I don't understand why so many of their planes are covered in old tires.

More tires...

I read somewhere, probably on 4Chan, that the tires throw off targeting algorithms.

>>509505463
How would old tires do that? And why didn't they do it?

>>509505643
It's supposed to fuck with AI image detection, but it only works if you break up the outline enough, which is where they went wrong on this.

>>509506067
Interesting. Makes sense. Wouldn't putting them in a hangar work even better in that regard?

What's with all seething today? Did Russia take another irrelevant town?

>>509505244 (OP)
I’m wondering about the big lump on the back of the plane. Is it some kind of disruptor?

>>509506335
Huh?

>>509506482
it is a big radar dome. Look up AWACS aircraft to learn more

>>509505244 (OP)
Just the way their mongoloid minds work

>>509506252
sure, but you need enough hangars, hangars aren't mobile and you need to maintain them
tires you can just throw in a heap until you need them again

>>509505244 (OP)
Why aren't those bases guarded by men with shotguns?

>>509507000
But anon, there are no men. not even humans in Russia, only asiatic mongrel snow nigger orcs....

>>509505244 (OP)
there was a post by an aircraft enthusiast anon who said it's to break up the aerodynamics of the wings so they don't have to tie them down in the wind. they can just start moving and the tires will fall off

>>509505244 (OP)
They expected that attack may be guided by AI. They wanted to cheat AI because there are no tires on planes.

>>509505463
wrong, it's to reduce damage from drones

>>509507173
time to go back to your nafo containment you troon cunt

>>509506956
I don't understand how leaving very expensive planes out in the open is better...

>>509506335
Kweef is on fire from massive drone / missile strikes. Piggies mad.
Expect more Piggie snuff films. Jerking off to snuff films is the only thing that calms Banderite trash when they get upset.

>>509507565
>it's to reduce damage from drones
Doesn't look like it worked to me. Kinda like how a t-shit doesn't work so well as a flack jacket.

>>509505244 (OP)
So it does not blow away in the wind.

>>509507686
there's some treaty with the US that allows satellite monitoring of long range bombers. they have to leave them out

>>509507255
Probably this, my first thought was weighing them down. Used tires are easy to get for free and dairy farmers hold down composting tarps with them

>>509507878
The US doesn't leave them out. And I think you just made that up.

>>509507686
The US does it too, because of some nuclear treaty like another anon said. It also gets expensive maintaining a bunch of climate controlled hangars, when you only really need them for service work, and planes you can't really put outside.

>>509508007
Yes you do, and no that anon did not make it up. You just don't know what the New START treaty is.

It's almost as though they're in a plane graveyard for long-term storage.

>>509507796
trash analogy, its better than nothing dumb ass

>>509508135
No, the US doesn't do it too and you didn't provide sauce on the treaty same as the other anon didn't. B-1s and B-2s are kept in air conditioned hangars, not left out to rust in the weather and covered in tires.

>>509508295
Post clause from the START treaty the requires strategic bombers and AWACS to be left out in the open. You won't because you made it up.
>>509508368
Anything is better than nothing, but it still didn't look like it worked...did it wog?

>>509508372
>sauce
retard, go google it yourself, both us and russia leave their nuclear capable bombers in the open for eachother to spy with sats, its the strategic arms reduction treaty

>>509508372
>B-2s are kept in air conditioned hangars, not left out to rust in the weather
OK

>>509508544
You cannot google that which does not exist. You concession has been accepted wog.
>>509508615
What do you think those buildings are anon?

>>509508729
you're just a faggot cunt, both the us and russia put their bombers in hangars as well but both keep them in the open as well per the treaty

>>509508729
>What do you think those buildings are anon?
dunno. but the B-2's aren't in them. also, how many B-2's and how many "hangars" are there?

>>509505244 (OP)
It's so it bounces off the ground if it crashes upside down.

>>509505244 (OP)
something about wind dapening

>>509508905
Post the clause from the treaty then wog. Why cant you?
>>509508971
They have to come out to fly silly shitskin. Stealth coating is very finicky and needs climate controlled conditions for storage. It's one of the reasons Russia doesn't have it.

