The great Chudda has always kept one tenant of his faith central to his belief system; "Nothing ever happens", he would tell us. But this is bullshit of the highest degree. How the fuck does a minister of a country (look at his schnozzle) come out and say that he wants to implement a tax on unmarried people? How long until the Japanese or South Korean ministers come out with something like this? Or the Germans? The way things are going, I wouldn't even be shocked to see them implement something like this as part of their Globohomo agenda. The question is; How much longer until all these systems they're putting in place collapse under their own weight?

>>509600651 (OP)
Also: how the fuck would this even work? Would the government mandate a random wide after a certain age of being in a "non-married status"?

>>509600821
We've had it in the US for decades.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/retirement/06/marriedperks.asp

>>509600651 (OP)
N
O
R
T
H

macedonia

>>509600651 (OP)
>Taking away the carrot didn't work, let's try more stick.
The only way more stick would work is stripping women of rights and forcing them into some sort of state breeding program. Good luck with that.

>>509600821
>>509601447
It's retarded. You can't tax men into becoming patriarchs. Money is the primary thing men need to get women and become fathers, taking away our money reduces our ability to form families in the first place, it's directly counterproductive.

>>509602399
Bingo which then makes them go "see we need more rapefugees from India now so the government can keep it's size"