>>509424564 (OP)The does not exist an uncorrupted politician. No amount of politics will ever "defeat corruption", just as treating the symptoms never cures a disease. The cure is always in removing the source of the problem, and the source of the problem is this: The majority of the people consent to corruption being ever present. The majority believe it is just the way of things to accept what is absolutely unacceptable. The only path back to a great civilization is for this consent to be removed. Not the anarchistic removal of government, not the idealized replacement of their corrupt shitheads with our corrupt shitheads, nor is it the bringing about of laws to "control corruption". The anarchistic removal of government would immediately result in a new government taking over, replacing their shitheads with our shitheads is just perpetuating a cycle of corruption, and laws are meaningless in a corrupted nation. The factor that everyone ignores is that it is by the will of the people that a government does or does not. So long as the plebs consent to corrupt leaders the government will do whatever the fuck it wants. But, if that consent were removed the government would be very cautious of where it steps. The name of the game here is to get plebs to see that what is unacceptable should never ever be tolerated, let alone held as acceptable and consented to.
The very idea of status quo is a filthy fucking lie the truth of which revolves around finding reasons to tolerate what ought never be tolerated. Whether it is "preserve status quo" centrism or "return to status quo" extremism, its all red herrings distracting away from varying degrees of any such 'movement' tolerating bullshit. What we need is a return to righteousness, even the most righteous men today let bullshit slide that they shouldnt. Is it better to hold your tongue and gain a friend or speak the truth and gain enemies? Id rather have an endless enemies than compromise my own integrity