Thread 508931908

Do they still have it?
Post your nuclear face

I think it's not actually beneficial in most circumstances to have the largest nuke possible. A lot of smaller nukes that can fit in the same missile seems to make more strategic sense.

Will they enter the battlefield? Were the parades just for show, like a paper mâché float in your local town's homecoming?

>>508932169
At the end of the game, the king and pawns end up in the same box.

Agreed, it is pointless to go with the bigger is better approach. The enviornmental devastation and rebuilding would take hundreds of years to recover alone.

China sits out, but certainly won't part with theirs. They enjoy the cold war sentiment too much. Who is actually the most likely to turn the key?

They could have made it 100 megatons, but the pilot would have definitely died.

>>508932483
Only case it would maybe work is if they hit mach 7 and bolted, but the target accuracy would be nonexistent and the weight of the warhead would be too high

Even India boasts their own arsenal, only thing we're missing is hundreds of jeets trying to ride the truck like a train

Even South Africa had them at one point until the 90s, dismantling them in a "peace effort"

>>508932791
Once we get AM figured out, it will get better.

>>508934037
How long would you estimate? I think it's already here if they are playing around with shit like zero-point energy already, which is still a big IF.

Posting more nuke faces for fun

>>508931908 (OP)
Probably, but big bombs fell out of favour with the introduction of MIRVs which are far more effective due to inverse square law.

>>508934333
Oh we are a LONG way off anon, 3 centuries minimum. But imagine Tzars yield the size of a IPhone.

status-6 has a 100 megaton warhead, so yes.

it's not meant to create a tsunami like retards say though. it's meant to wipe out coastal cities and also bathe the area in high radioactive water vapor.

tsar bomba deez nuts

>>508934512
Oh yeah, that's the one they cleverly named "satan"

>>508933160
Not to be antisemitic or anything, but...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africa_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction#Collaboration_with_Israel

>>508931908 (OP)
bomba is for dick waving only, is tactically useless
multiple warheads spread out with less than half the total yield delivers more damage

>>508934759
>But imagine Tzars yield the size of a IPhone.
Genuinely incomprehensible, and that's a good thing if it takes 3 centuries

>>508934885
sarmat reportedly has a 50 megaton warhead option, but it's smaller the the tsar bomba (which was a 100 megaton design)

>>508934896
Ty anon, any info is good info to me

>>508934922
they're useful for bunkers and single large cities

this is why sarmat still has a 50 megaton option for some of them, whereas most will have multiple marvs or hgvs.

>>508932169
Nukes in that range are actually useful in that they are pretty clean. The blast is so large the majority of the material that would become nuclear fallout reaches so high up into the atmosphere that it just disperses globally causing next to no harm.

The vast majority of nukes are rusted piles of trash sitting in silos no one maintained for 30 years

>>508934792
With even minimal weather interference, the radioactive water vapor fucks everything up, potentially coast-to-coast.

Which brings up a good point, know of any good dosimeters?

>>508934922
Seems pretty effective psychologically, at least. Some psycho will turn the key if SHTF though

>>508935237
>know of any good dosimeters?
picrel is not bad, based on my tests so far.

>>508935181
Yes, but that's among our publically known cache. I'm inclined to believe there are regularly-maintained units in a black budget ledger somewhere

>>508931908 (OP)
Losers.Has to be dropped by a propeller powered Bear bomber.

>>508931908 (OP)
No, and its still kept secret how they actualy made it. Also it was going to be 100Mt until the lead scientist convinced the USSR leader to tone it down cause >>508932169

>>508935180
How likely would the nuclear winter scenario be?

They've already fouled the world with over a thousand tests, might as well finish it

>>508935493
Nuclear winter as a concept is complete fiction

>>508935237
>the radioactive water vapor fucks everything up, potentially coast-to-coast.
yep. since the cloud is so large and high, it'll travel very far. and it the rumors are true that it's salted, then oof. depending on the isotope used, it could be intensely radioactive for short-term or moderately radioactive long-term.

i just use cheap chinese ones. they work well enough.

>>508935398
>Я гoтoв вcё paзpyшить, тoвapищ!

>>508931908 (OP)
that scale isn't accurate. Tsar Bomba was 3333 times the size of Hiroshima. just to let that sink in. Licorne (1meg) was 50x larger than Littleboy Hiroshima.
there is a better chart showing how micro size Hiroshima was compared to Tsar Bomba. which had a radias of 35 fucking miles. Hiroshima was close to a half a mile radius. but the kill radias of Hiroshima was closer to three miles.
Tsar bomba blew windows out 500 miles away in Finland and hear 1200 miles away. the fireball was also seen in Finland 500 miles away.
it was so fucking massive it rang meters 3 times circling the earth

>>508935529
And space as well, we can't even keep our nukies in the containment zone

>>508931908 (OP)
probably not.

100 disbursed half megaton detonations would cause considerably more damage and be wildly harder to intercept

it isn't necessary to vaporize the entire northeast all in one shot

>>508935493
I put it in the same boogieman-tier as 'climate science'

just a fairy tale we use to scare the normies

>>508935549
That's what I figured as well, seems to lead to max fearmongering over anything else

>>508935371
Tests are always a good start, ty, you're gonna make it anon

>>508935760
thats horse shit.
people have gone to NTS and registered high doses of radiation
People in the 1950s went to Vegas to watch the atomic bomb blast before JFK forced them underground
Stop trying to diminish the threat of nukes.
There will be so many deaths in large cities and you can't create a non nuclear fireball 35 mile radius and blow windows out 500 fucking miles away in another country like Russia did.

>>508935493
>>508935549
This. When you do the math you find out that all the nukes in the world detonated together will propulse a tiny fraction of what the biggest recorded volcanic eruption did early XIXth century, and that one ended up being a nothingburger.
In fact the "end of the world" scenario of full nuke exchange is complete BS, and once the first nukes fly (likely Israel nuking Iran) and people realise they're underwhelming, it will be the end of a taboo and more of them will fly.

>>508935963
>Stop trying to diminish the threat of nukes.
tHeY'RE gONnA bLOt oUt tHE sUN anD cAUsE aN iCe aGE aND KiLL aLL thE CrOps!!1!

stop

>>508934885
Satan is otan's designation for it, it's called warlord in original.

>>508935963
Nta, but I was particularly questioning the nuclear winter scenario. Regardless, the radiation is the true big scare, but the manner of how it unfolds cam be speculated
>picrel obvious radiation sickness, which only gets horribly worse from there

>>508935237
Don't even bother with dosimeter anything that you're actually worried about you're not going to catch unless you're meticulously scanning all your food and water (you're not going to find anything in the water). And you're probably not going to be walking into anything giving spicy levels of gamma for extended periods of time either.

