hitting a woman triggers a manchurian candidate like retaliatory response from all nearby men
>because women are weaker
how does does make sense? women have significantly more leverage in applying force in public.
furthermore, this wasn't true long ago. a man's dignity was valued more than a women's safety. but men, as benevolent as they are, decided to protect women from the imbalance. now the power tips in the other direction, and have women reciprocated in kind? no they arrogantly throw around their new found power to physically abuse men in public all the time, with the implied threat that defending yourself and your honor will trigger a mob beating.
in conclusion we need to go back to beating women in public when they act out. next time you see a man beating a woman in public, applaud that man.
>because women are weaker
how does does make sense? women have significantly more leverage in applying force in public.
furthermore, this wasn't true long ago. a man's dignity was valued more than a women's safety. but men, as benevolent as they are, decided to protect women from the imbalance. now the power tips in the other direction, and have women reciprocated in kind? no they arrogantly throw around their new found power to physically abuse men in public all the time, with the implied threat that defending yourself and your honor will trigger a mob beating.
in conclusion we need to go back to beating women in public when they act out. next time you see a man beating a woman in public, applaud that man.