I am tired of reading that Netanyahu is a psychopath. He certainly is not. I see no reason to consider him, or any other Israeli leader, a psychopath in the medical sense of the word. He, and others like him, have a collective psychopathy, which is a very different thing.

This is a crucial point, without which we will never understand Israel. Calling their leaders psychopaths is useless. What we need to do is recognize Israel as an entity suffering from collective psychopathy and study the origin of this unique national character. It is a matter of survival for the world, just as it is a matter of survival for any group of people to recognize the psychopath among them and understand his patterns of thought and behavior.
The difference is the same as that between a personal neurosis and a collective neurosis. According to Freud, religion (and he meant Christianity) is a collective neurosis. Freud did not mean to say that religious people are neurotic. On the contrary, he observed that collective neurosis tended to make religious people immune from personal neuroses. I do not subscribe to Freud's theory, I only use it to introduce my own: Zionists, even the most bloodthirsty, are not psychopaths at an individual level; within their community many of them are affectionate and even altruistic people. They are rather the vectors of a collective psychopathy, that is, of a particular way (which we could define as non-human) through which they see and interact collectively with other human communities.

>>509332839 (OP)
>What is a psychopath?

Psychopathy is a syndrome of psychological traits classified among personality disorders. The Canadian psychologist Robert Hare, following in the footsteps of Hervey Cleckley’s The Mask of Sanity (1941), had defined the diagnostic criteria based on a cognitive model that is now widely adopted, although some psychiatrists prefer the term “sociopathy” since, in reality, [this syndrome] has to do with the inability to socialize authentically. In an attempt to get everyone to agree, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders proposed the term “antisocial personality disorder”; but the term “psychopathy” is still the most widespread and, even if only for this reason, I will adopt it.

>>509332906
The most characteristic trait of the psychopath is the complete lack of empathy and, consequently, of moral inhibition in hurting others, combined with the thirst for power. Psychopathy also shares some traits with narcissism: psychopaths have a grandiose vision of their own importance. According to them, they are entitled to anything because they consider themselves exceptional people. They are never wrong and their failures are always someone else's fault.

The truth has no value for the psychopath; the truth is what is convenient at a given moment. He is a pathological liar, but he does not realize it. Lying is so natural to him that the question of his "sincerity" is almost irrelevant: the psychopath even beats the lie detector.

The psychopath feels only very superficial emotions and has no real feelings for anyone; but he has developed a great ability to deceive. He can be charming to the point of becoming charismatic. He is not able to feel empathy, but he learns to simulate it. His power is the extraordinary ability to pretend, deceive, trap and capture. Although he is immune to guilt, he becomes a master at making others feel guilty.

>>509332944
Because the psychopath is unable to put himself in other people's shoes, he cannot look at himself critically. Sure that he is right in every circumstance, he is genuinely surprised by the resentment of his victims and will punish them for it. If he steals something, he will consider the resentment of the robbed person as an irrational hatred.

Although the psychopath may be judged raving mad, he is not mad in the medical sense of the term, since he does not suffer: psychopaths do not go to the psychiatrist unless forced. In a certain sense, the psychopath is very well adapted to social life, if the purpose of social life is to get by individually. That is why the real mystery, from a Darwinian point of view, is not the existence of psychopaths, but their low percentage in the population.

The most optimistic estimate of their presence in the Western population is 1%. They should not be confused with the proverbial 1% who own half the world's wealth, although a study conducted among top executives of large companies had shown that psychopathic traits are very widespread among them.

>>509332985
Israel as a Psychopathic State

The fact that Jews are disproportionately represented in the elite today (they make up half of America’s billionaires, yet only 2.4% of the population) does not mean that psychopathy is more widespread among Jews. In a sense, the opposite is true: Jews demonstrate a high degree of empathy, or at least solidarity, towards one another, often to the point of personal sacrifice. But the selective nature of this empathy suggests that it is directed not so much at humanity in general as at their Jewishness.

