>>509440542>caucasiansIt is valid question to ask what is the most optimal name. This is not an easy question to answer. Because if it is not correct you might as well not say it. Like I said, if you are an upright primate, your name is much like your territory. You can go anywhere but you are still you if you can in-fact be that identity. It is not something entirely determined by biology. There is not an equation to tell you what everyones' name is. Genetic sequencing is actually just a comparison to reference populations from an earlier date. Your genes only say, you are you and some one else may be similar, but it does not say what that is. We decide what that is, and we can decide not to decide. So acquiring a name is much like acquiring sovereignty, and in many ways the two are indistinguishable. Knowing the complexity of this relationship is understanding its power, because otherwise it would not matter, yet it does. In a way, it is the definition of power, or the way in which that definition arises. Like the resolution of an image; to know its true name is to see it most clearly. And much like the resolution of an image we can describe the dynamics of systems in the same way. You will acquire your name through the interactions and relations brought about by the harmonious resolution of relationships. Identity is identifying that, and therefore identity has a very physical and mechanical occurrence where meaning becomes apparent through the completion of process. In this system the least meaningful outcome is one where nothing happens at all. Identity is the happening happening.
