>i tried to dunk on normies but they dunked on me instead because i have zero charisma
lmfao
chud
md5: 2f22d8d6204d322ce041dbba3037d4d9
๐
>>508943309 (OP)His problem is how he framed the argument. He could have argued for non-taxation in a much more intelligent way. As it stands, he only comes off as naive. The moment you have to say "no, that's not what I am saying", you have already lost the argument in the eyes of the surrounding NPCs.
>>508943309 (OP)He's a (((fellow white man)))
>debate
the mainstream opinion always has an advantage as the people arguing for it can do whatever they want and the others will subconsciously let them
he needs give equal treatment and tell him to just shut the fuck up and if he gets kicked out then its obvious its been rigged since the beginning.
to be clear, when the leftist says whites should be kicked out of America due to "native territory" (whatever that means) they are being a hypocrite, but you should not make your entire argument about them being a hypocrite but rather the fact that niggers are retarded and therefore whites deserve the land. "native land" is meaningless and since theyre a hypocrite, black nationalism is what the leftist is implying; the thing is niggers are retarded and whites are not making you inherently justified over them. if you give the full blown white supremacist argument though, immediately theyre going to crash out and simply refuse to debate you just because you dont have the mainstream opinion. if youre opinion isn't mainstream youre only given certain cards to play when it comes to debate.
loudness, wit, and force works; which is why the most insufferable people are always the most popular debaters and political streamers, not people with degrees or the people that are actually intelligent. when it comes to lower IQ people debating (yes, theres apolitical groups where people enjoy arguing to other people over irrelevant bullshit and just because) the victor is always decided based on who was funnier and louder.
this is why violence and subversion is historically the only answer.
>>508943309 (OP)Lol. Drumpftards really do be like this.
>>508943309 (OP)You need to go back to r/IncelTears, retard.
If it belongs on r9k then itโs just trolling.
Not /pol/
>>508943309 (OP)"Reactionaries" who defend jewish capitalism and plutocracy are not reactionaries at all
They are shabbos goys and worse than the leftoids
Controlled opposition
>>508943665His argument of zero tax for kike billionaires is non existent and his position is asinine
>>508943493Eat shit and die sand nigger
>>508943665>He could have argued for non-taxation in a much more intelligent way. The problem there is that there is no intelligent way to argue in favour of it. If you engage your intelligence you end up being against the idea that the super wealthy should not be taxed.
>>508943309 (OP)Bros mistake is sucking elite rich cock
>>508944559>when it comes to lower IQ people debating (yes, theres apolitical groups where people enjoy arguing to other people over irrelevant bullshit and just because) the victor is always decided based on who was funnier and louder.bro superman could totally kicks goku's ass bro