>>508646699Only when Man is allowed the control and dominance he ontologically must have over women can such protection that you speak of be expected of Man.
When Man cannot put his hand of woman to teach her proper behaviour, he cannot be expected to risk his blood to protect her.
Man warred because a wife at home would submit to him. That was the fundamental contract of humanity. This is no longer the case and women are half of the reason for this -the other half being j*ws-.
It was as simple as not stealing the apple and, yet, woman could not stop herself from being corrupted. In the absence of Man, woman is weak and a liability.