Is piracy nigger behavior?

>>509099550 (OP)
No but you have it.

>>509099550 (OP)
Niggers don't know how to pirate

>>509099550 (OP)
If buying is no longer ownership then piracy isn't theft.

no, but posting the same thread over and over is.

>>509099550 (OP)
No, and yes I would download a car.

>>509099550 (OP)
No, but being anti-piracy is certified Jewish behavior.

>>509099550 (OP)
Same as shoplifting really, no big deal (unless you get caught)

>>509099550 (OP)
Not pirating just makes you an idiot.

>>509099550 (OP)
No

>>509099550 (OP)

Obviously not. It is a moral imperative to pirate all the jewshit and never pay a cent for any of it... if you even chose to consume jewshit... and it's all fucking jewshit

>>509099550 (OP)
It's my culture. Not yours.

>>509099762
>Yes, goy!
>Buy our overpriced shitty media
Why are you kikes like this?

>>509099550 (OP)
Why are you spamming this thread? Are you hoping after the 90th time someone will agree that piracy is bad?

>>509099550 (OP)
you watch your god damn whore land lubber mouth

It's a moral necessity. Total corpo death.

>>509100014
Yes

>>509099550 (OP)
Nope

>>509101037
This is a non-sequitur
How someone sells something has nothing to do whatsoever with whether piracy is theft or not

>>509101037
>>509101123
if you can't own something you're at most just borrowing it without paying but that doesn't even matter because if you copy an album million times on your hard drive it's not magically worth 20 million dollars

>>509099550 (OP)
I'm downloading few books and turning youtube videos into mp3 as i type this.

btw btw i enjoyed few episodes from an apple series on stream for free and there's nothing you can do about it. Also guess what i don't have to see jewish advertisements thanks to my adblocker nor i have to pay for any subscription because paywalls are for retards.

>>509099747
It's literally copyright infringement.

It's not theft. Downloading pirated material is not even illegal (for burgers), only redistribution.

>>509099626
pirating games here is a older tradition than most users on this board

>>509099550 (OP)
Look at me.
I'm the captain now.

>>509099550 (OP)
how many times can one post the same thread consequently before they get banned? let's find out

>>509099550 (OP)
>Is piracy nigger behavior?
is ripping off jew media nigger behavior? idk or care op, fuck jews and niggers tho

>>509099550 (OP)
If you buy things that don't belong to you, they force you to subscribe, pay subscriptions, they behave like niggers, piracy then is not only justified, but by principle you do it even if you can afford it. That being said, you must also find ways to support the artists and creators who create the content you enjoy, don't be a bitch on that front.

>>509101846
makes me wonder, is that data mining thread or sth?

>>509101361
>turning youtube videos into mp3
My brother. I never visited spotify nor the itunes store back in the day and never will.

>>509101695
I was pirating games on tape cassettes before I was a teenager.

>>509099550 (OP)
Stealing from Jews is always justified.

>>509099550 (OP)
No it isn't because 'intelectual property' is yiddish behaviour. I don't need to pay for stuff on a machine which I already paid for on the internet which I also pay for. Same goes for ads, you don't have a right or privilege to put stuff on my monitor without my consent.

>>509099747
Not the same at all.
When I shoplift, I have gained an item, and the owner of that item has now lost it.
When I pirate, I make a copy of it. I now have the item, and so does the owner, who lost nothing.
The only argument you can make about piracy being stealing is if you assume that everything pirated would otherwise have been purchased by the person who pirated it, which is ludicrous.

>>509102013
You consent when you connect to their website

>>509099550 (OP)
I would engage in such behavior, but I find myself without a ship or a crew.

is slowly raising the price of streaming prices and separating shows/movies/seasons over multiple streaming networks so you have to have multiple services, is that nigger behavior?

Artist being paid absolutely fuckall by Spotify (whom are continually raising the prices) the largest streaming platform on the planet, is that nigger behavior?

>>509101695
Here too, used to buy pirated games before good internet

I buy games because Steam, GoG and humble monthly are good services.
I buy music because Bandcamp is a good service.
I used to have Netflix because it was a good service.
I do not buy subs to watch movies or TV series anymore because it is a terrible service.
I want to show an older movie to my GF? I can spend a half hour trying to track down what fucking online streaming service it's currently on, and what country to set my vpn to to watch it.
Or I can torrent it in 5 minutes.

Without even bringing cost into in, the choice is obvious.
Once movies and shows started getting randomly shuffled around various streaming services every year, it was over.

>>509099550 (OP)
Same thing as ripping off the self checkout really. I don't do either. You can only say FUCK THE LAW if you are squeaky clean yourself right?

>>509102220
You don't have the right to watch content that you don't have a license to view. Fuck you.

>>509102582
I don't care.
Make it worth the cost and easy to use or I will keep pirating, simple as.

>>509102677
Just don't watch it if you don't like it.

>>509099550 (OP)
jews pushed copyright laws to a ridicilous point, it's morally imperative to fight this by piracy.
There are books over 100 years old still under copyright. fuck that, seriously.

>>509103242
Stop stealing

>>509105627
no, I don't think I will.

>>509099550 (OP)

Piracy is white collar crime. Less that 5% of jailed niggers are in for anything white collar, and of the ones that are they are predominately for shit like credit card fraud or bank fraud and its almost always an extension of conventional burglary or theft. Niggers are too stupid the vast majority of the time to even know what piracy is.

>>509099857

I do struggle with the dilemma of propagating jewish propaganda by effectively making it more available and depriving jewish companies of the ability to sell more of their garbage. I guess if I'm forced to pick between the two I'd rather enable someone to steal the content and be exposed to it than pay for it.

>>509101872
This is a pretty fair take.

>>509102065
Ridiculous. I have every right to control my browser and how it behaves. If I choose to systematically block all the content I don't want to see that's my prerogative.

>>509106343
And they have the right not to serve you their website's content if you block ads. Simple as.