>>508936114
Finally got a ruski on the thread, welcome and thank you. From your pov, how likely is putin to go nuclear?

>>508934922
Yeah but it's kino

>>508931908 (OP)
Tsar Bomba is for asteroids, not people

>>508936173
Gamma spikes are no joke, and yes there's always a default level of radiation exposure for everyone yearly (0.62rem)

>>508936057
Mt. Tambora was the one you're talking about, in 1815. That had a blast radius of an impressive 40km3

>>508935602
Heпpaвильный мeдвeдь

>>508936194
Extremely unlikely, almost 0% chance. In fuckt, I think he would decide to surrender and try his luck in Hague before smashing that red button if it ever came to this.

>>508936579
Pyccкий бoeвoй мeдвeдь нe нaйдeн. :( Этoт — пoльcкий.

>>508936635
I would agree with that, but know nothing about Hague. What is the situation there, previously owned USSR territory?

>>508936742
The international court in Hague.

>>508936827
It makes sense, if he commandeers that, then he can redefine/nullify his war crimes, etc.

>>508936352
ye it just falls off quickly though even something thats like 10 rem is only going to be like 50 mrem 4 feet off the floor, as long as you don't step in it i geuss.

>>508931908 (OP)
They never had it. No one has had these since they're all fake.

>>508936969
Your claims are fake. Like Flat Earth retarded

>>508936969
I've heard this take before many times.
Do you have proof of their nonexistence? That seems like an incredible effort to go through for 60+ years of consistent documentation, interviews, disease etc.

>>508936959
Seems like 200-300rem is when things start to get fucked for good, in comparison

>>508932466
Moot.

>>508935614
I'd like to see that chart if you by chance have it, it would definitely help to comprehend the scaling more.

>>508934494
Based.

>>508931908 (OP)
It's too much of a liability to keep something that destructive around. I wouldn't be surprised if quantum physics says there's a nonzero chance that a nuclear warhead could spontaneously self-destruct at any given moment. Only in Russia with its ridiculous empty expanses would it make sense to keep something like that around.

>>508934922
You would know.
:)

>>508937367
>if only you knew how bad things really are

>>508931908 (OP)
Of course not, you silly man. They blew it up.

>>508937508
Well, yeah. Quantum physics *always* implies nonzero, but the sams odds could be argued for if a non-native bird wants to shit on my car's windshield.

Most are kept underground in heavily reinforced bunkers and silos, so the damage and blast radius goes down dramatically.

>>508935371
Industrial dosimeters are designed to find very small leaks of radioactivity long before they become a major health concern.
Good for testing food, bad for trying to figure out which direction you should go at a fork in the road.
You should look at the UPPER level as well as the lower level. Once it saturates, it becomes useless for helping you make split second decisions.

>>508935453
It's not a secret at all. It had like 30 stages, each one serving as an igniter (fission) or booster (fusion) for the previous/next stage. In the test the last 10 stages or so were with "dummy" materials.
It really wasn't that useful. For most scenarios, it would be more efficient to make 20 smaller nukes from the material used to make one Tsar Bomb. With bigger bombs, you're just making a deeper crater in the ground, for a few hundred extra meters radius of destruction.

>>508935614
Still not useful. 1/3 of the blast goes into the ground, and 1/3 goes into the air, and most everything over 5 PSI is overkill for most situations.
You would get MORE explosive power, over a larger area with many smaller nukes detonating apart.

>>508938309
I don't know comrade... he looks like he may have one more queued up

>>508938489
>Good for testing food, bad for trying to figure out which direction you should go at a fork in the road.
Have you not made an escape plan? Learn your routes out. Otherwise, what the fuck are you doing hanging around when the meter is ringing?

>>508935493
mostly fiction, but based partly on reality. it would slightly lower average temperatures for a couple years, not much unlike a large volcanic eruption. But that's about it, no mass extinction or whatever

>>508936937
are you really this stupid

>>508936937
Lmao

>>508938939
Take a guess mutt, hopefully you don't believe what I said.

>>508938979
You know that'd be a power move though lmao

>>508938616
>Have you not made an escape plan?
Like Mike Tyson says, everyone has a plan until someone drops a nuke in your pants. Or something like that.
Also, I live within 20 miles of 9 military bases. By "plan" is to drink bourbon heavily, put my head between my legs, and kiss my ass goodbye. If there's anything even vaguely female near me, I may try to fuck it (with consent).

>>508936827
It's a bot, man, knock it off.

>>508939107
Lmao the look of inbred disgust is just... the chef's kith

>>508932098
Which one is Prinz Eugen?

>>508939221
Sorry you aren't used to actual thread engagement, nice jewtin though

>>508931908 (OP)
Never did, kid

>>508931908 (OP)
Nukes are fake. It's a secret society lie to keep the dumbed down cattle in line.

>>508939296
Sunk, probably a few sea niggers in there squatting now

>>508939181
Define vaguely female
That aside, wish you luck anon

They have nukes speculated to be double or so the yield of the Tsar Bomba. Those nukes are aboard unmanned submarine drones, nuclear-powered, which coast around the ocean for a period of months.
People were butthurt when they built them because they are overpowered.
The idea is that they explode on the shoreline of an enemy nation, and the water vapor which is generated and falls on the land will be contaminated with radioactive material from the explosion, making a large area unsafe for humans.

>>508931908 (OP)
Edward Teller proposed building a device that was 10 Gigatons called 'Sundial'. It would have been too big to move. Thankfully, everyone thought Teller was nuts, and declined to consider it. The 1 Gigaton version called 'Gnomon' was also not built.

>>508940004
Interesting, seems like an effective tactic, but wouldn't likely be used until an extremely hot war breaks out and becomes a desperate territory claim

>>508940064
>early life

>>508931908 (OP)
Gigaton when?

>>508940064
Side note: that's fucking maniacal, glad they squashed that

>>508931908 (OP)
>Do they still have it?
lmfao
nuke technology is way ahead now
the thing weighed like 35 metric tons

>>508939043
Holy shit what a disaster

>>508931908 (OP)
Nukes are fake and gay. Educate yourself:
https://vimeo.com/331671526

>>508936969
>>508937090
>>508939549
>>508942340

>>508936969
>>508937090
>>508939549
>>508942340
>>508942441
Those of you itt who don’t understand just how easy it is for corrupt governments and powerful institutions/entities to propagandize entire societies should watch this immediately:
>Meet Edward Bernays, Master of Propaganda:
https://www.corbettreport.com/meet-edward-bernays-master-of-propaganda/

…And thats just the tip of the ice(((berg))). If you approach the rabbithole with a mentality of genuine interest in learning the truth about this reality and your place in it, (you) will inevitably arrive at the topic of flat earth.

