>>509343148
The liberal answer is inclusion of underrepresented and vulnerable minorities. Advertising firms and marketing departments, liberal or otherwise, are scared to death of bad PR and got scared of online liberal criticism, thinking that it was representative of anything other than an exceptionally vocal minority. As bureaucracies, their professional managerial staff will have more women than men, as well as various diversity hires. All staff will have been judged a good cultural fit by HR. Nothing designed by a committee such comprised can be permitted to be insufficiently diverse. For the underskilled, suggesting an addition of a novel diversity might be the only feedback they feel qualified to give.
This process repeats itself in different businesses until you get to where we are now where EVERYTHING has to be fully diverse. Not a broad array of striking and interesting differences but a sufficiently representative slice of the minority pie in every piece of media.
The actual effect? Reminding those cripple fucks that they're not like us, not normal. Shown off like a freak until the liberals are satisfied it's been sufficiently normalized, which is never.
>look how nice we are to you!
>you're so brave and strong!
>what's that, you want your privacy?
>you want to be left alone?
>you're tired of being asked to be in the company photoshoots?
>too bad!
This is also why you see so many black girls with the advertisement phenotype in media but not in real life. You know, the mocha skin model with North African features and perfectly bouncing curls who laughs at salad. Pair her with a white lady or a man with something wrong with him and you've covered your diversity bingo.