>>509099550 (OP)
depends on what you're pirating? is it worth paying for? or are you just downloading hollyjew trash that they should be paying people to watch? context matters

>>509102582

Anything older than 25 years should be a part of public domain. That's how the original law was conceived and regardless of whether or not kikes have attempted to rewrite the laws to push public domain qualification to 125+ years after the death of the creator the functional reality of media is that the people who purchase it have a right to share it with whoever the fuck they want. No amount of semantics will ever change this basic reality. So long as the entire concept of ownership is under attack through this licensing bullshit people should continue utilize every possible tool to justly share the content they purchased.

>>509101123
no it isn't, he technically can't be stealing something if that something can't be owned, what is he stealing? they don't even sell us licenses

>>509106669
But it is owned, by the copyright holder. That's why it doesn't work.

>>509099550 (OP)
>Is piracy nigger behavior?

no, it's swedish behaviour.

>>509106629
>Anything older than 25 years should be a part of public domain.
Why?
>That's how the original law was conceived and regardless of whether or not kikes have attempted to rewrite the laws to push public domain qualification to 125+ years after the death of the creator the functional reality of media is that the people who purchase it have a right to share it with whoever the fuck they want.
No, you do not have the right to copy content just because you purchased it. That's the copyright holder's right.
>So long as the entire concept of ownership is under attack through this licensing bullshit people should continue utilize every possible tool to justly share the content they purchased.
If you let someone borrow your car, they don't have a right to take it forever

>>509099550 (OP)
>Is piracy nigger behavior?
No idea. WASPs are basically pirates with a country.

>>509106701

The endless reclassification of consumer products into the level of non-ownership is the most jewish idea imaginable. Companies are selling cars with licensing locks on mechanisms built into the fucking car. The law has been coopted by psychopaths. People should ignore this bullshit whenever possible because of how ridiculous it is on its face.

>>509106860
It's called a license you fucking retard.

There is not much to bother pirating these days. Movies and music suck and it I really care that bad just listen to music on youtube. I have used linux on all my computers since the early 2000s and accompanying software. Modern games are goddamn trash. There is nothing even worth pirating

>>509099649

>>509106701
i didn't say it wasn't owned by someone, what relevance does that have?

>>509107130
You did, you stated that it can't be owned, when in fact it is owned by the copyright holder.
If someone else refuses to sell their car, that doesn't mean their car cant be owned, and that doesn't mean that taking their car isn't stealing. They own their car.

>>509106775

In the US the original maximum amount of time copyright could be held was 28 years, and without any intervention it was 14 years. Companies like disney have lobbied this into oblivion and basically turned it into an endless game of them renewing their copyright until the end of time. Not only that they've used this crap to fucking own stories that had been apart of the public domain for centuries before they even existed. Literally everything Hans Christian Anderson wrote is now somehow controlled by disney. They've basically destroyed the concept of public domain and these aren't just laws or consistent with any original intention of protecting the public and fair use of ideas and characters that become apart of the cultural heritage. The laws surrounding this bullshit need to be walked back 150 years to even approach being fair again.

>>509107270
>in the past it was different, therefore it should be what it was like in the past!
non sequitur after non sequitur kek
as retarded as saying monkeys in the wild buttfucking each other means homosexuality is normal and natural

>>509099550 (OP)
niggers don't know how to use a computer

>>509106959

Ya and now you need to pay a subscription to use your fucking seat warmers on a car you own. This shit is broken. Worse yet you can be charged with a crime if you modify a device you own to perform the way you want it to. It's beyond insane.

>>509107384
It would only be illegal to do so if you modified their software to enable it. If you created your own software or device which enabled it separately from their software, it would be entirely legal.

>>509107496

If you can't see how its an overreach to even tell people they aren't allowed to modify software on items they own then you're a lost cause.

>>509107594
It's not an overreach. You don't own their software, and using their software to do something they didn't intend the software to do is copyright infringement. This is why YouTube Vanced, for example, was shut down - because they violated copyright by using YouTube code and modifying it.

>>509107665

What are you an apple lawyer? Do you understand the difference between is and ought? I understand full fucking well that the law has been corrupted to this level, it ought not be because its fucking ridiculous to claim ownership over products you sell to the public that don't have any need for continued service whatsoever. It throws the whole concept of ownership into question. It's shit like this that john deer uses to software lock fucking tractors out in farmers fields. It's wrong, and its civil disobedience to completely ignore these unjust laws.

>>509099550 (OP)
It is not much different than we White Zoomers stealing from the self checkouts. So obviously I am ok with it. I don't care about the law like you beta guys do since you all need it for your very survival, like women.

>>509107194
No. I was stating what they're selling us can't be owned, by their own definition in their own terms, we don't own it. They aren't selling it to us.

>>509107867
>Do you understand the difference between is and ought?
he's some sort of retard for sure, so he might actually be a lawyer, because no one makes nonsensical arguments like this unless they are licensed attorneys in the US
our legal system is intentionally fucked when it comes to commerce, it's by design

>>509107867
I don't see anything wrong with companies protecting their copyright. You don't have the right to use their software willy nilly.
>>509108089
What they're selling can be owned. They could hypothetically sell their ownership of it to you.

>>509108250
>They could hypothetically sell their ownership of it to you.
they're not though, they clearly state that IN WRITING

shut up now, you're like a dumb mangy dog sniffing at random hands

>>509099550 (OP)
Be an American goy is a nigger behaviour within the western world.

>>509099550 (OP)
Fact check: It's Mostly False! In fact, if the media is from HollyJew(TM), it's actually really based to pirate from. Copyright law in the west is extremely broken and needlessly long. It used to be under 28 years, now it's lifetime +70 years after death iirc.

Video related:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1I3acAE8JA

>>509099550 (OP)
Does the pope shit in the woods?

>>509102061
This, there is no stealing, and if someone pirates something they would most likely not have bought it anyway. Especially people who don't have high income.

I would also argue that someone pirating a game or movie are creating value by possibly recommending it to friends and family who might buy it, but if they never heard about it from that person they wouldn't buy it.