Protip: every single answer to literally any and all flat earth related questions you may have can be found in this pastebin:
https://pastebin.com/jk2hAdmh

You can also use the 4plebs search function to find FE posts made in the past
https://archive.4plebs.org/_/search/text/Flat%20earth/

for those itt who are unaware:
space is fake and gay, the magical spinning cartoon ball earth is fake and gay. we literally live in God's snow globe and every decision (you) make has immense meaning and significance. change your ways and start living correctly. dont fall for the nihilism meme and dont fall for any of the religion memes. you can look at life as either a test or a game but whatever you do, dont look at it as meaningless. BE A GOOD PERSON AND LIVE BY THE GOLDEN RULE ALWAYS! also stop jerking off you pathetic littel squirtboys; your life will drastically improve when abstaining from degeneracy.

>>508936969
>>508937090
>>508939549
>>508942340
>>508942441
The world is owned and controlled by a small handful of literal satanists, eugenicists and psychopaths. They want to bring suffering, misery and death upon humanity. Above all else they want your soul. They will do anything and everything in their power to convince (you) to become materialistic and nihilistic so that you become easy to control and manipulate (thats the primary objective of the heliocentric model). If youre convinced there is no metaphysical nature to reality, it is easier for them to convince you to sin and commit atrocities for them. For lurkers itt who are unaware of this fact and new to learning about how this world actually works start here:

THE ELITE, ROYAL BLOODLINES, BILL GATES & THE EUGENICS IDEOLOGY:
https://www.corbettreport.com/bigoil
https://www.corbettreport.com/who-is-bill-gates-full-documentary-2020/

THE FEDERAL RESERVE:
https://corbettreport.com/federalreserve

CONSPIRACIES RESOURCES:
https://www.corbettreport.com/bestof/
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/70qvx7/updated_list_of_proven_conspiracies_and_hidden/
https://unlimitedhangout.com
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com
https://www.crrow777radio.com
https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/tkelly6785757

SHADOWBANNED FLAT EARTH VIDS/RESOURCES:
https://pastebin.com/jk2hAdmh

NukeHOAX:
https://vimeo.com/331671526

Germs/viruses:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/joZF7GsUmbfd/

HIV/AIDS:
https://youtu.be/8BXxXcIYY_Q

CovidHOAX:
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/448646795/#448671181

EVOLUTION:
https://youtu.be/rXexaVsvhCM
https://youtu.be/DtCIp9sgiE0
https://youtu.be/xDvKD_z3OeQ
https://youtu.be/vdSjyvIHVLw
https://youtu.be/cCk-b9GaY5k

SANDY HOOK:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iazwAxgBtexC/

Looking to perform your own tests/experiments to confirm or falsify the mainstream claims? (you) can start here:
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/40375472/#40435656
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/40375472/#40435684

>>508931908 (OP)
>Do they still have it?
Who cares? Huge nukes like the tsar bomba aren't effective as weapons for destroying shit on the ground. Something like 95% of the destructive power goes up into the atmosphere and is wasted.
It's far more effective to shotgun the same area with a bunch of smaller nukes.

>>508932379
Only noticed for the first time how unrealistic it is that his face melts long before his eyeballs do.

>>508934885
Is Russia about to spread Tiberium across the planet or what?

>>508942660
> If you approach the rabbithole with a mentality of genuine interest in learning the truth about this reality and your place in it, (you) will inevitably arrive at the topic of
> flat earth
Okay, I was curious about this now, but now that I know you're just a deranged shizzo retard, I know I can hide all your shitty posts

>>508931908 (OP)
Is it hydrogen or atomic?

>>508943036
>Something like 95% of the destructive power goes up into the atmosphere and is wasted.
Just have it detonate sideways this isn't rocket science

>>508931908 (OP)
Another angle

>>508936937
>Being this American

>>508931908 (OP)
they have that torpedo uav that uses 100mt

>>508942660
Idk how you cope with the flat earth being a kabbalic concept, firmament literally being defined in the kabbalah. You've jewed yourself

>>508932169
Could you be any more gay?

>>508932466
Weapons made by chinks are dud. You could nuke chyna right now and the chinks wouldn't do shit. They are a complete joke.

>>508943233
Well, we do have an organization of retarded schizos who call themselves NOD, so...

>>508944808
Being in the fireball is such a blessing. Being in that orange ring basically cooks you alive, and you're awake and aware for the 10-15 seconds before you finally get brain death. You basically want to be either right in the center or very very far away.

Makes you want to walk around with a pistol just so you can end it quick if that happens

>>508945071
No they don't. All the intel on Status-6 point to a 20 kt warhead, while substantial its not going to annihilate whatever harbour it is detonated in, because the water is going to absorb a massive amount of the heat and shockwave and diffuse it. I
Status-6 also makes no sense at all as a weapon system. It's useless for second strike, retaliation, and can only really be used as a shitty first strike weapon while there is plenty of civilian traffic to mask its sonar signature.

>>508942340
Nukes are a hoax for scare mongering purposes? To scare who? The masses? That's illogical because the masses don't control nuclear weapons, they cannot lauch one. Govts control nuclear weapons. The fact that some random guy thinks nuke is real or fake is utterly irrelevant. This conspiracy theory fails the basic logic test

>>508931908 (OP)
Tsar bomba was basically a publicity stunt, the last escalation in the contest of who could build the biggest nuke. But it's not economical or practical. Think about it this way: you could build a tank the size of a house if you really wanted to, but would it really be better than 10 normal tanks?

>>508932791
100 megaton version was designed as a warhead for UR-500 ICBM. 50 megaton was a proof of concept prototype, that's why it was dropped from the aircraft. The production "tsar bomb" was never intended to be a gravity nuke.

>>508938234
This shit always gets me. Everything around that man was so blazing hot that it left a shadow of him after he just evaporated, only because it was a few degree cooler in his shadow

>>508947924
It was not practical weapon design, too slow, liquid fueled, too vulnerable to interception. Just like Fractional Orbital Bombardment it only looks good on paper.
>>508948060
The woman with burns on her skin that exactly duplicate the pattern on her kimono also drives home just how intense the thermal radiation flash is.

>>508947866
Bombs are not tanks and you're just a retard who has no historical perspective. Tsar bomb was a heavy ICBM warhead testbed a whole DECADE before the technological advances has allowed to decrease ICBM's CEP to the point when smaller warhead could achieve acceptable amount of destruction on the target, and to develop MIRV warheads by reducing the size of the warheads.

