>Historically California has been a red state and Texas has been a blue state

Wtf happened?

>>509690184 (OP)
The parties changed you dumb fucking niggers

>>509690184 (OP)
The South never should've seceded just as Sam Houston said it was illegal. But the KGC and Masons had to oust him from being governor. The war was constructed and Abraham Lincoln was no help by illegally usurping power through the emancipation proclamation and national banking acts and spilling so much blood.

>>509690184 (OP)
The last century or so in this country has been very silly.

>>509690351
Even after the switch though.

The introduction of millions of democrat voting Mexicans

>>509691051
But both states got invaded by them

Back in the day republicans were the anti war party and held zionists in utter contempt. But the papist William Buckley Jr turned the party into a caricature of conservativism whose only purpose was to serve the yehudi.
>>509691051
Texas is also full of mexicans and the state is red.

>>509691494
Interesting have any videos?

>>509691151
Also Texas has had 2 female governors to California's 0 lol

>>509691633
About mexicans in texas or the old republicans?

>>509690184 (OP)
Reagan gave millions of illegals in CA amnesty in 84 and it hasn't gone red since.
>>509690351
Shut the fuck up, stupid.

>>509692825
>Reagan gave millions of illegals in CA amnesty in 84 and it hasn't gone red since.
What made him do this?

>>509690351
They changed, but didn't switch. The people there also changed.

Also, in the South, they voted Democrat in local elections until the 90's.

It's much less about Yankee vs Dixie, and more about Left vs Right.

>>509691151

Red and blue really did switch

>>509690184 (OP)
The sides switched.

>>509690184 (OP)
In 1940, blue meant raycis and red meant freedom (for niggers even, see civil rights)
In 1960, raycism no longer worked and blue politicians sold to the highest bidder (Jews) running on whatever worked, red remained freedom (for niggers even, see civil rights)
In 1980, reagan (neo-blue) and on judeo-freedom for red
In 1990, neo-blue continued and neo-conservative continued
In 2000, you have a judeo-two-party-system
2016, trump runs on red based on old blue/red paradigm but judeo-shitshow later the situation is as it is today

>>509692878
at the time, a lot of the people eligible for amnesty, at least 10 years living in the us, no criminal record etc, were people you knew who were mostly assimilated . also we were promised that they were going to lock down the border and go after they employers so it wouldn't happen again. people agreed to it as a one time thing only because they were trying to be nice. obviously the whole thing was a lie.

>>509695146
>and on judeo-freedom for red
*ran on judeo-freedom for red

>>509692034
Buckley

>>509690184 (OP)
Thieves stole elections because TACO applied to all politicians since 1963.

>>509696451
I don't think there are good vids on the matter.

>>509690184 (OP)
There is nothing conservative about modern white republicans in TX. Being conservative in that state means flooding Texas with spics to do cheap labor instead of paying white men a living wage + health benefits, importing a shit load of chinese and indians for white collar work, and spending taxpayer money on Israel.

Greg Abbott, John Cornyn, and Rafael Cruz care more about kikes than white Texans.

>>509690184 (OP)
Texas has lots of natural resources (especially oil/nat gas) and tends to attract the business men, which are normally right-leaning. CA used to have some oil in the early 1900s but largely is gone now. it then got infested with liberal douchebags that just want to serve their free-loading Mexican populace.

fun fact: the reason why Beverly Hills is historically a wealthy place is because, early on, it was one of the few places where clean water was able to be found.