Thread 508637502

To look at women.

I don't look at women anyway

>>508637502 (OP)
does that mean you gotta close your eyes when you rape them

>>508637502 (OP)
Yup

>>508637502 (OP)
it's okay you can stare at people as long as its not in a sexual nature
you can give anybody you want a prolonged look of contempt as long as you prove it isn't sexual

It's also illegal in the UK to buy cream without a liscence...no wait, that's the USA lmao

>>508637502 (OP)
Good

>>508637612
take note of the color of the eyes in the image. those are not brown eyes.

>>508637502 (OP)
Yeah but it doesn’t apply to shitskins so most of this board is good to stare. White dudes in Britain are of course double fucked

It's also illegal to sell items outside of designated zones in the UK...oh wait, that's the USA lmao

>>508637577
That will also be illegal soon

>>508637502 (OP)
Remove their rights before they just castrate you at birth.

It's also illegal to let your child walk alone in the UK...no wait, that's the USA lmao.

>>508637873
Just genocide them already. The humiliation is pointless. It comes off as lazy

is the UK just a humiliation ritual now? honestly starting to feel bad for some of them

>>508637759
>>508637862
>>508637941
it really isnt worth getting into a pissing match with america as a fucking bong, you'd have better luck against the germans maybe and id still say germany is less cucked

>>508637862
>>508637759
I am rather offended by the images and statements you're making. Are you prepared to be arrested for causing me anxiety?

>>508637759
you probably cant even buy those at all in the uk, and if you can. its probably some baby proof shit you cant even huff...

>>508637862
No it's not. Those are there for people selling stuff to strangers who want to lower the risk of being robbed. You can swap anywhere.

It's just safer to do it in front of or within sight of a police station.

>>508637759
anyone under the age of 21 probably doesnt have a valid reason for buying it anyway, valid law

>>508637502 (OP)
notice how the eyes are blue

Based, women are ugly.

hehe

>>508638027
its his means of coping that burgermen are somehow superior
you have to have some pride haha

>>508638228
>men carry weapons on them literally everywhere they go for thousands of years
>suddenly jewish faggots don't want you to do that

ALL the more reason to carry a nigger-gutter

>>508637502 (OP)
mashallah

>>508637862
This is actually a great idea. I used to flip phones as a side hustle. You can make money, but you have to deal with some sketchy fuckers now and then. The police station is the olny place I would ever meet to do business. If someone refused and wanted to meet someplace else, that told me all I needed to know. No deals anywhere except the police station.

>>508637502 (OP)
The style of this poster feels like there should be Ingsoc logo somewhere in the corner.

>>508637502 (OP)
who cares about women, what about MEn? im tired of fatties looking at me

>>508638319
oi you got a loicense to butter that toast bruv

>>508637502 (OP)
The best/worst part about this is that it'll never be levied against the people who are doing it because they're not white.

>>508638319
what weapons are brits allowed to have for self defense? Are they even allowed to defend themselves?

>>508638027
>it really isnt worth getting into a pissing match with america as a fucking bong
why not finnbro? we're provably better than they are. they just look good to a slow-minded snow monkey such as yourself because, they're standing on the shoulders of giants.

>>508638027
Bruh the only reason your irrelevant shitty country never gets called out on anything is because nobody knows (or cares) a thing about fucking Finland lmao.

>>508637502 (OP)
Not a problem, just grow your beard out and put on that silly outfit and you can rape them to your hearts content. Just be sure to say you're muslim if you get caught

>>508638733
>we wuz kangs
you know it truly is over when you start doing this unironically

>>508638863
>wuz
are

>>508638733
>we're provably better than they are

>>508637502 (OP)
OI U GOT A LOICENSE TO BE GANDERING AROUND?!?!?

Add 'starers' to the list

>>508637759
>the further America drifts from its anti-British founding the more totalitarian and shitty America becomes
Go figure

>>508638095
Literal NPC opinion. For some reason, 20 year olds are expected to live independently on their own, but can't buy certain things even though they're adults.

>>508638733
>nation with rich history of achievement
>supplanted and destroyed by brown skins in the space of 80 years
in 50 years no one will even remember what a 'britton' was. truth is youre every bit as cucked as we are, you just live under the aristocrats boot in addition to the sanhedrins.

