Thread 509290909

Why do Su-34s, Russia’s most advanced fighter jets, keep crashing?

>>509290909 (OP)
>Why do X do the Y?
>Su-34 most advanced jet
Holy fuck I hate you faggots are ran out of America.

>>509290909 (OP)
Probably because an overweight su-27 which in itself is extremely heavy isn't a very good airframe.

>>509290909 (OP)
Overuse leasong to wing fatigue, overstress of the pilots, higher risk because they now have to fly lower due to increased counter air missiles, so ruckus get punished instantly rather than have any air heights they can trade for safety.
/Thread

>>509292000
Leading
Fuckups

>>509290909 (OP)
Same problem as F-35s perhaps?

>>509290909 (OP)
Drunk Russian pilots with mere dozens of hours of yearly flight time are a threat to their own side

>>509290909 (OP)
All Russian/soviet tech newer than 1964 uses western technology and parts. Sometimes you need to replace parts for maintenance, and because of sanctions they can no longer get the same parts and sometimes they get cheap shit Chink copies that break easily.

>>509290909 (OP)
>plane crashes during training flight
haha those stupid russians, this kind of shit would never happen if they had a real airforce like the US air-oh wait

>>509292235
How many F-35 has and how many they lost in last 4 years?

>>509292347
>how many they lost in last 4 years?
more than i expected actually

>>509292235
F35s are new technology. There are undiscovered issues that have not been found yet.

>>509292515

To be fair though, there is thousands of F-35s all over the world. Losing 7 of them means they have less than a 0.7% failure rate.
Russia has apparently about 120 Su-34s and they have lost a whole lot more than 0.7% of them.

>>509292573
F16s keep crashing as well, are they new tech too?

>>509292515
Not bad when you consider there are over 1,000 of them built vs just 170 Su-35s, and Russia have lost 6 of them in just the past few weeks alone.

>>509292821
>4,600 built
>b-but whatabouuuuuut

Would countries be better served pumping out two or three 80s or 90s era planes?

>>509292782
>>509292833
>they're great, only a small bunch of them spontanously combusted
lmao meanwhile DoD says f35s are unreliable pieces of shit

>>509290909 (OP)
SU 57 is our best. Get with the times, faggot.

>>509290909 (OP)
russia sucks at war and their hardware is dogshit

>>509292000
Those are students pilots. Not full fledged pilots in active duty. Shit happens when you learn.

>>509290909 (OP)
The screenshot you posted answers your own question, Björn.

>>509293008
It's literally me..

>>509292157
Wrong. SU jets are built in house with Russian parts and tech. We didn't outsource them to outside entities, like how your government did.

>>509293024
Su-57 doesn’t leave tarmac

>>509292347
Recently 5 were downed by Iran.

>>509290909 (OP)
>Fighter jet
>Bomber
Are you dumb?

>>509290909 (OP)
Not due to NATO anti-air, that's for sure.

>>509293192
Sure, if you say so. Whatever makes cope.

>>509293008
based brainlet retard who can't into basic math

>>509293199
AHAHAHAHAHA

Hohol (bombing) fatigue.

>>509290909 (OP)
local dad joke used to be, question: how do you aquire a starfighter?(F-104F) answer: get a small property and wait for it. (269 crashes in total)

>>509290909 (OP)
No link
Propaganda from the troons again