*NeoGlobalsim thread*
Do you know that our planet's resources are limited?

Phosphorus (fertilizer)
Peak expected 2035 - 70% of reserves are in Morocco

Potassium (fertilizer)
Scarcity expected by 2040 - Russia, Belarus, Canada

Natural Gas
Gas is too expensive, fertilizer factories shut down.
Happening already in Europe

Cheap Oil
2035

Coal (high-grade)
2035

Rare Earths
Shortages already visible

Fresh Water (Irrigation)
Already happening

Copper
2032

What will happen first? Billions of how you name them shitskins will have starvation without fertilizers and fresh water and billions will be dead. There will be mass emigration, worse than now.
You will not have calm oldness.

Only hope is to unite to produce new technologies, like fast neutron reactors and GMOs and biotech. But instead of it we go to middle-age, and peasantry nationalism.

Sky is not fallen, but it's reality.

>>509565323 (OP)
Have You read "The end of oil"? Yeah, I did and by now we should have run out of oil. Here, Gretaposting is only acceptable with small boobs.

>>509567426
OP is not saying the oil is running out. He's saying there's going to be economic reasons for why the supply will shorten drastically and it is going to trigger mass exodus from third world in desperate attempt of saving themselves. Your guess is as good as mine as to what's going to happen next - my guess is we'll see a "Children of Men" type governments in all 1/2nd world countries pop up practically overnight and the waves of refugees are going to be mowed down with heavy machine gun fire at the borders.

>>509567698
mad max government where shooting shitsklins is a sport
europe caliphate

>>509565323 (OP)
it's more suicidal to support the third world like we are doing
horseshit and swinepiss will be sufficient for our socities.

>>509565323 (OP)
NOT MY PROBLEM. women can fix it

>>509565323 (OP)
I have no expectation to live beyond 2035. Did you know human life is also finite?

>>509567698
Sounds better than now desu.

>>509568496
Depends on your social/economic position in your country now. If you're upper middle/elite - yeah, I guess. If you're middle class or god forbid poor, the only choice for decent living will be to go join some extermination squad or work security in a concentration camp. I know yall meme here about these topics all the time, but be honest with yourself - how long will you last in a job like this? And more importantly, do you really prefer it over the peacetime jobs we have now?

>>509567698
Moving the goalpost doesn't absolve you from posting small tits.

>>509565323 (OP)
all of those things are everywhere, they are just at present not economically viable to extract and produce. as the price goes up through supply and demand the currently non-economic resources become economic and things continue on as they were only everything is more expensive.

>>509565323 (OP)
Grok said it was real

>>509565323 (OP)
Phosphorus fertilizers are damaging to the environment. Mycorrhizal fungi allow better uptake of phosphorus in less-dense soil, but it takes time and effort to propagate the conditions for it to grow.

Brassica vegetables are an exception -- they can absorb phosphorus from soil very quickly. Veggies like the cabbages, broccoli, and turnips are from the Brassica genus.

tl;dr We don't need phosphorus. There is plenty of phosphorus everywhere on Earth. We need more efficient farming methods.

>>509568802
nothing burger i figured. nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium can be produced from human excrement in sewage works as soon as this process is cheaper than the import.

>>509565323 (OP)
>IT'S HECKIN' PEAK OILERINO PEAK FERTILIZER WE WILL LITERALLY NOT SURVIVE NEXT 10 YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!
I heard this story 20 years ago, zoomer faggot. Twice.

Nothing ever happens.

>>509568654
Me mum won't let me, that's the problem.

Adam Smith was not creating a new ideology. He was making an observation about history. What was new about this era in history is industrialization and the adoption of hydrocarbon energy resources. Even though you input energy to obtain the hydrocarbons, the value of its potential does not match your input. This is what Adam Smith call "prodigal consumption". What he means is that basically you are just an energy consoomer. Oil is not capital because you didn't make it. You just found it in the ground and it comes out of your oil faucet. The demand to produce that energy requires you to immerse yourself in the stupid end products of industrial society that denies you life and requires you to exhaust yourself in futile efforts. Everything that you desire can be quantified by the ability to construct right angles in nature with energy you never had to make, and thus anything that threatens this is swiftly annihilated and conformed to its consumption habits. Yeah I mean the point here is that you didn't make that energy. You just found it. You are more like monkeys in a feeding frenzy who found a pile of bananas, and this is the best description of a leftists. You see, when you have to actually make your energy you can't live like a bimbo faggot. The faggotry is too expensive for energy producers.

The reason why you can't do cool things like nuclear energy is because nuclear energy is more like an energy machine or energy actuator. It is fixed capital. It does not compare at all to the hydrocarbons that are just there in the ground that you harvest from your oil faucet. But even if you had a box full of infinite energy you would still have to use that to make hydrocarbons. So as it turns out, you already have free energy. It doesn't get any better than hydrocarbons. It is this very fact that you did not have to make these hydrocarbons, that they just exist there for you and its free to obtain, is why you have all the problem that you have.

