Thread 508990092

To this day there is still no good explaination of why Building 7 collapsed in on itself on 9/11. How did it happen and why were news organizations saying Building 7 collapsed before it happened?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=677i43QfYpQ

can you fuck off with your antisemitism
mods delete this thread

>>508990092 (OP)
learn to worry only about things you can influence and be thankful thousands of yuppies died that day

>>508990092 (OP)
Blatantly antisemitic threads like this do nothing for the betterment of society. Do better.

>>508990092 (OP)
Oy vey shut it down

>>508990092 (OP)
>PULL IT

building 7 always brings out the shills

>>508990092 (OP)
>why was 6 afraid of 7?
>because 7 collapsed into its footprint at free fall speed without being struck by anything

>>508990092 (OP)
You're doing god's work. I saw in the last building 7 thread how many people are completely ignorant of the scenario.

>>508990092 (OP)
It was massively damaged by a collapsing 110 story building.

>>508990092 (OP)
Turns out steel frame buildings can be vulnerable to uncontrolled fires

>>508990926
Do you really think repeating this makes it true? You know people can just look at the footage right?

>>508993140
You mean the footage and researched into the matter that was surprised and then sealed under the ruling of being a threat to national security

>>508993699
I mean any footage of the collapse and aftermath showing it didn't come down into its footprint or at freefall, i.e all of it

>>508992108
Nope. Guess again. It rhymes with funtrolled ammunition.

>>508992962
>>508993140
Wrong. The free-fall collapse into its own footprint is proof, but you don't know anything relevant about this event, so you're denying that anyone knows more than the officials.

>>508993760
>i.e all of it
What do you consider "falling into its own footprint?" If a few bricks fall outside of the footprint, is that a failure? What's the acceptable margin of error?

>>508990092 (OP)
Who gives a shit, anyway, Pedro ?

>>508994229
Maybe 10%? Building 7 severely damage multiple surrounding buildings during its collapse whoch were far outside it's footprint

>>508993760
>it didn't come down into its footprint or at freefall, i.e all of it
It didn't even stutter as it came down, and it pancaked when it fell. How do you think an unevenly-damaged building should fall?

>>508994139
But it didn't collapse at freefall into its own footprint, that's the point. You niggers say the same thing about towers 1 and but it's even more obvious that they didn't than 7 in any of the collapse footage

>>508994339
Have you ever studied architecture?

>>508994410
NONE of them should've collapsed at all, and certainly not completely demolished.

I could state the same facts again that you've undoubtedly already heard time and again, but when engineers, first responders, pilots, architects, demolition experts and every other relevant field under the sun can't get through to you, I, anon from the interwebs, will not be successful, either. Study architecture and the physics of steel structures. They aren't houses of cards. What happened to all three of them was so rare as to never having happened in history. No steel building has ever fallen to fire, and three did that day.

>>508994371
1 and 2 pancaked, not 7. And obviously they didn't stutter the whole section of the buildings above the impact point was falling straight down through the middle of the building not floor is going to noticeably slow that down on an individual level. Collectively they slowed it down quite a lot which is why the fall was much slower than freefall

>>508990092 (OP)
Tons and tons of debris fell directly onto building 7 when the plane flew into the north tower, making it unstable.

How are retards still talking about this shit?

>>508990092 (OP)
explosive charges used for building demolitions planted by mossad

>>508994696
The only collapse that was surprising(in hindsight) was 7, 1 and 2 were pretty much inevitable after the impacts. 7 could have survived if the fire suppression systems and response had been adequate. Only a tiny minority of engineers worldwide disagree with these and there have been multiple steel buildings collapse from fire in the years since

>>508992108
Didn't Building 7 collapse a while after the Twin Towers already fell. It didn't even collapse with them, why would it take the damage that long to finally have an effect? On top of that why did the building seem to collapse downward into its foundation?

>>508990092 (OP)
Larry told them to pull it and Larry always gets what he wants. And yes, it was just a coincidence that he didn't show up to his office on 9/11

>>508990092 (OP)
As Lucky Larrie said :
"WE had to pull it"

>>508990092 (OP)
Collateral damage from unrevealed breakthrough technology that turned the WTC's to dust. Cars in the vicinity were torched and some say people were jumping from the towers due to a microwave sensation.

>hear the story of every guest who comes I show him this arrowhead a replica of a Roman arrowhead from the battle of Yodeft, Yodeft was the first fortress in the Galilee that fell to the Romans later Gamla then Jerusalem a great destruction and I tell them the Romans are no longer here, that was their arrow and this is our arrow. The most sophisticated dart missile in the world and now i'm showing them another dart this syringe

>>508995293
Apparently him or his daughter who worked for him. They were both described by employees at the Trade Centers as work oriented people who never miss a day. What a coincidence they were both out far away from the incident on that particular day, talk about lucky.

>>508990092 (OP)
Apparently it was struck by the antenna of the North Tower when it collapsed. All of the buildings in the WTC complex were damaged too plus the surrounding buildings further away.

Here is some footage of the WTC7 before it collapsed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5tEy6mXSE8

Its liké winning a lotery.Never happens to poor Goyim..

millions of tons of flaming debris fell on it from a height of almost as much as a mile and it was heavily damaged and caught on fire and burned for hours and then collapsed? just a thought

>>508996262
How does any of that explain why Building 7 collapse in on itself to its very foundation like it did? If anything it would just be a heavily damaged building at certain sections from what you described but it quite literally collapsed downward into itself into a heep of rubble. Falling debris and a fire doesn't cause that.

>>508996750
Good old Larry Silverstaine right after saying "Pull it!"
Kek

>>508990691
>>508990444
>>508990213

Who tf are these idiots?

>>508990092 (OP)
JEWS

thats fucking how.

>>508997911
kikes speedrunning the Streisand effect once again on /pol/ they are really good at it

>>508990092 (OP)
Keebler elves did it

>>508996439
I wonder....

>>508994910

Debris from these guys bro?

>>508995212
They waited for the 3rd plane way longer than they should have.

>It collapsed perfectly into its own footprint in it because some debris hit it, goyim

I see Mossad is working overtime today.

>>508995293

Just watch the interview when asked about this situation. Watch his body language, his eyes.
That's not a guy that was in danger and barely escaped.

