>>509706637
I just don't know. I'm agnostic to this really, I haven't been given reason to disregard this, there are things there that form a pattern as far as freemasonry goes, but so far, it's just apophenia for me. I'm open to all sorts of things going on here, I just don't know. The gematria thing I'd have to look into because I don't understand that or it's significance in use. I don't understand much about freemasonry either really, I just understand it's secretive and you allegedly don't really see what's inside till you've sworn you'd be killed in violent and heinous ways for speaking of what goes on within, and definitely at least declared secrecy. I know it's more secretive as degrees go up. I know they definitely seem jewy and allegedly there's history that goes back concerning jews, freemasons, templars, and other occultists, that ties them all into what ultimately is the same cult.
When it comes to Charls, I'm seeing him through the lense of having watched him for years. Everything I'd seen from him seemed good, he seemed like a real and legit dude to me, dif a bit eccentric. He's said so much truth and given takes that you don't often, if ever see, that I think are some of the most relevant. The "carrols laws" he coins seem to me, irrefutable heuristics. From that perspective, I'm just trying to reconcile him being a freemason engaged in some outward ritual, with all of that, and if he's really up to some kind of bad, which I really struggle to believe based on everything I've seen from him (like what kind of tool would he even be for ill will?). He's been into all sorts of spirituality stuff over the years. The "mirth" speak had gone back through years of his streams before his show "the palace". I never saw the start of that because I don't go as far back as his OG fans, but I can imagine how he could have picked up on that term at some point and found it as something that resonated in some way, or something, WITHOUT being a -cont'd