>>509108300
That doesn't matter if they do or don't
They still own it and you owning it is still hypothetically possible. Just because they only license it to you does not give you the right to steal it

>>509107665
gas yourself kike. I will ignore copyright and I will share the information that ought to be free.
Right now I'm working on digital version of antisemitic book from 1942, stil under copyright, but I will set it free.

always pirate jewish media and always buy aryan media

>>509099550 (OP)
Piracy is justice. Literally a victimless crime.

>>509108376
If they weren't going to buy it then they should have no problem not using it

ill pirate as long as i live
only cucks handover money for media

>>509108237

I couldn't agree more. We would be better off over night of all copyright law was shitcanned and we started from scratch.

>>509108250
If you can't see that copyright law has granted copyright holders such a ridiculous level of control they can basically destroy electronic products people purchase from them at will then you are legitimately retarded. Why should anyone in their right mind follow the law when companies like nintendo can remotely brick a game console over unjustified suspicion of piracy or system modification? People have an obligation to not follow such laws because of how ridiculous they've become.

>>509108607
Control over their own software and how their software is used is not ridiculous. Don't like how their software works? DONT USE IT. It's as simple as that. You don't have a right to modify THEIR software.

>>509108701

I have as much right to modify the software on a device I purchase as the device itself. It's absurd to think that software deserves to be on some magic pedestal when the law can be used in malicious and destructive ways against the consumer. Whatever the law is at this point it doesn't deserve to stay in its current state because of how unjust it's become against the consumer.

>>509108844
You have the right to modify the device. You do not have the right to modify the software, because you do not own the software.
As an aside, do you think it's theft if somebody takes free software and modifies it to appear as something else and sells it?

>>509108844
it should be banned to modify software or at least you should get banned from videogames, after signing up with your social security id, and if you get caught maliciously modifying the software your social security id gets banned

then we can have a playstation 6 network for esports without faggots on it

>>509108937

I'm not hearing any compelling argument for why current legislation should stay the way it's currently drafted. All I can see is it being abused by copyright holders to attack consumers for profit. If I buy an nintendo product and modify it or the software running on it and sell that device I should be completely within my right to part ways with that device in its entirety the same way I'm able to sell a modified car. The fact that the law has gotten so bad that products are being sold to the public and critical components to their operation can effectively be taken away from the owners of those products is down right criminal. The law is broken and it needs to change. I'm not saying that serviced based devices necessarily fall into this category but its just gone too fucking far in countless other categories.

>>509109124

Do you think people should be hauled off to jail for modifying seatbelt alarms in the cars they own? The fact that there is even a question about the legality of things like this is more than enough to seriously question the legitimacy of the laws themselves.

>>509109221
You do not have the right to modify software, they own the software, not you. You're free to remove their software and replace that software with entirely different software that accomplishes the same task. That's why emulators are legal but modified consoles are not. Because one is standalone software that does not use code from the original console, but the other one does use original console code, but modified without their consent. You do not own their software.

>>509099550 (OP)
Not necessarily if you see it as a free demo and eventually buy it. Plus you may want the latest version of the game at some point.

>>509109373
You really don't understand the difference between is and ought. Stop being such a midwit.

>>509108701
>You don't have a right to modify THEIR software.
>>509108250
>You don't have the right to use their software willy nilly.
>>509107665
>You don't own their software, and using their software to do something they didn't intend the software to do is copyright infringement

OP really out here going on his hands and knees for techno-jews cock before sunrise on 4chins.

>>509109512
>is and ought
Your statements:
>It IS being abused by copyright holders
It isn't being abused, that's the law
>I OUGHT to be within my right to sell a device with modified software
You didn't explain why that should be. You simply made an assertion.
>The law HAS gotten so bad
You didn't explain why it's bad, you simply made an assertion.
>IS down right criminal
It isn't criminal, the law allows it.
>The law IS broken
The law is not broken just because you believe it ought to be changed.
>It HAS gotten too fucking far
Again, not explaining why it's gotten too far, just making assertions

>>509109746
how it is "gone too far"*

>>509109746

I've been making those points for the last half dozen posts, go reread them if you want to understand the argument thats been made against your this whole time. The fact that you are too stupid to realize that I've been making those points this whole time just demonstrates how fucking dense you are.

Pirating is peak white culture

>>509109873
>Go read them
You are making assertions and claiming that you are arguing why it ought to be, when you're not. You haven't argued why it ought to change.

>>509109958

Why do I even waste my time..

Remotely bricking equipment with little to no justification, arbitrary criminalization of modifying the function of equipment you own that has no continued connection to the producer, willful destruction of the public domain. All of this is anti-consumer behavior and shouldn't be tolerated let alone legal, but you should have been able to gather that if you'd read more than the first 10 words of my previous posts.

>>509099550 (OP)
When everyone's a nigger, no one is.

Here's why it should not change:
A company exercising it's rights over it's software does not harm the consumer, objectively speaking. When you purchase a license to their software, you are agreeing to the terms they set in that license. This license does not provide you with any rights to modify, distribute or copy their software, and this license allows them to revoke your access to the software if you violate these terms that you agreed to follow when you purchased this license. You do not lose anything when they revoke your license except for the license itself. All of the components that you physically purchased and which you own are unaffected by this, and you still own these components. You are free to develop your own software that uses these components to your heart's delight, and your right to use these components as they exist is not infringed in any way. Arbitrarily deciding that you suddenly have ownership, modification, and copy rights to the software does not mean you actually have those rights. There is no good reason why you ought to be granted these rights simply because you feel it's right. Your inability to develop software to replace their software does not confer some wrongdoing on their part for revoking your right to access their software. A city shutting off your water for nonpayment does not mean that your pipes, water heater, and faucet are magically broken. You don't have the right to that water, and you do not have a right to the company's software.