>>509571341
We will never run out of energy. There is plenty of energy on Earth if we have the patience and will to make use of it. The Sun supplies us with constant high-energy radiation all day long. Reserves of nuclear material cover the surface. And the core of the Earth is extremely hot.

When we have perfected our engines, they will have no drag. We will create paradoxical engines that power themselves. There is no limit to ingenuity.

Did you forget they just injected the world with poison?
Connect the dots.

>>509571496
>Capital is when you make
No, it isn't.
>Desires can be quantified by right-angles...
Meds
>Didn't make energy
What is the first law of thermodynamics?
>Leftists
Leftists are reformists. That is all. Your bullshit would be amusing if I hadn't heard this nonsense before. Being a leftist doesn't mean you are gay, or a consumer, or a Democrat.
>Infinite energy doesn't fix anything, so you need oil
Meds.

tl;dr go to school

I just want to say that our politicians make isolated politics antagonistic to globalism, instead of connecting the best minds to solve this problem.

>>509567426
It’s strange with oil. With phosphate it’s poop.

>>509568345
But yes, feeding massivly growing poor countries population is not best idea.

>>509565323 (OP)
>Only hope is to unite to produce new technologies
What is missing from all industries are systems of control. When I say control I mean that the way a Greek philosopher would have understood it. Currently it is tribal Afghans have more sophisticated systems of control than you do. Every Western liberal ideology celebrates technology insofar as it increases consumption at the expense of control and its contradictions are becoming impossible to ignore. They are prohibiting an entire category of technology but for some reason they still believe they are technologists.
>https://x.com/ErectusRex/status/1908911569804943827


Some people have started to go in another direction, but there is still no contemporary ideology to make sense of this with political and economic intent.
>https://www.academia.edu/5517657/The_Putin_Thesis_and_Russian_Energy_Policy#loswp-work-container

Heidegger was the closest, but key axioms of his philosophy are still prohibited from serious discussion. It is rare to find anyone motivated by anything other than consuming more.
>https://www2.hawaii.edu/~freeman/courses/phil394/The%20Question%20Concerning%20Technology.pdf

It is perplexing to find these Greta Thunberg types blind their ideological eyes despite being called out directly by so many systems ecologists in their own fields. Ted was too kind.

>>509572995
>>Desires can be quantified by right-angles...
>Meds
you have no other way to feel liberated

>>Capital is when you make
>No, it isn't.
Capital is a store of value. If all you value is consumption, then every asset you own matures at a value of zero. There is no possible way to define your energy infrastructure of consooming natural resources as capital. Adam Smith made this very clear. Societies like Saudi Arabia and Qatar make this obvious. The most obese person in the world lives in Saudi Arabia. They have no economic viability outside of oil production.

>>Infinite energy doesn't fix anything, so you need oil
>Meds
that is not the argument. To store and carry its potential you need hydrocarbons. There is no replacement for this that does not involve a reduction of energy output.

>>509572079
>We will never run out of energy.
conventional oil has already peaked. This has been hidden by redefining gas condensates as oil.

>There is plenty of energy on Earth
>nuclear
>solar
you didn't make the oil faggot

While Niger fertility rate: ~6.7 children per woman. Other African countries the same.

>>509573757
perhaps I may be wrong about Greta in particular but the observation is apparent to everyone. A totally new ideology is warranted. An ideology that defies all current bifurcations

>>509565323 (OP)
>Billions of how you name them shitskins will have starvation without fertilizers and fresh water and billions will be dead.
William Rees would probably say there is no way to avoid this. This is the sin of progressivism. Shuffling the populations around will only make things worse and more difficult to correct. You cannot control a system if the components cannot communicate. Liberalism is just suicide at this point.

>What will happen first?
Enter modern warfare to the equation. This is now a much different game than what you started the thread with. The peasantry nationalism has its limits. The Amish for example, exist only at the privilege of American security. It is ideally romantic as a solution but there is a practical necessity for a global system of some sort. It is not possible to control a global system in totality. Differentiation is inherent to principals of logic in itself. The hubris of liberal progressivism has no way to make sense of whole systems.

>>509573527
>instead of connecting the best minds to solve this problem.
It is probably more accurate to say that politicians ignore the best advice. Their attention is only directed towards what reinforces their bias. We have plenty of good minds but they are ignored. This has become systematic. We have thrown away 2 entire generations of valuable young men out of fear of control. The politicians are alcoholics who will die if they stop consuming alcohol.

>>509565323 (OP)
>*NeoGlobalsim thread*
>Do you know that our planet's resources are limited?
So perhaps you may find it ironic that a complete critique of global order would take you in a full circle, but not Heidegger. Heideggar understood the distinction between Being, Presence, and how things appear in the moment. Everything is fake and gay. So the only viable solution is to do it all for reals. An actual global system, that produces real value (beauty), has a real religion/governance (control), managed by a true leader, that brings about our awareness of actual differences (justice).

I am a difference which makes a difference
We are the difference we make