https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867425004623

1/4

>>508969056 (OP)
New study of 2700 Indian whole genomes shows that Indo-European/Yamnaya/Steppe is quite low, about 15%. It is a bit higher in the north (almost 20%) and among those who speak IE languages, but not impressively so. Too much mixing since the arrival.

2/4

>>508969056 (OP)
Inbreeding is strong. The median person had identical blocks in their genome at the level suggesting their parents were 3rd cousins, whereas the human average is about close to 4th cousins (Africans less).

3/4

>>508969056 (OP)
Annoyingly, the data is not public, even though American taxpayers paid for this. Can't wait for Trump admin to maybe do something about this abuse (inb4 fell for it again award).

4/

Bottom Line!

The study reconciles previous archaeological and linguistic frameworks (like the Steppe hypothesis) with genomic data by showing:

Steppe-related groups did arrive in India and contributed genetically,
But their influence was relatively small—around 15% on average, and heavily diluted by extensive mixing over millennia.
So, while the arrival of Indo-European languages and Steppe cultural elements may have had wide-reaching effects, the genetic footprint left behind is modest.

sorry chud but we don't believe in evolution and the earth certainly is younger than 50,000 years

>>508969597
>we

To put this in modern perspective, 20% is the average european DNA in american blacks.

>>508969768
It disproves the idea of caste systems too.

>>508969056 (OP)
50,0000 years is a lot of poo

>>508969768
I will bump this.

>When did people first migrate to India from Africa—as part of the major migration out of Africa or at earlier times along the southern coastal migration route?
I stopped there

Heh, that would be interesting if it were true.

However, race isn't real and India didn't have borders circa 50,000 BP.

Checkmate, racists. BTFO out again by science and reasoning.