>>509505244 (OP)
Jews?

>>509509264
why is it always uhg trannies that say wog? kill yourself troon cunt, go back to your containment, death to all hohols, ukraine will be dust soon

>>509506956
It's worse than that. The tires do absolutely nothing. The algorithm is just lulling them all into a false sense of security so that they reach a critical mass of infrastructure "protected" by tires. Thus when they reach a large enough amount, it can can destroy them all in one fell swoop. Then they'll have nothing and be demoralised. Literal Mob Farming from MMO RPGs but in real life. Automated warfare.

>>509505244 (OP)
so the bombs bounce off and hit the drone that dropped them

>>509509425
Oh dear, now you're seething and talking about trannies. So angry!

>>509508460
>Non‑Interference with National Technical Means (NTM)
is what I would assume

>>509509626
>13pbtid
neck troon, you and the hohols will be capitulating soon thanks to your own country withdrawing support

>>509509725
Still seething, still talking about trannies.

>>509506067
this
i swear with the coming of AI, looney tunes tactics will be viable
like moving hidden in a carton box when trump and thiel sends the automated hunt-and-kill drones after you because palantir detected you uttering an anti-semitic phrase through your wifi-enabled doorbell

>>509508729
obviously not hangars as you can clearly see two B2s don't fit in one on top of clearly seeing 4 B2s sitting outside instead of inside of the hangars

here's visual aid you spastic retard

>>509510108
I asked what you think they are, not what you think they are not.

>>509509616
Donkey Kong physics

>I dun unda staand
browns ALWAYS NEED somebody to explain things to them when 80% of you turds can't even write in your own language and eat with your hands.

>>509510177
You didn't ask me anything at all, that was someone else. Retard.

>>509510327
ESL detected

>>509505244 (OP)
theyre inflatable decoys and they dont want them to blow away in the wind.

>>509505643
same as zebra stripes or spots of dogs and large cats, butterflies eyes, etc.

>>509510436
>I'll pretend I didn't imply they are hangars by saying I asked what they are IM SO SMART
>ah fuck he outsmarted me by pointing out that I never asked him any question FUCK
lmao retard

Pilotfag here. This is common in windy areas. disrupts the air flow over the wing, and adds weight(the planes might be used for part and don't have engines), without doing damage. Plus tire are pretty free and indestructible

>>509506482
>>509506830

>>509506252
>Wouldn't putting them in a hangar work even better in that regard?
The New START treaty obliges the parties to not hide their strategic nuclear bomber locations in hangars.

>>509510855
based SKG plane

>>509505244 (OP)
I have heard it is for radar or something, but I suspect it’s just for wing stability in the wind.

A plane sitting in strong wind flexing its wings is like the mileage on your car going up while it’s parked.

>>509510891
Post the clause that says that then. Why must I keep asking?

>>509510891
Yeah but that's an AWACS plane. I'm not sure that corroded ass array radome is airworthy either.

>>509511522
They could just use hangars instead of tires

>>509510327
its the same mossad nigger that forgot which i.d he was using

>>509513197
>Used tires are the same cost as massive aircraft hangers

>>509508729
Cum silos...?

>>509513197
Read the thread. They couldn't use hangars due to the START treaty
>https://www.intellinews.com/start-missile-treaty-exposed-russia-s-nuclear-bombers-to-ukrainian-drone-attack-384158/

Obviously when it was written they didn't think about little drones being used to attack them from anywhere in the world those weren't a thing then

>>509510845
Now tell me about the part of dumping fuel being common to make the planes wings light enough to land.

>>509514213
Making a simple hangar costs nothing compared to the planes
It's because they are following the treaty and not hiding nuclear bombers from satellites

Fucking Christ is all of the board zoomers now and dont read the threads they reply to
I swear it didnt use to be like this where browns and zoomers ask the same questions 5 times in a thread that have been answered already

>>509505244 (OP)
to fool ai

>(18)
/uhg/ly nigger

>>509506252
They only have hangars for around 25% of their fleet, and a lot of them are close to Ukraine.
>>509510891
Anon, that's an old AWACs at Ivanovo being used for parts or awaiting refurbishment.