>>508932348
Nah, the kings have deep underground bases fully stocked and capable of enduring mass nuclear warfare. They've had a while to plan. Why do you Elon has a Boring Company?

Honestly starting to believe nukes are all fake and gay.

>>508938410
>non-native bird wants to shit on my car's windshield.
Don't date immigrants

>>508948302
I do wonder what the nuclear balance would have looked like if Germany 'won' World War II, given their rocket and nuclear programme was far more advanced than any of their European contemporaries at the time. If they had, I imagine we would be looking at the end of the human race as we know it.

>>508948153
>It was not practical weapon design
UR-500 itself wasn't, heavy ICBMs were and still are. R-36M warhead is 20 MT.
>too vulnerable to interception
What interception, LMAO, ABM systems did not exist until late 70s, like 15 years after the Tsar Bomb test.
>Just like Fractional Orbital Bombardment it only looks good on paper.
That's some hardcore cope.

My shoulders are like 2 tsar bombas. It's nuts. Poppin boulders on my torso like damn

>>508944650
Or just turn it fully upside down

>>508948468
Germany was way, way behind in nuclear weapons tech.
They spent basically nothing on nukes compared to the allies. They judged that it'd take too long.
They spent their money on missiles/rockets and gained a lead in that tech, as well as jets and the like, but it wasn't enough.
A really interesting situation would have been to see a nuke dropped on Germany, and if they would respond by using their biological and chemical weapons.

>>508935493
https://youtube.com/watch?v=KzpIsjgapAk
See
>>508935549
It was made up in the Cold War to cause anti-nuke sentiment.

>>508947866
That's not really true. The huge nukes were a reply to the belief of heavy air defense making bombing even huge targets like cities hard. The wild inaccuracies of early ballistic missiles not being able to get hits on target within ranges of 10s of km.

A 50MT nuke doesn't really need to be even close to it's target to be effective and clearing the way for more accurate follow on attacks.

As missiles improved in accuracy the warheads could be reduced in size to better match the expected performance. Letting more more nuclear weapons be made engage more targets.

Smaller bombs with much lower yields are more destructive when spread out. The material cost of nuclear material of one large bomb does more damage when made into many smaller bombs, if you can successfully strike smaller targets.

>>508948302
That guy is 100% correct.

>>508947168
Shut up doomer

>>508948468
ironically it was Japan that figured out nook ooks ooooks could be real they had some smart nuclear scientists but didn't fund it.
Japan getting the bomb would have been legit scary. Hitler HATE chemical weapons god only knows what he would think about nooks and fallout

>>508932098
man I bet testing those things would be a blast

>>508948302
>Be German
>Obsessed with impractical wunderwaffen
Only one was ever built for a reason. A bomb with the yield of a few megatons will destroy pretty much any major city, nuking it extra hard with 100mt isn't going to make the people there more dead. With the same resources, you can make multiple weapons and adequately destroy multiple cities instead. If the bomber carrying your tsar bomba gets shot down, or it's shitty rockets blows up on the launch pad the materiel loss is far higher for you too. And let's say you do somehow manage to afford and field an entire arsenal of tsar bombas. If you use them, the best case scenario is you've just covered the whole planet with fallout. None of this makes any sense in the calculus of war. You can build one giant mega-tank that tanks harder than normal tanks and is super cool but gets stuck everywhere, or you can build 10 perfectly adequate tanks that actually have practical value.

>>508948855
I don't want to be that guy but even wikipedia says it was largely a publicity stunt.

>>508948989
>I don't want to be that guy but even wikipedia says it was largely a publicity stunt.
That's almost an argument. Is anything about the lack of accurate missiles or the expected heavy air defense wrong?
Like was the US making 10MT bombs a stunt too? Or a requirement of the technology of the time?

>>508936115
Wait until they find out about that Japanese guy, Hisashi Ouchi, that was kept alive for as long as possible just to see how long they could do it for. All the while his body was constantly disintegrating and he was in the most excruciating pain imaginable

>>508931908 (OP)
It's not efficient to make bombs as big as the Tsar bomb, due to diminishing returns on destructive yield per megaton. Better to have many smaller bombs.

>>508948989
>wikipedia says
You should've started your wall of bs with this. Thankfully, I didn't waste any time reading it.

>508946411
>Weapons made by chinks are dud.
Leave it to Israelis with memeflags to make the most dishonest posts conceivable to man.

>>508947866
It's not a tank. 50 MT is enough to regime change a tier 1 city and flood the neighboring cities and provinces with refugees for years. Excellent tool for sustainable supply line disruption.

>>508946411
Well yeah, main point is that they are never bold enough to strike, but it could be due to their shit arsenal

>>508934922
I'd still drop it in t*laviv for testing purposes

>>508949123
bullshit artist

>>508936115
Old effort post I repost sometimes:
being in a basement reduces gamma exposure by something like 83% since you’ve reduced exposure to only one direction. 6 inches of exposed concrete overhead would reduce that remaining 17% to like 4%, add a metal or wooden roof over that and you’re looking at around 1-2% exposure. And that’s assuming there even is fallout where you’re at.
https://modernsurvivalblog.com/nuclear/nuclear-radiation-shielding-protection/
Keep in mind that a ground burst would only be used on hardened targets (military bases, government buildings, etc) and ground bursts are the only thing that would cause fallout. Most strikes would be airburst due to it being cleaner and causing more damage due to a larger splash.

https://www.acq.osd.mil/ncbdp/nm/NMHB2020rev/chapters/chapter13.html
Also bear in mind that after like 48 hours it will be significantly less radioactive. So assuming you don’t live near a military base and the wind speed is like 8mph or something, how many hours would it take for fallout to arrive at your house? I figure I’d have about 48 hours.
https://www.britannica.com/technology/nuclear-weapon/Residual-radiation-and-fallout

https://remm.hhs.gov/nuclearfallout.htm

Fallout falls in an oval shape towards the prevailing wind and is only a really major risk during the first 48 hours or so and about 6-10 miles out from blast, everything going beyond that 6-10 mile range is only going to increase cancer rates by <1%, after 2 weeks it won’t even matter at all. They’ve done quite a few ground burst tests that launched fallout in NM and nobody died from fallout there, but there was an increase in cancer and other things, not the end of the world though.

https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/trinity-test-downwinders.htm

>>508931908 (OP)
Nukes are grug cope weapons. The future of war is drones, nanobots, chemical/biological weapons that target your enemy combattants and leave the infrastructure intact.

