>>509202119Holy shit you somehow get even more delusional and retarded. You ask for sources, I give you the sources, and you immediately ignore them and call them Jewish lies, you gargantuan retard. Let me guess, you're also a flat earther, because you argue exactly like them.
Women get aroused by a wide range of stimulus, showing erotic plasticity. If they don't have urges and don't fantasize or act on fucking a bonobo (although a suspiciously large amount of women like to fantasize about beasts) they arguably aren't some mindless, blanket sex mirror. But again, their sexuality is much more fluid than men's, and when it comes to their homosexual attractions, a shit ton of them fantasize about other women, consume lesbian pornography, want to fuck other women and even get into relationships with them, all the while loudly proclaiming their sexuality. Meanwhile you are in denial and engage in Olympic tier mental gymnastics to deny the obvious. So what sort of evidence are you even asking for? Do you want all women to have sex with each other in fron of you or something?
And I insist, the data isn't from some degenerate prisons or prostitutes, I'm talking about girl schools (catholic, even) and women colleges. Many people in multiple countries noticed the fact that a huge % of women have very deep, pseudo romantic relationships, and a significant number of them had overt romantic and/or sexual contact (20-30%). Note that the researchers talk of it as a problem, not something to be celebrated, and they also note that most of these girls/women end up marrying men
Here's a piece of advice for you retards: learn how to accept uncomfortable truths instead of avoiding them or reshaping them to fit a comforting narrative. When it comes to women and realizing just how little they're attracted to men and how much of a pansexual mess they are, accepting it will help you understand that they aren't worth the hassle and that you need to move on from them.