>>508994910
Probably because thanks to jewish shenanigans in ukraine and iran and now israel we have seen that even getting hit with a missle doesnt bring down tall buildings.

>>508997911
Poor Israelie agents,who spent all their VPN Moshad allowance shekels on cheap Ucrainian prostitués and have to post using même flags......

>>508996439
The overwhelming professional consensus — from NIST through ASCE, AISC, SFPE, NFPA, and other national structural and fire engineering bodies — is that WTC 7 collapsed solely due to fire-induced progressive structural failure, triggered by debris damage and uncontrolled fires on multiple floors.

Debris from the nearby collapse of WTC1 ignited uncontrolled fires on multiple floors (7–9 and 11–13), in part due to disabled sprinkler systems .

The heat caused structural steel beams and girders to expand and weaken. A key component—Column79—lost support as surrounding floor systems collapsed .

Once column79 buckled, it triggered a chain reaction of falling floors, core columns, and external supports, ultimately leading to a near‑vertical collapse visible in the videos .

NIST’s computer models matched real videos, showing the collapse was initiated by fire—not explosives—and lasted about 40% longer than free-fall .

They found no evidence of explosives, thermite, fuel‑line fires, or blasts; widespread incendiary theories are unsupported by scientific data .

>>508990092 (OP)
It was a 9/11 miracle

>>508990213
kek

>>508998174
wasn't it 28 concrete-reinforced steel columns that all failed within 0.5 seconds?

>>508997911
they take our tax dollars and pay pampered faggots to spread pro israel propaganda on here

>>508994824
>1 and 2 pancaked
thank God they pancakes. Can you imagined if you would have waffled? Or even worse, creped? As bad as it was that they pancaked, it could have been much worse.

>>508990092 (OP)
There's actually a very plausible explanation for it. Building 7 was built over an old electrical substation, which led to them needing to use transfer trusses and girders to avoid piercing through the substation during construction. This made the lower floors much more vulnerable. After fire burned for hours on one face of the building, thermal expansion of the girders caused interior columns to collapse.

>>508998526
yeah no one here gives a fuck faggot the only thing you're convincing anyone here of is to hate little rat faggots such as yourself more than we already do.

do the world a favor and fucking kill yourself.

>>508996004
Turn on the TV lately and you'll see buildings hit by fucking missiles. Half the building just fucking gone and reduced to rubble. But what remains of the building continues to stand tall for months and months without collapsing.

But building 7 gets hit with an antennae and has a small fire on one floor that the firefighters had under control. Somehow this is enough to cause it to completely collapse? Either American construction pales in comparison to the master craftsmanship of Palestinian engineering or the story is absolute bullshit. Think!

Um, sorry sweety, that’s a threat to national security

>>508990092 (OP)
It suffered a heart attack.

>>508998526
Awaawahahahhaaaa!

>>508999146
Building 7 had fires burning all throughout it essentially uncontrolled for 6 hours

>>508999397
uncontrolled fires started by debris from a neighboring building does not bring down steel and concrete columns jews do.

>>508999397
neat how the fires were perfectly symmetric and melted through concrete like that

>>508999397
And? Until this day, fire never collapses a building. Entire buildings burn almost completely leaving a skeleton behind without collapsing. It has also never happened again in the intervening 24 years. So it was just something that never happened before and never happened again, that's all.

Building 7 had some information about Hillary Clinton. Very common for suicidal buildings, but in the end it took it's own life.

>>508990092 (OP)
Building 7 was rigged with explosives before 9/11 despite not being set for demolition. Weird, huh?

In the chaos of 9/11 there was no way to go through all the steps necessary to rig and demolish building 7. It had to have been done in advance.

>hey, uh, can we just blow up our building?
National emergencies do not give people the authority to demolish their own buildings, so even if things went down the way they pretend, it's still fucked up.

Building 7 is a much bigger giveaway than jet fuel not being able to melt steel beams. BUILDING 7 WAS RIGGED WITH EXPLOSIVES PRIOR TO 9/11. WHY?

>>508990444
>yuppies
it was 2001 not the fucking 80's.

>>508990092 (OP)
>...Anon
>How did Building 7
Explosives
--> Demolition

>>508996004

Check the video, I mean firefighters did say that they expect it to collapse and if u look at the fire... that really does look dangerous enough to structurally damage the building. Especially since before collapsing u see the top sort of sag, as if a beam just buckled and then shortly after a chain reaction hits the building... Plus there were no explosives heard for the building not saying they could have exploded when the tower went down ~..
U know maybe the building actually lasted more than expected...I don't know building 7 is a mystery but not WTC 1 & 2, for christ sakes there's phone calls made AFTER the planes hit, from the planes.... I mean there's no doubt in my mind about them.

Not to mention, no proof at all and that shit was too perfect for US at that time and everything happened so quickly after as if they were prepared. Same as Covid.

>>508990092 (OP)
nerve gas

>>508990092 (OP)
>its right in front of their faces and they still don't see it

>How did it happen
explosives
>why were news organizations saying Building 7 collapsed before it happened
who knows but my guess controlled media knew about it before it happened and they did an oopsie. you can speculate that maybe there was a planned plane to hit it (curious posters that aren't AI trained bots, CIA nigger and friends, and whatnot could look up remote controlled planes - yes it's real).
some videos https://youtu.be/YhJXXoR0aVw?t=1428
read http://911review.com/attack/wtc/b7.html
read http://www.wtc7.net/toc.html
watch https://corbettreport.com/who-had-access-to-the-twin-towers/
spending too much time on something like wtc7 is kinda of a waste of time imo. after a while you start to see patterns of the tricks used for pretty much all "state created chaos" across the world. if it isn't already obvious the state hates you and i and while i agree the larry kike did profit off this, a lot, a whole fucking lot, of groups were involved beyond muh jews (majority jews though - rather zionist extremists and peoples that are controlled by secret societies to drive certain agendas). so you got cia niggers, mossad israeli niggers, presidental niggers (bush etc all), etc. etc. etc.
also, for those that have the attention span to read this much, https://www.bitchute.com/video/BRh282hgrwaF though those that submit to a certain dogma may not like it and dismiss it completely.

>>508998110
Now we know that there was supposed to be another plane hijacked but they got kicked off the flight early on when things got shut down, so the missing plane issue in this theory was revolved and this could be possible.

