>>509773216>>pointless wars and interventionismHis "wars" (Desert Storm and the invasion of Panama) lasted only for a few months total, and they were sweeping successes against corrupt former CIA puppets, not protracted regime change forever wars against actual independent foreign leaders. Overall, his handling of the fall of the Soviet Union - his and Baker's prescient warnings about Ukraine and NATO specifically and his standing up to the Israel lobby make him a successful foreign policy president.
>>fucking NAFTAFair enough, NAFTA was terrible, but then every living president supported it. And for what it's worth, the China Trade Act signed by Clinton is what really destroyed our country.
>>made the diversity immigrant lottery system lawAgain, a fair criticism, but this was also a bill with overwhelming support in a Democratic Congress. It would have passed no matter what, and between balancing the budget and greatly reducing smog with some of his environmental initiatives, he overall did more good domestically than all of his successors.