>>509509264
>“FYI, those bombers that were hit HAVE to be out in full view due to nuclear treaty obligations. Zelenskyy took advantage of that,” General Flynn noted on X.
https://www.eurasiantimes.com/did-a-2010-treaty-help-ukraine-in-targeting-russian-bombers/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_START

>The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day. Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck. I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying. Gradually I began to hate them.

>>509507686
moving them around is even more secure then putting them in the same hanger over and over again. They would have blown up sooner if they went to the same spot every time

>>509514846
>didn't think about little drones
or more like they never expected that their enemies could operate from within russia.

>>509515714
>https://www.eurasiantimes.com/did-a-2010-treaty-help-ukraine-in-targeting-russian-bombers/
>the treaty does not explicitly demand that the heavy bombers be parked outside
It is unironically a cope to deflect from the fact that they simply do not have anywhere near enough hangers, enough for maybe %25 of their fleet, and many of the ones they do have are located close to Ukraine.

>>509514979
Fuck off, snow nigger. Those are probably parts planes. Rarely are parts planes kept in hangers. They probably don't have engines, and are very light, hence they need ballast.

>>509505244 (OP)
To confuse the software of autonomous drones. Tires are readily available, the black color contrasts perfectly with the bright fuselage, and the tires can be re-arranged randomly. However, these drones were not autonomous, and base command failed to shut down the surrounding mobile network quickly enough.

>>509517227
not just drones but also making recognition from (at least the lower resolution) satellite photography more difficult.

>>509510891
To my knowledge there is no part of New START that requires bombers to be in the open, although article 4 requires that deployed heavy bombers be based only at designated air bases, and not having bomber hangars certainly helps the other party monitor treaty compliance.

>>509511691
Article 10, section 1 which says
>For the purpose of ensuring verification of compliance
with the provisions of this Treaty, each Party undertakes:
>(a) to use national technical means of verification at
its disposal in a manner consistent with generally recognized
principles of international law;
>(b) not to interfere with the national technical means of
verification of the other Party operating in accordance with
this Article; and
>(c) not to use concealment measures that impede
verification, by national technical means of verification, of
compliance with the provisions of this Treaty.

Section 2 permits environmental shelters, although I suppose it might be considered violating the spirit of the treaty if strategic assets that don't require environmental shelters are concealed in shelters anyway

>>509511691
Article 10, section 1 says
>For the purpose of ensuring verification of compliance with the provisions of this Treaty, each Party undertakes:
>(a) to use national technical means of verification at its disposal in a manner consistent with generally recognized principles of international law;
>(b) not to interfere with the national technical means of verification of the other Party operating in accordance with this Article; and
>(c) not to use concealment measures that impede verification, by national technical means of verification, of compliance with the provisions of this Treaty.

Section 2 permits environmental shelters, although I suppose it might be considered violating the spirit of the treaty if strategic assets that don't require environmental shelters are concealed in shelters anyway

>>509506515
Eh?

>>509505463
Michelin Man will save the planes from drones

>>509518219
Correct.
National technical means = satellites etc.

>>509505244 (OP)
because thats a plane graveyard
lmao nice google maps intelegence

>>509505244 (OP)
They're due to be scrapped.
The extra weight stops them blowing off the runway so they can be towed to the scrapyard without calling in a giant crane to drag them out of a bog.

>>509506956
You can put a large tarp over them
>mobile
Why do you need air bases to be mobile?

>>509506067
why not just vinyl wrap them in some kind of strange pattern to throw it off instead? pic rel

>>509510108
Sloppy edit but they park them like this

>>509520517
>parking a plane not facing the door
>parking two planes in such a way that you may need to move both in order to get one out
yeah, no

>>509508729
>You cannot google that which does not exist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_START

>>509521428
>https://www.eurasiantimes.com/did-a-2010-treaty-help-ukraine-in-targeting-russian-bombers/
>the treaty does not explicitly demand that the heavy bombers be parked outside

>>509521173
actually yes, i've seen it in person

>>509505244 (OP)
the tires localize the damage caused by the ordinance

>>509521823
>“The treaty permits the use of national technical means of verification (e.g., satellites) in a manner consistent with international law, and contains explicit provisions that prohibit interference with NTM and the use of concealment measures that may impede monitoring by NTM.”
>The verification by means of satellites meant that the heavy bombers were often parked in the open, in full glare of spy satellites.
>“Russia, like the US, often leaves long-range bombers parked outside and easily visible, both for operational reasons and as part of nuclear-treaty obligations,” the Wall Street Journal reported.
If you're going to pilpul, you shouldn't provide the link at all, my man.