Rebuilding roads, bridges and houses is energy intensive, and fossil fuels are no longer as cheap and abundant as 50 years ago. When you conquer some shithole, you want to extract slave labour for your people's benefit, not spend trillions rebuilding their infrastructure.

>>508949564
Nuclear winter is also a meme, they burned multiple cities creating more particulate than a nuke during ww2 with no environmental impact. Even a minor volcanic eruption produces more atmospheric particulate than every city being nukes simultaneously.
Think about it, every year in california more area of forests burn than area of city would burn in a nuclear engagement.

EMP attack is also a meme, the area effected by EMP burst would be smaller than everyone thinks and wouldn’t damage much, they’ve done multiple atmospheric tests in the past with no recorded issues with EMP.
https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/nuclear-testing-tally
Also your car will be fine:
https://theprepared.com/blog/cars-and-emps/

Here is more resources in regard to surviving a blast:
US Targets: https://www.nuclearwarmap.com/targetlist.html
https://www.nuclearwarmap.com
Nuclear survival skills:
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA328301.pdf
Shielding from fallout:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-C13-3cb00adda4ad64c21748c40ad117b971/pdf/GOVPUB-C13-3cb00adda4ad64c21748c40ad117b971.pdf

>>508949098
>Like was the US making 10MT bombs a stunt too? Or a requirement of the technology of the time?
Both, probably. There's still a use case for 10mt, but they would have understood diminishing returns you get with higher yields. ICBM technology wasn't mature but they would have understood that it would improve. Both sides wanted to have the biggest bomb beyond what was practical or necessary. You could argue that the space race was an extension of this.

>>508949172
I accept your gracious concession.

>>508949244
Yeah 50mt does more damage but it's damage you don't need to do. If you use a smaller nuke on a city most people will die within a few seconds, the leadership is dead, infrastructure is destroyed, everything that's not vaporized is on fire. Why would you want to irradiate the countryside? Nuclear components aren't cheap or easy to make, it's total overkill. If you want to disrupt supply lines there are countless other, better methods.

>>508949595
Think about the nuclear winter theory. They theorize that 5-150mil tons of soot and debris will block out the sun. A large portion of that is theorized to come from wildfires.
However we have had so many wildfires that it’s practically disproven nuclear winter

They’ll argue that nuclear ground burst will launch that dust into the atmosphere, but that’s the blast and not the wildfires, so it’s wrong.
The largest volcanic eruption in recent history was mount Tambora in 1815, it launched around 100mil tons of debris into the upper atmosphere. No nuclear winter then.
If you look at the trinity tests and how far fallout actually travels, and the effects of that fallout, you can see the danger is greatly overstated.

Now I’m not for using nuclear weapons, I think a nuclear war would destroy the modern world, but I don’t think everyone would necessarily die. I do however want to point out that caliwali is so poorly managed it has almost single handedly disproven the nuclear winter wildfire hypothesis.

>>508949109
Yeah thats without a doubt the most horrific shit i have read about/photos.wish i never knew about that.

Completely diabolical

>>508947224
Ahh yes, the cult classic

>>508948710
I'm going to go with a very obvious "yes" because it turns out everyone fucking knew what radiation was.
A biological weapon by other means. That's why we're fucking loathe to use them.

>>508931908 (OP)
no they sold the uranium for vodka

>>508931908 (OP)
Don't go out, they're starting project/operation bluebeans, whatever you do don't board the ships.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/MBkuSFLbKgw

>>508949611
We're not having a discussion, I'm just shitting down your wikifaggot retard throat.
>The text of the General Advisory Committee report with its majority and minority annexes remained secret until 1974, but the general drift of its argument became publicly known in 1950 after President Truman had announced that work on the development of a hydrogen bomb would be continued. In the public statements as well as in the secret debates of the early 1950s, the phrase "unlimited destructive power" constantly recurs. The peculiar horror of the hydrogen bomb was seen to be the fact that its cost would be almost independent of its size. Once you had built a workable bomb, you could increase its destructive power without limit by adding deuterium fuel, which would cost about sixty cents a kiloton at 1950 prices. The cost of adding the equivalent of another Hiroshima to the destructive power of a hydrogen bomb would be only about ten dollars.

>>508931908 (OP)
hiroshima and nagasaki were never nuked.

https://open.lbry.com/@ukcolumn:9/Michael-Palmer-No-Atom-Bombs-Were-Dropped-on-Japan:8

>>508948409
You bring up a great point, what I said was an old quote for a more ideal type world, but things are so fucking scewed man

>>508948441
Thanks I don't lol

>>508949637
Japs, man. There’s something in asian dna that causes an extreme lack of empathy. Feel bad for all the bros that took the rice pill
>they resuscitated him over and over again after multiple heart attacks even though he begged for death

>>508935963
thats exactly what i would expect to find if they were trying to invent nukes and failed.
>collect radioactive material
>blow it up
>no chain reaction
>repeat
nukes are not real. if they were they would use them. they would use them a lot.

>>508948927
He he heh..
Being the guy to actually detonate that would be surreal, one moment the sea is calm and then another it appears that you have birthed Godzilla in a fucking MOAB

>>508949692
WORLD TARGETS IN MEGADEATHS

>>508949109
You referring to the poor jap that was exposed to critical radiation at the powerplant in the 90s? The family had a lot to do with that, and their right to try bullshit prolonged his suffering for what must have felt like another entire lifetime

>>508931908 (OP)
They can make it 10x bigger there is basically no limit on how powerful a fusion bomb is. The problem is about weight because at certain treshold the bombs becomes stationary as there are no rockets or planes that are able to deliver it to the enemy.

>>508950221
The US did radiation exposure testing too, you just never hear about it

>>508948710
I think that would have just ended Europe, really. All European countries in 1939 had vast stockpiles of chemical weapons - one using them with abandon would result in others using them. Death by nuclear hellfire and chemical warfare seems preferable to being invaded by Africans though, so who knows.

>>508934037
Catch up lil bro we're at FM and DAB+

>>508950493
the problem is it is science fiction
the other problem is it is completely uneccesary. carpet bombing works just as well. if the want to murder a million people. chemical weapons work just as well. if no one i willing to use any of these weapons, they effectively do not exist. so even if you believe in nukes, its complete waste to think about them at all. nukes will never be used.

>>508931908 (OP)
>How many hiroshima blast zones can you fit inside a tzar bomba blast zone?
25 Hiroshima total destruction blast zones can fit inside the Tsar Bomba total destruction blast zone.