>>509099550 (OP)
>company claims you don't own what you pay for
>that is not piracy at all
just learning from the very people that stole from us

Licensing protections protect more than just companies from theft, modification, and copying, it also protects consumers. If a consumer develops a piece of software, and releases it with a GPL license, this protects your right for the software not be stolen and resold by corporations. Any software created with a GPL license will always be free to use and irrevokable, and no amount of money can change that.

>>509105627
stop promoting jewish materialism.

>>509109873
it's just pilpul, there isn't much substance.

>>509110803

I'm not saying that there shouldn't be some protections to people selling software, but consumers have rights too and the level of control wielded by copyright holders needs to be curtailed substantially. The same way its a fucking scam to sell people an online game and then then shutdown the servers a couple months later and kill the game, its a scam to remotely brick equipment. Companies screwing people over in this manner should be legally compelled to fork over the source code critical to the operations of such products. There are loads of contractual clauses that are considered illegal for being anti-consumer and there's absolutely no reason these licenses shouldn't be subject to the same kind of scrutiny. Laws defending bad faith business practices don't deserve to be followed anymore than any other unjust law that ends up repealed.

>>509099550 (OP)
No but being against it is jewish

yes pay for your shit u fucking niggers

>>509111710
>Consumers have rights too
They have the right to follow the terms of the license they agreed to.
>It's a fucking scam
You agreed to these terms
>It's a scam to remotely brick equipment
Revoking your license to their software is not "bricking" the equipment. You're free to develop your own software which interfaces with that equipment.
>Screwing people over
They agreed to the terms of the license
>There are loads of contractual clauses that are considered illegal for being anti-consumer
They are considered illegal because they are unconscionable, something you haven't demonstrated in your repeated screeds about it that would place them under the same amount of scrutiny.

>>509110702
peak nignog mentality

>>509111884

If you think copyright holders have the right to sell the public a product and then deliberately destroy it then you are just enabling bad behavior. Contract law has loads to say about bad faith behavior and telling people to just not buy such products doesn't exempt companies abusing the copyright system from scrutiny.

>Revoking your license to their software is not "bricking" the equipment. You're free to develop your own software which interfaces with that equipment.

When the software cooks a physical fuse built into a core component of the device its absolutely bricking it. This happens pretty god damn often and its completely unreasonable to claim that a device isn't bricked if a portion of the hardware is literally fried by that software.

>>509112496
They are not destroying anything.
>Bad faith
it isn't bad faith, you violated the license. they are well within their rights.
>abuse
they aren't abusing it
>cooks a physical fuse built into the core component
If the software deliberately destroys something physical, then it is wrong. If it simply disallows you from using the software, then it is not.

>>509099550 (OP)
No but reposting the same bot thread over and over is. Apparently this is /pol/'s new favorite

>>509099550 (OP)
Is giving jews goyish behaviour?

>>509101037
This. Buying digital anything is top cuckold behaviour
>we arbitrarily decided to remove this game from your library, no refunds btw
>b-but i paid for it!
>you agreed to it in the terms and conditions section
>o-ok mastah

>>509112915
If you don't like it, don't buy the license. You have the right to not pay them money. You don't have the right to use their software without a license.

>>509099649
Reddit tier babble

>>509099649
>>509099731
>>509099747
>>509099762
>i deserve free toys

>>509099626
That is a fair point.

>>509099550 (OP)
Yes, if you like them, but don't buy them afterwards.

>>509112602

>They are not destroying anything.

Physical destruction of an electrical component isn't destruction. Enough with the fucking cope.

>it isn't bad faith, you violated the license. they are well within their rights.

Are you arguing that it's impossible for licenses to have illegal clauses? Pretty fucking retarded.

>they aren't abusing it

Selling you something and them arbitrarily shutting it down and never allowing it to be turned on again isn't abusing consumers?

>If the software deliberately destroys something physical, then it is wrong. If it simply disallows you from using the software, then it is not.

Then you need to do some homework because practices like this are defended through copyright law. The law needs to be changed its overreach by the copyright holder in the extreme in its current incarnation.

I feel like our government encourages digital piracy and the famous old censoring regime+region blocking has a lot to do with that. As a nation that only consumes media, it's against our national interest to purchase foreign mediaslop.

>>509113026
>>509113123
Shalom

>>509113318
A license giving the copyright holder the right to revoke that license is not an illegal clause.
>Selling you something and arbitrarily shutting it down
They are selling you a license to the software that grants them the right to revoke your license to the software
>It's overreach
It's their right to do so

>>509113400
None of this shit fucking matters, "preservation" of pop slop media is stupid, and the people who bitch about it are fucking losers. You're preserving turds that people of previous eras just threw in the garbage without much regret.

>>509113465
You're the faggot who needs electronic toys to feel happy

>>509113512

Well anti-consumer practices will eventually be the downfall of all this legislation. The justification for it existence does not outweigh the negative effect it has on society.

>>509099626
every piece of media that is not native used to be pirated here. The retailers here even relied heavily on it.

>>509113640
There is no negative effect. You agreed to the license and agreed to their right to revoke your license. You lost nothing in this exchange.

>>509113691

Having components cooked in your electronics because of copyright is a negative effect and its anti-consumer. Stop being obtuse and retarded.

>>509113512
>found the kike
>we put it in the law to allow for sucking baby penis, that means we can suck baby penis
it's pretty disgusting though, and you should stop.
>stop being antisemitic

>>509113640
There should be more anti-consumer practices, it should be enshrined in the law that consumers are punished financially and spiritually for their lifestyle.

These people are now taking out loans to buy toys a few weeks sooner. They deserve to have their wages garnished and to live under a fucking bridge. Actually, they deserve to die in a flash flood while living in complete darkness with other drug addicted parasitic human waste.

They deserve to have every constitutional """""right""""" they think they're entitled to cynically crossed out. They deserve to feel humiliated and they should not be allowed even to share the same air that rats and insects breathe.

Take their organs away from them and their fat stupid kids and shoot them.

