← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 509874230

9 posts 2 images 3 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: uLl33ck4) United States No.509874230 >>509874864
Objectively speaking, is there any reason to not carry reasonable doubt that they have provided everything they could except for explicit child porn, other than appeal to authority? What physical evidence has trump team actually given us that would provide some closure?
Anonymous (ID: 4TZ6wS/x) United Kingdom No.509874654 >>509874854
The names of the people participating in the "porn"? This shit isn't going to work just so you know, nobody is falling for any of your tactics
Anonymous (ID: uLl33ck4) United States No.509874854 >>509875276
>>509874654
Ai bot
Anonymous (ID: u2yDM01X) United States No.509874864 >>509875006
>>509874230 (OP)
If there was more evidence we would have seen more prosecutions, they only got Epstein on a couple of women.
Anonymous (ID: uLl33ck4) United States No.509875006 >>509875331
>>509874864
Is this the script?
Anonymous (ID: 4TZ6wS/x) United Kingdom No.509875276
>>509874854
Actually I think we might be in agreement but your OP is so badly written that I thought you were defending them not releasing anything
Anonymous (ID: u2yDM01X) United States No.509875331 >>509875839
>>509875006
No I am someone who works in criminal law though. What do you think would be in these files? Do you think Epstein had a master list of all his "clients"?
Also if Trump was on such a list Biden would have used it
Anonymous (ID: uLl33ck4) United States No.509875839 >>509877436
>>509875331
>I work in
No you donโ€™t shut the fuck up.
Anonymous (ID: u2yDM01X) United States No.509877436
>>509875839
If you think that's a crazy claim u r a bum