25 Hiroshima total destruction blast zones can fit inside the Tsar Bomba total destruction blast zone.

25 Hiroshima total destruction blast zones can fit inside the Tsar Bomba total destruction blast zone.
25 Hiroshima total destruction blast zones can fit inside the Tsar Bomba total destruction blast zone.
25 Hiroshima total destruction blast zones can fit inside the Tsar Bomba total destruction blast zone.
You can fit 25 total destruction blast zones.

>>508932169
Fallout as well.
With massive nukes the uncontrolled criticality can lead to inefficient conversions from radioactivity to explosive heat.
Smaller nukes have less fallout since there's less chance of inefficient conversion, besides being smaller.
Airburst remains a must ofc.

>>508950699
>carpet bombing works just as well.
Are you retarded? No bomber is able penetrate missile defence systems unless massed with most of them shot down. Shooting down a ballistic missile is instead nearly impossible.

>>508950699
>chemical weapons work just as well.
No these types of weapons would need so many missiles fired to effective that its not worth the cost. Biological weapons released inside enemy country would be much more devastating weapons.

>>508951301
> Biological weapons released inside enemy country would be much more devastating weapons.
Problem is, once a virus is out you don’t know what it’ll do. They mutate. That’s why they haven’t been used already. Pic rel. the jews were going to use them on the arabs but found out that their shared semitic genes would cause too much collateral damage

>>508950674
Don't forget our skyking radio, SDR

>>508931908 (OP)
It was a one-off show piece for a Cold War pissing contest. The Soviets won that one.

>>508950493
I wouldn't be surprised if a train nuke was tested at one point when that was a more viable entry method

>>508942340
>3+ hour video from vimeo
One of the first points they make is that those atom bomb tests were fake because they claim a camera to film it would be destroyed.

The US Military explained in that original film that the camera was housed in a lead casing, a small slit made for the lens, and fortified with reinforced steel that dug 100ft down into the ground. They made sure that it would survive the process.

After that dumb take I couldn't bear to watch anymore

>>508940004
I don't doubt for a second that everything you just typed is real in your mind.

>NUKES AREN'T REAL!!!
>Nukes are fake
>nukes are made up
Nukes are more real than internet users, who are all actually bots.

>>508952157
This would be more believable if there was any footage of this, but it's all short clips with jump cuts.

>>508931908 (OP)
Nobody has ever had a nuke, because they don't exist.

>>508937224
>Do you have proof of their nonexistence?
>Prove a negative
Gentlemen, I present to you, the mutt

>>508952340
based

Fascinating how retarded this board has become over the past decade.

>>508952157
It would have been destroyed through the slits. Nuclear bombs are a jewish hoax. They’ve never been used anywhere except Japan, just a bunch of “tests” that are all fake. You can easily fake these scenes using miniatures and the jews own an entire industry that specializes in theatrics like that. Japan was destroyed with traditional bombs, the nuclear blasts are just more semitic theatrical and lies. Keep believing in your jewish fairytales, goy. Good goy. Don’t forget to eternally feel sympathy for the six million sweet innocent jews murdered by nazis like you.

>>508947737
>for scare mongering purposes?
Yes. The promise of the government having a magical god-like weapon prevents insurrections, it helps histrionic discourse like TDS ("Drumpf is going to press the big red button of the apocalypse any minute now!"), and it persuades stupid goyim to go to or at least approve wars with any country in the world by accusing them of developing this magical weapon, it's what happened with Iraq and what's happening with Iran today.

Without the idea of nukes, governments seem a lot weaker as they are in reality, and wars thousands of kilometers from you cannot be justified.

>>508953247
ok retard... show me one that isn't rotoscoping of old film footage with laughable results. you utter spastic cunt

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mX13a1Hz0SE

>>508948710
"Germany, the country with the biggest technological as well as economic miracle of all time didn't manage to invent nukes, but some fraudulent jews in the US managed to do it in 45." Yeah I don't buy that shit for one second.

>>508953370
Dunning-Kruger effect, look it up. That's you that is.

>>508953247
It's a dedicated effort to make the whole place less interesting by flooding it with retarded shit.
80-100 threads on the catalog are nothing but intentional clutter, populated by bots.
It's on purpose and it worked. Probably those Eglin faggots.
>>508953315
Like a sore thumb, get dead faggot.

>>508953333
quads confirmed... braaaap!

>>508953448
no it's not... its (((YOU)))

>>508953448
you fucking dumb 5 year old.... i bet you also hid in your house for 2 years and didnt see your granny becuz of 'muh flu' too

We get it, you're here to shill "nukes r fake", you don't have to spam the thread all by yourself.
(nobody believes you btw)

>>508953846
I'm still waiting for refutations to this.
What I mean is addressing the actual arguments and not just a generic line with no indication you've read it.

>>508953512
Anybody who believes nukes are real is a jew-lover. Either that or a worthless jew themselves. Nuclear bombs are a jewish hoax.

>>508954504
They can't argue it anymore than they can the moon landing. But at least with the landing, they can use the stupid wewuzwhites argument, arguing why shitskin countries like Israel, Pakistan or India never used the bomb after supposedly having it for 50 years is impossible.

>>508937611
Fakest shit. Film was great for editing, but digital is a masterpiece.

>>508953846
>(nobody believes you)
This is a classic pilpul tactic when arguing falsehood. If you had an argument other than "nuh uh!" then you would have no need of implied social manipulation.
Nor would there be a need to colorize this photo>>508932098

Look at pic related. Terrible photo forgery. Obviously a composite, why would three people be casually ignoring the apocalypse above them?

>>508931908 (OP)
Are there any tests done past 1961?

>>508947866
Yes, it's the size of a house. Duh

They switched from nukes to Indians.

>>508954978
Underground, goy. Just like how prolonged in person alien encounters pretty much stopped after smartphones could record video.

>>508932098
Thanks to all these tests after WWII, we are still experiencing a cancer epidemic today.

>>508954504
they never research it mate, the propaganda is so entrenched that it hurts their brains to think they were lied to, they'll believe every psy op and false flag forever. No matter how stupid and clearly impossible the physics are they'll believe in 'shadows burned onto walls' people evaporating into dust 5 miles away, and most hilarious that only a handful of countries mastered this 'miracle of destruction' and beleive Iran has been weeks away from developing Nukes for nearly 50 years. they are a lost cause and i'm glad they shit their pants when nuclear weapons get used to scare the public... I hope they never realise and live miserable lives being scared of films that Lookout Mountain & EG&G made , LOL

>>508948927
CARLOS, SHUT UP!

I don't think Russians ever managed to build one

>>508955108
What? From the cadmium yellow used to colorize that photo?
You know people died of cancer before 1945, they just called it something else. And cancer isn't one thing, it's an umbrella term for a lot of shit. No one had carpal tunnel back then, they had rickets. It's words, nigger.