>>509505463
Maybe it's windy and the tyres disrupts the airfiol.
Otherwise the planes might shift about in high wind.

>>509505244 (OP)
It absorbes a lot of EM radiation, like any black body does. Tire rubber is especially effective because its literally black and also porous.

>>509522782
One of your fellow shills provided it earlier trying to argue as you are now. Only I actually bothered to read it. And despite it pilpulling for much longer than you are capable of, I pulled out the one line they included which makes the rest of it completely fucking irrelevant because they weren't as bold of a liar as you are.

>>509522944
if that were case every plane would have tires on them, if you recall the recent ukrainian drone attack there were no planes that had tires on the wings

>>509507255
>it's to break up the aerodynamics of the wings so they don't have to tie them down in the wind. they can just start moving and the tires will fall off
>they can just start moving and the tires will fall off
>the tires will fall off

Its a radar shield you morons.

>>509523289
btw you need tornado force winds to move a plane of such weight even a few feet

>>509513197
>They could just use hangars instead of tires
>hanger = maintenance required
>old.tires =reusing old waste
Ok when you literally rely on tax payer money to survive tell me which one you would choose.

>>509520504
imagine, instead, if you had a car made of the hardest metal known to man. and a drone made of the hardest metal known the man. and the two collided!!!!

>>509523422
Checked.

>>509523485
Just don't a poor country and you can afford enough hangars so you don't need to cope about it at all.

>>509507255
>>509508000
using 2000 lbs of tires to weigh down a 200,000 bomb bomber doesn't really make sense. retard award goes to both of you

>>509523357
kek

>>509505244 (OP)
They're non-operational aircraft. Go look at planes in the american boneyard and you'll see similar.

>>509523652
200,000 lbs

>>509522713
you are lying, I'm the B2 planes and we don't get inside any hangars

>>509522769
THIS makes a LOT of sense.

>>509523100
>I pulled out the one line they included which makes the rest of it completely fucking irrelevant
No, you clumsily tore out half a sentence from a paragraph that states the exact opposite of what you're claiming.
>“The treaty permits the use of national technical means of verification (e.g., satellites) in a manner consistent with international law, and contains explicit provisions that prohibit interference with NTM and the use of concealment measures that may impede monitoring by NTM.”
>The verification by means of satellites meant that the heavy bombers were often parked in the open, in full glare of spy satellites.
>So, while the treaty does not explicitly demand that the heavy bombers be parked outside, this became a usual practice.
I.e. treaty doesn't explicitly require bombers being parked outside, but it forbids interfering with satellite surveillance.

>>509523784
not even fuckin close, google earth exists, I'm surprised I'm even entertaining such an idea with a response

>>509523802
My uncle also planes man he is driver. stay strong planes is hard job.

>>509523957
>treaty doesn't explicitly require bombers being parked outside
So they could be placed in hangars if Russia had any. Only they don't have enough, and many of them are too close to Ukraine. Hence this absurd coping.
>forbids interfering with satellite surveillance
By intentionally camouflaging them specifically to interfere with satellite surveillance. Placing them in a hangar does not breach this requirement since they are there to protect the aircraft from the elements, make maintenance easier, etc. and not to avoid satellites.

>>509523652
read the post again retard, it breaks up the aerodynamics of the wings so they don't provide lift. it has nothing to do with weight. also see pilotfag's post after mine.

>>509507335
I'm tired of the motherfucking tires on these motherfucking planes!