>>508638898
lets see a picture of this there king of yours

>>508637502 (OP)
does chef ramsay need a special license for those really fancy knoifs they use in restaurants?

this is a legit question that needs an answer

>>508638733
All the good Europeans moved here 200 years ago.
Cope.

>>508637502 (OP)
Cover them in burkas so britbongs don't stare.... OOooOoOooPS! I forgot they are being converted to a Muslim shithole teehee! Britbongs are halfway there already

>>508639066
>in 50 years no one will even remember what a 'britton' was.
You're not even 250 years old yet faggot and everything you are, will be or have ever been, is derived from us. give us a shout when you reach half a millennia. Then you'll only have another 3000 years or some shit before you catch us up.

>>508639671
Don’t do the Chinese thing. The Romans didn’t find a civilization when Caesar crossed the channel. They found aboriginal britons who lived in peat bogs

>>508639038
well seems to me the problem is that, not that some fattening topping that people use for a high that is often lethal requires an ID
its not like im trying to justify everything uk does you know

>>508639671
You can literally get thrown behind bars for calling someone a nigger. Here in America, you don't.

the future is uzbeki

>>508637845
Subtle. Good observation.

>>508637502 (OP)
How do you define "intrusive staring of a sexual nature"? Is there like a graph or something? Like, is there now a time limit on looking at women? How long is it? Five seconds?

>>508638114
i did.

>>508638715
The UK has some of the most limited self defense laws in Europe. You cant carry any kind of defensive weapon, and what constitutes self defense is completely arbitrary. Just going off what I can find omline using ANY kind of weapon instantly makes things very bad for you. Also it seems that even in situations where you were entirely justified in defending yourself you still have to go to court.

>>508638715
>allowed
it's called concealing your weapon and running from the body

>>508639824
>The Romans didn’t find a civilization when Caesar crossed the channel
caesar stayed for about 10mins.
>aboriginal britons who lived in peat bogs
we were known for tin mining throughout the western mediterranean and iberia for over 1000years before faggot caesar plucked up the courage to cross the channel.

>>508639917
>Here in America, you don't.
chitwood literally locks you up for anything you post online and in half the states you can't even deny the holocaust. so much for freedom of speech.

>>508637577
Based faggot

I knew this was gonna happen. It'll get worse. Eventually it will be illegal to just be a man.
>A MAN WALKING RECREATIONALLY? RAPE RAPE RAPE
>meanwhile the brownification of europe will run trains over these women so they feel liberated

>>508637759
Wow, nice PWN epic even. The score is now
>USA 6,000,000 : UK 1

>>508637845
>>508638114
>blue eyes
Nice catch.
We should emphasize the "socialized losses + privatized gains" aspect to feminism more, since opposition to that is a central theme in the modern zeitgeist. Muslims/celebrities/dudebros/etc get to be sexually extroverted (privatized gains), but the guilt for any inappropriate behavior is shared among all men or sometimes even among white men only (socialized losses). Anyone who grew up during or after the financial crisis is going to see socialized losses + privatized gains as one of the great demons of our time regardless of whether they are left, right, red, blue etc. Tapping into central themes of the zeitgeist like this is how you win over the masses.

>>508640069
Like most people will either look away immediately when you make eye contact or, if they're the bantering type, they'll smile or say something in passing. Actual staring is creepy cunt material and you should probably be prepared for some shit.

>>508638027
Every single bong is as adamant as chinks and pajeets that their country is better than others. I've lost count of the number of times someone from the UK has talked about how the world is a leftist police state before claiming their own country isn't that bad. Shit, I've seen several claim that Scotland is the one based part of the UK, AFTER the Count Dankula pug incident. At least Canadians don't hesitate to admit that their country sucks dick.

>>508640563
>a brit lecturing me on freedom of speech
Can't make this shit up

>>508640025
These guys look tough

>>508640069
It's a function of how ugly you are. If you are Chad you can stare at her for over a minute uninterrupted and she will be over the moon
>omg do you think chad likes me?!?
If you are ugly and a woman walks around a corner and into your peripheral vision then you are off to jail.

