← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 509192106

12 posts 6 images 10 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: +fF0SV6d) Argentina No.509192106 [Report] >>509192340 >>509192449 >>509192510 >>509192681 >>509192756 >>509192922 >>509193125
CHINA CAN'T STOP WINNING
>China has made significant changes to its divorce laws, aimed at making marriage registration simpler and divorce harder. A new 30-day cooling-off period has been introduced, requiring couples to wait before finalizing their divorce. This period gives couples a chance to reconsider their decision, potentially preventing hasty decisions, but it also raises concerns about women who may feel trapped in abusive or unhappy relationships.

>The law overhauls property division, shifting from equal distribution to ownership based on who paid for the property. This means that if one spouse paid for the property, they retain ownership even if the other spouse’s name is on the title. Property gifts from family members to one spouse are also exempt from being shared. This move could hurt women, especially in a society where women’s earning power is often lower than men’s. It shifts the balance of power further into the hands of those who traditionally held it, leaving women in more vulnerable financial positions post-divorce

https://citizenwatchreport.com/china-changes-divorce-law-wife-receives-no-property-from-husband-equal-custody-for-both-parents/
Anonymous (ID: Fl8PPiwZ) Italy No.509192340 [Report] >>509192469 >>509193976
>>509192106 (OP)
That won't raise their 0.8 birthrate lol
Anonymous (ID: wzpfFVAn) United States No.509192449 [Report]
>>509192106 (OP)
I wonder what happens if an American marries a chink in China.
Anonymous (ID: +fF0SV6d) Argentina No.509192469 [Report] >>509192533
>>509192340
>AI and robotics will make 99% of jobs obsolete in two decades or less
>Still thinking about 20th century socieonomic variables

Sad.
Anonymous (ID: 3zhWwCKt) United States No.509192510 [Report]
>>509192106 (OP)
I don’t think either extreme is good. Then whoever has the disproportionate power will abuse it. Like chicks here in the west are abusive with it, I bet dudes in China will be abusive with it
Anonymous (ID: Fl8PPiwZ) Italy No.509192533 [Report] >>509192908
>>509192469
Those won't raise their birthrates either lmao, the decline is not strictly linked to either of that
Anonymous (ID: iJUXuLd9) United States No.509192681 [Report]
>>509192106 (OP)
that is insanely based.
go chinx!!
Anonymous (ID: YwQv+kwx) No.509192756 [Report]
>>509192106 (OP)
they aren't getting married or having kids in the first place
Anonymous (ID: y1lk5kdt) Belgium No.509192908 [Report]
>>509192533
We don't need that many people because we don't need a mass of dumb meat robots to sustain an economy anymore. That was his point retard.
>but people will just dissapear entirely
No, things will eventually stabilise at a lower figure.
We need eugenics though.
Anonymous (ID: TbkAKBKT) France No.509192922 [Report]
>>509192106 (OP)
>we made it better for you to marry a 35 year old woman now you go, working man!
Anonymous (ID: KE+UkJU/) France No.509193125 [Report]
>>509192106 (OP)
Chink women are worse Kareens than White women.
They won't marry a men who is not in the top 0,001%, ask for 10 years of salary to be given to their family, ask for a fortune to be spent on you and still leave you while taking your shit.

It became a problem for the Chink government since young Chinks now don't get married.
Anonymous (ID: pkxWeGfO) United States No.509193976 [Report]
>>509192340
It will improve it.
Just gotta push more women out of the office and they'll be gold.