>>509113975
Losing access to software is not "cooking" anything
>>509114012
retard

>>509112602
Faggots like you is exactly why I pirate software. Stick cow dung in your ears and sing lalala while pretending everything is fine and dandy while I bypass the unfair practices you defend and enjoy some groovy music along with my cracked installer.
Allows me to access older (better) versions of the software too, which should be my right to begin with.

>>509114135
"Unfair practices"? Retard, you bought a toy.

>>509102061
Add that the argument only holds if the product is even sold by the producer anymore.
Something like an old NES game for example
>Nintendo no longer makes the console
>Nintendo no longer sells or supports the console
>Nintendo long makes, sells, or supports the game
So, so what exactly is Nintendo losing? Nothing.
On the other hand, pirtlaging something new like Mon Hun Wilds .. sure they could legally argue you "stole" $70 from them (Capcom). But by definition it still isn't stealing per say

>>509114106

Nintendo fries e-fuses to disable their, emphasis on the word 'their' because devices because apparently you dont actually own it, when they believe you are using a pirated game or that you modified the console, even without any real proof. This is deliberately destructive and should be illegal. This is anti-consumer and an abuse of copyright law and licensing agreements.

>>509114416
Why do you need to own it? It's a fucking toy. Buy a rubix cube and twiddle it for 10,000 hours you disgusting addict.

>>509114227
Technically I didn't buy it, I just had it rented because purchase is impossible. Which is why I choose to establish ownership through alternative means.
Not just toys btw, I need to use Adobe suite and GIS tools for a professional reason and the corpos went the Jew way which you advocate.

I use the briney flotsam version at home and import it into the licensed version at my workplace. Fuck your active device number limits kike.

>>509114513

Why do you need to keep breathing, why not put a new hole in your head?

>>509114517
If you can't afford it, you're probably not worth it anyway. Find a different career. Be a roofer or something. Get over yourself.

>>509114600
Why should I pay twice to use a license for the same task just because I don't want to haul my fucking work machine back home everyday?

>>509114600

I wonder what you'll say when your car ends up remotely disabled because you pissed off the wrong psychopath.

>>509099550 (OP)
Yes it is, but it's been normalized since the 2000s and there's a bunch of communists on the internet that think everything should be free. So that is in fact nigger behavior. But it's also hard to defend the anti consumer practices from digital media producers and how far quality in movies, music, and video games have fallen.

>>509102582
Shalom!

>>509114690
>muh 1984 chevy camero
read another book

>>509114690
>muh 1984 chevy camero
read another book

>>509099626
Wrong. We wuz pirates

>>509115414

Don't worry the same kikes behind the copyright laws will illegalize your wheels for not having a prissy peddle and a battery they can remotely shut off.

>>509115538
Hmm, what sort of faggotry could possibly be motivating your manipulative and hysterical appeal to hypotheticals

fucking freak

>>509115782

A word to the wise is sufficient, if you're too stupid to recognize when laws are a threat to your ability to function then you deserve whatever is coming to you.

>>509115892
Wow, I'm shaking. Your smart and stern warning is unlike anything I have heard in the last 25 years since you faggot freaks started fearmongering about the PATRIOT act.

>>509116070

You sound vaccinated.

always download everything You have enjoyed,
and never give a single $ to Satanist Jews wanting to put humanity down and profit off from what should be free and uninterrupted flow of data and ideas.
but they have won,
social justice and absolute control and censorship is not just everywhere,
but it is defended by those censored,
intellectual property is a Jewish construct - it is not real as You cannot claim the idea.
nor are the certain arrangements of pixels or 0s and 1s illegal or claimable as Your own as they do not really exist in reality but are projection.
pirate everything,
You own everything You pirate.
and if You want privacy,
unplug the ethernet cable for ever.
and if You want clarity,
listen to nothing but Your heart

>>509114416
>e-fuses
not a real thing. it's their software.
If their software, instead of intentionally killing itself, accidentally killed itself, do you have the right to force nintendo to fix it for you? no. So why do you think them making it kill itself makes any difference? fucking retard. They don't have to fix their software for you, nor do they have to continue to allow you to use it. A car manufacturer does not have an infinite perpetual agreement to fix your car for free if something goes wrong, and they don't have an infinite perpetual agreement to allow you to keep using their software in your car.

Piracy is why all forms of media are shit now. For example, most lower budget movies made their profits not off of the initial theatre run but from the subsequent VHS (and later DVD) release, generating long-tail revenue. As piracy became more common place with the proliferation of the internet, it began cutting into that particular revenue stream and incentivized corpo-slop blockbusters that were more likely to make all their money during the theatre run.

>>509116177
No but it'll be fun to watch you get "vaccinated" with hep-c in your new home

>>509099550 (OP)
Putting ads in a paid subscription service is negger behavior. Gaben is 100% correct about piracy.

>>509116394
You agreed to it when you purchased the product. If you don't like the licensing agreement, you can always just not use their product. It's that simple.

>>509116364

Oh so you only trust that what the government pushes on you is only good for you when the wind isn't blowing.

>>509099626
It's not difficult. If it is then some smarter nigger just cheaply sells pirated shit to the others.

>>509116332

You have no fucking clue what you are talking about.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EFuse
https://switchbrew.org/wiki/Fuses

These are physical mechanisms that are cooked by software commands.

>>509116428
That's what piracy is, opting out.

>>509116474
I don't have to fear the government because I'm not under the illusion that anyone's life matters. Get fucked.

retards being against licensing agreements allowing them to cut off your access will just push them to put specified limits on the life of their software. Instead of a potentially unlimited use of their software, you can't use it after 10 years. Now everyone's fucked, and it's thanks to your retarded petty seething that you have to pay for heated seats and want video game companies to coddle you by giving you free server software

>>509116773

All the more reason to ignore the law and proceed with proliferating the means to go around such limitations, until the laws protecting these practices can be removed.

>>509116361
>As piracy became more common place with the proliferation of the internet, it began cutting into that particular revenue stream
Wrong. Piracy increased because these b rated movies were increasingly no longer being released on physical media and began to be rented online for limited time periods before getting grandfathered into oblivion.

