indians. We are weak and silly, so it throws you off guard. We are large bioweapons so we just have to exist to destroy entire countries. We wield powerful weapons like curry diarrhea blast, smegma enhanced piss, turmeric burp burst, underarm garlic stench, and we have natural techniques to enhance delivery like head bobbing and yoga for maximum AoE. You just can't compete bloody

There is not such thing
War is about technology money and how motivated you are
If we talk right now about martial art level probably georgians and dagestanis

>>508643917
I think he means like "genetic potential" for combat. If resources/technology weren't a limitation, who would have the greatest potential as warfighters