>>508990092 (OP)
Did you miss the videos of part of the north tower falling on WTC7 causing it to collapse?

>>508990092 (OP)
>fire somehow spreads into the building
>the sprinkler system just wouldn't work on any of the floors
>falls down like it's being demolished

really makes the noggin go joggin

>>508990092 (OP)
>North tower collapses
>Part of it impacts WTC7 (this wouldn't happen in a controlled demolition btw)
>WTC7 catches fire
>Sprinkler system fails
>Fire causes the steel support beams to expand and contract
>Structural integrity of supports fail as the steel is gets hotter and hotter
>WTC7 collapses
Sad. Many such cases!

>>508990092 (OP)
Cool it with the antisemitism

>>508990092 (OP)
Chinesium

>>508999561
At least 4 large steel frame buildings have collapsed from fire since building 7

>>509003580
The CIA has been busy knocking down buildings so building 7 seems plausible?

>>509003724
Building 7 seems plausible because there is nothing obviously strange about what happened to it. The only suspicious thing was the buildings contents

It collapsed from a controlled demolition. Here is the footage and here is the science that confirms it.

https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7

The zionist Jewa did 9/11 to jusfify their genocides in the Middle East.

Controlled demolition.

>>508990213
Lmao fucking jews and their antisemitism bullshit scapegoat word. You all need to be gassed

>>508990092 (OP)
OY VEY!!! Stop asking questions goy!

pull it

>>509003813

>The zionist Jews did 9/11 to jusfify their genocides in the Middle East.

WTC7 was a government building and they wish to conquer their neighboring nations.

What did 7 have in it that warranted its destruction?

>>508990092 (OP)
It collapsed because the weight of all the evidence of decades of stock market manipulation and money laundering was too much for the structural integrity to hold.

>>509003813

jidf on suicide watch with this one

>>509004304
Shitloads of case files for federal investigations

>>508990092 (OP)
Ask Lucky Larry Silverstein.

>>508990092 (OP)
You know damn well how it happened. There were some sparks inside a microwave inside a closet. To prevent the fire from escaping its confined metallic prison and engulfing the entire building and all surrounding buildings in NYC, Larry, being Larry, gave the order to pull it.

>>508995392
>Building owner confesses to the world's largest case of insurance fraud on national television.
>Insurance company does nothing

>>509002125
The plane that was supposed to hit building seven crashed in Pennsylvania. So Larry Silverstein and his mates were left holding a hot potato. They couldn't plausibly explain the destruction of building seven without the plane but at the same time they couldn't leave it intact without risking discovery of the demolition charges the next day. So they decided to pull it down and then gaslight the public about what had happened. They would have succeeded if not for the internet.

A professor of structural engineering at the university of fairbanks had some hdr students create a cad model of wtc7. Finite element modelling of the structure, which I think they placed in the public domain, proves that the building could not have collapsed from the minor damage it suffered to its facade when the twin towers collapsed.

There were 7 total WTC buildings, 1, 2 and 7 fell on 9/11. 3, 4, 5, 6 stood beneath the towers and sustained heavy damage but did not fall. They were later brought down with controlled demolition.

Building 7 is noticeably further away but sustained enough damage to fall in 10 seconds?

>>509007265
Wasn't that the one meant for the white house.

>>509007306
No, it collapsed after burning for 8 hours

>>509006806
the insurance company did in fact fight him in court over the payout and the jewish judge made the insurance company pay double

>>508994696
> No steel building has ever fallen to fire, and three did that day
In the case of the towers it was not just a fire. It was massive structural damage and a fire. Why do you people always ignore the structural damage.

>>508996439
flight 93 never made it there

>>508990092 (OP)
Literally everyone knows it was a controlled demolition at this point.

>>509007742
>Why do you people always ignore the structural damage
Why do you people always ignore Larry Silverstein not showing up to his office on 9/11, saying "pull it" right before Tower 7 went down and the BBC reporting that Tower 7 had collapsed when it was clearly still standing?

>>508996750
haha good ol lucky larry silverstine, what a funny guy he is

>>508990092 (OP)
Because 7 8 9 and 10

>>509007742
>It was massive structural damage and a fire.
nope to both
>Why do you people always ignore the structural damage.
why do people, like you, ignore what the original builders of the towers stated. NO AIRPLANE COULD BRING DOWN EITHER TOWER. they were designed to withstand multiple collisions

>>509008121
Its not even possible for a building to not receive massive damage when hit with such a large fast moving object. Its fundamental physics, the building cannot possibly stop the entire plane dead, so the only other option is through.

>>509007972
because they are jewish rats trying so hard to perpetuate their fake and gay narratives around 9/11 even though likely more than half the nation at this point believes a giant load of KIKE SHIT.

pretty pathetic they come to a site that purely and unrelentingly professes their outright total hatred for these faggots. they have no objective. they are subhumans that have zero control over the dominating narratives that actual /pol/acks adhere to on this site.

they're so fucking stupid they cry "SAND NIGGER" "BROWN PERSON" when we say we hate kikes and when you tell them you hate kikes and the various niggers they've flooded our nations with they have no response.

they are useless and ineffective wastes of time that accomplish absolutely fucking nothing at all here and increasingly so the rest of the internet.

>>509007476
I guess chink engineering wins again.

>>508990213
Do you obsessed faggots seriously not get tired of saying the same exact thing in the same exact way all day every day? The way you inject your ADHD forced "humor" attempt is so cringe. Quit insisting on yourself. You're a pathetic mudslime shitskin.

>>509008555
Imagine believing that someone has never lied to you because they told you they've never lied to you.

>>508995293
None of his kids showed up to work that day either.

>>509008776
fortunately i'm unvaxxed and capable of critical thought unlike the vast majority of nigger cattle in this world.

>>508990820
Larry Silverstein’s phrase "pull it" in reference to World Trade Center 7 (WTC7) has been widely discussed and misinterpreted, especially in conspiracy theory circles.In a 2002 PBS documentary titled America Rebuilds, Silverstein said:

> "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. And I said, 'You know, we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."

The phrase "pull it" has been interpreted in two main ways:

1. Firefighting context (official interpretation):

According to Silverstein and his spokespeople, "pull it" meant to pull the firefighting efforts i.e., withdraw firefighters from the building due to danger.

At the time, WTC7 had been burning for hours, was severely damaged by debris from the Twin Towers, and there were fears it would collapse (which it did later that day).