>>509116773
what kind of invalid wants to use Flash MX 2004

kys

>>509116694

>>509116832
>go around the law
Can't go around the law if the software self-destructs before someone can crack it.

>>509099731
The elites don't want you know this, but cars are free. You can download them. I have 428 cars. Also a Bugatti in every color.

>>509116832
You deserve nothing and you will get it

>>509099550 (OP)
I selling tiny infinitely replicable and persistent electric charges to the value of 0 or 1 in a transistor nigger behavior or is it jewish? Maybe both?

>>509116953

The desperation reeks. Are you actually being paid or do you just like fellating people who rip off the public?

>>509099550 (OP)
>implying niggers know how to pirate
dumb faggot

>>509117081
Can't wait for software companies to institute specified limits after your retarded seethe sessions so that you can't use your iphone after 5 years. Literally nothing you can do because they explicitly stated that you can only use it for 5 years. faggot.

>>509117117
If they did know how to pirate, they would use nappyster

>>509116773
>UPGRADE your windows license for FREE for a LIMITED TIME
>remember that SERVICE IS DISCONTINUED for the previous version and that it's POTENTIALLY UNSAFE to use it and it may cause HARM to your computer and put you at RISK of RANSOMWARE ATTACKS
>Thank you for your cooperation on this matter.

>>509117081
How are you being "ripped off". You threw away your fucking money. Grow the fuck up.

>>509116773
>enter bios
>select year
>set to 2015
>???

>>509117189
If you can't afford a computer, go to the public library. A bunch of entitled bums. Cough up the rent or live under a bridge.

>>509117220
>cannot install or run without an internet connection
>remembers the installation date
>????

>>509117142
>>509117202

Seethe more. You've already demonstrated that you don't understand shit about the subject.

>>509117347
Grow up faggot. If you don't like their license, don't use their software. It's really that simple.

>>509117142
Yeah, because never in the history of ever has software been cracked (lmao).

>>509099550 (OP)
Streaming is fucking gay zoomer OP. I will gladly pay for it when it has more than a fraction of what private trackers do, and no DRM and no commercials. Which will not be in our lifetime.

>>509117347
I understand that you think you should be able to free ride everything and never contribute anything back to the economy, you fucking maggot. I don't give one fuck how you rationalize it.

>>509099550 (OP)
America is a pirate nation build by pirates. To be a pirate is simply to reject the authority of kings. It is to keep what you earn and care not at all what some faggot elite thinks about you. Every great pirate was white, from William Dampier to Thomas Jefferson.

>>509117279
Then how is the date even relevant you 60IQ brownoid?
Requiring an internet connection is very different from minding dates.
But anyway, open hex editor, change the installation date wherever it is.
>more cope
You realize all this shit has been tried, done and cracked, you absolute imbecile?
>install emulator of whatever internet shit it requires
>???
More realistically someone will simply roll it all into an exe file called a "crack".
Are you just incredibly dumb, 12 or brown?

>>509117396
It's getting more and more difficult.
Xbox series X has yet to be cracked, and it was released in 2020

>>509117389

Can't win an argument through logic and reason, don't even understand what is being done to hardware, don't understand contract law. You're a fucking midwit.

>>509117389
>If you don't like their license, don't use their software.
Or whatchu gonna do Timmy? I'll get it through peer to peer filesharing and I will consider whether to pay based on how faggy the company is about fucking over their customers.
Seethe, cope, cry and dilate.

>>509117485
>open hex editor and just edit it
the license is managed via an external server, sorry. It must phone home in order to function.

>>509117449

I just want the ability to modify devices I already own as I see fit. Only literal kike rats have a problem with this.

>>509099649
Nothing but jews responding. Don't let them steal your shekels with nothing to show for it.

>>509117493
>A fucking console
Lol, lmao.

>>509099737
Heeheehee! Now pay your rent!

>>509117516
Cant do that if the software self-destructs before it is cracked.

>>509099626
Unironically true.
Used to get paid $5 a dvd for burning pirate bay movies for a black friend
He thought I was a saint cause I'd just give him extra movies cause after $50 I felt bad charging him and would give him double or more for free.

>>509117559
Oh, are you some electronics engineer? You're just motivated by sheer curiosity? Yeah right. You're a fucking loser and you waste your time modding consoles because you're broke.

>>509117556
Emulate it.
Seriously are you a shitskin, because this has already been defeated a hundred million times.
You are the ultimate subdeveloper.

>>509099550 (OP)
Pirate

>>509099550 (OP)
What for video games? Never wrong to steal from jews.
>erm $80 is ACKtually a really fair price due to erm :nerd emoji ,inflation!

>>509117628
>emulate
Sorry, the key used to allow your software to function is encrypted. You cannot provide a valid key to the software without the private key to generate it. Sorry, you're out of luck.

>>509117673
Here's an idea, maybe it's a sin to waste your time playing video games when you haven't even paid off your car. Grow the fuck up.

>>509099550 (OP)
Jews only charge money for movies to give impression of value.

If they needed to the Jews would PAY Goyim to watch, like maybe with a short quiz for prizes.

Figure the Jews steal about min of $500K per Goyim over the Goy's lifetime, and that would be possible without Hollywood brainwashing, so paying Goyim a $100,000, or about $1,000/month during their school years would be "can't afford not to".

>>509099762
In all fairness there is less and less to pirate every year. No, I wouldn't watch "adult-centric iCarly" (real thing btw) even downloaded for free.

I try to pay for stuff if it's made by a small guy or company with real art put into it.
If it isn't easily available for purchase, however, I'll just pirate it. And I have no qualms about pirating from large companies etc

>>509117724
Your thinking lags behind the state of the art by more than 30 years, which presumably is almost 3 times your age.
>listen to the network traffic
>replicate it
Worst case you simply put the software into a static virtual machine.
>it's the same day and same run of the software forever

>>509117673
$80 isn't even the real price. The game companies factor is sales, so the lowest price they ever sell a game on sale is the real price that they expect will make them a reasonable profit on their product. If you pay more than that you are a fool and they're just exploiting your FOMO.

