Thread 509295092

Article 1
>Constitutes content that undermines the fundamental principles of the Republic: any statement or publication, regardless of the medium:
>1° Which directly and publicly incites hatred or violence against a group of people or institutions because of their commitment to republican values, as defined in Article 1 of the Constitution;
>2° Which calls into question the democratic, secular, and indivisible nature of the Republic;
>3° Which promotes a political or legal regime based on principles contrary to those of the Republic, in particular theocracy, communitarianism, or supremacy based on gender, origin, sexual orientation, or religion.

Article 2
>The production, dissemination, or public advocacy, by any means whatsoever, of anti-republican statements as defined in Article 1 is punishable by three years' imprisonment and a fine of €45,000.
>These penalties are increased to five years' imprisonment and a fine of €75,000 when the acts are committed:
>1° In a group;
>2° Through an online public communication service;
>3° Or by a person holding public authority or holding an elected office.

https://questions.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/textes/l17b1535_proposition-loi

So France is about to abolish free speech and /pol/ doesn't care?

>>509295433
>So France is about to abolish free speech
About to? I have been under the belief that no country currently has freedom of speech, and in most cases they've probably never had it. You already get locked up for questioning the holocaust or questioning COVID or whatever. So this is just one more thing. But why pretend France was ever free in the first place?

>>509295433
>about to
Ever heard about Gayss0t act and its ancestors and derivatives ?

France also suicide many pro kremlin voices, like 3ric d3nece

>>509295433
France has the most freedom of speech and expression in Europe.

>>509295566
You don't have free speech either, you indoctrinated moron.

>>509295433
Correct. Tell those swarthy Niggers to speak English

>>509296127
>You don't have free speech either, you indoctrinated moron.
Re-read my post carefully. I said that:
>>509295566
>no country currently has freedom of speech
So why are you calling me a moron while at the same time being clearly retarded and having terrible reading comprehension? Also you're a memeflag so you're most likely a jew too, but also a dumb one.

>>509296079
>France has the most freedom of speech and expression in Europe.
Except when it comes to denying the holocaust.

>>509295092 (OP)
Let me guess: Claiming his abusive, face-slapping cock-wife is a troon counts as anti-repubplican speech, right?

>>509295092 (OP)
>the fundamental principles of the Republic
Shipping bombs to blow up babies in Gaza?

>>509295433
Of course not. This is a total nothingburger. But /pol/ chuds need their daily dose of fearporn so they can shit their pants.

>>509296691
gottem

>>509295092 (OP)
>be Fifth French Republic
>almost 100% native French when founded in 1958
>outlaw speech promoting political or legal regime based supremacy of origin
>mfw when the origin of the French Republic is the French
>mfw I technically outlawed myself

>>509296865
Why is this whore negress pretending anyone gives a shit about what she says.

>>509296079
>France has the most freedom of speech and expression in Europe.
Doubt.
The jaii holohoax deniers.

>>509297562
I give a shit, depending on the topic, her show can be very entertaining.

>3° Which promotes a political or legal regime based on principles contrary to those of the Republic, in particular theocracy, communitarianism, or supremacy based on gender, origin, sexual orientation, or religion.
So... can't be a fucking commie? Fuck that shit.

Wow, another masonic law!

>>509295433
France has abolished free speech long, long ago

>>509296079
if even true, that still doesn't say much, lol

>>509297562
I give a shit, because it's obviously true the creature that the sodomite kinglet insists to pretend as his "wife", actually is an obvious, vile, pedophiliac, looney troon

>>509296962
worse
our asswipe of a constitution was written by the jew debré, who was the little colonel dégueule's handler, with his hand always deep up the little colonel's butt
the first article of that abomination states:
>France is a laical, indivisible, democratic and social republic
and laical+indivisible=jacobine (the formers are the two teats of the latter)
same as democratic+social=neosocdem=neotrotskyist (in the context of the trotskyist long march through the institutions, that debré couldn't ignore, again, because he was jewish, and it was done by his fellows)
so basically, the utmost principles vomited by that debré animal (and the so-called republican sodomite traitors) are jacobino-troskyism, ie ultra-communism
not that they understand what a republic is either (literally, a regime under which political matters are public matters: and that's with the laughably so called "french" republican party being a specialist of under the table deals, corruption and fuckeries)

not that it's exactly new: the 1789 declaration is a jusnaturalist marvel, but the 1st gaypublic, founded in 1792, was already completely degenerated and vile
official (jewish) narration says it's the fault of the jusnaturalist revolution, but it's actually the republic (that put an end to the jusnaturalist revolution) that started the terror, the regicides, the massacres of Christians, and all that vile communist jazz
just check the dates, if you need a proof (it's that easy to demonstrate, lol)

a final word about hélène laporte: vice president of the parliament, who cosigns that abomination of a text
she pretends she is with rn: she demonstrates she's a traitor to France, the French and anything right winged, here
it should be remembered, desu

>>509297987
communautarism!=communism
what they mean by communautarism is a group living with its own, distinct rules
it clearly aims goatfuckers, but would aim tradi christians just as well

Since nobody actually read the law proposal and only shat their pants, let me summarize it. These are aimed as muslim separatists who preach for overthrowing the republic and replacing with sharia law. But for some reason /pol/cels are siding with the sharia law muslims. Maybe because they think they will finally lose their virginity to a sharia law mandated wife.

>>509302542
Interesting. We have a very similar phrase in the german constitution.
>>The Federal Republic of Germany is a democratic and social federal state. ART20 GG
YUP, we are so cucked

>>509301806
>La planète des singes is real

>>509303280
a cohencidence, I'm sure

>>509303302
DOCTOR ZAIUS!!!
DOCTOR ZAIUS!!!
HAAAAAAA: DOCTOR ZAIUS!!!

>>509303431
Do you personally believe that Brigitte is "un femme avec penis" or whatever the fuck you guys call it?

>>509304389
yes, clearly
at first, I repeated it to everyone, because everything that buggers traitor micron amuses me
but looking at it, it's actually obviously true: even showed wemb related to my old mother's friends, in their 80s, and without telling them anything beforehand, they all were shocked, and told the same thing:
>but not true woman would ever move and sit like that
and we mostly call them "travelos", which is slang for "travestis", ie transvestites

>>509295092 (OP)
Fuck France. Down with the Republic. Deport non-French, remove their citizenship.

Ah, freedom.

>>509304982
well, all that would unfuck France, akshully

>>509303103
/pol/ suggests that such an outcome could be obviated by never importing browns in the first place, not by passing useless laws that shall be repealed the moment that browns are in the majority.

>>509295092 (OP)
read those laws out loud, its about muzzling the remaining white people, so that they keep it quiet while the new arabic caliphate arises

>>509302794
C'est plus le plan 2030, stakeholder capitalisme qui promouvoi le communautarisme, mais avec un monopole de compagnie privée.

>>509309637
>promouvoi
*promeut
enfin, bon : ça reste de la bouillie de mots (et encore, je suis gentil)
>mais avec un monopole de compagnie privée
rien que ça : incompatible avec la notion de capitalisme, puisque les monopoles ne peuvent être maintenus que par l'action étatique
je rappelle que par définition, "capitalisme" d'état, c'est juste du socialisme, du tout au tout