2. Controlled demolition interpretation (conspiracy theory):

Some interpret "pull it" as slang for demolishing a building, used in the demolition industry (e.g., “pulling” a building down).

Conspiracy theorists argue that this was an admission that WTC7 was intentionally demolished, and they question how a building could be rigged for demolition so quickly.

However, experts in demolition say that controlled demolitions take weeks or months of preparation, and there’s no evidence WTC7 was prepped in such a way.

If WTC7 had been brought down by explosives as part of a secret demolition plot, and Silverstein was involved, it would be incredibly reckless and irrational for him to say anything remotely incriminating on a publicly broadcast documentary.

>>509010196
>memeflag
>shilling on behalf of a kike, on 4chan - ever
immediately discredited. this is a kike, bot or shill or some combination of all three.

kill yourself rat

>>509007414
Yes it was heading to the white house, that other guy is a retard. Also, a hijacked passenger jet hit the Pentagon as witnessed by hundreds and tracked by ATC radar and other aircraft in the vicinity.


https://youtu.be/kMOvlrT-AFc

>>509010196
shills are now using ChatGPT for their work

>>509008580
It's a little different when you have water pressure

>>508990092 (OP)
>3 buildings, 2 planes, 1 day
the side fires and light damage caused intense core structure failures that cut deep into the foundation allowing complete structural collapse
>pure coincidence it looked like a controlled demolition, surely
poor larry only got paid twice but three buildings fell ;^)

>>509011243
All the money he was paid went into rebuilding the WTC, it qas mich less than the complex was worth

>>509011243
>poor larry only got paid twice but three buildings fell ;^)
yeah how convenient he took out a fucking insurance policy against terrorism and just felt like he shouldnt go to work that day. werent those buildings all packed to the brim with asbestos as well and remodeling them cost more than dropping them?

but surely some fucking memeflag subhuman kike faggot would tell the truth on the internet. fucking faggot should have a bullet put between his eyes.

>>509011866
shut the fuck up jew the buildings were deemed hazardous to health because of the asbestos used in their construction and the payout for them being dropped with his magical terrorism insurance jew fraud

faggots like you need to be lined up and fucking shot. anyone shilling for kikes and/or billionaires should be shot.

>>508995124
It's funny how every single word you say in your post is outright wrong.
But jukes aside, building 7 came down exactly the same reason the other two: a plane was supposed to crash inside it. The only fuckup is that plane never reached it, so it had to collapse out of sheer confusion and shame.

>>508990092 (OP)
The north tower fell on it you retard

>>508998084
What the fuck? Is this real?

Come on. After the cellphone bombs, iran drone trucks, mosad in Iran, its clear as day mosad out explosives in all those buildings knowing 9/11 would happen.
Mudslimes crashed the planes. Mosad set off the explosives.

>>509012221
>he doesnt know
you thought the dancing israeli thing was a joke? its all real newfriend.

they are the devil incarnate.

>>509012221
>What the fuck? Is this real?
off by one...

>>509012099
Ok, but that doesn't change the fact that the insurance payout was a lot less than the WTC was worth and Silverstone was legally obligated ti rebuild it

>>509012360
No not all desu, I've known about that for a while. But I've only looked into this E-TEAM stuff really tonight and I'm shocked.

>>509012594
shut the fuck up rat you arent convincing anyone of shit here this board is specifically curated by its core constituents to increase hatred for your vile subhuman kind and you are accomplishing that very task right now with every word you type.

you need to be fucking eradicated rat.

>>509012360
>>508998084
I've never seen this either. waow

>>509012312
No not all desu, I've known about that for a while. But I've only looked into this E-TEAM stuff really tonight and I'm shocked.

>>509012203
No it didn't the trade centers collapsed, already hit the ground, then Building 7 collapsed after the trade centers already collapsed and hit the ground. There is plenty of video showing this so if you are going to make stuff up at least try.

>>509012657
>But I've only looked into this E-TEAM stuff really tonight and I'm shocked.
Wait until you realize there is no possible way it was a passanger jumbo jet that "hit the pentagon":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMY5-R2baM4

>>509012684
Ii know it's hard when your sad fantasies fall apart the second you look into them at all. Cry about it faggot

3 months after the Worl Trade Center fell there were so many Chinese stories built by 4 of the greatest Jjapanese architects from India.

>>509012777
yup. didnt Stew Peters "Occupied" documentary cover eteam?

if you havent seen Occupied you need to watch that shit. its free on rumble/xitter

>>509012908
Link me and I will watch it tonight.

>>508990092 (OP)
24 years later there's still no official explanation other than DUUUUUH IT JUST HAPPENED.

>>508990092 (OP)
north tower was rigged with explosives + all footage of a plane crashing into it is manipulated/edited

south tower had an actual plane fly into it

all three buildings where rigged with explosives

something they planned for wtc7 didnt work out

it was the jews

>>509012947
https://rumble.com/v5tqte2-occupied-world-premiere-warning-sensitive-content-viewer-discretion-is-advi.html

>>509008488
>Its not even possible for a building to not receive massive damage when hit with such a large fast moving object.
but its not possible for the building to collapse especially when its hit up at the top

>>508990092 (OP)
Just so everyone knows WTC 7 held massive amounts of DoD documentation and they shared the 25th floor with the CIA and the IRS. In addition to being a CIA HQ this building also housed the Federal Home Loan Bank had offices in this building, this was the bank that paid bailout to hedge funds during the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis. They were one of the only institutions that remained completely solvent through the crisis. How did they do it? They were restructured into an independent agency the Federal Housing Finance Agency and US Secretary of the Treasury was now allowed to purchase their securities like they're stocks with no limitations.

>>509008102
CARLOS!!!!

>>509012893
you're the one with sad fantasies its clear as day people hate you you subhuman rat faggot and extremely dangerous amounts of people know what you kikes do and its global both left and right that hate you and want you fully fucking exterminated regardless of you faggots bombing our people and our buildings just like you did with the U.S.S. liberty.

you all have to die and by the end of the decade you just might rat.

>>509012781
This place is pointless anon. It's becoming more and more of a waste of time to try and start discussions here. Ourchan runs slow but at least the kikes and India are range b&. This place should be left to rot already.

so who did 9/11

>>509013739
Ruling class kikes and mossad.