>>509524492
I forgot that russia gets 150mph winds that can even begin to move the aircraft a cm constantly my bad bro

>>509524334
>Placing them in a hangar does not breach this requirement since they are there to protect the aircraft from the elements, make maintenance easier, etc. and not to avoid satellites.
It matters what a hangar does, not "what it's for". And what it does is physically obstruct visual surveillance. Hence the earlier Diego Garcia photos.
>only my specific private interpretation of interference, that I came up with a minute ago to win an internet argument, is correct
>this absurd coping
...

Gay tranny thread

>>509524492
fuckin retard

>>509525072
>the treaty does not explicitly demand that the heavy bombers be parked outside
This must mean that hangars are not considered to be "concealment measures" and you are wrong.

>>509525423
It doesn't explicitly mention any "concealment measures" it just puts a blanket ban on any and all of them.

>>509505244 (OP)
vodka niggers armour materials science

>>509525620
the leaf is a retard who cannot into physics or global politics

>>509514979
Anon you have no idea how much a hangar costs. They are extremely expensive, like millions per hangar per plane. Especially for an aircraft that size.

>>509525620
Fine. Let me fucking spoon feed it to you, you dumb nigger.
Here is the clause from the goddamn treaty with the relevant pieces highlighted for you.
>the obligation not to use concealment measures shall not apply to
>cover or concealment practices at ICMB bases
>to the use of environmental shelters for strategic offensive arms
>environmental shelters
>shall not apply
Now stop coping go build some fucking hangars.

>>509526027
See
>>509526401
And read the fucking treaty.

>>509526509
I never made any argument about hangers only you lack of understanding of physics and global politics.

>>509526401
Fair enough, I stand corrected.

>>509526996
No, I made the arguments and then you decided to dickride a retarded vodka nigger glowfag who disagreed with me on those specific points. It's a lot more pathetic, really.

>>509505244 (OP)
your IQ must be fucking below 0

>>509505244 (OP)
You retarded?

>>509527076
Good rock talk, Anon.

>>509527098
Well, you engaged in sophistry for so long prior to making an actual argument and then you keep calling everyone le kremlinbot like an uhg tranny fresh off the reddit boat, so one can see where US anon was coming from.

>>509506067
>>509506252
feds tag teaming each other, lmao
These are long range nuclear bombers that were required to be stored in view of satellites
Unlike the traitors of the US government it seems Russia tries to hold to their agreements

>>509527453
I know you lost the argument, but there is no need to get salty over the bantz.

>>509507255(checked)
>>509507799(checked)
>>509509111(checked)
>>509510845
>>509522944(checked)
I work for an airline. Planes this large are not tied down like your dad's Cessna. The parking brake is set and the wheels are chocked. If the operator is expecting weather so severe it can move the aircraft (like a hurricane) then you fly that $100M aircraft somewhere else to avoid damage.

ZIGGER BROS
WHY DIDN'T THE DRONES
BOUNCE OFF TIRES???

>>509527601
>I work for an airline
t. baggage handler

>>509527739
A&P mechanic but may as well be.

>>509505244 (OP)
>I don't understand why so many of their planes are covered in old tires.
i ask this all the time and no slavnigger will answer because they're all too stupid or embarrassed to say

>>509507255
Plausible, if it was about messing with targeting they would probably have used camoflage nets.

>>509527454
see
>>509526401
The treaty does not apply to hangars.

>>509527919
They are REQUIRED TO BE TRACKED VIA SATELITE
Of course that treaty is probably in a trash can now

>>509528121
see
>>509526401 (You)
The treaty does not apply to hangars.

>>509523485
>>hanger = maintenance required
Why don't they just make the hangar out of the same stuff the plane is made of so it doesn't need maintenance

>>509528172
Every single government employee raped kids to death on epsteins island
The government destroyed the evidence
Under the rules of spoiled evidence I am obligated to conclude that every single government employee is factually guilty
Every single government employee is to be considered an armed and dangerous felon, to be shot on sight

>>509528375
>i am mad
>mad at the government
Okay. But the treaty still does not force Russia to keep their planes in the open.

>>509528441
>>509528225
>>509528121
>>509527980
Does the treaty prevent building hangers Ivan? No. Your drunken theft and incompetence prevents that.

