25 days from now Ohio, Texas, and 26 other states will begin REFUSING to grant Birth Certificates and CITIZENSHIP STATUS to the offspring of illegal migrants born in their states. They will also begin to REJECT any birth certificate from a child of an illegal that was issued after the EO went into place which would be late February 2025 is when the EO says it went into place.

Hospitals who do NOT comply with this Executive Order will be committing a FELONY OFFENSE each time and will lose their FEDERAL FUNDING and be unable to pay their FEDERAL TAXES and go bankrupt within a year not to mention the people in charge of those hospitals will get decades in prison for the hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands of felonies they will be committing.

This is the greatest day in American History, FINALLY the constitution is being enforced as it is written!

>>508966581 (OP)
JESUIT XISTERS HOW WILL WE CONTINUE TO USE MIGRANTS AS WEAPONS?! ITS OVYIR!

>>508966712
by jesuits you mean jews?

>>508966581 (OP)
And for the multiple generations of illegal derived spics that are 20% of the US population, we will say "we did it, reddit" ?

>>508968096
That's where SCOTUS comes in again in October of 2025 where they will make a ruling on the merits of the case.

SCOTUS will rule on the 14th amendment and if POTUS's Executive Order is ruled constitutional by SCOTUS then that is RETROACTIVE.

Meaning it will be RETROACTIVE going back to 1866 and if not 1866 then 1929 because that is when the Permanent Residency Card system was created, meaning the children of illegals going back to AT LEAST 1929 are now no longer US Citizens.

This is the greatest day in American history.

>>508968257
Oh, ok thanks.
>This is the greatest day in American history.
If true, then yes. Or that day in October, anyway.
Interesting that it just happens to be that month.

>>508968257
>This is the greatest day in American history
He can also take your guns now. Yay

>>508966581 (OP)
Great now get dual citizens out of federal and state governments.

>>508968509
It could be September
It could be October
SCOTUS makes their own deadlines
Yesterdays ruling was supposed to come out anytime from late June - Mid July
They do this so nobody knows exactly what their rulings will be or when

There has only ever been one leak in SCOTUS history and that was on Roe V. Wade and that (((leaker))) has still never been punished which means it was probably one of the justices themselves who did it.

>>508968628
And get AIPAC to register under FARA!

>>508966712
>>508967700
lel jesuits do import beaners and defend them as their lawyers, but i also assumed he meant jews

>>508966581 (OP)
I like to thank the Jews for finally allowing us this. I’ve hated them for years now but Zognald really shows we can work with them on some stuff.

>>508968618
I love this new lack of an argument from globalist shills
>IF YOU GET RID OF ALL THE ILLEGALS THEY WILL TAKE YOUR GUNS!
lmfao, such a non sequitur

>>508968646
50 million equatorial abominations suddenly becoming stateless sounds pretty dangerous.
I expect "Look at this picture of a crying child, now we have to burn the constitution!" to be the least of our worries as we move toward that ruling.
Hopefully the judges don't cuck as they have on some rulings, because if they do our country can be marked officially done.

>>508968903
>*justices
Whatever, I'm not a legal expert I just make memes that are illegal in the UK.

>>508966712
>>508966581 (OP)
It needs to be retroactively enforced

>>508968872
It's not though. This order removes an avenue of recourse against executive orders. Feel free to explain to me how monarchies and dictatorships are superior to republics

>>508969134
>Feel free to explain to me how monarchies and dictatorships are superior to republics
They get shit done and have a single individual to blame instead of a blackmail system that is gridlocked for 50 years?

>>508966581 (OP)
Trump himself has 34 felonies and had to be put in prison long time ago.

>>508969088
The EO doesn't phrase it that way but if SCOTUS makes a ruling on the 14th Amendment which is a constitutional question then THAT would be retroactive all the way back to when the 14th Amendment was ratified which is like 1866 or some shit.


Trumps EO states:

“Sec. 2. Policy. (a) it is the policy of the United States” to no longer ISSUE or ACCEPT documentation of citizenship in two scenarios: “(1) when [a] person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or (2) when [a] person’s mother’s presence in the United States was lawful but temporary, and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.”

it goes on to say...

>(b) Subsection (a) of this section shall apply only to persons who are born within the United States after 30 days from the date of this order.

The date of the order was January 20th, 2025.
So that means it only went into effect on February 20th, 2025.

>>508969134
Cope and seethe
>IF YOU GET RID OF OUR ABILITY TO BLOCK YOUR POLICIES THEN YOU WONT HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO IT WHEN IT IS OUR TURN IN THE WHITE HOUSE!

It was only (You) who was using these national injunctions in this way, retard. Because it is (You) who is the wannabe dictator, it is (You) who abhors freedom, it is (You) who will never win an election again.

Trump had more injunctions placed on him than for every President of the 20th century COMBINED.

>>508969327
I thought we had judicial precedent that laws can't be retroactive?
Does that only apply to laws and not executive orders?
That's why I have doubts about a willingness to defend the retroactive aspect of this.

>>508969229
Yes, Belarus, China, and Turkmenistan are all superior to the US

>>508969503
SCOTUS doesn't make "laws" they interpret the CONSTITUTION as it ALWAYS WAS for they do not have the power to amend the constitution either. The power to Amend the constitution is firmly placed in Article V of the U.S Constitution, so when SCOTUS declares an action or interpretation of part of the US Constitution as "Unconstitutional" that is RETROACTIVE IN NATURE BY DEFAULT because they are interpreting the Constitution as it ALWAYS WAS to claim otherwise would be to argue that SCOTUS is exceeding the powers granted to them by that very same document.