>>509013576
gonna bookmark that one. but doesnt seem to have a lot activity. also as its new it still has breaking points ahead eg spam/raids etc that have here been figured out. agree however that 4chan is shitted up by trannys/juden and asorted losers

>>509013874
and shabbos goyim.

>>508999199

STFU KIKE, YOU FORGOT YOUR MEMEFLAG, JEW FAGGOT. HEIL HITLER, KILL YOURSELF JEW.

>>509013874
i thought it was Muslims.

>>509008488
Airplanes are soft, not rigid bodies. All you have to do is dissipate 100tons*750m/s*750m/s /2 = 28GJ.
Aircraft plastic deformation absorbs 5-20GJ
Considering that the tower didn't move much due to impact, the actual damage would be local.
All in all, sloppy job.

>>509013930
Yeah I hope it can catch on a bit more. Or at the very least something similar to it. They do mod it pretty decently too. No obvious demoralizing posts or random porn bs. It just needs the users but anons are slow slow to jumping ship.
>>509013932
You're right, them too.

>>509013932
>>509014278
didn't muslims like fly the planes or whatever?

>>509014247
>Airplanes are soft, not rigid bodies.
and there really isnt much mass to then since they are mostly hollow tube-like structures

>>509013985
A lot of us did. Social conditioning against questioning it is a hell of a drug man. South Park had an entire episode dedicated to calling 911 conspiracists retarded. >The group thinks it's retarded
>Questioning it will make you be seen badly
That sort of nonsense.

>>509014525
so muslims weren't flying the planes on 9/11?

It was rigged with explosives in the elevator shaft. Mossad and Skull and Bones CIA niggers got access to the elevator shaft (very ez with a simple hand tool the slides into a lil hole on the elevator door) They then put the charges on the main supports.

The Silverstein jew admits on taped interview that he "PULLED IT".

>>508990092 (OP)
It is obvious , but nobody wants to admit it

>>509014563
It was your mother.

>>509014305
yes we hate kikes(masterminds) and subhuman shitskin golems both here at 4/pol/

the two are not mutually exclusive

>>508992108
WRONG! Nice try though glowie.

>>509014676
yea I guess people don't want to answer that question. thanks anyway.

>>508992962
the building steel is covered in firestop. Nice try though glowstick.

>>508990092 (OP)
>there is still no good explaination of why Building 7 collapsed in on itself on 9/11
There is one, you’ve just decided you don’t like it.

The building got hit by several thousand tons of burning steel and concrete when the North Tower collapsed across the street. The rubble damaged the connections between the mains water and the fire suppression system, destroyed several parts of the support structure, cleaved a 20ish story gash down the length of the south side of the building, and lit fires on multiple floors. With no functioning fire suppression, a third of the responding firefighters killed in the collapses of the North and South towers, the fires in WTC7 burned with little resistance for the next six hours until supports started failing from the combination of structural and fire damage.

>>508994824
Keep parroting your jewish masters lie glowstick.

>>509014694
so it was Muslims that were flying. just making sure I remember correctly it was a long time ago. i remember Muslims being very happy over it, too. Like gloating and shit.

>>509014718
Already answered your question. It was mossad and the ruling class. They've proven themselves to do this sort of shit already. It's obvious.

>>509014742
I read it from muh nine uhlevin commishin reeeport!

>>509014819
other anon already told me Muslims were flying the planes in newyork and washington. i was just confirming whether or not i what i remembered was correct.

>>509014792
yes sand niggers hijacked the planes. did they fly them? doubtful considering their lack of experience and the difficulty of flying them into towers themselves. considering the entire us airforce was om vacation that day and were unable to intercept literal civilian airliners its safe to say that the planes that connected were remotely operated.

needless to say every conflict we have had in the middle east has been facilitated by jews. it is blaringly and on their behalf admittedly their modus operandi

>>508990092 (OP)
> why Building 7 collapsed in on itself
I'm not sure exactly but it seems the Millenium Hotel had something to do with it.

>>509003813
>those flashes
These can be easily explained. There was a music concert across the street and there were a lot of people taking pictures from B7.

>>509014742
>pull it

>>508992108
Why didn’t every other building nearby collapse in the same way
did 7 have burning shingles magnets in its roof

>>509014963
Those planes were cruise missles and the live footage was CGI. There are plenty of anomalies with the footage. It was a holywood production.

Anybody who saw passenger jets hit the towers were only conditioned to see such when they were told 24/7 via MSM it was planes. It was cruise missiles.

>>508990092 (OP)
Because buildings are built on foundations and in this case basements.
Now hang yourself, kike.
>>508990213
False flagging kike.

>>509014963
the sandniggers could have said no, though, refused to do it or participate. they also could have not celebrated the fact that it happened. muslims working with jews to fuck up the United States is fucked, but I guess it wouldn't be the first time that happened.

>>508990926
based and childhood humor pilled.

>>508995212
Sometimes damaged concrete crumbles gradually.
It collapsed downward into its foundation because of gravity, because the foundation was badly damaged, because of the 110 story buildings collapsing next to it, which also had basements.
You are a false flagging kike.

>>509015121
commercial jets can be remotely operated theres no reason for them to be missiles.

>>509014963
the sandniggers could have said no and refused to do it, they also did t have to celebrate it after the fact either, i remember that part pretty distinctly. muslims working with kikes to fuck Up the United States is fucked but I guess that wouldn't be the first time that's happened, they do the same shit in other countries. It's just weird because people think muslims and jews hate each other. but both will work together to attack white countries.

>>509013985
Shows how retarded you are atm

>>508990092 (OP)
the collapse of building 7 created a seismic sign about on par with the use of a jackhammer. lower than either plane impacts. kinda crazy when you really think about it.

double posted because it wouldn't go through the first time but yea.

>>509015128
the sand niggers likely largely if not completely unaware of them being manipulated. i am sure 99% of isis a complete and total CIA/Mossad organization is completely unaware they are being manipulated by jew rats.

at any rate i would like to deport all sand niggers back to their homes and far worse for those who put them in our lands.

>>508990092 (OP)
An invisible plane filled with Iraqis hit it sent by Sadam Hussein.