>>509505244 (OP)

Fine I’ll tell you. And you won’t hear it anywhere else, and I won’t say it again.
> drones
no
> imagery
no

The planes in question are flight ready on the tarmac but NOT fueled, or are about to be fueled. In order to keep stress off the airframe and simulate wing-loading during flight, Russians put tires on the wings to keep them toward a hanging state as though they were full of fuel. Most of the fuel is kept in the wings. Lift generated by weather on unloaded wings and other stresses will age the airframe.

There, now you know.

>>509527098
you are the laughing stock of this thread

>>509529073
Nervous laughter about having your shilling about the treaty BTFO maybe.

>>509529133
you havnt even read the thread when did I say treaty a single time

>>509529755
>i never said the word treaty
Nice pilpul.
No, you just interjected yourself into a discussion about the treaty to tell the anon disagreeing with me about it that you support him.

THE
MASTER
PLAN

>>509524912
>winds that can even begin to move the aircraft a cm
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/tjn_PZrzmxY

DO NOT QUESTION
SMO
OR YOU GO TO THE GULAG

>>509529978
yes because you are a dumb nigger who thinks that tires can hold down an airplane

>>509523268
>if you recall the recent ukrainian drone attack there were no planes that had tires on the wings
dude, that is literally the video in the OP

>>509530406
>https://www.youtube.com/shorts/tjn_PZrzmxY
my car does this too when i forget to set the parking brake

>>509530442
>Two Hundred Years Together
fantastic book

>>509505244 (OP)
They hit a boneyard. not an airbase, another nafo psy op

>>509530540
not the same attack you fuckin retard different airfield closer to the front that is a radar plane not a bombe, the tires are used to localize explosions from the ordinance

>>509506067
>It's supposed to fuck with AI image detection
Then why do they draw them on the fake painted decoys?

>>509530816
to fuck with retards like you and waste millions of your dollars

>>509521173
Lmao this man has never been in a hangar in his life hahahah

Russia's military is geared entirely for offensive operations. They never thought anybody would dare strike them in their own territory.

>>509508372
The F-117s are resting in their climate controlled hangars still.

We still even fly two of them out of TTR for testing.

>>509530655
>>509530655
>>509530655
AGREED
GREAT READS
A SHAME ONLY 1% OF OUR COUNTRY READS AFTER HIGHSCHOOL // COLLEGE

>>509531033
>A SHAME ONLY 1% OF OUR COUNTRY READS
well, i admit i'm listening to Pete Quinones narrate on his youtube channel. he has one of the guys who helped translate it giving additional commentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uaNjkzWNrc

>>509530899
You literally can't show me a single military American hangar in which a plane isn't facing the exit while parked (so, not being worked on).
And even if you can find me one picture of a military shared PLANE hangar (you will be hard pressed to find one, they do exist though) you still will not be able to find me one in which the planes are parked in such a way that they don't have full clearance to get out.

I will literally find and escrow and bet with you about this, just say the number.

>>509531367
>>509531367
>>509531367
https://www.alexlinder.com/audio/

KNOWLEDGE
IS POWER

TY FOR THE LINK ANON
I
APPRECIATE YOU

>>509505244 (OP)
it breaks up their radar signature. There are devices called "air-to-ground radar" and they reflect off of shapes on the ground to target all kinds of weapons and direct the operators of weapons which are not guided this way.

HAPPY 4TH OF JULY
AS WELL
CHEERS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4a83IXHrJt0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQVp9GxRlv0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQaqC1YdID4

so much zigger cope

>>509530504
You are confusing me with someone else, dumbass. Take your own advice and read the thread, only this time look at the IDs.

>>509507255
this makes sense because it is very cheap & idiotic, therefore quintessentially russian.

>>509510891
Stop spreading this bullshit, this is not true, and its 100% vatnigger cope. Russians are just too cheap to build hangers.

>>509533266
>>509533266
>>509533266

Furthermore, after consulting chatGPT it seems that the tire fragments adhere to the hull for just long enough that the aircraft gained a critical amount of speed.

>>509507000
a shotgun is only effective against a drone that’s flying straight at you. what good would it have done in this scenario?