Thread 510007417

Can we all agree that Africa was severely affected by European and Arab colonization? They wouldn't be as poor as they are today if it didn't happen.

>>510007417 (OP)
They wouldn't have roads or indoor plumbing either without European / Arab colonization so it wasn't all for not. African nations would definitely be wealthier but they also wouldn't be harvesting their resources to the same extent without colonial oversight anyway.

Africans suffer because they all bring each other down and would trade away their own people for liquor.

>>510007417 (OP)
I knew those lazy niggers couldn't do it.

No.

>>510007417 (OP)
If it didn't happen they'd still be tribal, with a total population under 50M for the continent. So yes, they'd be far better off. So would the world.

>>510007417 (OP)
So hindus believe we take the subtle body to a next life whereas buddhists believe we take the mind to the next life , IS this correct? Or are we just going to hell with our souls and thats it?

>>510007417 (OP)
No one would know Africa exists if white people never went there.

>>510007417 (OP)
Yeah, you can see how Ethiopia towers above the rest of Africa in its prosperity. Oh wait. It doesn't.
>>510007564
Building roads is so extremely simple. Fill the potholes, dig drainage trenches, etc. Any nigger can do it. But they don't, because they are lazy.

Sorry op but you can't give people roads, Infrastructure money etc for decades and then blame whitey.

You mean you can but its not going to change shit. For "smart" people you jews are extremely slow.

You literally cannot help Africans. You can give them infrastructure but they will let it fall into disrepair or sell it for scrap.

You can give them a herd of cattle but they will slaughter all of them for the meat. They simply lack forward-thinking/long-term planning.

>>510007417 (OP)
>6 billion
lmao that's not even close to how much it would cost to build just a regular small city

>>510007417 (OP)
>They wouldn't be as poor as they are today if it didn't happen.

Exactly. They'd be poorer.

>>510007417 (OP)
Niggers are a type of monkey, if whites never gave them anything they'd still be living in stick huts and squatting around fires in the dirt.

The unforgivable crime of the last 500 years has been treating non whites like they are "people"

>>510008216
>. They simply lack forward-thinking/long-term planning.

And having NO Frontal Lobes in their brains - who could have thought about that one?

>>510007614
This.

There's some copypasta about a guy who was in the Peace Corps working in Africa. Tldr they are constantly robbing from each other to the point of absurdity. A local guy decided to start a bread baking business and his entire family essentially extorted all the bread he made. So he never baked another loaf. That's the entire continent. You can't build a "Wakanda" because they would just keep stealing the tools and materials.

>>510008427
Right. This is why 'one race, the human race' is integral to the liberal world view. It is essential to believe that Africans are merely dealt a poor hand in life, through no fault of their own. It all unravels the moment you admit that it's a biological deficiency. It's about 80% nature, 20% nurture, if we're being generous. Probably closer to 90-10%.

>>510008482

It only works over there with some sort of monarchy or absolutist gov to keep them in line. They only understand things when theres an iron fist.

Colonization was good for them. Not the opposite.

>>510007417 (OP)
Think about all the things that happened in the last 4000 thousand years, all the civilizations that arose and fell, all the discoveries, inventions and art created in most of the rest of the world. Now, consider that during all this time, while all of that happened, niggers continued to live in the exact same way. 4000 years of absolutely nothing but killing, eating and enslaving each other. If it wasn't for Europeans and Arabs, they'd be doing the exact same thing still. And they do, but over street blocks and in "bands". Europeans opened Pandora's Box when they went into Africa.

>severely affected by European and Arab colonization
Yes; it stopped its retarded, bestial inhabitants from going extinct, as per Darwinian rules.

>>510008482
A teacher from the Congo used to tell every class a story about the UN building a school in a village and how the UN had ti keep building new schools because the villagers would grab brick by brick the entire school to build their own houses

>>510007417 (OP)
They learned nothing and managed to ruin everything given to them. Tribal to the core.

>>510007564
They wouldn't be wealthy wtf are you talking about? The reason they sold us slaves in the first place is because when the Europeans showed up they literally had nothing else to trade.

>>510007417 (OP)
They're poor because their environment provided all they needed to survive at a basic level, so they didn't have to struggle for millennia to overcome and adapt.
Hence they did not evolve in the same way or at the same rate.
Also, they did not breed with Neanderthals, for what it's worth.

>>510007417 (OP)
no, Africa would still be full of niggers

>>510007417 (OP)
Blacks labor under the delusion that their place at the bottom of the hierarchy is solely the result of foreign meddling. Looking inward requires a level of self awareness that they lack just like the Indian.

>>510010586
Also, slavery disappeared from Europe during the Middle Ages. It was essentially replaced by serfdom and then the black death made labor far more valuable so it never returned.
When the demand for slavery came back due crash crops, international trade and colonization only Africa already had the infrastructure and logistics necessary for slavery anymore.
I guess the Middle East could have worked too, but they were probably buying most of their stock from Africa anyways.

>>510007564
>All for not
You retards are a diamond dozen.

>>510011750
>diamond dozen
That's bait.

>>510007417 (OP)
They're comparatively rich compared to what they would have been. And their descendants in other nations are basically kings.

>>510011916
Actually it was tongue-in-cheek irony.

>>510007417 (OP)
>Can we all agree that Africa was severely affected by European and Arab colonization? They wouldn't be as poor as they are today if it didn't happen.
You have to be retarded to believe that. Even liberals don't really believe that, they just pretend to, to spite whitey.