>>509014742
>the fires in WTC7 burned with little resistance for the next six hours until supports started failing
steel doesnt burn. the building would not collapse due to fire alone. its impossible

>>509015332
was isis around back then or was it still al qaeda? i know it was al qaeda that claimed responsibility.

fuck you ban me

https://youtu.be/gjQ6x4vJ_IQ

Supertramp Album Cover - Flipped

- "UP" makes "911" behind WTC buildings
(When cover is flipped)

- Airplane window frames the cover
(Viewer is inside an airplane)

- Orange juice against the buildings represents fire

- Album title is "Breakfast in America" which is when Israel carried out their false flag attack

>>508995212
Fires leaked the already damaged structure until the central supports gave way. There is a popular video of it's collapse where you can see the penthouse on top caving in as the center structure collapses. Seconds later the perimeter structure fails, having lost support from the center.

>>509013443
Whatever you need to tell yourself you mindbroken queer

>>508994410
Wtc 7 collapsed at 9.8m/s2 for 2.25 seconds.

I didn't know the world trade center was bombed in 1993. The more you know, I guess.

>>509015711
Oh you're still here.
Can you concede this point quickly and prove you're an honest poster?
>>509015716
>Wtc 7 collapsed at 9.8m/s2 for 2.25 seconds.

>>509015675
This kind of thing was always a stretch. It was an iconic part of the skyline of the most famous and recognizable US city, and millions of people got a similar view of it through an airplane window.

>>509015794
No?

OK whatever.
Next time a shill disputes the free-fall collapse of wtc7 point them to this page.
https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-center-investigation/study-faqs/wtc-7-investigation
It's from the official NIST report.

>Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Wtc 7 collapsed at 9.8m/s2 for 2.25 seconds.

>>509016162
So it was bombed?

>>509016201
Professor Leroy Hulsey PhD S.E from the university of Alaska Fairbanks concluded in his finite element analysis that all of the vertical support columns must have failed simultaneously in order for wtc 7 to collapse the way it did.
https://ine.uaf.edu/projects/wtc7/

>>509015557
i dont remember hearing about isis until the very early 2010s

The jews doing that thing with the exploding pagers makes this more plausible.
It's so brazen and basically challenges you to do something back to them.

>>509016311
who put the bombs there? did they get away?

>>509016349
Your Mum.
No.

>>509015711
shut the fuck up jew

>>508990092 (OP)
The fires, it was the intensity of the fires being just too much.

>>509016340
me neither. but i don't know if al qaeda is mossad or not all i can find is that isis is an offshoot of al qaeda.

>>509016410
The office fire on floor 13?

>>509016379
was it the same people/organization that bombed the WTC in 1993?

>>509010196
>According to Silverstein and his spokespeople, "pull it" meant to pull the firefighting efforts i.e., withdraw firefighters from the building due to danger.
That would be "pull out." As in we had to pull the firefighters out of the burning building so that they didn't all die.

There's only one thing that "pull IT" can mean.

>>509016349
Mossad. A bunch of israelis were detained, then released because our greatest ally. Go watch every video James Corbett has made on 9/11

>>509016504
It's your Mum, you tell me.

>>508990092 (OP)
>there is still no good explaination of why Building 7 collapsed in on itself
I mean, if you ignore the report where it is explained in detail i guess you can say there is no explanation...

>>509016549
NIST won't release the data they used to make their model.

It's science.

>>508998678

Those pirates are all going to Davy Jones's Locker.

>>509016528
>a bunch of israelis
got a name?
>>509016538
I'm asking honestly and you seem confident you know this shit but if you don't want to answer then whatever. I thought it was a good question.

>>509016448
The intense raging jet fuel fire on the 13th floor.

>>509016632
I know NISTs explanation for the collapse of wtc 7 well and I know Professor Leroy Hulseys model well.

NIST claims that an office fire on floor 13 caused six inches of lateral girder expansion which caused column 79 to be pushed off its seat and fail. Which then led to the total collapse of wtc 7 in which for 2.25 seconds wtc 7 collapsed at free fall.

The NIST explanation doesn't stand up to any scrutiny, not just for metallurgical reasons, but because NIST never released the data for their models.

>>508990092 (OP)
a boxcutter fell out of tower one, propelled by jet fuel, it sliced through all the columns
later found by authorities, it said "property of mohammed atta" on it

>>508999597
Underrated theory.
I was always under the impression it fainted from witnessing the surrounding drama.

>>509016603
Its all explained in the official report as well as countless other reports detailing the collapse and the structural damage causing it.

If you disagree say so and provide sources to contradict it.

Conspiracy 101
>Claim there is no evidence
>Demand others to prove there is evidence
>Ignore all evidence cuz Jews or something
This way you can argue all day without having to provide anything tangible to support your claim.

>>509016703
>jet fuel fire
Oho.

There was no jet fuel fire in wtc 7.
Also according to NIST it was a regular office fire.

>Debris from the collapse of WTC 1, which was 370 feet to the south, ignited fires on at least 10 floors in the building at its south and west faces. However, only the fires on some of the lower floors—7 through 9 and 11 through 13—burned out of control. These lower-floor fires—which spread and grew because the water supply to the automatic sprinkler system for these floors had failed—were similar to building fires experienced in other tall buildings.

>similar to building fires experienced in other tall buildings
https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-center-investigation/study-faqs/wtc-7-investigation

Try again.
I know the arguments too well.

>>509016958
>If you disagree say so and provide sources to contradict it.

I disagree.
Here's an objectively better finite element analysis on wtc 7.
https://ine.uaf.edu/projects/wtc7/
It's objectively better because the data is available and it can be falsified, unlike the NIST report.

>>509016831
i believe you, that it was bombed. Specifically because WTC was bombed before. Obviously the two incidents are related. I don't know anything other than that and it's fine if no one does I guess. Maybe it will just be one of those things no one has an answer for.

>>509017116
I've never said wtc 7 was "bombed".
Mostly I've made innuendo about your mother.

>>509016632
>got a name
https://archive.org/details/DancingIsraelisFBIReport

>>509010196
>AI slop response
Shills aren't even trying anymore these days

>>509011925
>yeah how convenient he took out a fucking insurance policy against terrorism
Why wouldn't he?

>>509017053
>Here's an objectively better finite element analysis on wtc 7.
Why is it objectively better?
Taking into consideration that Hulsey and his report have gotten criticism for leaving out important parts in his report in order to reach his conclusion?