>>508969453
>Trump had more injunctions placed on him than for every President of the 20th century COMBINED.
Why is that, do you think?

>>508969537
From what I understand, Belarus is run pretty well.
At least the citizens look healthy and content.
IIRC the evil dictator didn't allow refugee and covid bullshit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JgJQB6JIgk

>>508969704
Because the opposition found a loophole that allowed just 3 judges to became emperors and dictators and rule over the entire country from Boston and Maryland like emperors.

It took months for it to eventually go through the courts and for SCOTUS to obviously rule that the Judges acting as Emperors were exceeding their powers and that National Injunctions are unconstitutional.

>>508969134
this order actually has the opposit effect you would know this if you werent aleftist shill
the dems have used the slow roll to the SC to hold on to and enforce laws to fuck with gun owners this is how we got nation wide CC and why new york freaked the fuck out when the case hit the SC they tried to backpeddle the whole law.

now any nation wide law on guns can be defanged immeditaly by singular states and if the government wishes to fight them it will be expedited to the SC now while blue states can be sued the same they are now unitl it goes to SC nothign changed for them

the SC just voted to do their job more and now wont have the onus of mutliple state cases to throw gun cases back to to avoid ruiling on it

>>508969803
>Because the opposition found a loophole
Whats this loophole?

>>508969917
multiple state cases fighting national injunctions*

the SC cant say the lower court has to argue the injunction from this state on a case from another state for instance

>>508970046
abusing nation wide injunctions as well as judge shoping leftist judges to apply them to the whole country...

>>508970046
National Injunctions when used by radical leftists judges as a cudgel to force the halting of all policies produced by an administration.

This is something that has only occurred with Trump and a handful of districts out of the nearly 800 judges only 5 or 6 actual judges havae placed ALL of the injunctions and they are ALL located in heavy left leaning locations like Boston.

And this laughably corrupt practice of these judges instead of ruling on the basis of law and instead basing their rulings and decisions off of policy disagreement and emotional bullshit is finally coming to an end.

Republicans didn't do this under Biden because republicans don't suffer histrionics like a woman on her period the same way these radical leftist judges have been acting.

>>508970114
The GOP repeatedly obtained nationwide injunctions to impede various Obama policies, so this isn't a new loophole

>>508968646
We do know it was jew that leaked it. They had their protests all lined up and scheduled.

>>508970460
cool the dems abused it so hard it got closed.

>>508969655
I hope the court sees it the same way.

>>508966581 (OP)
This is all so awesome. I’m thrilled about this.

>>508968706
The jesuits have been composed of and compromised by jews since the beginning. It’s really sad actually.

>>508968903
Good

>>508969268
Nobody cares

>>508968903
The US needed to go to war with Mexico anyways

The US needs total control over Mexicos borders and ports, it is very clear that the Mexican Government is NOT capable of governing itself and Mexico is largely just a hub of criminality and death. A war with Mexico and annexation if only partial of Mexico is needed to enforce the law and stop all the fucking fentanyl from flooding over the border.

>>508970046
You’re really having a hard time following this thread aren’t you?

>>508970859
seems almost like a bot

>>508968257
>POTUS's Executive Order is ruled constitutional by SCOTUS then that is RETROACTIVE.
you are clearly some midwit with a GED at best level of education. Holy shit even Trump's EO has wording that is 30 days from now etc, not retroactive. So I don't understand how you read the EO and thought hum yes yes retro.. plus he can't change the constitution with a EO. That's why the SCOTUS case on birthright hard dodged the merits of the case on every level. Only looking to focus on the blocks from lower courts.
Like I get you don't understand legal wording or anything about these sort of issues and odds are just looking to troll but god damn you're stupid. There is already decades of case law on this issue. We can change birth right but it would take a true constitutional amendment. Anything/everyone other than that is just political theater for Trumps mostly idiot level base who think this EOs are all king level laws being passed down.

>>508967700
They are hand in glove on this one, together.

>>508970701
Because Trump and his MAGA are nothing but a bunch of grifters. If you don't care means you don't care about the country no matter how many times you say the words America and great every day.

>>508966581 (OP)
Why do conservatives hate the Constitution so much?

>Hospitals who do NOT comply with this Executive Order will be committing a FELONY OFFENSE each time and will lose their FEDERAL FUNDING and be unable to pay their FEDERAL TAXES and go bankrupt within a year not to mention the people in charge of those hospitals will get decades in prison for the hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands of felonies they will be committing.


And then you woke up.

>>508971688
Doesn't matter what the EO says because SCOTUS ruling would not be on the EO itself it would be on the MERITS of the EO as in a ruling on the 14th Amendment.

SCOTUS rulings on Constitutional Questions are RETROACTIVE and that authority supersedes that of an Executive Order or any act of congress EXCEPT for Article V powers.

>>508972266
Bullshit felonies for bullshit charges
The AG who prosecuted Trump on those charges is guilty of the same bullshit "felonies".

>>508968903
I’m kind of over the constitution desu
Israel and China have shown us The Way of the Future
Might makes right and fuck em all to death

>>508973919
The constitution is based

>>508966712
>>508967700
nah, jesuits are the current subversives, jews are a different class of subversives

>>508969537

>>508977638
There is no greater threat than jews. There is no group, no ideology, no doctrine that is worse than Judaism.

>>508977890
they are a righteous threat.