>>509493489 (OP)You know what's so great about the holocaust story?
The name. Holocaust. "Fire Sacrifice."
It refers to the time when Moses came down from the holy mountain with the Ten Commandments etched into stone tablets, and saw that about half the Hebrews had given up on the message and erected a golden idol of Baal Hammon again.
Moses reacted by doing two things, the first being to smash the tablets.
The second thing was to get the other Hebrews who stayed faithful and arm them, then arrested the fallen, forced them to dig a massive pit in the sand, built a fire in it, and threw the Hebrews who worshipped the idol into the fire while they were still alive.
The idea? "If they wanna sacrifice to their demon, they can go sacrifice themselves" *kick*
In the Septuagint, this was called the holocaust.
This means that the Holocaust must be a live sacrifice into fire.
The entire WW2 Holocaust narrative stands on the premise that the Jews were first killed in the gas chambers and then unceremoniously cremated in a battery of furnaces.
For it to be a holocaust, they must be alive when they're burned. The dead never get offered. That's sacrilege even to hell.
In other words, as the Jews themselves put the holocaust, the Germans couldn't have done it, because the Jews would've been dead before they were cremated.
There's a secondary side to this.
All that talk of nuking Israel?
Check the pop demographics of Israel.
See how many Jews live there right now.
Should be a funny number.
It anything were to happen with nukes, then this would be a holocaust yes, and if the funny number winds up getting nuked, that would fit the "forcing God's hand" prophecy for the Jewish end times.
