Lets just be less people, why do we need one million fucking pajeets coming in?

>>510001553 (OP)
it is bad for ((them))
it ends the ponzi

>>510001610
/Thread

>>510001553 (OP)
because of the economy. stupid

>>510001553 (OP)
No more goyim

>>510001553 (OP)
Less cattle to partake in consumerism is le bad.

>>510001665
Oh no! No more junk food and plastic trinkets that serve no meaningful purpose in this world!

>>510001553 (OP)
Because business owners want cheap labor who won’t unionize and Jews want always want a multicultural society that won’t rise up against them. There’s a lot of overlap here also.

>>510001553 (OP)
Line must always goes up, or something.

>>510001553 (OP)
Because your politicians took a loan from the central banks, gambling on the fact that they have more taxes and tax cattle to pay it off in the future (or at least to gett a bigger loan in the future to pay off the old loan).

>>510001553 (OP)
the mafia state has no money to pay the pensionati and all the welfare programs that get 80% of their fundings stolen, what's the mafia state gonna do about it admit defeat and hand it over to some capable dictator ? never the mafia state would rather sink the ship with everyone on board squeeze the pockets of the tax payers and buy a bunker in new Zealand before the nukes fly

>>510001553 (OP)
The global population needs to be 500 million Whites and 6 million jewish slaves.

>>510001553 (OP)
Because big number NEEDS to go UP

Its not bad

>>510001553 (OP)
Because the boomers have voting rights.

>>510001801
>burger thinks that economy is hamburgers and plastis forks

figures

>>510001665
What is the economy for?
If the economy is the end rather than a means to the end then it's just masturbation.
I want purposeful economy, not economic masturbation.

>>510001553 (OP)
reducing people concerns

the more or less educated population of the first worlds with historical memory due to the threat of exposing certain operations that are crimes against humanity

a population that "won't fit into the market" for technological reasons

>>510001553 (OP)
The kikes want more slaves not less

>>510001553 (OP)
it's not bad anymore at all, we can just get robot workers to fill in the gaps. This allows us to live longer lives without overpopulating too.
Maybe soon we can be like LOTR elves and live young forever while having children extremely slowly

This gives me angst. I am not able to acquire assets and build wealth for my retirement. More people stressing the housing market will bring me even further from building anything. Sizeable apartments are very expensive so I don't know if I can at least start a family and kill myself later when I run out of money during retirement.
Please reduce the pressure on the people and make life affordable again, someone.

>>510001553 (OP)
declining population is great
it'd be nice to get back to under 1,000,000,000

>>510001946
They just get the printer to print the money.

So Jews feel safe when they are fucking you over.

>>510001553 (OP)
Our society is fucked up, it relies on eternal growth, even though this is clearly impossible. It's going to go to shit sooner or later.

>>510002942
that's antisemetic we need infinity consoomers

>>510001553 (OP)
That is the thing: In a closed system (borders closed), it is more or less irrelevant how many people live in a country as long as it has enough manpower to defend itself from exterior threats. Looking at the geopolitical boundary conditions (nearly everything is bound together by various defense treaties) and still persisting technological edge ( + nuclear weapons making an actual total defeat very improbable) of white nations over potential outside threats, renders this point completely moot.
You have some smaller issues regarding average distances for centralized services like schools, hospitals etc. (less densely populated land) and simply not the absolute economic firepower to conduct any "Great Projects", but our current greatness-detesting ruling-class isn't interessted in pursuing anything worthwhile anyway so that doesn't matter either.
Without immigration to surpress wages, clog up any public services, siphon massive amounts of tax dollar and permanently increase land value, the birthrate would probably reach an equilibrium at some point. Given that the technologcial ramifications don't change that rapidly again (I don't think they will) and that the collective self-hatred and anti-natalism is eradicated.
As soon as you have massmigration into a democratic state, the whole system simply becomes a racial/ethnic headcount, which is why we either desperately need to increase our birthrate, simply kick them all out (easiest option and even mostly compatible with some nation's current laws) or institute an authoritarian goverment to manage our new multiethnic shithole (see Singapore for a rough idea).

>>510004444
Checked and agreed. We can bounce back from population decline, just not with our current landscape.

