>>509314078 (OP)the most radical "leftist" (libtard) voice allowed in bourgeois discourse. a vaguely reformist voice is called "communist" by conservative liberals. its so over for the american proletariat.
besides that, yeah this will do literally nothing. if he goes through with the policy tweaks, it will still preserve the structure that keeps the capital flow from the global south to the north, and from the working man to the ruling class. it doesnt challenge the capital, which is the actual cause of the problems it is trying to solve. the worst part is that the revolution will get pacified since people won't be as desperate anymore, because they will get a bigger slice of the pie, without questioning who cooked the damn pie. that congolese kid mining lithium is still going to die without seeing a day with three full meals. and the controlled opposition "radicals" (western chauvinists) call this progress
soft-fascism, that's what this is. capital's polite liberal pressure valve that seduces the masses with better lifestyle instead of hierarchy and direct repression. Mark from Bushwick buying a new TV is not a win for the workers.
and it will still collapse eventually under its own contradictions eventually, as it always has. don't get surprised when a smiling neoliberal technocrat jerkoff wins the mayor elections in the next 10 years.