← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 509311253

12 posts 8 images 10 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: GElLeEzk) United States No.509311253 >>509311844 >>509312646
>Billions of "people" decided to turn the world into Hell by worshipping THIS
>THEY'RE STILL DOING IT
>THEY'RE LITERALLY TRYING TO START WWIII OVER THESE FUCKING INBRED DESERT RATS
Truly unfathomable. Mankind deserves its fate. Literally 8 BILLION "people" suffering from a collective madness.
Anonymous (ID: RbFLDd7m) United States No.509311394
So you're saying... I should capitalism harder?
Anonymous (ID: URot3NWP) New Zealand No.509311587 >>509311850
>kikes are awful!

yep
Anonymous (ID: 2/vpIjM6) Norway No.509311607 >>509311929
im so disillusioned with the right
Anonymous (ID: +BN5JG8w) United States No.509311844 >>509312386
>>509311253 (OP)

I'm 90% sure the AI push at all the tech companies is simply because investment houses are forcing them to adopt it because of other companies owned by the investment house - so you have the most petty decadent non-engineers deciding which direction massive amounts of engineering output should be focused on and it's driven entirely by wall street speculation not by any actual coder or mathematician giving them the green light

"Don't worry, this will solve our labor problems" is being said behind closed doors but there's a fucking ZERO PERCENT CHANCE it will do anything of significance at all other than disrupt and damage the rest of the electronics and software markets even further

all this self destruction simply for 6 month stock portfolios to keep going up with no self correction ever happening

I fucking hate jews so fuckign much
Anonymous (ID: GElLeEzk) United States No.509311850 >>509311911
>>509311587
Martin Luther was one of them. And not just because he was one ethnically (he was), but because all chriggers are. Why do chriggers exist? Why did ANYONE start following these desert bandits to begin with? They offer NOTHING but ruin and dysgenics.
Anonymous (ID: slCD+mLn) United States No.509311911
>>509311850
This is a kike
Anonymous (ID: XFyNjXE/) United Kingdom No.509311929
>>509311607
I'm utterly disillusioned with the left
Good luck on your journey brother, though we may be travelling in different directions
Anonymous (ID: FCo6UjsV) United States No.509312386 >>509312871
>>509311844
It's going to cut off a lot of white collar jobs anon. This much is obvious. IT jobs are in the gutter especially. Entry level software jobs are going to get buttfucked and completely shipped off to jeetland because a jeet with AI is about on par with a recent grad. In less than a decade they'll work out the kinks of self driving cars and trucks putting millions more out of work. Robotics is advancing as well, so factories aren't going to be lasting a long time either. Basically the only thing left are trades.

Immigration is just a stop gap in the mean time and to keep what wages exist as low as possible. The top 10%, the ones actually with decent jobs, are going to be THE consumers, the only consumers. I'm talking 80%+ of all consumption. It's already at 50%. We're headed to full on techno-feudalist oligarchy with our own knights and barons and kings. Enjoy serfdom.
Anonymous (ID: A/7uqEOp) United States No.509312646
>>509311253 (OP)
>later that morning
Anonymous (ID: 97R6Wgid) United States No.509312871 >>509313440
>>509312386
The depressing thing is, eliminating the need for people to perform labor should be a GOOD thing.
Think about it. On paper, only needing a fraction of your population to perform the work it needs to supply food and goods and the like to the whole population is great. The fewer people that need to work, the better. That's how you you get to something like post scarcity society, the majority of work is done by robots or the people who actively want to work for the satisfaction of it.

But as we approach this massive spike in the obselesance of the human worker, we are still addicted to the idea that person's worth is dependent on their work, even as we take that ability to work away. Instead of a comfy society of people who don't need to work to survive, we're just apparently okay with the rich dooming the poor to starve for profits.
Anonymous (ID: slCD+mLn) United States No.509313440
>>509312871
> The depressing thing is, eliminating the need for people to perform labor should be a GOOD thing.
It is for men of aristocratic nature. If they don’t have to work, they can spend more time thinking about war, training for war, creating/patronizing art, doing science and philosophy, and participating in governance

Peasants and men of lesser spiritual nature clearly need to work though or else they just become degenerate. 40 hours a week is probably too much though