>>508640791
What are you even saying? This is a bot? You didn't answer any of my questions.

>>508638492
if anyone ever asks me to meet at a police station im deleting their number

>>508637502 (OP)
Of course they choose blue eyes

>>508640791
>Oi! You got a loicense for that bantering and smoiling?

>>508640823
Americans claim their country is the greatest country in the world.

>>508640928
I'm saying normal people are too polite to keep staring once they've seen you've noticed them, so if they do they're probably trouble.

>>508638114
>her

Nice try rabbi

>>508641158
name a better one

>>508641303
Finland

>>508640983
Black hands wrote this

>>508640563
you brits are so backwards, that people have to literally do polls to remove gay shit from long standing british games.

https://steamcommunity.com/app/1343370/discussions/0/592900638661173211/

>>508641196
Okay, I understand that, but again it does not tackle any of my questions. This is a serious issue. If there are no established rules you could be charged at any time for any reason. Maybe a woman thought that the one second you looked at har was enough to be called harrasment. What if you are looking at something behind a woman, and she doesn't catch that?

>>508640889
>>508641435
>double reply
smells like cope.

>>508637759
This is for nitrous oxide though not whip cream

>>508641303
Japan

>>508637502 (OP)
> staring of a sexual nature
How is this even defined? Looking for longer than 10 seconds continuously at some woman's buttocks or décolleté?

>>508641383
meet me at the toronto bolice station

>>508641362
i pay 40% tax and i dont even make that much money

>>508638018
I'm at the point where I'm fantasising about going to the Russian, Chinese or Iranian embassy and offering to spy for them or whatever. Doubt they'd have any use for me, but that's how much I hate the regime. (I'd like to make calling the uniparty/establishment "the regime" a thing.)

>>508637862
Doesn’t say anything about anything being illegal though

>>508637502 (OP)
Funny how they make the eyes blue, we all know it's the pakis and africans doing it.

>>508641612
You aren't surrounded by fat americans all day though.

>>508637873
It will be mandatory for men rated by women as 7+/10 to look at them, and illegal for those 6-/10.
BAME get an exemption.
I give it until 2028 max for this to be law of the land.

>>508637502 (OP)
But what if it is part of your culture to stare?

>>508637941
Keep coping Nigel

>>508641735
fat americans appreciate hard work instead of crying for communism because neighbour earns 50 euros more a month

>>508637502 (OP)
>blue eyes
there's a reason you never see the photos of any of these perpetrators

Do bongs really go to jail for face crime?

>>508641793
I can not comprehend how unsettling it must be to just be sunbathing at a beach and all of a sudden, you're surrounded by pajeets staring at you.

>>508641468
Fair enough, things could be misconstrued so I suppose there would have to be some time limit. It's difficult to judge because I guess for most people it's that predator gaze that puts you on edge. Like they're staring so hard you assume they're going to do something. But until they do no crime has been committed and some people would definitely abuse it.

>>508641083
Up to date m8 :3

>>508642041
That’s their culture, bigot

>>508638783
Bruh the only reason why Finland is "irrelevant" is because of 5 million population. Per capita Finns are way more innovative and productive than bongs or Americans. All the Nordic countries are.

>>508637502 (OP)
We made the eyes blue and the letters around the eyes white but don't read anything into it, we're obviously not using super subtle propaganda to push an anti-White narrative haha don't be silly!
Oh, here's comes Mohammed – remember to avert your eyes! Right. Maybe just crouch down a bit for him? Cultural custom innit.

>>508642182
It must be those chinky eyes.

>>508638783
You aren't even british, you're a norman rape baby.
Only the welsh are real brittons.

>>508637502 (OP)
>OI
>YOU GOT A LOICENSE FOR THAT LEERING

>>508641793
it's not an issue in that case because women see non whites the same way they view small animals: helpless and inoffensive. So they see it as endearing and enriching

There was a 3 second maximum when looking at women that were working on the construction site

>>508637502 (OP)
>BTP
It's not a law, but staring at a women in a creepy way for like 30 minutes to the point of making someone uncomfortable like Indians do should be illegal imo.
It's in response to those videos of creepy Indian men who get caught staring at women who don't want to be stared at for 20 minutes on public transport, this is harassment.
It's not really an issue for bongs generally who generally go for glances, it's aimed at migrants for the most part.
>>508640889
The holocaust isn't real
I cannot be arrested for this. You can (in some states)
Cope.

