Explain to me how pedophilia is "wrong" without using emotional arguments like a feminist.

>>509155287 (OP)
Ill explain it to you in the woods with an axe

>>509155287 (OP)
Enjoy how the killing of homosexuals is wrong without using emotional arguments like a feminist.

>>509155432
I will sex ur unborn daughter

>>509155287 (OP)
It's wrong because kids can't choose and they will grow up to regret it without having given informed consent.

Also, if the kid is below 13 there's a likelyhood you will literally damage their genitals permanently. Many pedo victims have talked about growing up with their pussy feeling strange.

>>509156149
False.
James Cantor, PhD:
>The research is much more consistent with the conclusion that harm is caused instead by coercion, manipulation, secrecy, and by courting kids who already have problems, not the sexual interactions per se.
Michael Bailey, PhD:
>Indeed, the best scientific evidence suggests that the most typical experiences considered childhood sexual abuse may not be as harmful as most people think. Specifically, sexual activity that children engage in voluntarily (albeit illegally) with adults is nearly uncorrelated with undesirable outcomes
Jordan Peterson, PhD:
>Did you know that about 20 years ago the American Psychological Association published a paper showing that most people who were sexually abused as children recovered with very little psychological damage? This is an unsayable truth.
Richard Green, PhD:
>Ultimately, scientists, if no one else, must be objective in their approach to this emotional issue. Judgmental terminology regarding intergenerational sexuality is more dramatic than that in the earlier psychiatric literature on homosexuality. There, patients were labeled perverts and psychopaths. Here, the experience is always abuse, the children are invariably victims, the adults are perpetrators, and those who later report childhood sexual experiences are, without apology to victims of the Nazi Holocaust, survivors.
Bruce Rind, PhD:
>Self-reported reactions to and effects from CSA indicated that negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense, and that men reacted much less negatively than women. The college data were completely consistent with data from national samples. Basic beliefs about CSA in the general population were not supported.

>>509155287 (OP)
1. Underdeveloped bodies. More prone to death.