>>510004444

You'd still have to go out their with your armies to defend your trade routes and business contracts. Along with making sure that brown people never become competitive in your markets. I.e. making sure all the profits flows to Europe/NA as it does now. How do you manage that (i.e keep exploiting third world to maintain western white utopias) within the framework of an isolationist stance?

>>510001665
ohhhh right, we need credit card and call center scammers to help the economy! pff of course!

>>510005005
Yes, complete isolationsim is completely retarded and practically impossible in today's economic/technological landscape. Securing global shipping routes is mostly done by the US navy, which currently employs 325.000 active duty personal, which is ~0.1% of the total US population and ~0.17% of the non hispanic-white US-population. Even if one were to deport all non-whites from the US and the white population declines by another 50% (I don't think that the latter thing happens if you actually were to basically depopulate this enormous fucking country), you would still only need 0.34% of the population to continue to have the necessary manpower to practically control the world's oceans. Calculating if the US would still have the economic output to afford their large military is too time intensive for me to do right now, but looking at the net fiscal impact of whites compared to hispanics or blacks would at least suggest that the budget would be in a significant surplus (even though the absolute total tax income would be smaller due to a obviously smaller economy), which could be redirected to military spending.
I am not quite sure what you mean be "making sure that brown people never become competitive in your markets". Assuming you think that the third world (Middle-East, Africa) is purely underdeveloped due to western meddling and is being radically exploited by the west (literally retarded take in 2025): It does also not require a lot of money and manpower to simply destabilize a place that has been a shithole for decades/centuries (Middle East) or forever (subsaharan Africa). I don't see how a relatively smaller population radically impacts the relative bussiness competetiveness except maybe economy of scale effects.
I don't think that the West should be isolationist just because I don't want massmigration. I don't think we shouldn't cooperate or trade with the rest of the world.

>>510001553 (OP)
>why is declining population bad?
>gets killed, raped, skinned, and eaten by the population that chose not to decline
>in that specific order, if he's incredibly lucky

>>510001553 (OP)
because kikapitalism goal is to grow and expand
if the population is not growing in a natural way, kikapitalists will import (legally and illegally) millions of shitskins to keep the economic growth going

>>510007825
OP is a retarded faggot.

>>510001553 (OP)
Declining population is very bad for the money obsessed capitalists that run western nations

>>510007825
So...We like fat people now?
Or the Niggers...who am I supposed to cheer here? Fuck...this place is so divisive!

>>510001553 (OP)
It's to prop up the value of boomer homes.

>>510001553 (OP)
Line MUST go up.

>>510001553 (OP)
because we just need them okay?

>>510001553 (OP)
The powers-that-be are readying the world for the reign of the antichrist.

>>510011586
>The powers-that-be are readying the world for the reign of the antichrist.
They want ordo ab chao--order out of chaos.

Destroying the west will create chaos.

>>510011727
>They want order out of chaos
>They want chaos

https://old.bitchute.com/video/a5x2Q3JUHsOP/

>>510011799
https://old.bitchute.com/video/s8B3caA1hcrf/

>>510001553 (OP)
we can't have workers enjoying a surplus of job openings and wages going up goy!

>>510001553 (OP)
>Why is declining population bad?
its not, low population is extremely beneficial to a country, thats why the jews are pushing for infinite population growth, africa style.

there is literally 0 fucking reason to want a huge population, or even a population increase at all.
>low maintenance cost
>low healthcare cost
>low eveything cost
>no need for imaginary make-work jobs just to keep idiots employed

and most of all:
>but muh industry
the biggest most industrial factories in the world right now use like.... 5 dudes, its all fucking mechanical right now.
its not 1800 anymore you dont need 20,000 people to make a lamp or a fucking keyboard.

>>510001553 (OP)
What's the use of being rich if nobody is willing to serve you for your money?

>>510001553 (OP)
We just need to stop subsidizing and feeding browns

>>510007825
anon you getting stabbed by a nigger is another evidence that you need smaller populations.
>meme flag
ah, you're a jew, ok.

>>510007825
>webm
brass knuckles?

>>510001553 (OP)
pajeets + population decline = pajeets
>goyim can't onto math
you are being replaced

>>510001553 (OP)
The debt based system requires unending growth or the whole thing will collapse.