>>508953428
You don't read much scientific literature. The amount of top-level scientists who worked for the Manhattan Project or adjacent programs vastly overwhelms the number who worked for the German effort.
Heisenberg was legit S-tier physicist, but the next generation of elite physicists were centred in the US, and several of them, like Feynman and Dyson, were involved in the Manhattan Project. Meanwhile you cannot name any significant young physicist involved in the Uranium Club of the Germans.
According to Wikipedia, when asked, the German scientists themselves predicted the US would be capable of nuke production in a few years' time.

>but some fraudulent jews in the US managed to do it in 45
The US had pretty much unlimited resources, any number of scientists from all over the Anglosphere, and factories and facilities which couldn't be bombed.
I don't even think nukes are that hard to make. The only reason why there are not way more countries possessing them is because the NPT puts great effort into stopping them being developed.

>>508931908 (OP)
Seems like bullshit


splitting the atom, Einstein/jews, the idea of nuclear armageddon at the press of a button so that all jew slaves larping as country leaders can play their role in the bread and circus, the supposed impact zone should then be radioactive causing damage for years and years


Galen Winsor ate radioactive material all the time and exposed himself to it regularly

https://youtu.be/BeXn3JvSWJ4?feature=shared

>Nuclear scare

>>508936057
It would be the end of the world as we know it, governments all over collapsing completely, but definitely not a literal end of the world. Humanity would recover and go on normally

>could have nuclear reactors near neighborhoods providing clean energy
>Could tell the government to fuck off

Big bombs are impractical. For one, carrying them makes you a massive radar target. Secondly, the damage doesn't scale linearly and drops off quite quickly.
>A larger yield leads to a greater radius of damage, but not proportionally larger.For example, a 10-fold increase in yield results in only a little over a two-fold increase in the radius of destruction.The volume of destruction, which is related to the cube of the radius, increases much faster than the radius itself.
That is why militaries generally go with a lot of smaller yield bombs.

>>508955221
nobody did. Hollywood just faked them better.

the chinese propaganda films are utterly hilarious https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xoHbBkUGSQ

>>508955173
Me trying to red pill my Hollywood brother. He's an NPC, but he's been screwed out of literally hundreds of millions in merch rights by jews, so I still try.
Sneed.

>>508931908 (OP)
Nah that shit expired long ago and they don't have a good way to deliver it even if it they had a brand new one.

>>508955504
my brothers the same, he absolutely lost his shit at the suggestion, haha he went red in the face and looked like he was gonna jump out of window at the thought of it, lol

>>508955328
I bet you believe Einstein came up with relatively and is anything but a propaganda plant like nigger da grass tyson.*chirp*

>>508932348
>The enviornmental devastation and rebuilding would take hundreds of years to recover alone.
why isn't the environment devastated from testing firing 2000 of these motherfuckers then?

if nukes were real they would have used them in vietnam, but they didn't... and they couldn't

>>508934885
we're the ones that named it satan you fucking douche

>>508931908 (OP)
No. Big warheads are inefficient. The same material split into multiple smaller MIRV does much more damage.

Only the chinks keep using big warheads.

>>508955868
They were tested over the course of decades in literal empty deserts and islands, retard, not in important infrastructure centres.

>>508955673
What's sad is this guy is the "smartest" man I've ever known well (in terms of shit like math) but falls for the most retarded shit.
It could be an act tho. It's possible he's in on some of it (2 degrees of separation away from Epstein through Matt) but it's that's the case he's selling it too hard.

>>508955102
If you can name a single science that works without testing, I'd believe it. Otherwise all 'improvement' to nukes past 1961 is purely theoretical. And if they won't show the proof then they're expecting the public to take it on faith.

>>508951417
The defence against biological weapons is total isolation and shooting anyone who approaches the survival communities. The problem is that nuclear weapons make sure there are no communities left.

>>508955876
Here's the real question. What was the deal with MacArthur then? Why did he get fired for suggesting we use them?
Was he calling it the lie?
Did he not know?
Are they real and just not as powerful as claimed?
Is it all kayfabe? General Doug goes out on a heel turn?
Yes, Korea not Nam, but it's a valid point.

>>508956078
always the way, the term 'too smart for your own good ' exists for a reason. they laugh at stories about god creating the universe in 7 days but believe the universe just appeared in a nanosecond because professor brian cox tells the it, lol..

to quote douglas adams... ''once there was nothing, and then it exploded' hahaha

>>508948060
why do you explain it so weirdly

>>508956095
Exactly, science is verifiable, falsifiable, and repeatable. I hate it when people say "I'm no scientist" like it's some kind of priesthood or ethnicity. If you have logs and a control group you're a scientist. If you don't, you aren't no matter who gave you a degree.

nukes are the fakest&gayest shit invented by jewish imagination. do you really think israel, the nation that has been indiscrimanately massacring civilians in gaza, would not turn iran into a crater if they really felt threatened by its existence?? they don't do that because they can't. it's a hoax of the foundational myth of jewish power
1. the holocaust
2. the nuclear bomb
both made up to keep people under control in fear.

>>508956414
This. "Can you believe how stupid people were back in the day? They thought that meat could spontaneously create maggots![...} Why yes of course, all life appeared spontaneously in a sterile puddle which eventually became a fish then a monkey then us; why do you ask?"

>>508934494
cute

>>508955832
I bet you believe that mainstream science credits only Einstein with special relativity and totally disregards people like Lorentz and Poincaré; and you probably also believe that Einstein stole general relativity from a patent office and was beaten to it anyhow by Hilbert. Both wrong.

>>508935493
Anyone who can tell you with a straight face it’s either 100% real and will cause the extinction of humanity or that it is complete fiction cooked up by hippie scientists either doesn’t know what they’re talking about or are intentionally lying to you. It depends on a ton of factors, and we don’t really have a good test study to compare it to because the last time we detonated a nuke above a city was in Nagasaki. I’m suspicious the previously linked video given that it was a collab with the RAND corporation.

Basically, many hundreds if not thousands of cities are hit with nukes, which makes multiple firestorms, which form clouds that send black carbon (soot) from the fires into the stratosphere where they can’t be washed out and where they block sunlight and spread all over the earth. A bunch of firestorms all within a single or 2 days at most collectively send a ton of soot into the stratosphere, which causes a huge decline in temperature and sunlight while at the same time hearing up the atmosphere itself and tearing up the ozone layer. The basics of it are, as far as we know, correct, as we have forest fires to compare it to, and we know that ash and smoke get thrown into the stratosphere-but we don’t have a good model for how much soot would get thrown into the stratosphere from a firestorm in a modern city. You’ll see arguments like “well huge forest fires don’t cause cooling and what they send into the stratosphere falls back within months”, which is true, but forest fires don’t send black carbon up, they send regular ash particles, which don’t absorb sunlight, are more susceptible to gravitational pull which forces them down and, most, crucially, as they don’t absorb sunlight, ash doesn’t heat itself up so the air around it remains quite dense and prevents it from lofting itself up, while soot, which absorbs sunlight, does the opposite.

