Thread 509501815

>>509501815 (OP)
i love stalin so much bro

>>509501815 (OP)
>5'4 midget with the voice of a cartoon mouse who keeps people in line through fear vs decorated veteran, 5'9, deep voice, gets people to support him purely based on speeches

>>509502020
don't forget stalin was a simple, common georgian criminal who was even a little cross-eyed, you can see it in the rare untouched HQ candid gifs of him

>>509501815 (OP)
get fucked commie friend

>>509502148
>who was even a little cross-eyed
this is why all his professional portraits capture him staring off into the distance btw, never straight ahead, unlike hitler and basically any other leader (including Mao)

>>509501815 (OP)

Stay mad jeet

>>509501815 (OP)
Communism only has two achievements: Dragging extremely backwards countries out of extreme backwardness until they were only a few decades behind the west, and helping to defeat the Axis.

>>509503123
>Dragging extremely backwards countries out of extreme backwardness until they were only a few decades behind the west
russia was always a few decades behind lol

>>509503363
They were centuries behind before the Soviets.

>>509503123
Russia was going to industrialize anyways with the Czar in power or not. Stalin just made sure several million people would die in the process and everyone would live in terrible conditions.

>>509504906
Russia under the Tsars would not have industrialised fast enough to be of any help at all against the Axis.

>>509503439
wagons of technology, materials, resources and food flowed

>>509506217
Even taking the immense help from the Americans into account, they still developed much faster than what the Tsars could have.

>>509501815 (OP)
Thank you for harassing kikes?

>>509505033
>Russia under the Tsars would not have industrialised fast enough to be of any help at all against the Axis.
create problem - propose yourself as the solution
look up the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, Gestapo-NKVD conferences etc.

>>509506434
you still disregard why, if the riches of oligarchs flowed and the war machines that fed it; and there was no war

>>509506813
The UK was also criticised for its policy of appeasement, but it bought time to prepare to fight the Axis.
The Soviets got into power long before the Nazis did.

>>509506859
You're just doing schizo rambling at this point.

>>509501815 (OP)
Dropping some absolute kino in:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqV6hMoE6MA

>>509507009
Didn’t buy enough time. The UK should have waited until the German invasion of the USSR to launch a combined attack with France.
Guaranteeing Poland was a blunder that nearly led to the total capitulation of Britain and defeat.

>>509507075
probably, you are pretty defensive about it

>>509501815 (OP)
Peace!

>>509507352
You idolise a artfag that shot himself and you're so defensive that even pointing out communism (a failed ideology)'s two achievements makes you seethe.

>>509507953
i professed no such thing, calma