>>509576115In Greimassian terms, intelligence is a narrative value embedded within the actantial model of the kinds of stories Taleb favors.
For Taleb, "intelligence" is not an intrinsic quality of the hero (the Subject). Instead, it's a contested Object of value within the narrative itself. More precisely, there are two competing objects:
- The False Object: "Intelligence" as defined by academia, IQ tests, and theory. This is the treasure that the Opponent (the Fragilista, the IYI) tells the hero to seek.
- The True Object: "Survival" or "Prevailing." This is the real prize, the attainment of which is mediated by the ultimate Sender—Reality itself.
The entire drama of a Talebian story is the Subject's journey of realizing he is seeking the wrong Object. The "intelligent" man who goes bust is a morality play about this confusion.
What Taleb enjoys is not just stories for the sake of stories... What he enjoys is the reversal of values that structures them. His intellectual pleasure is derived entirely from witnessing this reversal. It is the core dynamic of the Greimassian semiotic square applied to his favorite topic:
- S1 (The Asserted): Academic Intelligence (High IQ, theoretical knowledge)
- S2 (The Contrary): Ruin (Going bust, being a sucker)
- ~S1 (The Contradictory): Not-Intelligence (Street smarts, mētis, practical heuristics, ignoring noise)
- ~S2 (The Contradictory): Not-Ruin (Survival, Antifragility)
The Talebian plot is always the same: A character is told to pursue S1 (Academic Intelligence). This path, however, is revealed to be a direct route to S2 (Ruin). The true hero—the Talebian Subject—is the one who understands this. He embraces ~S1 (the rejection of formal intelligence) as his primary Helper, and by doing so, he successfully attains ~S2 (Not-Ruin/Survival), which is the story's ultimate positive value.