>>508957780
>Both wrong
Because you say so? And no, I don't believe your well poisoning story about patents. You need to add that so you have something to disprove. Combined with your earlier "no one believes you" which I can see isn't true ITT is the most "gradually I began to hate them" behavior.

>>508931908 (OP)
According to commercial tests conducted by other members of the Jewish Oppenheimer family, the American theoretical physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer (1904-1967) belonged to haplogroup Q1b. Oppenheimer played a major role in the Manhattan Project and is considered one of the fathers of the atomic bomb.

>>508932348
It’s more so you can use smaller nukes without triggering MAD which means smaller nukes are significantly more useful.
Big nukes are going the way of gas.

>>508931908 (OP)
Tsar Bomba was literally a 1 time test. It was never a fielded weapon. It was a test done in the early 60's to just scare the west that the Russians were capable of making such a large nuclear device. Their largest fielded warhead was 1/4 of what the Tsar Bomba was capable of doing and that has largely been decomissioned. In the 60's high yields were sought because they had very poor accuracy. So you'd need to dump 10-20 megatons worth of explosion in a general vicinity to destroy a specific target with certainty. But now they can get missiles accurate to within a meter or two and they don't need multi-megaton devices anymore, something a few hundred kt will suffice, and they prefer to have multiple independent warheads on one missile, being capable of doing far more damage overall than just 1 big fireball.

>>508932169
Yes, but Tzar bomb is perfect to put on Poseidon nuclear torpedos.

>>508958346
If you read textbooks about special relativity, you'll see Einstein credited with putting the finishing touches on a theory that was 90% worked out. However, Einstein's contributions were vital, given that they do away with the aether.
Einstein worked out the ideas behind general relativity pretty much alone, but perhaps with a little help from the Swiss or Swiss-Jew physicist whose name I forget, and it is a much more complex idea than special relativity. He announced his theory and in the next few months himself and Hilbert - the greatest mathematician of the era - raced to see who could finalise the differential equations behind the theory first. No one knows for sure who got there first, but in my shallow opinion they both pretty much got there at the same time. A Brit named William Clifford had a vague conception of describing gravity using non-Euclidean equations, but I'm sure it cannot have been anywhere near as detailed or complete as Einstein's work. Christopher Jon Bjerknes has written a book accusing Einstein of stealing general relativity, and although CJB gets a bit of respect from me for being pretty well-read on some topics, he is still a massive sperg with a deranged mind and I doubt he has debunked Einstein in any important way.

>>508950221
Yellow fever anons are breeding a stronger white race that will have no feelings for keeping shitskins alive. Coalburning roasties won't exist in the future white race.

>>508959639
>Propaganda approved textbook credits retarded jew
Okay boomer.

>>508961127
Yellow fever anons are breeding a second generation of hispanics. There's little genetic difference between an East Asian and a Native American. But it's true that latinos generally hate niggers, so you got that much correct.

>>508932466
The US on behalf of Israel or Israel itself 100%.

>>508953315
Jewish dialectic: thesis + antithesis = synthesis
Ex: holocaust is bs (it truely is bs) + nukes are fake (nukes works for real) = it contaminate the fact that the holocaust is pure bs with more nonsense unrelated to it.
The flat earth theory was used for that exact reason, same for the one about the extra-terrestrial beings kidnapping people.

Poisoning the water wells is an old jewish trick, and here they poison the wells and the sources of knowledge.
The "nukes are fake" morons never use footage from the 90s to debunk nukes, it's as if they still live in the 1940 or 1950.
Their end game argument is "unless you make a nuke yourself it's bs".

>>508962328
Retard.

>>508948468
Well Germany didnt win and the jews running America and Britain did. Now we have to deal with the end of the White race as we know it. The Nazis weren't evil monsters as jews claim. Had they won, it probably would have been much better than the current state of affairs.

>>508962636
Instead of addressing the actual holes in the narrative >>508954504 you claim that it's well poisoning to question the narrative.
4d pilpul

>>508948302
>Bombs are not tanks and you're just a retard who has no historical perspective. Tsar bomb was a heavy ICBM warhead testbed a whole DECADE before the technological advances has allowed to decrease ICBM's
Wow, love it when someone pretends to be knowledgeable on history while straight up making shit up. The Tsar Bomba was 100% a publicity stunt. It was a prototype dropped out of an airplane. It was known to be impractical when it was being built and done so only with PR and records in mind. They only built one other prototype in that range. And It had nothing to do with ICBMs either as they never planned on actually using something so impractical.

>>508965692
Wow, nice pile of retarded clueless bullshit. Go be fat somewhere else, retard.
>Development of the Proton began in 1962 as a two-stage vehicle that could be used to launch large military payloads or act as a ballistic missile with a 100 megaton nuclear warhead.
>The Proton had its origin in the early 1960's, at a time when all Soviet rockets required military justification to be developed. At this time the military-political leadership formulated a requirement for a heavy rocket that could be used to launch large military payloads into space as well as act as a ballistic missile for nuclear warheads up to 100 MT in yield.
>Council of Soviet Ministers (SM) Decree 'On start of work on the UR-500 missile and carrier-rocket' was issued. The rocket was to be built initially for the GR-2 requirement - a heavy rocket that could be used to launch large military payloads into space as well as act as a ballistic missile for multiple nuclear warheads up to 100 MT in yield. The decree ordered development of this powerful new rocket to be completed within three years. This was a difficult task, considering the factory and launch facilities that would have to be built to allow testing of the rocket to begin. The draft project UR-500 was completed in 1963.
http://www.astronautix.com/p/proton.html

>>508932348
>At the end of the game, the king and pawns end up in the same box.
That's not even a relevant use of that idiom you fucking retard

>>508931908 (OP)
>Executes last Tsar and family
Names their nuclear bomb a Tsar

>>508968308
More evidence it's jewish bullshit.

>>508968308
It's a western nickname, retard. Just like how you call R-36M Warlord ICBM a "Satan".
https://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Russia/TsarBomba.html

>>508968572
Yes, bullshit.

>>508969882
Like everything american.

>>508931908 (OP)
crazy stuff

>>508970077
I probably should've colored him brown...