>>509117595
It can be copied and cracked in the void without allowing it to verify date or connect to external servers. External servers can also be emulated, as was often done with pirated licenses for professional software.

You are an utter midwit and treat technology like magic because you can't understand it.

>>509101984
>games on tape cassettes
what

>>509117627

Explain to me why copyright should prevent me from taking the working screen from one phone I own with a dead board, and putting it into another phone I own with a working board and broken screen? This shit isn't rocket science you moron. You need little more than a screwdriver to do shit like this on a whole bunch of the iphone models. But apple bricks the devices that people try to swap parts on. How much of a jew rat do you have to be to be against something like that?

>>509117856
>listen to the network traffic
>replicate it
Sorry, you need a unique key every time.
>static virtual machine
Sorry, the time that the software uses is validated by the server using a private key

>>509117763
I do have a paid of car though. Nice try shilock.

>>509117856
Don't waste your time, that moron doesn't think e-fuses even exist. He's a complete midwit.

>>509099649
This reads extremely cringe but it's a fair point.

>>509117933
Explain to me why you think it's worth your time fixing some e-waste. You're so stupid it's unbelievable.

>>509117933
They simply make it so that their software doesn't allow that.
It's not bricked. You just aren't allowed to use their software after you've replaced the part.

>>509118214

You wanna make the argument that it should be illegal for me to modify their software to get around that arbitrary limitation. You strike me as way too dumb to have any concept of right to repair legislation.

>>509099550 (OP)
Stop making this thread you fucking nigger.
Go back to shitmongold.

>>509118145

How many parts have you had to pull out of your car from 1984 to keep it running moron? Or are you the kind of dickless faggot who couldn't even change his own spark plugs?

>>509118330
The argument is, if you care about getting fucked out of pennies you are a loser.

> paying for Hollywood productions
> Hollywood that’s ran by Jews
> Hollywood that Jews use to propagandize Europeans into accepting their own genocide gleefully
? Dumb mongrel

>>509118395
An iPhone is not a car. You game library is not a house. Your concerns are retarded.

>>509118453
>NO, YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND, I NEED MY TOY!!!

>>509116876
No, this is just completely wrong. A common complaint about the early streaming platforms was their poor availability of movies and how DVD's were still more convenient in that regard. Never mind the fact that streaming platforms post-date movie piracy by about a decade.

>>509118409

Computers are showing up in fucking everything, and unless you are a pathetic loser who is literally incapable of fixing anything you own, having the ability to fix your own shit and keep it running is common fucking sense. Right now copyright law is a major fucking barrier to fixing all sorts of shit that is computer based.

>>509118570
Stop buying things you cant easily repair. Problem solved.
>B-BUT THERE ARE NO COMPANIES THAT MAKE THOSE
not my problem

>>509099550 (OP)
you already asked that in an identical slide thread

the answer is no, jews don't deserve money, but you deserve the rope

>>509118670

Oh I can fix them, I just flout the law to do it. You are just being a groveling faggot trying to tell me I shouldn't be allowed to for reasons you apparently dont understand in any way shape or form.

>>509118789
You are already allowed to fix an iPhone. What you're not allowed to do is use their software in a way that they did not explicitly allow in their license. If their software does not support swapping components, they are not obligated to change that. You could simply just not use their software if you have a problem with that.

>>509099550 (OP)
Just came in this thread to say fuck anyone that doesn't seed. You are subhumans to me.

>>509118886

Yes you are a groveling faggot telling me that I should be allowed to circumvent the elements of apples software that would otherwise prevent me from fixing and utilizing hardware and software I have already paid to use twice. Jesus christ you're pathetic.

>>509118570
This shit is all disposable junk. It's obsolete in 5 years because programmers are perpetually lazy and software slows down faster than hardware improves. If you aren't prepared to throw it away then you need to find a better job.

>>509118972
shouldn't*

>>509118983

If you can't understand how this same line logic applies to multimillion dollar pieces of equipment then you are truly stupid.

>>509118972
You're not allowed to do that, as per their license.
They're allowed to revoke that license. Your incessant seething will only make them clamp down harder. Eventually they will have specified time limits in their license and there will be nothing you can do.

>>509119071

You must be a fucking bot.

>>509119042
You have to generate the revenue pay for the tools if you're going to compete in an industry. Everyone else can do it but you, curious!

>>509119125

>>509118568
Movie piracy used to be limited mostly to copying a DVD to give to a friend so you don't have to give him your disc or watch it together. It only shifted to straight up bypassing the purchase altogether much later when internet speeds got more viable and filesharing got easy, which is also when companies began to grandfather physical media altogether and long-term access became complicated even while paying a regular access fee.

Not to mention that early streaming services were amazing because they had mostly high quality releases to entice new customers. Did we live in different timelines, or do you get your knowledge about how the world used to work before you were born from YouTube?

>>509119221

>Requests I repeat arguments, spergs incessantly about the law being a certain way instead of arguing why this shit should be allowed to continue.

>>509119330
I don't need to argue why it should continue. Piracy is wrong, plain and simple. incessant seething about how they license their software doesn't change the fact that piracy is wrong.

I guess. I enjoyed watching Frozen on Broadway on Disney+ last week.

>>509119444
winter vagina

>>509119204

So if I spend 2 million dollars on a combine harvester I shouldn't be allowed to modify the software bricking the whole machine because of copyright law?

>>509119511
You didn't buy the software, so no. Maybe you should think about what you're purchasing before purchasing it.

>>509119405

Its wrong until the companies controlling the copyrights abuse their customers.

it's not a crime, it's a civil thing

>>509119555

Ya because allowing john deer to arbitrarily force their buyers into unnecessary service conditions whenever the fuck they please is a legal business practice. Complete fucking nonsense.