What I am wondering is,
why ? the spate of 9/11, WTC thread topics on /pol/ the past few weeks

>>509016958
>the structural damage causing it.
You guys haven't even done the research, and you think you can come here and spout off your bullshit without anyone calling you out, but this is the wrong thread for it.

Wtc 1 did cause some structural damage to wtc7 but it was not the cause of the collapse, the office fires on floor 13 caused the collapse.

Per NIST.
>The debris from WTC 1 caused structural damage to the southwest region of WTC 7—severing seven exterior columns—but this structural damage did not initiate the collapse. The fires initiated by the debris, rather than the structural damage that resulted from the impacts, initiated the building's collapse after the fires grew and spread to the northeast region after several hours.
https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-center-investigation/study-faqs/wtc-7-investigation#Collapse

>>509016831
What about these buildings?
https://youtu.be/In697MamSKE
https://youtube.com/shorts/PfY32lSdXkM

They werent on fire or hit by planes

>>508995124
The issue is that with building 7 the reports about a trillion dollar missing in military spending also disappeared.

>>509017537
>Why is it objectively better?
See.
>>509017053
>It's objectively better because the data is available and it can be falsified, unlike the NIST report.
It's incredibly rich for you to talk about things Hulsey "left out", when NIST refused to release any of the data they used to make their conclusions.

What do you think Hulsey left out? You don't understand either model. You're out of your depth.

>>508990092 (OP)
>2 planes
>3 buildings

Clearly it was controlled demo, there are videos of the pre-positioned charges going off in the building before it came down. Also good old Larry was captured on hot mic saying "pull it" just before the charges went off. Get fucked damage control shills. Obligatory, jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams.

>>508990092 (OP)
Silly goy. Allow me to educate you.
You see, flaming debris from the two burning buildings teleported across the street and flew deeply into the core of the building, which was seen lightly smoking before the collapse, which was a perfectly reasonable reaction from a sky scraper coming into contact with hot pieces of metal falling off another gigantic skyscraper.

You see, goy, the fire, which lightly burned for a few hours, was enough to completely liquefy the steel beams of the building 7 and render it unstable and... oy vey are those my shekels?? I Must go.

>>508999146
After the fall of the east block you could see similar shit.
Everyone shat on their construction because it is ugly as fuck.
They could at times remove three out of 4 supportive walls for block buildings and it would still stand without collapsing.

>>509017150
>>509017257
Oh I thought that's what you were saying. How did it collapse then? Does that report have the names of the perpetrators that were detained? It's hard to read.

>>509017664
Do you have any reading comprehension?
>but it was not the cause of the collapse, the office fires on floor 13 caused the collapse.
>collapse. The fires initiated by the debris, rather than the structural damage that resulted from the impacts, initiated the building's collapse
These are not mutually exclusive you know....

>>509017758
>It's incredibly rich for you to talk about things Hulsey "left out"
Yes, leaving out important parts in order to reach a different conclusion is just an aryan way of sticking it to the jew

>>509018091
You claimed the structural damage from wtc 1 caused the collapse of wtc 7. It didn't, nor was it a contributing factor according to NIST.

See again.
>The debris from WTC 1 caused structural damage to the southwest region of WTC 7—severing seven exterior columns—but this structural damage did not initiate the collapse. The fires initiated by the debris, rather than the structural damage that resulted from the impacts, initiated the building's collapse after the fires grew and spread to the northeast region after several hours.
https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-center-investigation/study-faqs/wtc-7-investigation#Collapse

What do you think Hulsey left out of his model?

>>509017618
CIA and Mossad are probably flirting with the idea of doing another one and wondering if they could get away with it again.

>>509002473
You guys must have shit safety ratings.
Even losing half its structural integrity a building should never collapse.
A building does not need a light weight design to fly like a plane to safe in fuel and even be able to generate enough lift.
Plane parts have a safety rating of 1.25 to 2.5, meaning a part with a rating of 2.5 has to be able to hear a 250kg load when the expected max load is 100kg.

Buildings should at least be 5 and actually closer to 10 in regards to safety rating.
Which they also are in most of the world.
Which is why even after shit gets bombed out of them you still see like singular walls stand three stories tall if they did not get hit directly.

Yet this very important building hat a safety rating of what, 0.5?

>>508990092 (OP)
>no good explaination
its only no good because you will only accept 1 answer which is that it was controlled demo.
9/11 retards are the incels of conspiracy schizos.

>>509007742
Because it is bullshit.
The Hits did not cause integrity failure, not with they the building was constructed.
Especially considering the designer planned for accidental plane hits in the construction, even if not for those exact planes.
You also have the fact that the fall of the towers flung out pieces of the support frame more than twice as heavy as the planes on lift off and fully loaded and crashed into buildings that were not designed to survive a plane hit and yet despite damage and fires did not lose structural integrity and collapsed.
The planes also hit the top, to do structural integrity in you would have had to hit far lower.
If the floors had a low safety rating of 5 you would still need to overload them by 5 times and then you would not see that was acceleration.
The floor would collapse onto the next one and the overload would slowly snap the support anchors or the floor, which would take a bit and then accelerate as the overload becomes more extreme as the thing progresses.
This leaves another issue, the outer and core structural beams would mostly be unaffected by this.
They would not come crashing down or fall into themselves.
You would be left with most the skeletal structure of the building and not the entire building collapsing.
The half inch anchor will give in and snap first before the 2 inch thick support column desicides to give in.

>>509018170
>You claimed the structural damage from wtc 1 caused the collapse of wtc 7
Did I? Please do show.

What I find funny is the disbelief that this is something people would instigate for money and resources.
When every day people are killed for the few bucks they have in their pockets, or killed at home for a few hundred to thousand dollars worth of shit.
We know the super rich are some of the greediest mother fuckers to ever exist and for jews especially non jews are not even human.
We know pharma and Chem companies have knowingly caused the death of several tens of thousands of people over the years.
Yet there are people that believe a group of people would not do this for nearly 10 billion dollar and like ten times that in land and resources.

>>508990092 (OP)
The paperwork and all the evidence for the investigation of the missing 2.3 trillion that Rumsfeld announced the day before, was all in building 7.

That's how it collapsed.

>>508990213
Get back in the fucking oven shmuley who the fuck let you out

>>508990092 (OP)
Controlled demolition.

