>>510033397
you say you can cope with a meaningless universe, but coping isn't the same as thriving.
Christianity doesn't offer meaning as a crutch, it offers it as truth.
if the universe truly has no purpose, then neither do any of your values, your relationships, or even your defiance.
but if Christ rose from the dead, and there's compelling historical evidence that He did, then meaning isn't something we invent. it's something revealed to us, something we step into, not construct.
>>510033579
your team deathmatch analogy is embarrassing.
games have designed objectives, the universe in your view does not (as far as you're able to tell, i'm bored of qualifying it like this so this is the last time i offer you that courtesy.)
cooperation is useful if you value survival, but you still can't explain why survival should be valued in a purposeless framework.
a selfish player could just as logically betray their team for personal gain (like some fat kid on the opposing team offering them $20.)
you say "not knowing =/= no purpose", but then admit you have no alternative metaphysics. without any grounding (divine, natural law, etc) your ethics reduce to "might makes right" which justifies everything from racial survivalism to genocidal conquest.
pre-Christian whites had metaphysics (odin, zeus, etc). your problem is you reject all transcedent frameworks, leaving only race, which can't answer why life matters. "spending time with family" is just sentimentality, nihilists do that too before offing themselves.
you mock the ten commandments but can't name a single objective moral truth in your own system. "race survival" isn't morality, it's a preference. if a stronger tribe (like da jooooos) conquers ours, your ethics (by your logic) are just "cope."
you're left begging the question: "race matters because race matters."
what's funny is it's easier to ground racial preference within a Christian framework despite its universal accessibility, ordo amoris for example.