I can also call for the death of my politicians, you will get a visit from the FBI.

There are different types of freedom, I just cant openly call people religious, racial or gendered slurs and incite violence towards members of the public.
That's basically it.

>>508643070
>The holocaust isn't real
>I cannot be arrested for this
but youll get arrested and then killed in prison for putting a bacon sandwich in front of a mosque
god bless the great caliphate of britain

>>508637502 (OP)
We will fight back with civil disobedience. British women will be stared at by brown invaders.

>>508642344
careful, you're offending him. he may go to the bobbies to file a hate speech report.

>>508643188
Why would I do that though.
I want them all deported, but why would I waste bacon on some stupid protest.
I bet you dont even put bacon in front of mosques even with that freedom.

>>508637502 (OP)
Then why do they push sexual propaganda in the media onto children from birth? They create an addiction to control people.

>>508643304
insallah

>>508643070
You can’t be critical of your country’s immigration policy though lmao

>>508643574
Can't I? Funny how it's a common topic in newspapers and talkshows, in the street, people I talk to, websites and message apps.
Yes I can. Point me to a law where I can't.

>>508640607
you're a slave to your animal instincts subhuman, barking at a free man like your jewish masters told you to

The UK is really speedrunning building a dystopia...

>>508643913
Most of it's pretend.

>>508637502 (OP)
Who would stare at ugly limeys anyway ?!

>>508643070
>The holocaust isn't real
>I cannot be arrested for this
I wouldn't be so sure. Just because we don't have a specific crime of holocaust denial (yet), that doesn't mean you can't be charged under e.g. the Communications Act or the Racial and Religious Hatred Act.
>I can also call for the death of my politicians
And you might get away with it... or you might be jailed.
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/jail-emails-female-conservative-tory-mp-b2557451.html

>>508637502 (OP)
Only if you're White

>>508639593
Europe resisted jews for 80 years longer than Americans did

>>508640377
You can't have anything if its for "defence". You can however grab something in the heat of the moment and use it provided you use it in a proportional manner.
>Man assaults me
>I grab for something that happens to be a knife and he gets slashed
Because I didn't bring the knife specifically I'd get off even if the guy died. However:
>I grab for something that happens to be a knife and he gets stabbed
Then I might go to prison because stabbing is less defensive than slashing is. But:
>if I placed a knife with the intent to use it to fend off intruders
Then I go to prison for using a deadly weapon.
Its beyond cucked. I should be able to blow away intruders with a double barrel shotgun then stand over the guy and use the second shot to make sure.

>>508640412
stop coping like a bitch

>>508643574
They can, but the trick is to not discriminate in the process. So you can't say "ban all Muslim immigrants", but you could say "ban all immigrants from countries that weren't part of the British empire" for example.

>> https://www.gov.uk/discrimination-your-rights
> It is against the law to discriminate against anyone because of:
> * race including colour, nationality, ethnic or national origin
> * religion or belief

One time I fell asleep in a waiting room (I had already been there for over 12 hours, cut me some slack). I was wearing sunglasses dark enough that you could not see my eyes. Some crazy bitch from the other end of the waiting room decided that, since she couldn't see my eyes, that must've meant I was staring at her and decided to wake me up by screaming in my face.

>>508644463
>I grab for a knife from the knife dispenser we have on every corner
mental illness or bot

>>508637502 (OP)
OP, have you ever seen British women? This is a rare example of their government doing men a favor.

Does the UK have something as ridiculous as the ADA? Imagine somebody with absence seizures getting arrested.

>>508637904
You wanna know how I can tell this was written by ChatGPT?

>>508637502 (OP)
>Staring is illegal
Sure, but you can still glance, gaze or notice.

>>508637502 (OP)
*shitskins will be immune to punishment for this offense

Evermore reason to feast your unyielding eyes on
GLORIA STIRPI