>>509008720
what a clever approach to this situation

>>508997911
poltards trolling larping as jews.
any jew worth his salt knows better than to post such obvious bait bullshit. kikes are sneaky that way
this is just summer weekend for 16 year old trols

>>508990092 (OP)
Did the BBC ever provide a credible cover story for this footage of Building 7 still standing behind the reporter? Maybe they used blue/green screen tech like CNN did with the Gulf War, but the BBC used the wrong footage.

>>508990213
Kek, I get it, anon.

>>509010196
Yup "pull it" was in reference to the rescue operation that was going on

>>509020642
>oldfags using irony to speak between the lines are summer newfags
Lurk more, faggot.

>>509020936
I believe they quite litrally said "accidental coincidences happen and also everybody expected it to collapse like that at any minutes and then they promptly memory-holed the entire affair before more questions could be asked.

>>509021288
>...at any minute", and...

>>509020936
That doesn't work as the reporter was pointing to the background as if it were live.

>>509021652
>as if it were live
It was, in fact, a live broadcast.

>>508999790
they were yuppies and their lives got cut short, that was a win

>>509010196
Guess that settles it then, this build collapsed into its own footprint in a few seconds after a fire burned on its lower levels for a while. First time for everything I guess.

>>509021288
>accidental coincidence
KEK mistakes were made
>>509021652
The tech can be used for live broadcasts and HAS been like the fake report from CNN back in the Gulf War. It's like the weather forecasts after the news. It's LIVE but the background is a blue/green screen.

>>508990092 (OP)
> there is still no good explaination of why Building 7 collapsed
Nigger what? Controlled demolition is an EXCELLENT explanation!

>>509014563
They were most likely remote piloted and aimed at the beacons the Israeli "art students" had been installing here >>509012360

The pentagon flight path was particularly impressive for someone who had only ever flown a Cessna. Also, the hijackings were impressive since they were only armed with box cutters (Stanley knives to bongs).

>>508999397
and was the building made out of wood or made out of concrete and metal?

>>508990092 (OP)
>How did Building 7 collapse on 9/11
Peer pressure

>>508990092 (OP)
The amount of people that still (or newly) believe in the official narrative is disturbing.

>>508990213
Shut up retard LOL

>>508990691
Jews barely do anything for the betterment of society

>>508990213
>>508990691
Ah another 2 for the chambers.

>>509022569
It's been proven that you can falsify a transponder, and the radar if you have a simple machine that they could easily have acquired. This was a government/jew/muslim job, where the government found out from the jews who pushed the muslims to do it, the government was told to let it happen in order to attack Afghanistan and shit. They have done this more than once, jews are the problem.
Fuck the talmud.
Fuck the jews.
Fuck israel.

>>508996750
Can turn his face into a shoe, it's pure leather.

THERMAL EXPANSION.

>>508999597
Shot itself twice in the back of it's head whilst hanging itself... then it collapsed brother!

>>509002473
>Defending the 9/11 narrative using /ptg/ lingo.
>>509010196
>ShillGPT response
Shills are understaffed and over worked KEK.

>>508992108
You fucking jewish asshole

>>509019167
>The Hits did not cause integrity failure
>The designer planned for accidental plane hits in the construction, even if not for those exact planes.
>The planes also hit the top, to do structural integrity in you would have had to hit far lower.
all excellent points. nobody can refute any of the things you said

>>509019167
Finally puttin that useless engineerin'/STEM degree to use there, heinz?

>>508998084
This image conflates two different events, the E-Team one was in 2001, the one in the middle with the balcony was a group named "gelitin" in 2000 which was on floor 148 and not within the same range of floors as the E-Team one.

https://www.gelitin.net/projects/b-thing/
http://www.travelhome.org/127/index.html

Also neither of the groups seem to be actually Israeli from what I can tell, E-Team seems to be German and gelitin is Austrian.

>>508990092 (OP)
So the reason why the twin towers collapsed was their unique tube design but building 7 wasn't built like this it has a more traditional design. Nobody can explain this

Architechts and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
(A great organization you should be a member of if you are a true American)
Helped fund this research that took place in the 2010's.
They chose Univ of Alaska-Fairbanks because of the massive earthquake activity the structural engineering dept. was one of the best in the US.
The did not choose UCLA, who has the best department because in LA the kikes could easily subvert it.
Fairbanks Alaska would be MUCH harder
Read how when the report - which to 4 or 5 years to complete was not covered by JewCNN or JewFOX.
Yeah WTC 7 was 100% controlled demolition and there was a 99% chance WTC1 & 2 were also.

BUMP. Glowniggers tongue my anus, pain and death upon them and their families.

>>508998989
This is the first somewhat reasonable explanation for the angle of collapse.

Glowniggers are a lot like politicians. About the only good one is a dead one, with his head missing.

>>508999397
Grenfell tower had a fire burning throughout it for 24 hours. Still standing.

>>508995293
It's quite the coincidence that 4k jews didn't show up that day and a total of 4 kikes died. The most jewish city in America and 4 yids died.

Who has the video where you can see THE FUCKING DEMOLITION CHARGES EXPLODING? That’s all a person needs. Pain and suffering be on all glowniggers, piss be upon them.

>>509008555
Checked

>>508999146
>>509000225
BTW I didn't mean to say that there is nothing there but people should look all the facts and details to get the full picture of an event.

The only plausible reason for blowing up the building seems to me that there was an CIA office in WTC7. You cannot trust the government either. So I don't know.

>>509029521
they blew up themselves?
who do you think works at the cia? a bunch of goyim?

>>509017339
the fact that theyre saying its not the jews tells me that the jews did it

The muslims were probably working with the jews to do 9/11 and the muslims carried out the attack and planned it with the jews. The jews probably funded the half million dollars to do 9/11. For over 20 years everyone else has been distracted with how the WTC complex was destroyed and not focusing on avenging the thousands of innocent people who were killed and at least interrogating the jews who probably funded it.

>>508990092 (OP)
It caught on fire from burning debris and they diverted the water from its sprinklers to fight the fires in the main tower, so it just burned until the structural steal weakened enough for it to collapse.

>>509014738
That doesn't do shit against concentrated heat.

Every week two of you niggers start these threads. i fucking HATE ZOOMERS SO FUCKING MUCH IT'S UNREAL!!!!!!!