Lol.What anime is that from?Can you make it look real using AI

>>509333051
In fact, Jews tend to confuse Jewishness with humanity. For this reason, what is good for Jews must necessarily be good for humanity. In contrast, a crime against Jews is a “crime against humanity,” a concept they created in 1945. Confusing Jewishness with humanity is a sign of collective narcissism, but when it comes to considering non-Jews as sub-human, it becomes a sign of collective psychopathy.

Collectively, Jews consider themselves innocent of the charges brought against them. For this reason, the Zionist pioneer Leo Pinsker, a physician, considered Judeophobia “a psychic aberration. As a psychic aberration it is hereditary, and as a disease transmitted for two thousand years it is incurable.” Consequently, Jews are “the chosen people to attract universal hatred” (even atheist Jews cannot help but define Jewishness as one aspect of being chosen).

>>509332839 (OP)
tldr

>>509333086
Israel, the Jewish state, is the psychopath among nations. It acts toward other nations as a psychopath acts toward his fellow man. “Only psychiatrists can explain Israel’s behavior,” wrote Israeli journalist Gideon Levy in Haaretz in 2010. However, his diagnosis, which includes “paranoia, schizophrenia and megalomania,” is wrong. Considering Israel’s sheer presumptuousness, its dehumanization of the Palestinians and its extraordinary capacity to lie and manipulate, [it is clear that] we are dealing with a psychopath.

In drawing a parallel between psychopathy and Israel’s behavior, I do not blame Israelis or Jews as individuals. They participate in this collective psychopathy only to the extent that they are subservient to the national ideology. We can draw a comparison with another type of collective entity. In The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power, Joel Bakan observed that corporations behave like psychopaths, insensitive to the suffering of those they crush in their pursuit of profit: “Corporate behavior is very much like that of a psychopath.” My analysis of Israel is based on the same reasoning. Only Israel is far more dangerous than any mega-corporation (even Pfizer), because the ideology that causes its personality disorder is far crazier than the liberal, social-Darwinian ideology that governs the stock market. Israel’s ideology is biblical.

>>509333182
The Biblical Virus.

Israel’s collective psychopathy is not genetic, it is cultural, but it was formed in very ancient times and is, therefore, rooted in its ancestral subconscious (whatever that is): it derives ultimately from a jealous god invented by the Levites to control the hungry tribes that had set out to conquer Palestine some three thousand years ago. By birth, Israel is the nation of a psychopathic god.

Yahweh, “the god of Israel”, is a volcanic, angry and solitary god, who manifests towards all the other gods an implacable hatred and ends up considering them as non-gods, being, in reality, the only true god. This characterizes him very clearly as a psychopath among the gods. On the contrary, for the Egyptians, according to the German Egyptologist Jan Assmann, “the gods are social beings”, and the harmony between them guarantees the harmony of the cosmos [8]. There was, moreover, a certain degree of translatability between the pantheons of the different civilizations. But Yahweh had taught the Jews to contempt for the deities of the surrounding peoples, making the Jews, in the eyes of their neighbors, a threat to the cosmic and social order. Yahweh is, according to Assmann, essentially a theoclast god: “You shall utterly destroy all the places where the nations whom you are about to expel serve their gods: on the high mountains, on the hills, and under every green tree. You shall break down their altars, smash their sacred stones, cut down their sacred poles, and burn the images of their gods in the fire, and blot out their name from those places” (Deuteronomy 12:2-3).

>>509333252
Yahweh may be a fictional character, but his hold on the Jewish mind is real. “To appeal to a mad and abusive father, and for three thousand years, that is what it means to be a mad Jew!” said Smilesburger in Philip Roth’s Shylock. The Jews have been taught by Yahweh to remain strictly separate from other peoples. Food prohibitions serve to prevent any socialization outside the tribe: “I will separate you from all these peoples, that you may be mine” (Leviticus 20:26).

