>>509372488Something I've noticed recently is this pattern of filename:
>IMG_20250703_063130(1).jpg>20250703_002326.jpgBut especially this pattern:
>1000002443.jpgWhenever I see this last pattern, there's a 99% chance it's a bot.
Otherwise, you can detect the bots by their use of perfect english or their attempt at making it appear more natural by using lower case, their use of โ and recently - after many anons noticed the resemblance to ChatGPT, their boomer use of !, the arguments used by any side the bot takes being blatantly steryotypical of that side, as if the arguments were taken directly from plebbit or the data from /pol/ was fed to a plebbit-trained AI, and this leads to how these bots are incapable of original thought or can't into board culture, a trait you'll find when you manage to hook one into discussing a subject with (You).
Other than that, there's also all the plebbit spacing, which before was a tell tale of plebbitry, but since AI is trained on plebbit and other such forums, it's now also a tell tale of AI.
Also, in most threads these bots are employed, you can see that there's a "commander" in it, steering discussion in a way that takes the focus off of the blatant botting while also aiding the bots' effectiveness. This can be seen with how the most retarded takes on the first 10 replies of a thread get multiple replies but usual /pol/ replies that would rake in replies are left with just 1 to 3 replies. There also appears to be some kind of trigger words which make specialized bots engage you in a "deradicalization" manner, and then the "commander" starts engaging with you to take some of the heat off the bots. So far, I've seen specialized bots and their commander being deployed when holohoax is a subject.