It's over.

It turns out that:
>the number is actually 1.5 billion less than previous estimates
>Because indians aren't technically human

>>508788689 (OP)
QRD faggot?

>>508788689 (OP)
Great story, Guido. Nice link and follow-up, faggot.

>>508788689 (OP)
The earth is flat and there's only 5 million people.
They say there are much more to make you feel less special.

>>508788835
>>508788838
>>508788912
>>508788972

>>508788689 (OP)
If anyone read the article it says it's probably more than previously stated, because they failed to count a lot of people living rural. It didn't seem to give an updated number however.

I prefer the theory that there's actually less people on the planet because countries pretend to have more people than they really do

Travelcel here, I thought this for years
There's around 1 billion max

I watched a video saying there are only 500,000 Chinese.

There are actually 2 billion Jeets.
This has been suspected for a while.

>>508788689 (OP)
Shitskins are not human

>>508788689 (OP)
The answer is that there is way too fucking many and humans are a pest. That's why nobody should care when they die

>>508788689 (OP)
ive thought this for years, what amount do they say now? I would bet good money there is not more than 3b people on this planet and ive been to 56 countries and every major us city

>>508789057
Slaves weren't counted in ancient census, and africans, Indians and the Native Americans never did them. This chart is really bullshit

there's another 2 billion people on the planet and they're pannicking and will rush out an unfinished human version of the mosquito castration virus

>>508788689 (OP)
>look mom, I posted it again.

>>508788689 (OP)
>Third world shitholes don't have reliable statistics
I'm shocked!

>>508788689 (OP)
Cities have all the people.
It's 2 - 3 billion maximum.
The rest are to manipulate votes.

>>508789509
Can also be used to manipulate GDP, military strength, and so on

>>508788689 (OP)
I've been seeing this exact fucking article for the past 2 months. Who is pushing this shit and why

I've no idea why anyone would think that the elites would give accurate population info to the plebs, even if they had it.
They lie about literally everything else so why not that too.

>>508789057
Is this the incorrect projection or the correct one?

>>508788689 (OP)
china lied

>>508789796
Bear run inc

This is the source

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-56906-7

Real global population is closer to 9 billion than 8 (the paper doesn't cover this, but you can extrapolate the data).

>>508789057
No one knows the accuracy of any of those numbers, including the current one. You think they counted all of the people in rural Australia and Africa and Asia and South America? Did they count the people inside the hole in Antarctica? How about the underground lizard people? Seriously, though, none of these numbers can be accurate even without considering fictional people. Additionally, in the most populous area, millions are in hiding. "Go ahead and answer the census. We won't deport you." Famous last advice to an illegal, or at least, even in the most liberal areas that have no intention of deporting them, that's what they'll think.

I don't know what the possible combined margin of error this could possibly be, but we've bred like rabbits, especially in the areas that lack the infrastructure to truly know who's who and living where.

True. I know a lot of Jeets coming to USA stack 2 or 3 high.