The nature of the covenant is not moral. The only criterion for approval by Yahweh is obedience to his laws and arbitrary commands. Treacherously slaughtering hundreds of prophets of Baal is good, because it is Yahweh’s will (1 Kings 18). Showing mercy to the king of the Amalekites is bad, because when Yahweh says “kill everyone,” he means “everyone” (1 Samuel 15). In biblical historiography, the fate of the Jewish people depends on carrying out Yahweh’s orders, no matter how foolish. As Kevin MacDonald rightly observes:

>>509333303
The idea that Jewish suffering stems from the Jews’ turning away from their own law runs almost like a constant drumbeat throughout the Tanakh, a constant reminder that the persecution of the Jews is not the result of their behavior toward Gentiles, but rather the result of their behavior toward God.”

If the Jews follow Yahweh’s command to separate themselves from the rest of humanity, Yahweh promises to make them masters of humanity in return: “Follow his ways, keep his statutes, his commandments, and his customs, and listen to his voice,” and Yahweh “will exalt you above all the nations he has made”; “you will make many nations your subjects, but you will not be subject to any of them” (Deuteronomy 26:17-19 and 28:12). This, in fact, almost sounds like the pact that Satan had proposed to Jesus: “The devil showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor, and said to him, ‘All these things I will give you, if you will fall down at my feet and worship me.’” (Matthew 4:8-9).

>>509332839 (OP)
>According to Freud
stopped reading

>>509333347
If Israel follows the Law strictly, Yahweh promises that Israel will be able to subdue all the nations under its dominion and destroy those who resist. “The kings will fall prostrate before you, with their faces to the ground, and they will lick the dust at your feet,” while “the nations and the kingdoms that will not serve you will perish” (Isaiah 49:23 and 60:12). The nations will have to recognize Israel’s sovereignty or be destroyed. Yahweh tells Israel that he has identified “seven nations greater and stronger than you” and “you will utterly destroy them” and “you will make no alliance with them nor show them mercy.” As for their kings, “you will cause their names to perish from under heaven” (Deuteronomy 7:1-2, 24).

>>509333437
The war code of Deuteronomy 20 orders the extermination of “every living thing” in the conquered cities of Canaan. In practice, the rule is extended to all the peoples who resist the conquests of the Israelites. It had been applied by Moses to the Midianites, although in this case Yahweh had allowed his warriors to keep the young virgin girls (Numbers 31). It had been applied by Joshua to the Canaanite city of Jericho, where the Israelites “laid the curse of destruction on all who were in the city, both men and women, young and old, including the oxen, sheep and donkeys, slaughtering them all” (Joshua 6:21). In the city of Ai, all twelve thousand inhabitants had been slaughtered, “until not one of them was left alive, and not one of them escaped. … When Israel had finished killing all the inhabitants of Ai in the open field and in the wilderness where they had pursued them, and every single one had fallen by the sword, all Israel returned to Ai and slaughtered the people who remained.” The women had not been spared. “Israel took only the livestock and the spoil of this city as spoil” (Joshua 8:22-27). Then came the turn of the cities of Makkedah, Libnah, Lachish, Eglon, Hebron, Debir, and Hazor. Throughout the land, Joshua “left not a single survivor, but put every living being under the curse of destruction, as Yahweh, the God of Israel, had commanded” (10:40).

>>509333464
As Avigail Abarbanel wrote in “Why I Left the Cult,” the Zionist conquerors of Palestine “followed very closely the biblical dictate of Joshua to come in and take everything. … For a supposedly non-religious movement, it is remarkable how closely Zionism … followed the Bible.”[11] Kim Chernin, another Israeli dissident, wrote in “The Seven Pillars of Jewish Denial,” “I cannot count the number of times I have read the story of Joshua as a story of our people coming into rightful possession of the promised land without stopping to say, ‘But this is a story of rape, pillage, massacre, invasion and destruction of other peoples.’”

>>509333517
Yahweh offers only two possible paths to Israel: domination over other nations, if Israel will respect the covenant with Yahweh on separation from other peoples, or annihilation by these same nations, if Israel will break the covenant:

“For if you apostatize and join yourself to the remnant of these nations that are left among you and intermarry with them and mix with them and they with you, then know that Yahweh your god will no longer drive out these nations from before you, but they will become a net and a trap for you, and a scourge on your sides; they will become thorns in your eyes, until you perish and are consumed from off this good land that Yahweh your god has given you.” (Joshua 23:12-14)

To dispossess others or be dispossessed, to dominate or be exterminated: Israel cannot think beyond this alternative.