>>509119559
It's wrong, period. How they license their software to consumers is irrelevant. Your entire point boils down to "WAAAAAAAH I DONT LIKE THAT THEIR LICENSE SAYS THIS SO I SHOULDNT HAVE TO PAY!!!" and it's retarded. If you don't like how they license their software, there is no obligation on your part to purchase anything from that company, you just aren't allowed to use their software. Trying to bypass this is morally wrong, period.

>>509119665
It is, because the buyer agreed to the licensing terms. That's how it works. If you don't like John Deere's licensing practices, don't buy their tractors. It's that simple.

>>509119475
I don't know what that's supposed to mean. The original Frozen movie is one of my all-time favorites. Hmmm. Should I watch the German dub when I get out of work?

>>509119738

And the laws can and should change, and until they do the owners of these devices that find themselves with bricked equipment will continue to circumvent their bullshit until the law catches up.

>>509119405
It's not wrong, it's illegal.
Learn the difference, you spineless bootlicking faggot.

>>509099626
What? They've been making and selling burned cds in the hood for as long as cds have been a thing.

>>509119814
If the laws change, they will simply make their software expire after a set time period, and then everyone loses.

>>509119866
>they will simply make their software expire after a set time period
We will make that illegal too, you faggot.

>>509119898
>we will abolish all copyright law
ok buddy, good luck

>>509117916
I had a Commodore 64. It had a cassette player to load programs/games. Had a bunch of cassettes with multiple compressed games on them. To load a game you had to load the decompressor first at the start of the tape the wind forward to where he game you wanted to load was. The cassette player had a timer to show where on the tape you were.

>>509118409
>>509118528
These two are especially Jewish

Piracy is for kids. When you grow up you're supposed to start ponying up.

>>509119866


Holy shit you are stupid, do you not understand the difference between granting consumers some rights and completely fucking eliminating copyright law?

>>509101123
Don't worry, I didn't take the conditional use licensee you paid for, I just downloaded a few useless files.

You didn't think you were buying the video game were you? No no no, you're not purchasing a good that any consumer rights would apply to silly!

>>509119968
Nah, just harmful anti-consumer practices that remove your agency over the product you purchase, thank you for your attention on this matter.

>>509119898
whoops wrong person

>>509099550 (OP)
I pirate books. Can niggers even read?

>>509120090
By eliminating a licensee's right to limit access, you are essentially making every aspect of copyright law null and void.

>>509120102
Your agency isnt removed at all. You're allowed to develop your own software that interfaces with the hardware that you purchased.

>>509120102

It's hard to believe anyone can't understand that, that fucking clown has no concept of how overbearing copyrights holders abilities against consumers are.

>>509120166
Do you not know what regulation is? There is absolutely no reason whatsoever that the government couldn't regulate software distributers into submission on this matter.

>>509120285
there's nothing overbearing about it. IT IS THEIR RIGHT AS THE OWNER OF THE SOFTWARE.

>>509099550 (OP)

No, piracy is anti Jewish behavior

people still argue with literal moron shill, amazing

>>509120360
How do you exercise your rights as a licensee if you do not have the right to revoke access to that license for violating it?

>>509107665
>tfw I've been on 4chan long enough to see the anti-piracy shills come back
Wheeeeew lads what a ride

>>509120367

Amazingly with stroke of a pen all that can change and they can be made to release source code and provide alternatives to their running their code in an accessible manner after a reasonable period of time.

>>509120464
It was obvious he was a shill 50+ posts ago but right to repair is worth arguing for against these idiots.

>>509099550 (OP)
Hollywood and the modern german film industry should never get any money.

>>509120464
Good morning French furriend

>>509102582
If he can't buy it, don't complain when he doesn't buy it.

>>509119866
And everyone will bypass that, while you're too stupid to figure out how. Only you and retards like you lose. That's fine by me.

>>509120055
They also have 85 fucking pbtid between them.

>>509106155
They pay to make propaganda. Other people paying for it is just a bonus to them. But make no mistake, propagating jewish poison is only of benefit to the jews.

>>509099550 (OP)
Is Pirate Bay even still a legitimate site to find anything?

>>509106534
And he has the right to block the adblock block.

>>509120812
Technically still going, but there are better options frankly. Private tracker scene is amazing right now.

Piracy is self defense

>>509116283
Nice image
>Filename
Is my computer infected with aids now?

>>509120367
>IT IS THEIR RIGHT
All manner of anti-consumer practices were stopped by introducing laws that prohibit them. You act as if laws are immutable and eternal which is retarded.

>>509119738
If you buy a machine you buy everything in the machine. If the previous owner left a gun or a gold bar, you get a gun or a gold bar. Therefore, if the previous "owner" of an otherwise new machine left some software on it, you own that local copy of the software, free to modify it at your own leisure.
>but it says not to modify!
A quick text edit and now it says "please modify me harder onii-chan!"

>>509120812
I use rutracker, since ruskies don't give a fuck about western copyright.

>>509120637
I guess the shills are back in force now that Israel isn't being bombed.

>>509121822
Kek, based.
>You can't modify it because it says so okay?!
The fuck s'Timmy gonna do?

>>509099550 (OP)
Why is the CIA pushing this "issue" all over social media?

>>509120467

Do you mean rights as the licenser, you fucking clown? They exercise their rights by being able to sell the god damn license retard. Just because the conditions of that license can be set through regulation doesn't mean they've lost all right to it. Nor does it mean that literally and shady jewish bullshit they attempt to rip of the end user with cant be removed through regulation, and if they don't want to make the software anymore then fucking great, one less jew screwing people and room for an honest business man to take the kikes place.

>>509121945

We can always hope someone brings a nuke into tel aviv. Fucking based that all those intelligence officials with mossad got bombed though.

>>509108493
Sure, but also no problem using it, what's your point? If you have the chance to use something you want to without hurting anyone, why should you not?

>>509118946
>Just came in this thread to say fuck anyone that doesn't seed. You are subhumans to me

based rare faggot

>>509099550 (OP)
If you buy a book, and then send a scanned pdf to your friend is it stealing? No. That's what piracy is writ large.