>>509333557
Zionism is Biblical.

What does Zionism have to do with it, you ask? Isn’t Zionism a secular ideology? I think it’s time to dispel this misconception. Zionism is a product of Judaism, and Judaism is rooted in the Hebrew Bible, the Tanakh. Whether a Jew has read it or not, whether he or she deems it historical or mythical, each Jew ultimately bases his or her Judaism on the Bible or what he or she knows about the Bible. Judaism is the internalization of the psychopathic god. It makes little difference whether Jews define their Jewishness in religious terms or in ethnic terms. From a religious point of view, the Bible preserves the memory and essence of the Covenant with God, while, from a secular point of view, the Bible is the fundamental narrative of the Jewish people and the model with which the Jews interpret all their subsequent history (the Dispersion, the Holocaust, the rebirth of Israel and so on).

It is true that Theodor Herzl, the prophet of political Zionism, was not inspired by the Bible. However, he called his ideology “Zionism,” using the biblical name for Jerusalem. The Zionists who followed Herzl and the actual founders of the modern State of Israel, however, were inspired by the Bible. “The Bible is our mandate,” Chaim Weizmann declared in 1919, and in 1948 he presented Truman with a Torah scroll for his role in recognizing Israel. Thus begins the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel:

ERETZ-ISRAEL [(Hebrew) – the Land of Israel, Palestine] was the birthplace of the Jewish people. Here their spiritual, religious and political identity was formed. Here they first achieved statehood, created cultural values of national and universal significance, and gave the world the eternal Book of Books.

>>509333613
There is no doubt that the State of Israel was founded on the basis of the biblical claim.

David Ben-Gurion, the author of this document and the father of the nation, had a biblical vision of the Jewish people. For him, according to biographer Dan Kurzman, the rebirth of Israel in 1948 “was equivalent to the Exodus from Egypt, to Joshua’s conquest of the land, to the Maccabean revolt.” Ben-Gurion had never been to synagogue and ate pork for breakfast, yet he was steeped in biblical history. “There can be no good political or military education about Israel without a deep knowledge of the Bible,” he used to say. Tom Segev writes [of Ben-Gurion] in his most recent biography:

[Ben Gurion] sponsored a Bible study course at his home and used to reiterate two concepts to characterize the moral character of the State of Israel and its destiny and duty to itself and the world: the first was that of the “chosen people,” a term that derives from the covenant between God and the people of Israel (Exodus 19:5-6); the second was the commitment of the Jewish people to the principles of justice and peace that make them a “light to the nations,” in the spirit of the prophets (Isaiah 49:6). He spoke and wrote often about these concepts

>>509332839 (OP)
tl;dr

jews are of their father the devil - John 8:44, Rev 2:9, 3:9

>>509333613
Ben-Gurion’s biblical mindset became more and more evident as he grew older. Consider, for example, the fact that, while he was begging Kennedy to give his people the atomic bomb because the Egyptians were threatening to exterminate them (as they had done under Moses), he prophesied in Look magazine (January 16, 1962) that, within twenty-five years, Jerusalem would be “the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all disputes between the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah.” Ben-Gurion was not crazy, he was simply thinking biblically.

Almost all Israeli leaders of Ben-Gurion’s generation and beyond share the same biblical mindset. Moshe Dayan, the military hero of the 1967 Six-Day War, justified the annexation of the new territories in a book entitled Living with the Bible (1978). Naftali Bennett, Israel’s Minister of Education, also justified the annexation of the West Bank from the Bible. The Zionists can find all the justifications they want in the Bible: for Gaza, they have Judges 1:18-19: “Judah took Gaza with its territory… Now Yahweh was with Judah, and they took possession of the hill country.” Currently, there are Bible fanatics in the Israeli government, such as National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who fires off biblical quotes every day. “God gave the land of Israel to the Jewish people” is the alpha and omega of Zionism, not only for Israelis, but also for Christians who, since 1917, have supported the Jewish claim and support Israel today.

>>509332839 (OP)
Why not both, Shlomo? And yes, he def is a psychopath.

>>509333722
Almost all Israeli leaders of Ben-Gurion's generation and beyond share the same biblical mindset. Moshe Dayan, the military hero of the 1967 Six-Day War, justified the annexation of the new territories in a book entitled Living with the Bible (1978). Naftali Bennett, Israel's Minister of Education, also justified the annexation of the West Bank from the Bible. The Zionists can find all the justifications they want in the Bible: for Gaza, they have Judges 1:18-19: “Judah took Gaza with its territory… Now Yahweh was with Judah, and they took possession of the hill country.” Currently, there are Bible fanatics in the Israeli government, such as National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who fires off biblical quotes every day. “God gave the land of Israel to the Jewish people” is the alpha and omega of Zionism, not only for Israelis, but also for Christians who, since 1917, have supported the Jewish claim and support Israel today.

We are an ancient people. In our nearly 4,000-year history, many have repeatedly tried to destroy the Jewish people. Tomorrow night, on the Jewish holiday of Purim, we will read the book of Esther. We will read about a powerful Persian viceroy named Haman, who plotted to destroy the Jewish people nearly 2,500 years ago. But a brave Jewish woman, Queen Esther, exposed the plot and gave the Jewish people the right to defend themselves from their enemies. The plot was foiled. Our people were saved. Today, the Jewish people face another attempt at destruction by another Persian potentate.

You are all wrong. You are fools that profess yourselves to be wise.

Enlil Yahweh is the leader of the White descendants of Jacob-Israel, not the people that call themselves Jews today!

>>509333810
Netanyahu had scheduled his speech on the eve of Purim, which celebrates the happy ending of the Book of Esther: the massacre of 75,000 Persian men, women and children. In 2019, during a tour of the West Bank, Netanyahu said: “I believe in the book of books and I read it as a call to action: each generation must do what it can to ensure the eternity of Israel.” The Bible occupies such a large part of his brain that he wants to send a Bible to the moon!

So please stop calling Netanyahu a psychopath. Or at least call him a biblical psychopath, a worshiper of a psychopathic god. And while you’re at it, learn to see the Hebrew Bible for what it is: “a conspiracy against the rest of the world,” as H. G. Wells wrote. In the books of the Bible, “the conspiracy is clear and obvious, … an aggressive and vindictive conspiracy. … It is not tolerance but stupidity to close one’s eyes to their quality.”

Shut the fuck up jew

>1930 edition soncino press babylonian talmud
lmao

Yeah not reading any of these
Uhhmm... Thank you for noticing or whatever and have a kosher day
You get 1 random bump and 1 deliberate ted cruz
Am Israel khai

>>509333887

Persians were White Israelites.

>>509332839 (OP)
Individual and cultural

>>509333853
By biblical lore "whites" are descendants of Japheth, not Shem.

>>509334061
Israel, and jews in general, are like America's BPD girlfriend.

>>509334236

We are descended from both sons of Noah. He was the first White man.

>>509332839 (OP)
>Calling their leaders psychopaths is useless. What we need to do is recognize Israel as an entity suffering from collective psychopathy and study the origin of this unique national character.
We know the origin. Evil and they are possessed by it. What needs to happen is to stop giving them the benefit of doubt.

>>509332839 (OP)
Jews made a 100 year pact with satan to summon the antichrist. Satan wants sacrifices (guess how many). Jews now know they can't make the deadline. Hilarity ensues.

>>509332839 (OP)

>>509334431
We've been at it so long and so hard that picrel

>>509334437
Technically Noah was the last white man.

>>509333887
Until you've met him in person and gotten to know him well, you can't say definitively whether or not a man is a psychopath.
To be sure, the tribal culture of "the jews" is one of profound predatory psychopathy. And just becausec of that, most will present as psychopaths.

>>509332839 (OP)
Ok, he's just a jew doing jew things then. Literally the same thing
Hitler was right

>>509334888
Imagine this neurotic elderly kike calling you every 20 minutes for an update on bombing Iran, for three days straight. You would probably lose your shit in front of reporters too.